Blogger: Second Life Population Numbers Suspect

Blogger: Second Life Population Numbers Suspect

December 27, 2006
The popular MMO Second Life has been featured in a number of stories recently on GamePolitics and in the mainstream media.

From the Mark Warner campaign stop to the establishment of a Second Life presence by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administrationn (NOAA), wherever you turn these days, it seems like SL is the place to be. A number of corporations, including big media like Reuters (SL screen shot at left), have also set up shop inside the game.

But an investigative blog piece at Corante questions whether the current buzz surrounding Second Life is real or a marketing creation. Author Clay Shirky wonders aloud whether game publisher Linden Labs has juiced the number of actual SL users:
If you like your magic tricks to stay mysterious, leave now, but if you want to understand how Linden has managed to disable the fact-checking apparatus of much of the US business press, turning them into a zombie army of unpaid flacks, read on...

Linden’s definition of Residents, however, has nothing to do with users at all — it measures signups for an avatar...

They reported adding their second million Residents between mid-October and December 14th, but they also reported just shy of 810 thousand logins for the same period. One million new Residents but only 810K logins leaves nearly 200K new Residents unaccounted for...

Like a push-up bra, Linden’s trick is as effective as it is because the press really, really wants to believe...

Shirky cites mainstream coverage of SL's supposed population in the New York Times, USA Today, CNN, Forbes and Fortune. Shirky's piece also appears on ValleyWag. For some additional perspective, check out the comments about Shirky's article on Terra Nova, a site which dissects MMO's in a serious way.

Comments

Anyone who has a bit of common sense realized that the numbers on Second Life's website were pretty much bogus and unrealistic.

I play There.com for the simple fact it's more stable, no one chases you around with extra appendages, they don't give false statistics to the membership and the CEO actually cares about it's members and has interests that support people both in and out of the virtual world.
yeah SL numbers are a bit unrealistic as are WoW(7 million is actualy closer to 5.2 tho still alot)I know FFXI has around 520k players ,eve online has 22-31 etc etc.

However i do agree that this "bra pushuppery" clouds the fact that SL is more like a slightly less sucky sims ripoff then any real means to advertise.
it would prove surprising to find a list of MMORPGs that displayed their running and migrating populations. no doubt many would not be willing to surrender such exposure.
www.there.com

Better than SL anyday
Those numbers are like a push-up bra because they're technically not LIES, but they're padded and manipulated to appear to be bigger and better than the reality of the situation.

"Two million users!" is to "810,000 logins" as push-up bra cleavage is to real breasts.
I'm thinking it's in relation of how a push-up bra makes breast look larger than what they really are and how Linden Labs is making their community look bigger than what it really is with counting everyone, whether they're really playing the game or not or if someone has multiple characters, the numbers are kind of inflated..

Anyway, I played SL for maybe a day or two and aside from the horrible slowness of textures loading (not my computer or connection's fault) it found it to be boring as hell....
Pardon my ignorance, but I don't get the analogy. "Push-up bra"? What does that have to do with MMORPGs?

Ladies underwear has never been my strong point.
100% FREE see this pages.
bisexual cumshots anime wallpapers /%/ Dont delete this links, its very useful for :) [@multi_txt.txt||2||r||1||

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 07/04/09 at 01:18pm
Andrew Eisen: Rodrigo - A fun idea but you might want to fix the typos.
Posted 07/04/09 at 12:57pm
GRIZZAM PRIME: Happy 4th of July!
Posted 07/04/09 at 12:44pm
Yuuri: Happy Blow Crap Up Day!
Posted 07/04/09 at 11:09am
Rodrigo Ybáñez García: I designed this shirt for Jack debate today: http://i44.tinypic.com/2552t89.jpg
Posted 07/04/09 at 11:06am
BearDogg-X: There's a one minute and a half preview of the video game episode of Penn & Teller: Bullshit! up at http://www.sho.com/site/ptbs/home.do
Posted 07/04/09 at 10:08am
Arcanagos: Happy 4th all
Posted 07/04/09 at 09:32am
Firebird: Greetings GP community, and HAPPY 4th of JULY!!!
Posted 07/04/09 at 03:48am
Michael Chandra: I missed out on Jack? =(
Posted 07/04/09 at 01:52am
Escanor94: hmm, looks like when someone gets banned all their comments are automaticly deleted
Posted 07/03/09 at 11:46pm
Arcanagos: aww, did i miss the JT party? :(
Posted 07/03/09 at 11:00pm
Leet Gamer Jargon: Where's the recent JT bullcrap? Which comments section has he vomited on? EDIT: Nevermind; it's in the "Radio" thread.
Posted 07/03/09 at 09:17pm
BearDogg-X: I wonder what the Metropolitian Moron of Miami said in response to my comment saying that he got a dose of his medicine on the SGC09 Debate thread?
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:51pm
Rodrigo Ybáñez García: He gets offended with a bunch of flowers.
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:49pm
GoodRobotUs: LOL He takes offence at the fact he might have *chosen* to be crazy?
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:47pm
Rodrigo Ybáñez García: He warned me to get a lawyer after I called him "crazy by his own choice"... that´s libel for him
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:45pm
HilaryDuffGta: "libel" what did he threaten now?
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:44pm
Rodrigo Ybáñez García: Was fun to be threatened for "libel" again.
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:26pm
HilaryDuffGta: hey so what did i miss??? the usual spam of "crap"
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:15pm
FlakAttack: Jack ruined his chance to have civil debates with us here. Glad you banned him (again).
Posted 07/03/09 at 04:04pm
Krono: Unexpected is probably the best word to describe it. Particularly as no decent reason is given.
Login or register to post shouts