PEGI Ratings Now Law in Finland

PEGI Ratings Now Law in Finland

December 23, 2006
If you're underage, don't plan on buying GTA: Helsinki City Stories anytime soon.

Last week the government of Finland made a change to its media classification system, the Act on Classification of Audiovisual Programs, to give the PEGI (Pan- European Ratings Information) rating system the force of law.

While video game rating previously came under the jurisdiction of the Finnish Board Of Film Classification - much like games in the U.K. are rated by the British Board Of Film Classification - the Finns will now use the PEGI ratings as its official guide, and will incorporate all previous laws - such as those making it illegal to sell 18+ games to minors.

A PEGI press release said:
This additional support given to PEGI by the Finnish Parliament sounds particularly propitious at a time when legitimate calls are made to improve the protection of minors from unsuitable content... (this step)  provides further evidence of PEGI's ability to articulate effectively with national legislations on a continuing basis.

Other changes made to Finnish video game laws include the abolition of the country's existing 11+ and 15+ ratings, replaced with PEGI's standard 12 and 16. However, it has not been mentioned how the new statute will affects games distributed online, which are not covered under its jurisdiction.

-reporting from the U.K., GamePolitics Eurospondent Mark Kelly...

Comments

"Let’s get down to what’s really important: how are you going to enforce, and what are the penalties?"

They'll enforce it the same as they did before, and the penalties will be whatever they were before. Judging by the article, this isn't new regulation for games. It's them changing the standard they use for their regulation to PEGI because it's more standard and well known.
Okay, my opinion: This doesn't change a whole lot. The only big change is that someone else is guessing what the ratings should be.

VET (Finnish film rating board) game ratings were introduced several years ago. However, it was always more lax than film ratings.

There's basically two kinds of ratings: ones given by the rating board, and ones given by the distributor. If you're distributing a film, you can hand it to the rating board, and get a rating that way. However, you can also elect to just notify them that the film is unrated... and slap 18+ on the box. (I was pretty amused to find unrated 18+ label on the original Star Wreck 6 DVD release. =)

In general, the film ratings have gone more free than they were before. A few decades back, stuff was heavily censored. Now, you can publish anything; at worst films pass the censor with 18+, and you can always elect to publish them as 18+ *anyway* just to cut the bureaucracy. Pornography producers were delighted.

However, games were *never* rated by the board and probably never will be. Their ratings were *entirely* based on the importer's suggestions. When PEGI was introduced, the PEGI ratings could also be used as a guideline. Now, all they've done is codified that PEGI is definitely as solid as the VET ratings.

Think of the implications.

An odd example that'd make JT scream: Myth III: The Wolf Age, part of the glorious series with exceptionally detailed physics engine that makes the violent explosions pretty and blood flow downhill, got 11+ rating. =)

Basically nothing has changed - all I see is that we can *hopefully* trust the PEGI folks to make extremely important decisions like this better than some random overworked game importer. Besides, if PEGI screws up a rating like that, the whole Europe will scream.
Let's get down to what's really important: how are you going to enforce, and what are the penalties?
jt must have peed himself with joy when he read this.
if you can teach your 10-17 year old to drink and what it what then the same should apply to media.
So now the minors parents will have to buy it for them or be there when the buy it... so how will this effect gamers who parents are game illiterate?
Eurospondent...Lol.
Ok so its status quo socialism.
Watch Jack now ask "Why can't we do that here?" when any competent lawyer should know full well why.
As I understand it, all media are treated similarly. This is just a change of ratings body.

/b
As far as I know its been illegal to sell 18+ games and movies to minors for a long time, they just changed it to the PEGI system.
Same question if other media is not "restricted" then this is socialism at its best.
How does Finland treat violent films? Can a minor purchas a violent film? If this restriction applies to videogames and ONLY videogames, then it's completely unfair. If they treat all of their media equally then I have no problem. If this is based on some crazy anti-game hysteria then I'm strongly against it. There shouldn't be double standards.
[...] Via Game Politics Here's A Few More Related Posts! Parents Satisfied With ESRBESRB rates unannounced retro gamesGamestops ESRB TV CampaignClinton, Lieberman Combine Forces With ESRBPresidential hopeful resurrects federal game bill [...]

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 11/08/09 at 09:02am
DarkSaber: http://tinyurl.com/yez7jyo
Posted 11/08/09 at 09:01am
DarkSaber: Oh for gods sake, the Gearbox pres is gobbing off about Valve again
Posted 11/08/09 at 08:53am
JDKJ: But cheer up, Austin. If the unemployment rate continues to double-digit as predicted for the next few years, your half-dozen stands a better than likely chance of returning to power.
Posted 11/08/09 at 08:46am
JDKJ: @DS: If he had added the line about "or hiring illegals aliens under the table to work as nannies," it would have been a completely perfect descripition. And, yes, it's about the same difference between a six and a half-dozen.
Posted 11/08/09 at 08:31am
DarkSaber: My god, that description makes them sound almost Republican. Still what did you expect, Obama is only marginally more left than republicans.
Posted 11/08/09 at 01:07am
Austin_Lewis: Health insurance, brought to you by the same kind of bureacrats who couldn't, in timely fashion, investigate the comments of any of the men Obama appointed Czars. Or their past. Or their history of not paying taxes.
Posted 11/08/09 at 01:06am
Austin_Lewis: Yes, and what a piece of crap it was. Arresting and fining people just because they don't make a personal choice to buy healh insurance, creating over a hundred new bureacracies, and worse.
Posted 11/08/09 at 12:24am
ZippyDSMlee: JDKJ:the only trouble is a bunch of witless hacks wrote it....its going to be a train wreck....
Posted 11/07/09 at 11:33pm
JDKJ: BREAKING: In a photo-finish at the wire, House passes health care reform bill. Relatedly, in a fit of pique, Austin Lewis kicks innocent dog.
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:27pm
ZippyDSMlee: man I got alot of junk and dup files too >< god I need orginization...and no not the knee capping media mafia kind :P
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:26pm
ZippyDSMlee: replaced :P
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:23pm
ZippyDSMlee: beemoh:hey its like 60GB porn,400GB anime 100GB games and crap I have took from all my DVDs, I hate waiting on dvds to install stuff..... oh and 40GB of my porn was in the found.000 folder...mostly corrupted.... least I got names of wut needs to be repa
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:18pm
beemoh: @Zip: ...and you'd have to spend all that time re-downloading that porn?
Posted 11/07/09 at 03:34pm
ZippyDSMlee: ggrrrrr......vista lost one of my hard drives and I had a heart attack thinking I lost 1TB of data....
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:58am
JDKJ: Which could be explained by both (a) and (b).
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:56am
Austin_Lewis: JDKJ: You forgot C) the fact that, for some reason, every time he did something that would suggest he shouldn't be in the military, let alone an officer, higher ups ignored it or let it slide.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:51am
JDKJ: Part of the problem is, I believe, that (a) the Army had a lot of time and money already invested in him and which they were unwilling to simply write-off and (b) an increasing need for the type of skills and services he provided.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:48am
JDKJ: And that even if he was begging not to get cut loose, he was apparently a real good candidate for being cut loose, anyway.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:11am
JDKJ: @chada: And while Kennedy once noted that there's usually more than enough blame for everyone to get a slice, the possibility that the Army was unwilling to cut loose someone who was asking to get cut loose could be a factor.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:07am
ZippyDSMlee: *noms on his feet*..nomnomnomnom*droooll* ...wuuutttttt uuu looking at?
Login or register to post shouts