2006 Annual Video Game Report Card - The Grades

November 29, 2006
2006:

Parental Involvement: INCOMPLETE
Ratings Education: B
Retailers' Policies: B
Retailers' Enforcement:
   Big Box stores: A
   Game Specialty Stores: F 
Ratings Accuracy: (not mentioned)
Arcade Survey: (not mentioned)
Industry's cumulative grade: (not mentioned)

2005:

Ratings Education: C+
Retailers' Policies: B
Retailers' Enforcement: D-
Ratings Accuracy: F
Arcade Survey: B-
Industry's 10-year cumulative grade: D+
Buzz It

Comments

Pretty half-assed report card if there is no interpretation as why each grade was chosen, what the criteria was, etc. The report card is not comparable to previous year's either - show some consistancy with the grades that you make up NIMF.

The scores for "Retailers' Enforcement" are pretty ass-backwards, in my experience. I kinda look like I could be 16 or 17 (but am actually 19), and I can waltz into Best Buy or CompUSA and buy any game I want without the clerks even making eye contact with me, because they'd be holding up the line. On the other hand, if I go to EBGames or Funcoland, I get asked for ID whenever I buy an M game.

Also, I find it rather humorous that "Parental Involvement" has no score yet.. judging by the amount of legislation our elected officials think games need, I'd expect a D or F.

Are we going to get to see the rest of the grades at some point??? I'm most interested to see the accuracy rating.

Whoops, should have checked the next story first! Sorry GP!

These games are appropriate for all ages and must not be given ratings like there's something wrong with underage people playing them. I played all kinds of ultra-violent games when I was underage and there was nothing wrong with that. People need to stop listening to anti-game activist turds.

Oh brother. You can tell this is a cheap ass attempt by the NIMF to save their credibilty they threw away with the clear anti-game bias in their last report card. Why do you think the category "Ratings Accuracy" isn't mentioned? Most likely it's for two PR reasons:
1: The whole "Hot Coffee" outcry has pretty much come to a complete end, so they won't look as credible using it as an example as they did last year.
2: So that parents groups like the PTA-which slammed them on the last report card-may consider taking them seriously by not doing what they have clearly been doing for a long time: Slamming game ratings for not following their arbitary moral standards and because of their blatant double-standard concerning violence and sex in games.

Another possibility is that they truly have realized that a huge segment of the U.S. population (at least 60 million, I believe?) plays games. This may have convinced them that if they want recognition in the mainstream, they need to attract support-or at least tolerance-from many gamers. As such, they may be trying the stop throwning out misinformation about games and the people who play them. If you piss of such a large percentage of the public, your credibilty tends to suffer.

Admittingly, a lot of what I said is speculation. Still, I wouldn't accept them with open arms just because they SAY they have reevaluated their position on games. What we should do is pay attention to what they say and do in the future.

Did anyone else notice on how they graded big box stores like Best Buy and places Gamestop down? Who thinks that NIMF just said that because Walmart and Best Buy are their sponsers. Not to agree with He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named, but that's a bit unfair. I've found that enforcement of the ESRB has been equal at both places.

Honestly, who didn't see this coming?

he grade for Movies and DVDs
Parental Involvement: (not mentioned)
Ratings Education: C+
Retailers’ Policies: C+
Retailers’ Enforcement:
Big Box stores:C-
Theaters : C
Ratings Accuracy: D++
Unrated DVD Survey: (not mentioned)
MPAA's cumulative grade: (not mentioned)

Halo 3 rox my sox!!1!

This website merely summarises the salient areas brought up by the report card. You ought to view the complete report card before you spew ignorant statements.

[...] Every year the National Institute of Media and Family (NIMF) produces the “Annual Video Game Report Card”. This report is often cited each year by political candidates in the issue of violence in video games and how we are protecting our children. The 27-page document was released today at an event attended by Senators Joseph Lieberman and Amy Klobuchar. To cut to the chase, the overall rating given was a “C”. It seems odd that they would get a “C”, given that last year’s report seemed to be pretty positive (though no overall grade was given last year). Granted, this has been a year of controversy. Whereas last year’s ESRB swift reaction to the Hot Cofee mod in GTA was applauded by the industry, the Manhunt 2 controversy clearly set a different tone for this year’s reaction. David Walsh, who penned the report, firmly states …While the Entertainment Software Rating Board (ESRB) has continued to educate the public about its video game rating system, several shocking incidents have inadvertently revealed dangerous loopholes in the ratings process. Simply put, some of the hard-won progress seen in previous years has been lost, and now, too many children are spending too much time playing inappropriate video games that can harm their health and development. [...]
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Uncharted NESCritics: 'Left Behind' game glorifies violence- http://tinyurl.com/wu64s02/12/2012 - 4:34pm
ZenI felt Brutal Legends was a funny & beautiful look at the world of rock from Double Fines point of view. The only parts I wasn't hot for were the RTS bits as it felt forced. Otherwise fantastic.02/12/2012 - 1:34pm
DorthLousPassed 1.5M$. And I'd also say that Brutal Legend is far from being a bad game. I just think it was a few levels under what people expected from the people working on the project.02/11/2012 - 8:25am
TechnogeekBrutal Legend wasn't bad so much as "marketing had no idea how the game actually played", causing it to suffer accordingly.02/10/2012 - 10:38pm
RedMageIt looks the CIA's website has been DDOS'ed. Anon?02/10/2012 - 7:52pm
RedMageBrutal Legend.02/10/2012 - 7:52pm
ddrfr33kHas anything Tim Schafer ever made been of crap caliber? I'm struggling to think of one...02/10/2012 - 7:37pm
GuamishI think it is in good hands. Tim did a game for the GDC award show and that was fun for how short it was.02/10/2012 - 12:22pm
Andrew EisenIt'll be tragic if the game ultimately sucks.02/10/2012 - 12:17pm
james_fudge$1.3 million02/10/2012 - 11:32am
Uncharted NESGermany Says It Won't Sign ACTA [Update: ... Yet]- http://tinyurl.com/7r2twrg02/10/2012 - 11:21am
Andrew EisenDamn. Double Fine's Kickstarter fund has already passed a million dollars.02/09/2012 - 8:16pm
Andrew EisenAudrey didn't quote the sassy parts. Here's IGN's article: http://wii.ign.com/articles/121/1218359p1.html And here's my original post: http://tinyurl.com/7y68a3902/09/2012 - 7:50pm
james_fudgeI hope you some said something sassy! Where's the link?02/09/2012 - 7:46pm
Andrew EisenHey, neat. IGN quoted a blog I had writen only two hours earlier. I certainly timed that one pretty well.02/09/2012 - 7:38pm
Andrew EisenToki Tori has been added to the Humble Bundle for Android.02/09/2012 - 5:11pm
james_fudgeThanks for the heads-up DorthLous02/09/2012 - 4:33pm
DorthLousWill do, my apologies.02/09/2012 - 4:14pm
Andrew EisenI appreciate the heads up but please keep typo alerts to the specific article's comments or PMs.02/09/2012 - 3:33pm
DorthLousThe title says 30, but in the article, the developer says it's like a 20% net tax http://www.gamepolitics.com/2012/02/09/developers-call-facebook-currency-transaction-fee-thirty-percent-tax02/09/2012 - 2:43pm

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician