Washington Times Reports on Cease Fire Between Senators, Game Industry

Washington Times Reports on Cease Fire Between Senators, Game Industry

December 8, 2006
Aside from an Associated Press report, there has so far been little notice paid in the mainstream media to yesterday's surprising announcement that Sens. Hillary Clinton and Joe Lieberman are backing an ESRB initiative designed to increase parental awareness of video game ratings.

The conservative Washington Times, however, offers some analysis in this morning's edition, quoting Sen. Clinton as saying:
These PSAs are a great gift for parents. They provide information to help parents provide a healthy environment for their children... Parents are really hungry for this information.

The Times spoke to Norman Ornstein of the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank, who credited Sen. Clinton for making a politically savvy decision to partner with the game industry on the parental awareness campaign:
It's a very adroit move to find an issue in which she can work with Mr. Lieberman after this past election... The idea of sort of being offended by some of the coarsening elements of the culture is not as ideological as people assume. It would not surprise me if Mrs. Clinton had just sort of seen some of the violence and was offended by it.

Another conservative, Brian Darling of the Heritage Foundation, added:
I don't assume that everything Senator Clinton is doing is political, but clearly, because so many parents care about this issue, this would certainly help for Senator Clinton to promote the perception that she is a moderate Democrat.

Comments

It just seems so damn flip-flopish, to go from supporting a press release that calls on the gaming industry to stop release games that encourage kids to become cannibals (in Lieberman's case), or denouncing the ESRB as "broken" (in Clinton's case), to actively partnering with the ESRB to help educate parents.

I mean I should be happy and all, but it seems more like a marriage of convenience than any change of policy. NIMF pulled the rug out from under their "teh retailers are teh evil!" leanings, so the only way to get anything done now is to do these PSAs. I mean your call to slap around retailers hardly has support if a national parent watchdog group drops the whole "retailers are bad" deal and starts questioning whether parents truly care about what their kids are watching/playing...
Thier siding with the ESRB because they saw the light.

Watch out, Censorcrats. It's only a matter of time.....
I think its a smart move. Game legislation fails at every turn. Clinton & Lieberman finally got that if they want to change what they do not like about the Game Industry they are going to need to do it with the help of the the Game Industry.

It is a shame it took this long for the idea to get through those thick skulls.
Maybe I'm misinterpreting the articles, but it seems like the writers are heaping an awful lot of praise on HC for this move. I guess it looks like she's breaking new ground to them, but from where I'm sitting this should have been done years ago. Just because your 45/100 score was the best in your class of retards doesn't make you a genius to the rest of us.
I think it's good that now maybe, just maybe, senators will stop attacking the video game industry. I have mostly bashed Jack Thompson because, from what I've seen on other web sites, I get the impression that Jack Thompson is keeping this fight against video games alive. It doesn't make sense that right now America is at war with Iraq and other problems are happening around the world, yet they keep attacking video games on Jack Thompson's whims. Washington D.C. has no place in the video game industry and they need to stop attacking the video game industry just because Jack Thompson wants them to.
Daniel

This entire issue is much larger than JT. He jumped on the band wagon with school shootings. Please, stop making jack out to be bigger than he is.
@ Brokenscope

I admit it. Jack Thompson didn't start the controversy against the video game industry. That was Joe Lieberman and Herb Kohl, who started complaining about the violence in Mortal Kombat. However, Joe Lieberman and Herb Kohl have, for the most part, moved on. They really don't make attacking the video game industry their carreer. When I read about controversy in video games, the name Jack Thompson keeps coming up. He's the one who keeps it going.

It's bigger than Jack Thompson, but it would probably end if Jack Thompson gave it up because, as I said up there, many more important things are going on in the world and the government wouldn't care about video games if Jack Thompson didn't keep saying that these games are murder simulators and that they're destroying the minds of young people. If he stopped with all that garbage, then the government would pay attention to more important issues and the whole video game issue would fade into the past. In conclusion,while he didn't start it, he is the most vigorous enemy of video games out there.
That's a load of bull. He could stop and it'd still go on. Learn politics; "Hey, if this can get me votes, I'll do it!" or "If it gets me publicity with my target group, sure!"

He didn't start it, he just jumped in and started screaming out from inside the box. He is not its lifeforce. It will go on with or without him. As long as there are people who think violent video games affect our generation, it will continue.
People will be screaming about it forever, just like they scream about TV.

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 07/04/09 at 01:18pm
Andrew Eisen: Rodrigo - A fun idea but you might want to fix the typos.
Posted 07/04/09 at 12:57pm
GRIZZAM PRIME: Happy 4th of July!
Posted 07/04/09 at 12:44pm
Yuuri: Happy Blow Crap Up Day!
Posted 07/04/09 at 11:09am
Rodrigo Ybáñez García: I designed this shirt for Jack debate today: http://i44.tinypic.com/2552t89.jpg
Posted 07/04/09 at 11:06am
BearDogg-X: There's a one minute and a half preview of the video game episode of Penn & Teller: Bullshit! up at http://www.sho.com/site/ptbs/home.do
Posted 07/04/09 at 10:08am
Arcanagos: Happy 4th all
Posted 07/04/09 at 09:32am
Firebird: Greetings GP community, and HAPPY 4th of JULY!!!
Posted 07/04/09 at 03:48am
Michael Chandra: I missed out on Jack? =(
Posted 07/04/09 at 01:52am
Escanor94: hmm, looks like when someone gets banned all their comments are automaticly deleted
Posted 07/03/09 at 11:46pm
Arcanagos: aww, did i miss the JT party? :(
Posted 07/03/09 at 11:00pm
Leet Gamer Jargon: Where's the recent JT bullcrap? Which comments section has he vomited on? EDIT: Nevermind; it's in the "Radio" thread.
Posted 07/03/09 at 09:17pm
BearDogg-X: I wonder what the Metropolitian Moron of Miami said in response to my comment saying that he got a dose of his medicine on the SGC09 Debate thread?
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:51pm
Rodrigo Ybáñez García: He gets offended with a bunch of flowers.
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:49pm
GoodRobotUs: LOL He takes offence at the fact he might have *chosen* to be crazy?
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:47pm
Rodrigo Ybáñez García: He warned me to get a lawyer after I called him "crazy by his own choice"... that´s libel for him
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:45pm
HilaryDuffGta: "libel" what did he threaten now?
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:44pm
Rodrigo Ybáñez García: Was fun to be threatened for "libel" again.
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:26pm
HilaryDuffGta: hey so what did i miss??? the usual spam of "crap"
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:15pm
FlakAttack: Jack ruined his chance to have civil debates with us here. Glad you banned him (again).
Posted 07/03/09 at 04:04pm
Krono: Unexpected is probably the best word to describe it. Particularly as no decent reason is given.
Login or register to post shouts