Sunday Editorial Roundup: Does PS3 Gaffe Make Edwards a Hypocrite?

Sunday Editorial Roundup: Does PS3 Gaffe Make Edwards a Hypocrite?

November 19, 2006
The unofficial campaign of presidential hopeful John Edwards (D) took a widely-reported misstep last week. Wal-Mart, a frequent Edwards target, revealed that an aide to the former senator lobbied one of its Raleigh locations for a hard-to-find PlayStation 3.

Pundit Jeff Taylor of Reason.com takes a dim view of Edwards' economic politics as well as his staffer's attempt to grab a PS3:
Everyone loves a good hypocrite; they make us feel superior just for being consistent, if not competent...


Aside from the staffer's positively insane decision to reach out to a Raleigh Wal-Mart given all of Edwards' repeated slams of the company, nothing too surprising here. Just garden variety American ruling class behavior...




...Contrary to the Edwards' pitch that labor-hostile companies are leaving American workers destitute, somebody is making some money out there in America. More importantly, they are making it in many, many cases without a union card.  This reality will very hard for union-funded Democrats like Edwards to ignore as the 2008 presidential campaign unfolds...


In any event, maybe the best thing for Wal-Mart to do is stop chortling and go ahead and give John Edwards a PS3 and a couple games. Throw in a flat-panel too. Maybe that way he'll reacquaint himself with American prosperity and abundance and be a better candidate for the experience.


Comments

I think it's good that Edwards went so far out of his way to try to get a PS3. That clearly shows that there's a politician gamer out there. If there are a lot of politician gamers, it will make it very hard for Jack Thompson to ban any games anywhere. Even though he tried to get it at a Wal Mart, I think it's awesome that there's a politician gamer out there.
I still stand by my statement that pundits are some of the worse people in the world.
Yikes.

I got a lot of respect for Dennis but unless I misread that, he was defending Wal-Mart in that last sentence.

As far as I'm concerned, there is no debate on how productive Wal-Mart is. It sucks for employees, and in the end, it sucks for consumers, as the amount of money Wal-Mart sucks out of the state (via paying their employees so little that they are forced to turn to welfare to survive) is then taken out of the tax dollars of the people - even the ones who don't shop at Wal-Mart.

And apart from that, there's how they're environmentally irresponsible, racist, sexist, right-wing (funny how all those things go together), and they're computer/video games are overpriced.

Edwards is a loser and he should know better than to run for President, but as noted, if he didn't tell the aide to get the PS3 he didn't do anything wrong, this is just the spin-machine at work, and the story is of questionable relevance - yes, it mentions games, but unlike most Game Politics stories has no effect on gaming itself.
Only if he actually asked the staffer to reserve it for him, which seems very unlikely given the stories that've been published so far. In other words, the "typical ruling-class behaviour" bit is misplaced. However, the larger point about Wal-Mart and the bought and paid for union rhetoric of certain politicians has a degree of merit to it.
Reason likes talking about how someone is making money but they apparently don't realize where it is actually going.

Someone is out of touch and I don't think it's Edwards...
@MechaCrash

Yep, someone: as in all the someones who were able to blow $600 of disposable income on a PS3. As in the average American wage-earner.
I'm a Republican and I really don't think this is a big deal. Why criticize Edwards for something this trivial when there's so much more?
How many of those things are in living rooms hooked up to TVs, and how many are sitting in a corner awaiting a winning eBay bid?
"This reality will very hard for..." and this guy is a writer?

Look, I am tried of the Republicans spinning useless info into big events. Here's a logical break down for anyone listening:

Lies

Blow job /= Weapons of Mass Destruction and/or War justification

I presonally think that the Republicans are grasping at straws for any little thing due to how big their faux paus cmoe across. When you put yourself on a high horse of "better" morals and "family values" anything that your party members do that is out of line with these (ie sleep with young pages or try to have homosexual encounters with them while trying to amend out gay marriages), then, you will get a harsh response to this.

Oh, and pundits are the worse people out there, right next to lobbist.
Reason isn't a Republican site. it's libertarian. Criticisms of Wal-Mart go far beyond them nto paying enough wages, though, there's also the issue of preferential treatment in emminent domain cases and illegally making their workers work off the clock, both things libertarians are normally opposed to.
only spinners of hate wil take this nit bit of info and try and make it into something...this is a non issue.
Wow, a laizes faire magazine ragging on a Democrat? Wonders never cease... Clearly, the fact that some people are willing to spend $600 on a video game system proves, without a doubt, that there is no widening poverty gap and everything is just perfectly hunky dory in America. After all, "somebody is making money in America."

And nevermind the fact that flat panel TV's are dropping below the $1000 mark because supply has outstripped demand, and companies can't afford to slow production and sit on excess parts...no, clearly Wal-Mart is "leading the way," fighting to provide flat-panel entertainment to a broader audience.

I'd be fine if they wanted to call Edwards a hypocrite for spending $600 on a PS3 instead of donating it to the poor...they'd sound like petty retards but that'd make more sense then using the PS3 to try and support a Libertarian's economic policy. Actually, since this whole thing happened because some idiot staffer made a valiant attempt to kiss his boss's ass...maybe they should have just kept their mouths shut.
Does this *really* belong on a blog devoted to game politics? This sounds more like politics, and frivilous politics at that.
@Dylan
The last line of that article wasn't written by Dennis. Everything in the grey text with the bar on the left is quoting the article by Jeff Taylor.
On the article itself, it's really trying to blame Edwards over nothing. I don't think Edwards having an apparently not too bright aide makes him a hypocrite.
Edwards is a poor excuse for a politician who pretty much lost Kerry the election

It's not suprising to hear that he is being a hypocrite as usual

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 07/04/09 at 12:44pm
Yuuri: Happy Blow Crap Up Day!
Posted 07/04/09 at 11:09am
Rodrigo Ybáñez García: I designed this shirt for Jack debate today: http://i44.tinypic.com/2552t89.jpg
Posted 07/04/09 at 11:06am
BearDogg-X: There's a one minute and a half preview of the video game episode of Penn & Teller: Bullshit! up at http://www.sho.com/site/ptbs/home.do
Posted 07/04/09 at 10:08am
Arcanagos: Happy 4th all
Posted 07/04/09 at 09:32am
Firebird: Greetings GP community, and HAPPY 4th of JULY!!!
Posted 07/04/09 at 03:48am
Michael Chandra: I missed out on Jack? =(
Posted 07/04/09 at 01:52am
Escanor94: hmm, looks like when someone gets banned all their comments are automaticly deleted
Posted 07/03/09 at 11:46pm
Arcanagos: aww, did i miss the JT party? :(
Posted 07/03/09 at 11:00pm
Leet Gamer Jargon: Where's the recent JT bullcrap? Which comments section has he vomited on? EDIT: Nevermind; it's in the "Radio" thread.
Posted 07/03/09 at 09:17pm
BearDogg-X: I wonder what the Metropolitian Moron of Miami said in response to my comment saying that he got a dose of his medicine on the SGC09 Debate thread?
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:51pm
Rodrigo Ybáñez García: He gets offended with a bunch of flowers.
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:49pm
GoodRobotUs: LOL He takes offence at the fact he might have *chosen* to be crazy?
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:47pm
Rodrigo Ybáñez García: He warned me to get a lawyer after I called him "crazy by his own choice"... that´s libel for him
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:45pm
HilaryDuffGta: "libel" what did he threaten now?
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:44pm
Rodrigo Ybáñez García: Was fun to be threatened for "libel" again.
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:26pm
HilaryDuffGta: hey so what did i miss??? the usual spam of "crap"
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:15pm
FlakAttack: Jack ruined his chance to have civil debates with us here. Glad you banned him (again).
Posted 07/03/09 at 04:04pm
Krono: Unexpected is probably the best word to describe it. Particularly as no decent reason is given.
Posted 07/03/09 at 03:59pm
GoodRobotUs: Just heard about that myself... kinda unexpected
Posted 07/03/09 at 03:58pm
Krono: Huh, apparently Sarah Palin is resigning.
Login or register to post shouts