Boston GTA Controversy Has Roots Well Before "Vice City Stories"

Boston GTA Controversy Has Roots Well Before "Vice City Stories"

November 27, 2006
The recent controversy over GTA ads on Boston subway cars seemed both sudden and unexpected, but GamePolitics has learned that the issue is not a new one for the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority.

As far back as February, Boston Common Asset Management, which describes itself as "a full service, employee-owned social investment firm dedicated to the pursuit of financial return and social change," broached the subject of restricting video game advertising on MBTA vehicles with Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney.

February 24th letter on behalf of the organization and its clients requested that an MBTA ad contract for the GTA series be allowed to expire without being renewed. A press release issued that day, which appears on the Boston Common Asset Management website says:
In light of the recent surge in violence in the Boston area, we feel it is particularly irresponsible of the MBTA to act as a billboard for products that promote urban violence. The advertisements have been running on the outside of MBTA Green Line trolleys and the Commuter Rail since January 3, 2006.

The ads mentioned would most likely be for the PSP title GTA Liberty City Stories, which was released October 24th, 2005.

In addition to Gov. Romney, the February GTA letter was forwarded to Mayor Thomas Menino of Boston and Kenneth Reeves of Cambridge. Both elected officials would go on to sign the November 20th letter from the Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood which jump-started last week's controversy.

Comments

Hmmm, interesting, the original letter was also supposedly forwarded to the MBTA...

This does poke a hole in the "this is the first I've heard of it" argument. His point about "the city should be fighting the REAL problems, not imaginary ones" is still valid though.
This is just noisemaking from an organisation that wants an easy win. And they will win. Especially with support from a politician who wants to be seen to be doing something.

Grabauskas has made an attempt to deal with it, but he's not really in a position to put up a fight against this much political pressure. And he's not going to get that much support. The right of a company to advertise their product may be important but it's hardly the sort of thing that's going to get the ACLU steamed up.

A polite letter and discussion with the head of the MBTA would probably have had pretty much the same results, except more quickly and easily, but then the mayor wouldn't get his mention in the papers.
What is it with Boston? Why do they have to attack violent video games? Violence has always existed and it always will. Violent video games have nothing to do with that and Boston has to stop attacking innocent ads, that won't even get anyone to buy the game anyway. No one even buys anything off an ad on a train. What I would like to know is why do they even care? the ads are probably on the outside and the passengers ride on the inside, so when do they even see the ads? To the people of Boston, you're morons and you need to stop listening to that retard, Jack Thompson.
@ Squigs- WE should have done something to support him before he got ganked by censorcrats.
Did I miss something on this website? I can't find any articles on the front page talking about this.

http://www.internetcases.com/archives/2006/11/seventh_circuit_1.html
well this is interesting. who sees the outside of a subway train? no one. so people need to stop fighting little battles and trying to make money off of peoples feelings. how can an ad that depicts no violence, just a name and thats it cause someone to kill someone. plus freedom of expression with the sub not being government propert how can they make them take a non-profane name off the bus.

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 11/08/09 at 09:02am
DarkSaber: http://tinyurl.com/yez7jyo
Posted 11/08/09 at 09:01am
DarkSaber: Oh for gods sake, the Gearbox pres is gobbing off about Valve again
Posted 11/08/09 at 08:53am
JDKJ: But cheer up, Austin. If the unemployment rate continues to double-digit as predicted for the next few years, your half-dozen stands a better than likely chance of returning to power.
Posted 11/08/09 at 08:46am
JDKJ: @DS: If he had added the line about "or hiring illegals aliens under the table to work as nannies," it would have been a completely perfect descripition. And, yes, it's about the same difference between a six and a half-dozen.
Posted 11/08/09 at 08:31am
DarkSaber: My god, that description makes them sound almost Republican. Still what did you expect, Obama is only marginally more left than republicans.
Posted 11/08/09 at 01:07am
Austin_Lewis: Health insurance, brought to you by the same kind of bureacrats who couldn't, in timely fashion, investigate the comments of any of the men Obama appointed Czars. Or their past. Or their history of not paying taxes.
Posted 11/08/09 at 01:06am
Austin_Lewis: Yes, and what a piece of crap it was. Arresting and fining people just because they don't make a personal choice to buy healh insurance, creating over a hundred new bureacracies, and worse.
Posted 11/08/09 at 12:24am
ZippyDSMlee: JDKJ:the only trouble is a bunch of witless hacks wrote it....its going to be a train wreck....
Posted 11/07/09 at 11:33pm
JDKJ: BREAKING: In a photo-finish at the wire, House passes health care reform bill. Relatedly, in a fit of pique, Austin Lewis kicks innocent dog.
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:27pm
ZippyDSMlee: man I got alot of junk and dup files too >< god I need orginization...and no not the knee capping media mafia kind :P
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:26pm
ZippyDSMlee: replaced :P
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:23pm
ZippyDSMlee: beemoh:hey its like 60GB porn,400GB anime 100GB games and crap I have took from all my DVDs, I hate waiting on dvds to install stuff..... oh and 40GB of my porn was in the found.000 folder...mostly corrupted.... least I got names of wut needs to be repa
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:18pm
beemoh: @Zip: ...and you'd have to spend all that time re-downloading that porn?
Posted 11/07/09 at 03:34pm
ZippyDSMlee: ggrrrrr......vista lost one of my hard drives and I had a heart attack thinking I lost 1TB of data....
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:58am
JDKJ: Which could be explained by both (a) and (b).
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:56am
Austin_Lewis: JDKJ: You forgot C) the fact that, for some reason, every time he did something that would suggest he shouldn't be in the military, let alone an officer, higher ups ignored it or let it slide.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:51am
JDKJ: Part of the problem is, I believe, that (a) the Army had a lot of time and money already invested in him and which they were unwilling to simply write-off and (b) an increasing need for the type of skills and services he provided.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:48am
JDKJ: And that even if he was begging not to get cut loose, he was apparently a real good candidate for being cut loose, anyway.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:11am
JDKJ: @chada: And while Kennedy once noted that there's usually more than enough blame for everyone to get a slice, the possibility that the Army was unwilling to cut loose someone who was asking to get cut loose could be a factor.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:07am
ZippyDSMlee: *noms on his feet*..nomnomnomnom*droooll* ...wuuutttttt uuu looking at?
Login or register to post shouts