VGVN Urges Gamers to Vote

VGVN Urges Gamers to Vote

November 6, 2006
The Video Game Voters Network has issued an e-mail to its members this morning, urging them to vote in tomorrow's mid-term elections.

The VGVN, which is owned and operated by the video game publishers' trade association, the ESA, did not endorse specific candidates in the e-mail, but placed the video game legislation issue front and center:
Video games have become a very easy target this election year for politicians at all levels of government, from local county executives to U.S. Senators, who want to blame society's problems on our favorite pastime.

We need to send a clear signal this Tuesday: video games are protected speech, afforded constitutional protection by the First Amendment. Our taxpayer time and money should be spent on the real issues affecting our country and taxpayers.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
This should have been bought up way sooner....But i hope we gamers can help turn the tide...the millions of us.
illspirit
its funny one wants to burn them at the stake and the other wants to simply ban them in the hopes of getting votes.......neither of them seem to understand that what they are doing is against the law 0-o
Gee, let's see. Angie Paccione (pro-government solutions, government spending, not sufficiently anti-gun control), Marilyn Musgrave (anti-gay marriage, etc), and Eric Eidsness (not sufficiently anti-gun control)...Not one of them passes muster, nor are there any acceptable candidates for governor.

Heh, ever tried to find political candidates that are pro-gay -and- pro-gun? I have other criteria but those two alone seem to eliminate 90+% of the field (politicians in this district are smart enough not to sound -too- anti-gun, but as far as I'm concerned "I support the laws on the books" is going entirely too far since there are plenty of laws on the books that are unconstitutional and should never have been passed).
I really, REALLY wish I would be old enough to vote in time for the general election. :( At least I'll be able to vote in the prez election.
Saw yahoo pop up alerting with that a while ago.
@Brer

Yes, that's quite a conundrum we're faced with. I think I'll hold my nose and go with the doubleplus-pro-gun anti-gay House candidate here. At least they're trying to go about it via the Constitution (which will hopefully fail) rather than ignoring it altogether like the anti-gunners.

Well, that, and, the Democrat challenger here has made game bannage a campaign issue. And he has a track record of looting the city treasury to fund no-bid contracts for giant, worthless projects. While he's not anti-gun, per se, but the idea of Nancy Pelosi as speaker and John Conyers as the chair of the judiciary committee is quite scary...
Yea, some sort of rating system for the politricks would have been nice. They should have sent out a questionnaire to candidates like other PACs and posted the results.

As it is, there will probably be tons of people who automatically equate censorship with super-religious Republicans, then run out and vote for Hillary and company thinking they'll save gaming. I cannot count the times I've seen that sentiment posted at sites not as politically inclined as GP.
I was kind of hoping that the VGVN would show quotes/votes/etc. of those up for re-election regarding the videogame issues, whether they be con or pro. I know that's a lot of work, but it would likely have a noticeable impact.
Yea I live in Georgia. Here Pro-Gun is generally a Good thing because lots of people are hunters and NRA support is usually a notch in your belt. Our incumbent Govenor Sonny Purdue is supported by the NRA for example.

Yes, I know Georgia is a state that GP is watching, but dont worry. Not too long ago they said He was favored to win with 60% or better of the vote. Also, it was raining all day today and even Democrats admit that rain tends to support Republican candidates (it's a statistical fact!). Take that little bit of information however you want.

@ illspirit
Agreed. Did you look at the elections GP is watching? While I admit I just skimmed it, it seemed like most of them were Democrats and that most of them were against gaming or for legislation. While it seems a few of the Repubilicans actually supported games, but not all.

ECA IconA PUBLICATION OF THE ECA RSS IconSUBSCRIBE User LoginLOGIN / REGISTER

Crispy Gamer




       

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 03/20/10 at 09:40am
JDKJ: You accusing someone else of flagging for attention is just too funny for words, Zippy. After all, you're an obvious graduate of the Jack Thompson School for Attention Whores.
Posted 03/20/10 at 09:38am
ZippyDSMlee: JD:BREAKING, JD wants attention!
Posted 03/20/10 at 09:35am
JDKJ: BREAKING: House votes unanimously to close Zippy's doughnut hole.
Posted 03/19/10 at 06:42pm
Valdearg: Sage advice, Zip. Sage advice.
Posted 03/19/10 at 06:37pm
ZippyDSMlee: Don;t talk to MS/LIve users that you do not know....is jsut easier that way...
Posted 03/19/10 at 06:14pm
Flamespeak: Didm't steal anything or other people not knowing what the heck Tribes was but felt inclined to tell me it wasn't Halo.
Posted 03/19/10 at 06:13pm
Flamespeak: stealing 'new' game ideas from Tribes while marketing them as something 'new and shiny'." I was blasted by people claiming Halo
Posted 03/19/10 at 06:12pm
Flamespeak: I told some Halo fans that 'with the inclusion of jet packs in Reach, Halo has successfully completed its mission of totally
Posted 03/19/10 at 05:39pm
Valdearg: @JDKJ: Well, it's not like you were very subtle, there..
Posted 03/19/10 at 05:18pm
JDKJ: @Val": You got me there. That one was pure troll. And posted in memory of DarkSaber, who hasn't been around much, lately.
Posted 03/19/10 at 02:36pm
Andrew Eisen: JDKJ - Probably the widow/widower.
Posted 03/19/10 at 02:33pm
ZippyDSMlee: JD:who gives a shit about you :P
Posted 03/19/10 at 02:33pm
Valdearg: Lol.. Wow, JDKJ. Troll much?
Posted 03/19/10 at 02:27pm
JDKJ: Who gives a rat's ass about the children of fallen soldiers?
Posted 03/19/10 at 02:16pm
Andrew Eisen: I completely agree.
Posted 03/19/10 at 02:15pm
Valdearg: If they really wanted to help the troops, they should donate their money to a legitimate charity with a good cash in/out ratio.
Posted 03/19/10 at 02:14pm
Valdearg: It's just offensive that people who attend these things think they are helping the troops, when in reality, Hannity is using MOST of the money to live large in the cities he travels to. He could at least scale down his accommodations..
Posted 03/19/10 at 02:13pm
Andrew Eisen: Val - But they did get something and that's better than nothing. Also, the Freedom Concert site is clear that expenses are subtracted from the donated amount so while it’s not fraud (from what little I’ve seen) it is pretty crummy.
Posted 03/19/10 at 02:12pm
ZippyDSMlee: fou fundrasier, from a fou consertive, who would have thought :P.
Posted 03/19/10 at 02:11pm
Valdearg: The problem, Zip, is that barely ANY of the proceeds are going to the children. It's all going so hannity can line his own pockets and enjoy a life of luxury. He is a grade A Piece of Human Crap.
Login or register to post shouts