The unofficial campaign of presidential hopeful John Edwards (D) took a widely-reported misstep last week. Wal-Mart, a frequent Edwards target, revealed that an aide to the former senator lobbied one of its Raleigh locations for a hard-to-find PlayStation 3.Everyone loves a good hypocrite; they make us feel superior just for being consistent, if not competent...
Aside from the staffer's positively insane decision to reach out to a Raleigh Wal-Mart given all of Edwards' repeated slams of the company, nothing too surprising here. Just garden variety American ruling class behavior...
...Contrary to the Edwards' pitch that labor-hostile companies are leaving American workers destitute, somebody is making some money out there in America. More importantly, they are making it in many, many cases without a union card. This reality will very hard for union-funded Democrats like Edwards to ignore as the 2008 presidential campaign unfolds...
In any event, maybe the best thing for Wal-Mart to do is stop chortling and go ahead and give John Edwards a PS3 and a couple games. Throw in a flat-panel too. Maybe that way he'll reacquaint himself with American prosperity and abundance and be a better candidate for the experience.
Comments
I got a lot of respect for Dennis but unless I misread that, he was defending Wal-Mart in that last sentence.
As far as I'm concerned, there is no debate on how productive Wal-Mart is. It sucks for employees, and in the end, it sucks for consumers, as the amount of money Wal-Mart sucks out of the state (via paying their employees so little that they are forced to turn to welfare to survive) is then taken out of the tax dollars of the people - even the ones who don't shop at Wal-Mart.
And apart from that, there's how they're environmentally irresponsible, racist, sexist, right-wing (funny how all those things go together), and they're computer/video games are overpriced.
Edwards is a loser and he should know better than to run for President, but as noted, if he didn't tell the aide to get the PS3 he didn't do anything wrong, this is just the spin-machine at work, and the story is of questionable relevance - yes, it mentions games, but unlike most Game Politics stories has no effect on gaming itself.
Someone is out of touch and I don't think it's Edwards...
Yep, someone: as in all the someones who were able to blow $600 of disposable income on a PS3. As in the average American wage-earner.
Look, I am tried of the Republicans spinning useless info into big events. Here's a logical break down for anyone listening:
Lies
Blow job /= Weapons of Mass Destruction and/or War justification
I presonally think that the Republicans are grasping at straws for any little thing due to how big their faux paus cmoe across. When you put yourself on a high horse of "better" morals and "family values" anything that your party members do that is out of line with these (ie sleep with young pages or try to have homosexual encounters with them while trying to amend out gay marriages), then, you will get a harsh response to this.
Oh, and pundits are the worse people out there, right next to lobbist.
And nevermind the fact that flat panel TV's are dropping below the $1000 mark because supply has outstripped demand, and companies can't afford to slow production and sit on excess parts...no, clearly Wal-Mart is "leading the way," fighting to provide flat-panel entertainment to a broader audience.
I'd be fine if they wanted to call Edwards a hypocrite for spending $600 on a PS3 instead of donating it to the poor...they'd sound like petty retards but that'd make more sense then using the PS3 to try and support a Libertarian's economic policy. Actually, since this whole thing happened because some idiot staffer made a valiant attempt to kiss his boss's ass...maybe they should have just kept their mouths shut.
The last line of that article wasn't written by Dennis. Everything in the grey text with the bar on the left is quoting the article by Jeff Taylor.
On the article itself, it's really trying to blame Edwards over nothing. I don't think Edwards having an apparently not too bright aide makes him a hypocrite.
It's not suprising to hear that he is being a hypocrite as usual