Jack Thompson, Video Game Legislation Make Next Gen's "Gaffes & Blunders" List

Jack Thompson, Video Game Legislation Make Next Gen's "Gaffes & Blunders" List

December 21, 2006
They certainly like publishing lists over at Next Generation, and we enjoy reading them.

A feature listing Gaffes and Blunders in 2006 includes a section on Miami attorney Jack Thompson's failed legislative effort in Louisiana. From the article, penned by Matt Matthews:
It just wouldn't be the same business without perennial clown Jack Thompson to provide the tragicomic relief. This year, Jack can claim three spectacular achievements. First, he wrote legislation for the state of Louisiana to ban the sale of violent videogames. This stinker of a law... (was) killed with a permanent injunction in late November.

The Next Gen article reminds readers of Thompson's well-publicized failed to block the release of Bully as well:
Jack's second assault on the Gulf states took place in Florida where he waged a battle against the release of Rockstar's schoolyard game for the Sony PlayStation 2, Bully. Thompson filed a suit in Miami-Dade circuit court...  A patient Judge Ronald Friedman watched Bully being played and subsequently deemed it no worse than nightly television...

Matthews also laments the continuing run of video game legislation, which saw 2006 laws passed - and defeated - in Louisiana, Oklahoma and Minnesota.

Comments

@ Daniel and Jotun etc,

Bashing "He who doesn't DESERVE to be named" is pointless. It's been said and is worth saying again that there are problems within the video game industry that need to be examined, dissected and dealt with. This is absolutely true. Daniel; your comment on another thread that the video game industry is innocent smacks of a short attention span. The video game industry is not "totally" innocent. Granted, they are not the monsters that mr lawyer says they are but they are far from innocent. They look at their profit margin and dollars vs customer. All bigger companies do. To say they are totally blameless in everything is absolutely wrong. His methods are deplorable but I can understand where he's coming from. The first generation of gamers (mine) IS older, these games ARE targeted at us but younger people will always get their hands on them. Everyone seems to be focusing on where they should now. ESRB ratings and PARENTAL RESPONSIBILITY. If we can stick with that and stop this foolish wasting of taxpayer money on failed laws we'll all get over it.
So, We're now taking bets on how long it takes Thompson to threaten Next Generation with a lawsuit when he finds out about this.

$10 for within 24 hours
To Beacon,

You laugh yourself to sleep at night, me too!

To Daniel sir,

I agree with you good sir, Jack Thompson has been blowing lies on video games since I am a newcomer to this gamepolitics. Why does people still want to support this nincompoop lawyer who spreads lies day by day and night by night?
Ah, there's nothing like publicity about Jack Thompson that the gaming community likes (read: the stuff Mr. Thompson WON'T tell the world a million times by now).

And Jotun, yeah, those PS3 commercials are screwy. "Oh wow! It makes eggs roll, toss 'em into a wall, and turn 'em into ravens!!" Put simply, WTF?
Jack Thompson is a moron. He doesn't know anything about anything. Violent video games are winning this fight and I hope that, in the coming year, people stop listening to his lies. Game legislation has failed everywhere and people need to realize that Jack Thompson is a lying turd and stop sueing the video game industry everytime someone does something crazy, like Devin Moore. When are people going to learn that Jack Thompson is a bum and a liar.
Jack Thompson preparing to fire off an angry email to Next Gen in 3...2...1...
The Next Gen article reminds readers of Thompson’s well-publicized failed to block the release of Bully as well

uh-oh typo I think you mean well-publicized failure not well publicized failed.
@Jotun
Yes, it is sad. It's so sad I have to laugh myself to sleep every night.

@MastedPixelante
But I don't want my rubix cube to 'xplode!
And I honestly don't get why a creepy baby doll crying is supposed to make me want to buy their system.
Yeah, those were some pretty dumb commercials. "Hey guys, the PS3 is so powerful it can solve a rubix cube, and then make it explode! That's awesome, I can't wait to blow 600+ dollars on it!"
@Daniel


Avtually, the ESRB is and has always been industry run and funded. It was made to avoid government regulation, some people in government seem to want it gone so they can have total control.
Don't forget the PSP ad campaign. Both the fake graffiti, and the supposedly racist one.
@ Jotun

Thank you for your comment. As to the last thing you said about why people listen to him, I have no answer to that. No one should ever listen to him and you're totally right.

@ Eville

I guess you're right. The video game industry has made mistakes in their taxes, if that's what you're trying to say. However, I am only saying that violent content in video games is totally innocent. That's what I'm defending. I know that video games don't make people violent.

@ hayabusa75

I know that the ESRB was formed to keep violent games away from young people. I think that's wrong because I don't think that violent content in games, makes anybody violent. I renounce the idea that it does completely. I started playing violent video games many years ago, in the 90's. I haven't been effected at all, so I know it's not true that these games make people violent. I mean they're just images on a screen.

How can that effect anybody? The ESRB was created for conservative old people, who wanted to be re-elected and be at ease with their accomplishments in D. C., made a fuss about video game violence. They made the video game industry create the ESRB because they believed the lies of anti-game fanatics.

I'll end this with a complete refutation of the lies of anti-game activists. They claim that violent video games make people unaware of the world around them. I've been playing for a very long time and I am fully aware of the world around me. They claim that video games make people violent and want to kill. I don't want to kill anybody and have never even thought about it. They claim that video gamers are losers with fried frontal lobes. I'm in college. That's why they're all lies and liars. Please tell me, why should violent video games be restricted? In light of all this, why should they be regulated by the ESRB? They don't cause harm and all the arguments against video game violence are complete lies. Please tell me how their lies are true.
The Phantom? God, I haven't heard about that system in years.

Yeah, the PS3 launch was bad... almost laughable. I don't get the joke, Sony.
Jack Thompson won't stop does he? But good news that his publizied (sp?) block against Bully failed miserably.

Mr. Jack Thompson sir, is not only a crusader against video games but also a crusader against freedom. But sadly he failed miserably in all the cases and lawsuits in attempt to ban freedom and video games. Sad isn't?

One word of advice to this simpleton lawyer, "When a case can't be argued, shut up and work on your closing."
@Eville:

You're wasting your time and breath; Daniel thinks that the ESRB should be abolished and that it's ok for little kids to play Manhunt, Scarface, etc.
I agree with you MaskedPixelante sir,

If I can remember clearly though, the PS3 commercials (not only the launch like you said) were also laughable, especially the baby commercial, it has the creepy feel, if you ask me though.
Well as far as I am concerned ESRB=MPAA as a Guide system for Parents to know what is contained in a game at a Glance. It's places power into parent's hands who may not know better. I happen to be a gaming parent so I know what my children play. They are getting older so I allow the 14 year old to play a few 17+ games, that I OK for him to play
hi...

wonderful post...

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 07/04/09 at 12:57pm
GRIZZAM PRIME: Happy 4th of July!
Posted 07/04/09 at 12:44pm
Yuuri: Happy Blow Crap Up Day!
Posted 07/04/09 at 11:09am
Rodrigo Ybáñez García: I designed this shirt for Jack debate today: http://i44.tinypic.com/2552t89.jpg
Posted 07/04/09 at 11:06am
BearDogg-X: There's a one minute and a half preview of the video game episode of Penn & Teller: Bullshit! up at http://www.sho.com/site/ptbs/home.do
Posted 07/04/09 at 10:08am
Arcanagos: Happy 4th all
Posted 07/04/09 at 09:32am
Firebird: Greetings GP community, and HAPPY 4th of JULY!!!
Posted 07/04/09 at 03:48am
Michael Chandra: I missed out on Jack? =(
Posted 07/04/09 at 01:52am
Escanor94: hmm, looks like when someone gets banned all their comments are automaticly deleted
Posted 07/03/09 at 11:46pm
Arcanagos: aww, did i miss the JT party? :(
Posted 07/03/09 at 11:00pm
Leet Gamer Jargon: Where's the recent JT bullcrap? Which comments section has he vomited on? EDIT: Nevermind; it's in the "Radio" thread.
Posted 07/03/09 at 09:17pm
BearDogg-X: I wonder what the Metropolitian Moron of Miami said in response to my comment saying that he got a dose of his medicine on the SGC09 Debate thread?
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:51pm
Rodrigo Ybáñez García: He gets offended with a bunch of flowers.
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:49pm
GoodRobotUs: LOL He takes offence at the fact he might have *chosen* to be crazy?
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:47pm
Rodrigo Ybáñez García: He warned me to get a lawyer after I called him "crazy by his own choice"... that´s libel for him
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:45pm
HilaryDuffGta: "libel" what did he threaten now?
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:44pm
Rodrigo Ybáñez García: Was fun to be threatened for "libel" again.
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:26pm
HilaryDuffGta: hey so what did i miss??? the usual spam of "crap"
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:15pm
FlakAttack: Jack ruined his chance to have civil debates with us here. Glad you banned him (again).
Posted 07/03/09 at 04:04pm
Krono: Unexpected is probably the best word to describe it. Particularly as no decent reason is given.
Posted 07/03/09 at 03:59pm
GoodRobotUs: Just heard about that myself... kinda unexpected
Login or register to post shouts