PEGI Ratings Now Law in Finland

PEGI Ratings Now Law in Finland

December 23, 2006
If you're underage, don't plan on buying GTA: Helsinki City Stories anytime soon.

Last week the government of Finland made a change to its media classification system, the Act on Classification of Audiovisual Programs, to give the PEGI (Pan- European Ratings Information) rating system the force of law.

While video game rating previously came under the jurisdiction of the Finnish Board Of Film Classification - much like games in the U.K. are rated by the British Board Of Film Classification - the Finns will now use the PEGI ratings as its official guide, and will incorporate all previous laws - such as those making it illegal to sell 18+ games to minors.

A PEGI press release said:
This additional support given to PEGI by the Finnish Parliament sounds particularly propitious at a time when legitimate calls are made to improve the protection of minors from unsuitable content... (this step)  provides further evidence of PEGI's ability to articulate effectively with national legislations on a continuing basis.

Other changes made to Finnish video game laws include the abolition of the country's existing 11+ and 15+ ratings, replaced with PEGI's standard 12 and 16. However, it has not been mentioned how the new statute will affects games distributed online, which are not covered under its jurisdiction.

-reporting from the U.K., GamePolitics Eurospondent Mark Kelly...

Comments

"Let’s get down to what’s really important: how are you going to enforce, and what are the penalties?"

They'll enforce it the same as they did before, and the penalties will be whatever they were before. Judging by the article, this isn't new regulation for games. It's them changing the standard they use for their regulation to PEGI because it's more standard and well known.
Okay, my opinion: This doesn't change a whole lot. The only big change is that someone else is guessing what the ratings should be.

VET (Finnish film rating board) game ratings were introduced several years ago. However, it was always more lax than film ratings.

There's basically two kinds of ratings: ones given by the rating board, and ones given by the distributor. If you're distributing a film, you can hand it to the rating board, and get a rating that way. However, you can also elect to just notify them that the film is unrated... and slap 18+ on the box. (I was pretty amused to find unrated 18+ label on the original Star Wreck 6 DVD release. =)

In general, the film ratings have gone more free than they were before. A few decades back, stuff was heavily censored. Now, you can publish anything; at worst films pass the censor with 18+, and you can always elect to publish them as 18+ *anyway* just to cut the bureaucracy. Pornography producers were delighted.

However, games were *never* rated by the board and probably never will be. Their ratings were *entirely* based on the importer's suggestions. When PEGI was introduced, the PEGI ratings could also be used as a guideline. Now, all they've done is codified that PEGI is definitely as solid as the VET ratings.

Think of the implications.

An odd example that'd make JT scream: Myth III: The Wolf Age, part of the glorious series with exceptionally detailed physics engine that makes the violent explosions pretty and blood flow downhill, got 11+ rating. =)

Basically nothing has changed - all I see is that we can *hopefully* trust the PEGI folks to make extremely important decisions like this better than some random overworked game importer. Besides, if PEGI screws up a rating like that, the whole Europe will scream.
Let's get down to what's really important: how are you going to enforce, and what are the penalties?
jt must have peed himself with joy when he read this.
if you can teach your 10-17 year old to drink and what it what then the same should apply to media.
So now the minors parents will have to buy it for them or be there when the buy it... so how will this effect gamers who parents are game illiterate?
Eurospondent...Lol.
Ok so its status quo socialism.
Watch Jack now ask "Why can't we do that here?" when any competent lawyer should know full well why.
As I understand it, all media are treated similarly. This is just a change of ratings body.

/b
As far as I know its been illegal to sell 18+ games and movies to minors for a long time, they just changed it to the PEGI system.
Same question if other media is not "restricted" then this is socialism at its best.
How does Finland treat violent films? Can a minor purchas a violent film? If this restriction applies to videogames and ONLY videogames, then it's completely unfair. If they treat all of their media equally then I have no problem. If this is based on some crazy anti-game hysteria then I'm strongly against it. There shouldn't be double standards.
[...] Via Game Politics Here's A Few More Related Posts! Parents Satisfied With ESRBESRB rates unannounced retro gamesGamestops ESRB TV CampaignClinton, Lieberman Combine Forces With ESRBPresidential hopeful resurrects federal game bill [...]

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 07/03/09 at 11:00pm
Leet Gamer Jargon: Where's the recent JT bullcrap? Which comments section has he vomited on? EDIT: Nevermind; it's in the "Radio" thread.
Posted 07/03/09 at 09:17pm
BearDogg-X: I wonder what the Metropolitian Moron of Miami said in response to my comment saying that he got a dose of his medicine on the SGC09 Debate thread?
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:51pm
Rodrigo Ybáñez García: He gets offended with a bunch of flowers.
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:49pm
GoodRobotUs: LOL He takes offence at the fact he might have *chosen* to be crazy?
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:47pm
Rodrigo Ybáñez García: He warned me to get a lawyer after I called him "crazy by his own choice"... that´s libel for him
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:45pm
HilaryDuffGta: "libel" what did he threaten now?
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:44pm
Rodrigo Ybáñez García: Was fun to be threatened for "libel" again.
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:26pm
HilaryDuffGta: hey so what did i miss??? the usual spam of "crap"
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:15pm
FlakAttack: Jack ruined his chance to have civil debates with us here. Glad you banned him (again).
Posted 07/03/09 at 04:04pm
Krono: Unexpected is probably the best word to describe it. Particularly as no decent reason is given.
Posted 07/03/09 at 03:59pm
GoodRobotUs: Just heard about that myself... kinda unexpected
Posted 07/03/09 at 03:58pm
Krono: Huh, apparently Sarah Palin is resigning.
Posted 07/03/09 at 03:34pm
GoodRobotUs: Sounds like he's been mainlining the Angel Dust again
Posted 07/03/09 at 01:50pm
ezbiker555: I'm back. Just in time too, my Jack Thompson sense were going wild
Posted 07/03/09 at 01:47pm
DarkSaber: You mean "playing with himself"? :-P
Posted 07/03/09 at 01:16pm
Matthew: Oh, Jack's back? I guess he got bored of playing single-player.
Posted 07/03/09 at 01:05pm
Andrew Eisen: I'm leaving most of his comments up but he'll be banned again shortly.
Posted 07/03/09 at 01:03pm
PHX Corp: So the jackhole finally got through to attack us again
Posted 07/03/09 at 01:03pm
Andrew Eisen: I deleted all of JT's off topic stuff.
Posted 07/03/09 at 01:00pm
PHX Corp: He also has more BS Law suits agains the florida bar
Login or register to post shouts