Second Life Protest Against U.S. Military Action in Iran

February 23, 2007 -
In his The Click Heard Round the World blog, Second Lifer Rik Riel reports on an in-game demonsration protesting possible U.S. military action against Iran. According to Rik:
There are twenty-some avatars gathered at the Capitol Hill sim holding signs and shouting slogans at each other...  Someone is shooting off some rather spectacular particle effects, which is quite pretty...

The Second Life Herald has more, including news that the protest appeared to be more or less of a spontaneous event:
When asked why he was here today, Anit-Ban leader Cochise Collas simply said: "I am against war and afraid the US will attack Iran." I think he was going to say more but a dog and a bear came charging through at that point dancing to an infinite-looping "La Cucaracha". That's protesting SL style!

Amid the bizarre spectacle of a Second Life protest, one person that caught my eye was John Gage from Sun Microsystems. I asked him what brought him here: "...Years ago, I was one of the organizers of Vietnam Moratorium...we had 400,000 people on the Washington Monument grounds, and had a significant impact on Nixon... we should do the same here."

Comments

Maybe people tend to forget that Iran is the country responsible for supplying and harboring terrorists that are killing our troops in Iraq?!? O_o

Or that they are lead by a anti-semitic mad man who is essentially Hitler reincarnated as a Muslim?

Or you could just ignore all the evidence that shows that Iran is trying to become the new Nazi Germany and let them continue to draw closer to getting a nuclear bomb which they will then sell to terrorists and will be detonated in either Israel or the US "_"

@Phoenixzero... actually, we first got in there under JFK, but Johnson certainly ramped it up. The anti-war protests reached crescendo under Nixon, which is why some people probably think of it that way.

Why does Nixon always get the blame for Vietnam even though we entered into it when Johnson was President? O_o Sure he President for the majority of the time we were in Vietnam and didn't pull out until there was a ton of pressure, but anyway.... I really hate it when people compare Vietnam to Iraq/Iran/Afghanistan but with how so many people bitching and wanting to get out immediately maybe they'd like it to end like what happened in Vietnam but worse? IMO, going into Iraq was a mistake, certainly was, but to just pull out of there and then also ignore Iran and what they've got cooking (same with could somewhat be said about North Korea) either way we're probably going to be screwed. >_>

As Rik pointed out, we now live in a world where small pieces of theater can get amplified many times.

Have you ever seen protest in the form of a political cartoon? Do you say "HAHAHA Idiots actually think that protesting with a cartoon is going to do ANYTHING?"

Do you remember when blogs were dismissed as teenagers posting their diaries on LiveJournal? Did you say "HAHAHA Idiots actually think that protesting with a blog is going to do ANYTHING?"

Darn it, I just uninstalled second laugh - I mean life. The horror of both the members and the gameplay gave me a headache

It is fun to laugh at the various freaks on SL and I imagine the protesters here would trump those at a actually protest in the freak factor.

Well, given how incredibly out of touch with reality the protesters are, I suppose it's only appropriate that they take their protest out of reality as well.

I find this extremely funny. It's like they think protesting war in a VIDEOGAME will have an effect in the real world.

We're so in trouble, and this shows it. Not even our hippies are willing to get up and protest in reality.

"But, 20 people who can’t even be assed to pull themselves off their damn game decide to start the “hey-hey-ho-ho” action IN SecondLife? Yawn. Be a man, and grab yourself a real picket sign."

"AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
This story was good for a laugh. Idiots actually think that protesting inside of a video game is going to do ANYTHING? HA!"

Actually, this isn't as stupid as a move as one might think. This is about the only place Bush can't sick a SWAT team on them,, well, not the ONLY one but you get my point. With how alot of politicians are anti human rights nowadays, if they tried this IRL odds are they would wind up in the hospital because someone thought these people were being "unamaerican." And unless you try to organize a protest and get your message to people who aren't even going to listen in the first place, kindly stfu. At least they're doing SOMETHING.

And I forgot to mention, if this is in said country, Iran, a protest could very likely send these people to their graves because alot of the governments their don't allow their people to protest their actions, ever.

I think this protest in 2nd Life will have just as big an effect as protesting in real life!


. . .


Which is to say none at all...

To Glugory - I was thinking the same thing.

I mean, it's cool that they can do that in that context, but it's such a minority of a minority of a niche of people that it's effect will be, arguably, insignificant.

You have better luck protesting on myspace or friendster OR in front of the White House itself.

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
This story was good for a laugh. Idiots actually think that protesting inside of a video game is going to do ANYTHING? HA!

lol, something tells me Bush doesn't even know what Second Life is.

I agree that real world action is the best strategy for real world change.

IMO, these virtual environments are most useful as gathering places for political activists to strategize, support each other, dialogue about important policy issues, and raise awareness, not as venues for public protest.

Then again, the video I created of the Jan virtual protest against the war in Iraq was viewed more than 52,000 times, so I would argue that there are ways to multiply the impact of these virtual political activities.

See http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5105316486771142892&hl=en

Military action against Iran is almost inevitable; it'll either happen sooner or later. The only reason people should be protesting Iran is because we're bogged down in Iraq.

20 people in a video game, protesting a potential fight with Iran. Excuse me if I don't stand by in awe.

Don't get me wrong, I appreciate a good protest. There's something awesome about several thousand people taking time out of their day to protest something in their lives they don't approve of, from illegal military actions, to your local vending machine company taking Cheesy Poofs out of the machines. But, 20 people who can't even be assed to pull themselves off their damn game decide to start the "hey-hey-ho-ho" action IN SecondLife? Yawn. Be a man, and grab yourself a real picket sign.

lmao...

lol...our country is so fucked....the whole world is going to hate us....and half of our country is worried about voilent videogame......this world is getting worse ad worse....

Do all you anti-war with Iran folks realize that we'll never come home from Iraq until the Iran issue is resolved? Please see www.In-Iran.com for an alternate, inteligent opinion.
Thank you
Sergeant S.W. Foster
US Army
www.DesertVets.org
www.IraqfromtheWindow.com
www.SgtScorpion.com

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Will Code Avarice's Paranautical Activity make its way back onto Steam?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
prh99Honestly I've never liked Gawker, and considering their own behavior the self righteous indignation in the wake of GG rings a bit hollow. If my email causes them to lose money I will not feel even a twinge of guilt.10/23/2014 - 1:00pm
Papa MidnightNeo_DrKefka: Till outlets such as IGN and GameSpot so much as even acknowledge the mere existence of "GamerGate", I highly doubt it will affect their modus operandi anytime in the future - near or otherwise.10/23/2014 - 12:26pm
Neo_DrKefkaWhat GamerGate is essentially doing whether people like it or not its going to change the gamingmedia but inturn its also going to replace some outlets & practice the same wrongs they claim they fought against. Its happening already look at TheRalphRetort10/23/2014 - 12:18pm
Neo_DrKefkaIf a company claims it supports the Klan or another offensive organization than the advertiser needs to make sure they're brand is not tainted so they pull they're ads. One side does not determine the right to determine what is universally offensive.10/23/2014 - 12:14pm
Neo_DrKefkaActions have consequences however. If you do a Bioware and insult EA's customers would you be suprised if they lost advertisers and customers? Advertisers are not giving money to charity to they putting ads to make money.10/23/2014 - 12:13pm
Matthew Wilsonwhile I disagree with people pushing pressure on advertisers, consumers do not have many other options to show there disagreements with a article or writer. if people are going to do it, it should be for somthing much worse then that guy did.10/23/2014 - 12:10pm
Neo_DrKefkaNow they are about KingofPol & InternetAristocrat making streams that are bait and switch Streams that claims they are about GG but are about them getting drunk and them making fun of Autistic people10/23/2014 - 12:09pm
Neo_DrKefkahttp://tinyurl.com/nhlbgq8 These people some of them are using GamerGate to prop there careers up. GamerGate streams used to be about ideas of change and solutions to problems.10/23/2014 - 12:09pm
Neo_DrKefkaI believe the message of #GamerGate but I do not believe in the Cult of Personality that has formed. Where sites like TechRaptor gained exposure and they are a great site. Sites like TheRalphReport are using this movement for there own personal gain.10/23/2014 - 12:05pm
ZippyDSMleeSo has the whole GG thing become toxic to the point its time to move on yet?10/23/2014 - 11:54am
prh99As for GG, I am surprised they haven't pulled out every 4chan spawned mob and script kiddie's favorite tool, LOIC to DDoS their foes. Or maybe they did and I missed it.10/23/2014 - 11:38am
BillIn his article Max says "I've been told that we've lost thousands of dollars already, and could potentially lose thousands more, if not millions."10/23/2014 - 11:25am
BillJames, do you think new advertisers won't bring this up when negotiating Ad rates? From a business standpoint, if I were to advertise on Gawker I would point to this and be pretty firm on lower rates.10/23/2014 - 11:21am
prh99Had my say, what they do after that is their business. Though calling your current advertisers "craven idiots" and "pusillanimous morons" probably isn't all that smart if you are going to complain about lost revenue from pulled ads.10/23/2014 - 11:18am
james_fudgeand when they do they will innoculate themselves from this stuff before the deal is even signed10/23/2014 - 11:02am
james_fudgewhen you do that much traffic you can always replace advertisers, guys10/23/2014 - 11:02am
prh99I helped him out and emailed Gawkers advertisers with the message "This is how Gawker covers you when they disagree with you". Not necessarily as support for GG but he is just down right insulting. 10/23/2014 - 10:48am
BillI think he got rolled twice. They made him mad enough to insult a possible advertiser. Other advertisers are going to notice this. It may be cathartic for him, but it's not good business.10/23/2014 - 9:17am
Billhttp://gawker.com/how-we-got-rolled-by-the-dishonest-fascists-of-gamergat-164949657910/23/2014 - 9:14am
Andrew EisenMarvel also shows it understands that once it leaks, it's out there and went ahead and officially released the trailer. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmeOjFno6Do10/22/2014 - 9:36pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician