Violent Games Don't Cause Youth Violence, Says USC Sociologist

Violent Games Don't Cause Youth Violence, Says USC Sociologist

February 28, 2007
Do Grand Theft Auto and Gears of War cause youthful players to commit real-life violence?

No, says a well-known sociologist at the University of Southern California.

Writing in the latest edition of Contexts, a quarterly journal published by the American Sociological Association, USC's Karen Sternheimer (left) says we need to look beyond video games for the roots of youth violence:
Politicians and other moral crusaders frequently create “folk devils,” individuals or groups defined as evil and immoral. Folk devils allow us to channel our blame and fear... Video games... have become contemporary folk devils because they seem to pose a threat to children.

Such games have come to represent a variety of social anxieties: about youth violence, new computer technology, and the apparent decline in the ability of adults to control what young people do and know. Panics about youth and popular culture have emerged with the appearance of many new technologies... cars, radio, movies, rock music, and even comic books...

Beyond political posturing, Sternheimer argues that the media contributes to the fear of video games in modern society, while the actual root causes of violence are largely ignored:
The biggest problem with media-effects research is that it attempts to decontextualize violence. Poverty, neighborhood instability, unemployment, and even family violence fall by the wayside... Ironically, even mental illness tends to be  overlooked in this psychologically oriented research.

Subtle racism may also be at play in the video game violence debate, according to Sterheimer. She argues that the influence of games is largely seen as corrupting middle-class white male adolescents:
Blaming video games meant that the shooters were set aside from other violent youth, frequently poor males of color, at whom our get-tough legislation has been targeted...  The video game explanation constructs the white, middle-class shooters as victims of the power of video games, rather than fully culpable criminals. When boys from “good” neighborhoods are violent, they seem to be... created by video games rather than by their social circumstances. White, middle-class killers retain their status as children easily influenced by a game, victims of an allegedly dangerous product. African-American boys, apparently, are simply dangerous.

Sternheimer is the author of It's Not the Media: The Truth About Pop Culture's Influence on Children and Kids These Days: Facts and Fictions About Today's Youth.

Comments

Im doing a research paper on how television,radio, and video games cause teenage vi olence. Would any one be able to help me go agianst it ?
I am a Mexican student which thinks that this problem of violence is a great issue in which mass media can´t be blamed. I see TV, play video games and I am not a violent person; this people which blame video games for their kids mental instability should see all the others like me which never became violent. I have to thank you for this web site which is great and clear our ideas about this problem.
JDT
thought police!
first off this is why their are ratings that slot not so apparent and apparent violence in categories from cartoon to realistic from 6 to 17 if you think 17 is to young then preahps thats the problem to have you and other thought police protect others from life to the point they are more messed up by bing fully ignorant of it...

Ethel
so because parents cant parent lets ban media because parents cant parent?

"If the media can have such a strong impact on our acceptance of sexualization, why not on our acceptance and internalization of violence?"

Because its not porn,pron has a direct effect on you while violence has a in direct one one can be taught to control,also "porn" is fun to do with other beating people up less so altho both get you into as much trouble *L*

you really need to relook at kids and game ratings because they rate games ahell of allot better than movies.
because most "negative messages"/illicit sex/sex/violence happens in 17+ games while 13+ get lightly sexualized themes (OMG a cute woman,OMG couples and flirting).

this is not a "goverment" matter unless you want a bland state controlled media,this falls on the heads of parents and partially on the goverment for not doing a better job to help parents IE programs to hep them teach and grow their children.

In the end the world is a horrible place,you cant protect kids from life and dodging the question by putting bland media blinders on is just as assnie...
I think Sternheimer is a little too dismissive of the effects of media - at least, in the quoted portions here. The American Psychological Association recently produced a lengthy report on the effects of media on the sexualization of girls. The report showed clear evidence that the media can strongly impact the tendency to sexualize and objectify girls. If the media can have such a strong impact on our acceptance of sexualization, why not on our acceptance and internalization of violence?

I also disagree with her idea that video-game blaming is racist. I would expect middle-class children's parents to have more time to be involved with the media their children are exposed to - meaning that exposure to violent video games and any negative influences of the games is the parent's fault. A poor family's parents are more likely to be too busy earning a living to monitor children effectively - something for which they cannot be blamed. But the middle-class family whose children learn violence from games would have no excuse for not being there to educate and influence their children rather than letting games do it. It's the old "Where are the parents?" question.

However, I agree with her completely that anti-video game lobbyists and politicians tend to be demonizing idiots. IMO they would be better off urging funding to educate parents on the importance of parental involvement and the importance of monitoring their children's entertainment. And concerned parents should be lobbying for education to help children digest media better, including advertisements, stereotypes, and the lack of realism present in all media. Perhaps get busy writing letters to video game developers asking for more wholesome family-friendly media and more informative parental advisory labels (although games are already labeled more clearly and specifically than movies, if I recall). Maybe those parents should even try playing some games themselves so they are in a better position to help their children interpret any negative messages, like parents are urged to do with their children's TV watching.
The world is full of idiots who just need to blame something or someone when something goes wrong.In this case the something is video games.That makes video games the victim in this.Video games keep people of the streets and keep drug dealers busy.If all those people who are in jail because of drug related stuuf or for any reason just had played video games to realese all that anger and stress that they had they wouldn't be in jail.I play video games to escape the cruel harsh world that we live in because people can't find something better to do with their lives.If people who say that video games cause violence just grabbed a controller and played once in a while they would see the whole thing differently.
I’m not claiming that video games cause youth to do violent acts however, put it in context. So far what I have read takes it out of context just like Karen Sternheimer seems to do. I believe that all violence (and other immoral acts) starts as thoughts; I’m sure you would agree. How are our thoughts developed? They come from external stimulus. When you let your mind dwell on things that are unhealthy you are giving yourself opportunity to act on those thoughts, more so than if you take them captive and toss them away. As with video games, peoples minds are impacted in a more constant manner by the corrupt acts portrayed there. This doesn’t mean they will do them, it only means they have more thought time donated to them. If you add in the other pieces that others have talked about, all the social decay, now you have an environment that does not provide any guidance for young people to use when thinking about these things. I sure would not like my son to see some ugly act (illicit sex, violence, theft….) and not have me there to help him understand that this is inappropriate behavior.
I think that her research is not related to the videogame program in USC, but with the line of investigation opened by Barry Glassner, the author of "The Culture of Fear" book, who is also professor in USC. Anybody who has read this book will find similarities with Karen's argument.
she's hawt. rawwrrr.
'How about generations of black leaders blaming a white power structure because it doesn’t wait hand-and-foot on an entire race that hasn’t managed to acclimate itself after 400 years despite billions spent on low income housing and entitlement programs'

Possibly because they didn't want low income housing and entitlement programs, they wanted an equal chance to earn their own living and have somewhere for their family to live.

It should also be noted that 'them' is simply 'us with less money'. It's worth bearing in mind.
Whether you agree with the woman or not is no reason to refer to her as a bitch. If anything that invalidates your entire post in my eyes.
@ Wickedashtray

If not poverty and/or factors that are often a result of poverty - such as the "shitty" parenting that you speak of, what would you blame when people choose to "act like animals", as you so eloquently put it?

Also, your reasoning is more than a little dubious. 400 years? Last I checked, slavery ended some 150 years ago; the time preceding that can hardly be considered an opportnuity to "acclimate". But enough about history - let's talk about today (This also plays into why othe ethnic groups have been able to acclimate more easily than black folks, but I'm not going to go there right now.) Firstly, your anecodatal evidence doesn't say much other than the fact that violence in YOUR neighborhood got worse when more black people moved in. Secondly, nobody is excusing anything. Some of us are simply saying that subtle racism may be a factor in the way that the media perceives video game violence. When the argument is viewed in this (correct) light, a lot of what you're saying just comes off as hot air.
Ohhhh, lets blame poverty, unemployment, etc for acting like animals. Bitches like this who probably haven't stepped foot into anything more poor than a blue collar suburban neighborhood yet know exactly why people act out. It's all right there in their textbooks.

How about generations of black leaders blaming a white power structure because it doesn't wait hand-and-foot on an entire race that hasn't managed to acclimate itself after 400 years despite billions spent on low income housing and entitlement programs while dozens of other groups acclimated with little trouble? I grew up in a shitty housing project that was about equally distributed among racial lines of white, Hispanic and black. It was rough but I remember my mother could walk across the complex to the corner store without getting knocked over her head for her purse. Over the years as the racial makeup changed over to all black the crime skyrocketed. Many of the guys i grew up with didn't turn out to be drug dealing, gun toting gang members. Poor doesn't equal violent. Shitty parenting and lack of respect for societal norms does. Yes, I'm be simplistic but I so fucking tired of this excuse for shitty behavior and people like this claiming that , once again, whites are to blame.

I simply can't believe what this bitch is trying to pawn off as research.
To Solid Squall,

You do make a great point. There are always automobile accidents, so why not just ban automobiles too? See? Obviously these legislators have no common sense at all and this kind of anti-free speech behaviour is not tolerated and only bring shame to the human race.
While looking for more pictures... er, more information on Dr. Sternheimer, I came across an old article that might be of interest.

Remember an old experiment by UCSF's Dr. Sonya Brady which proposed a possible link between playing violent videogames and more permissive views towards using marijuana and alcohol?

http://www.gamespy.com/articles/701/701037p1.html

GP covered it too, I'm sure.

Well, Dr. Sternheimer had also commented on that study as well.

http://www.gamespy.com/articles/703/703756p1.html

Great interview. Beats the O'Reilly Factor interview.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,96012,00.html
O'Reilly is such a... Well, we know how unethical and disrespectful towards those he disagrees with. A very familiar tactic.

Nightwng2000
NW2K Software
The less I hear about Bill "Culture Warrior" O'Reilly, the better. The guy's a jackass.
hey i wrote my article on this very topic.

Wish I was someone important :(

http://www.destructoid.com/bluewolf72-on-positive-gaming-30057.phtml
You have to love how politicians and other fear-mongers can always make the jump from "correlation" to "cause". Video games are so prevalent today that most young people would have played them, so it should be pretty null and void as a link to make between young people who commit violence.

I mean hey, I can play that game too though!

100% of criminals breath air. We obviously need to ban air.
100% of criminals drink liquid. Drinking liquid causes violence!
100% of school shooters had skin. Obviously skin is to blame for these acts, so we need to get rid of it.
99% of crime is committed by people with teeth. Coincidence? I think not.

Hey, that was pretty fun! I guess now I know why they love doing it so much!
@doctor proctor

In the end they don't care about the "why" of the violence. All they are about is the violence. They only pay attention to the why when it serves their agenda.
While I agree with Ms Sternheimer on most things, I do feel that the fact the most famous 'video games made me do it' case was actually involving Devin Moore, a young African American sort of throws things askew on some of the comments made regarding race.

I'd say that it's more of a 'class' thing than a race thing at the end of the day.
Give that woman a goddamn medal. I think we should start a mass "Jesus Christ; Thank You" e-mail to this Psychologist. Holy crap.
@pest_control: Right on! Violent crime across the board is down to levels that haven't been seen since the '70s...long before the current "video game" crisis.

Additionally, I think a large part of the problem of media perception of the game industry is that no one really speaks for us. We have people going into court showing some of the worst things you can do in the GTA series, Postal 2 and all manner of games that either A) Don't sell well or B) are already being blasted from within the gaming community as garbage.

Why isn't someone in there showing a game like Halo, where you're a hero and saving the world? Or what about Call of Duty or Rainbow Six, where you're stopping Nazi's and terrorists? These are all M rated games as well, but they're not violent for violences sake...

People will never take these studies seriously until they start seeing some of the other M rated games that are out there. And they'll never see those games unless we, the industry/gamers, show them.
Good post. The only thing this left out is the fact that youth violent crime rates have dropped in the past two decades, at the same time the varieties of violent media has expanded. That seems like the best defense against the media causes violence theory of all. Most people are floored when they find out that fact, they think crime rates just keep rising every year.
@nightwng2000

I agree with that assessment, and should have been more specific when I alluded to the supervening factors that are a result of poverty (as opposed to poverty itself, per se).
Crime due to "poverty" is a slight misconception.

For some, it may be directly related to being poor and being unable to financially take care of one's self and one's family. There is no doubt that that sort of crime exists.

But there is also the "reputation" that is taken into consideration. Not so much to be "rich" and being allowed to hang out with the "beautiful people", but rather not being seen as porr while living in what may be considered a "poor" neighborhood. Whether it's money or materials, for some, the more you have, the better you look. Not necessarily "cool", just not "poor".

For others, it may be out of a fear of not having anything, so having "enough" is never considered because to that individual, there is always the chance of losing it all.

nightwng2000
NW2K Software
@ GoodRobotUs

I would submit that poverty, regardless of one's race, is often a driving factor in crime, as well as the driving factor in surrounding cultural elements that also contribute to crime.

@ Eric

On a semantic bent, "slightly irrelevant" doesn't make sense. Something is either relevant or it's not. As far as the blanket rejection of Sternheimer's "warm and fuzzy" rejection of her somewhat race-based theory goes, there's definitely more than a little truth in what Meggie said. Sternheimer isn't "presenting society as racist"; rather, she's arguing that remnants of the more (overtly) bigoted scoeity that preceded that of today influences adult thought with regard to the media's effect of children. I fail to see how pointing out reality makes one "perpetually offended."
The second "rejection" shouldn't be in there.
It's a shame that opponents to this line of thinking will be able to dismiss it out of hat by simply claiming that she must be in collusion with the gaming industry. I say this because USC has one of the nation's best "Game Programming" programs, so she must be in cahoots to protect her University's program.

I don't know if I agree with the "subtle racism" aspect of her piece, but otherwise I feel it is pretty spot-on.
I blame commercials on (American) TV.
You can't follow a story without beeing interupted every 5 minutes with solid 10 minutes of messages. Als an european citizen we had it easy up until 10 years ago with the introduction of commerial broadcasts cooperations.
Before that only before or after a broadcast. Its Every time you hit that brick wall when they go out for a message just when you're getting into the story.
That should have had some social impact. Now youth is escaping into internet and games. Up until now beyond the grasp of the big coorparations. (not everybody finds out that there is sports, reading, music, art etc.)
'Interesting. Slightly stupid because the sociologist obviously likes the self-righteous warm and fuzzies of presenting society as racist (so 1960’s) and slightly irrelevant since the prime cause of crime isn’t poverty but narcissism. Still, at least her slightly irrelevant rhetoric will go over well with the perpetually offended and victimized.'

To a certain degree, I'll agree, there is a little bit of 1984 in there, but that is par for the course these days, that in itself is a symbol of a loss of trust in those in 'command', something possibly far more dangerous than computer games, but far from uncommon between the 'Rulers' and the 'Educated Elite'.

As for the focus of crime being Narcissm, I'm not so sure, I wouldn't say there is any particular 'focus' on crime, that's the whole reason why blaming 'Urban Demons' is such a bad thing in the first place. I think a variety of things make a criminal, the need for attention, boredom, adrenaline buzz, as well as the more 'mundane' things such as poverty or greed.
I actually blame youth violence on Beowulf and MacBeth. I remember when I was a teen and even though I played Doom I thought Beowulf was quite violent. In other words, very very cool.
Interesting. Slightly stupid because the sociologist obviously likes the self-righteous warm and fuzzies of presenting society as racist (so 1960's) and slightly irrelevant since the prime cause of crime isn't poverty but narcissism. Still, at least her slightly irrelevant rhetoric will go over well with the perpetually offended and victimized.
"The video game explanation constructs the white, middle-class shooters as victims of the power of video games, rather than fully culpable criminals....African-American boys, apparently, are simply dangerous."

Dead on. Every "white kid with gun" case is thought of as extreme and winds up being turned into anti-game fodder, while "black kid with gun" incidents are considered business as usual.
@Spicyragnatz

That's not...it's a rather layman view compared to the whole, if you will. There is more to it. As violent video games can just as easily attract someone who is the opposite of your example person, someone who is more of a pacifist than violent. I mean, it's not untrue, but it's dividing the issue; all sides should be seen in perspective, not just "Well, those who are more accustomed to violence would be more attracted to it." But also, what about them is attractive, what is it that generates the associated stimuli, perspective of social culture, etc.

I, myself, think there should be a joint study, to look at it as a whole, socialogy, psychology, other scientific studies that would be involved (perhaps neurological and chemical aspects), as a whole research project. I agree with what she said, she couldn't have said it better. But I think more interest should be taken by others.
:: sigh ::
I'm in Love.

Ok, so I don't know her well enough to call it True Love.
But it's definitely something more than just Lust.

I'm definitely going to have to take some time tonight or this weekend to follow up on this Sociologist's writings. I hope there are plenty of them online. While there will probably be other issues I won't agree with her on (just being pessimistic), certainly what she's said here really struck a positive cord for me.

:: sigh ::

nightwng2000
NW2K Software
Was it Chris Rock who said, "Whatever happened to just plain crazy?" If you could pin violent behaviour as being a result of, or even just heavily influenced by, playing violent games, then the human brain would be a lot easier to understand than everyone else seems to think.

Your average person just doesn't want to think that they are quite similar to a murderer. They don't want to believe that, if they were in that person's situation, they wouldn't have resorted to violence. Thus there must be something simple and tangible that separates criminals and themselves. There must be an "evil gene" that the killer had to begin with, or a hypnotic trigger that turned them from choirboy to maniac. It *can't* be the case that whether or not someone kills another person is based on their entire life history and upbringing, recent emotional state, and the situation they found themselves in. Because if that were the case, they could be a potential killer too.
As always, it comes down to Violent Games are attractive to kids that are likely to be violent. If you took a kid off the streets who has had a shithole life and offer him a chance to play an Time Crisis, or some other gun-based arcade, you think the kid is going to have a bad time? Of course not...
/sarcasm

Yea, videogames are machinations of satan that causes poor little white boys to kill people, despite the fact that said whites boys have suffered physical and and emotional damage prior to ther'e crime.

White power!!!!!!!!!!!

/sarcasm
About the subtle racism, we should add sexism as well. Although, it would be obvious 7-10 years ago, but it is more subtle today because we now have heroines, female active supporting characters, etc. But the image they project is pretty much the same as in t.v., sexy, stereotyped and etc. Look at us, most of us are obsessed with Britney Spears and Anna Nicole Smith~!

A factor in this is probably because the development is mostly male...We should diversify~!
@Conejo

In most "habitual" addictions I'm willing to bet the addiction is to the endorphins, not the activity that triggers them. You're addicted to the feeling of comfort/satisfaction. Whereas with alcoholism and drug abuse, you're addicted to the chemical effects of the drugs you are doing.

This is likely why it's easier for a gaming addict to switch to golfing, or vice versa, but not so easy for a heroin addict to switch to alcohol. Different drug effects...
I'll agree that the addiction and physical health concerns are more real than the current sham over 'agression enhancements' people claim they cause.

Problem is, a lot of people read 'addiction' and immediately think 'Drugs', which is a bad image to give. People WILL kill over drugs. However, Video Games are addictive like Bowling or Fishing, it is a hobby, but marriages have broken up over bowling and fishing, and the same can happen with computer games, it's the art of moderation.

Look at it this way, if one man murdered another because he thought he was killing a fish after capturing, would there be any question whatsoever that the man was affected by far more than fishing?
having an addictive personality has nothing to do with what you wind up addicted to, anyway.
@Jotun

Not all addictions form because someone has a lack of self control. Especially with when it comes to alcoholism. Some people are genetically predisposed to it.
Violent Games Don’t Cause Youth Violence, Says USC Sociologist...

...
i miss the days when crazy people were just crazy instead of the victim in some grand conspiratorial scheme against humanity.

broken children don't become so from one singular influence, and if your common sense says otherwise you're obviously not playing with a full deck.
did anyone watch Attack of the Shoe last night? They were talking about video game violence in The Loop, and one of the debaters brought up GamePolitics
Video games don't cause violence but cause addiction on people who do not know how to control themselves. Lets say for example, Person A drinks a wine, but in moderation, this shows that he is in control, whereas Person B drinks one wine, but ends up drinking too much and got drunk instead, that shows he isn't in control and is crazy and it is the same like games. Wine and games don't cause people to become violent, it is the person who chooses to went out of control.

Youth Violence comes out of youth themselves. They should be the ones who should be blamed, and should know that they must exercise self-control before any disaster occurs.
it seems like much of the Outcry against games is the result of uninformed fearmongers trying to find a way to avoid having to place blame on Parents, Society, and the criminals themselves. The race thing is something I'd not considered, but it also brings up a good point. How many times a day is there a shoting or fight in inner city "hoods" in la, Detroit, New york. Yet the moment some "white boy" Loses his mind and shoots up his school? " IT"S THE EVIL GAMES I TELL YAS"

Seems pretty stupid to me.
On. The. Button.

The Beatles White Album did NOT cause Charles Manson to murder Roman Polanksi's wife, Video Games do NOT make people commit school shootings now, to say otherwise is the purest form of scapegoatism. Charles Manson was a murderer because he was mentally unstable not because he was programmed.

I remember one comment made in a certain interview in which the person stated that modern music 'isn't the same as Elvis'. Well, apart from winning the 'That's because Elvis is Dead' award, they are 100% wrong, it's exactly the same thing, just performed by people who wouldn't be in their late 60's in 2007.

You know, I sometimes wonder, if every state that had tried to push through unconstitutional laws had pooled the money they ended up paying in fees, how many 'borderline' cases of social deprivation or abuse could they have helped with that money? How many lives could they have REALLY saved instead of merely giving lip service to protecting them.
It's easier to create legistation against demons than it is to come up with proactive, positive steps to reduce the personal circumstances of people in the real world, though.

Ms. Sternheimer's piece is fantastic, though - kudos.
I love the quote:

"White, middle-class killers retain their status as children easily influenced by a game, victims of an allegedly dangerous product. African-American boys, apparently, are simply dangerous."

I wish more folks would pay attention to what their view points are and how they are shaped. That one statement seems to say it all. Wish more people would really think harder on circumstances and not focus on just one factor.

I have to thank her for that one, made me smile.
Yes yes, we all have opinions, the world is full of idiots, the end.

Look ... some here insist on criticizing the woman's research, or what she "tries to pass off as research." The problem is there's no "research" presented. She's quoted giving one example of how hypocritical the association of race and social class is with the source of someone's violent acts, and she's not wrong.

Chris Rock jokes that he won't let himself be trapped in an elevator with a white high-school kid since the columbine tragedy. Meanwhile, middle-america continues to assume gang-related violence is the result of a kid being raised in a "poor, black neighborhood." The point she makes is that these stereotypes are rediculous.

If some of you insisit on posting critically, then you really must learn how to read. Maybe it would help to read it again.

Now then, the big question: Do video games make kids violent? No, folks, they don't.

When this gets published, I'll be very interested to read it in its entirety. Until then, I guess I'll have nothing better to read than the mad ramblings the people who post on a site dedicated to the politics of something they know nothing about.

They're easy to spot ... they're the ones who call Ms. Sternheimer a "bitch," among other things, as if that somehow proves her wrong.
Why would people think this? Video games are pure ENTERTIANMENT. The people who blame their actions on video games are A. Looking for a quick buck somhow. (stupidjacktompson) B. COMPLETELY PSYCHOTIC!!! C. Had absolutly no positive role models growing up whatsoever! You could seriously choose one of the three statements above for ANY case involving real-world violence and video games and you'd be right!
im doing the same thing as stephanie can some one help on against
Well, there are books on violence-perhaps they cause violence too? Let's get rid of them! But wait, of course, burning books is frowned upon.
To really understand what does or does not cause the youth of america to cause crime is irrevulent when a politician sees an opportunity to find a way to gain either more power or more money. Those two things drive people more than any other influence. Some murderers "get off", so to speak of, on the power they have over their victims in fact the term "their victim" just gives them more reason to do so and by empowering their views.
The money is both a good and bad influence, power is only bad. Money gives someone the motivation to do great work in our society, but it also is the same thing that motivates a hitman.
Video games on the other hand are access to both money and power, but not that much to consumers as much as buisnessmen and woman.
Video games do not make killers money and power does.
[...] Sociologist Karen Sternheimer of USC brings a refreshing dose of sanity and perspective to the debate (such as it is) over the pop culture scapegoat of record - video games. As always, GamePolitics is all over it. [...]
[...] Second of all, let’s define what we mean by “destructive” and “aggressive behavior,” because as video games have become more popular, youth violence has actually dropped, despite those stories that grab all the headlines. [...]
what are u talking about???????????
Actually, this article is partally true. For children with ADD(attention depheset disorder) and ADHD(attention depheset hyperactive disorder) or a similar case, like myself ADHD, should stay away from video games. They can't learn to have limits to these "addicting" things. for more, e-mail me at megapcgamer@hotmail.com.^^
sorry, megapcgamer@hotmail.com . no .^^
I ARGREE WITH EVERY THING
ohh then what happen to the little kid who got murdered by his 12 year old brother whos favorite game was a terrorist game
i need help im doing a paper on going agenst banning violent video games
and i need some suporting info could you help me
i think that violent game do not cause violence in the world but its violent people. People like gang members and people in prison. They are the one to blame for.
I read your report on the racial part. I consider what was said in the last sentence very offensive, 'African-American boys are simply dangerous'. That right there is a steriotyped statement that I found offensive and frankly untrue.The reason why some boys, and not all of them are Black, grow up violent without video games is because the only way to survive in their neighborhoods is to involve themselves with gang violence or drug dealing. But some lucky ones get out with real jobs. So either you mistook yourself in that statement or you have a personal thought of African-Americans in your head planted there by yourself or someone else. Whichever it is, get rid of it because it isn't true.

-Daniel Felten, 13.
if violent games cause youth violence, then shouldn't we be roaming the streets with our shotguns and Uzi's firing our ammunition???? Now there's something to think about
THIS IS VERY GOOD!
Re:

Video Games, in no way, cause violence in our youth.  I'm sure you remember the whole "backyard wresling" ordeal from a few years back.  Tv and the show on it are far more influencial than video games.  All these experts who say that the school shooters trained on a video game are talking out their asses.  How can someone train for killing people in real life by playing a video game?  The only way I can answer this is by having the person put a welding mask on and holding a real gun.  Now the view he has matches the way the tv makes it look.

There is no documented evidence that videogames cause violence in kids.  The only evidence that there is to speak of is from people who have only seen a glimpse of the game.  These people contenually talk out their ass to prove a point they really can't argue to save their life.

Re: Violent Games Don't Cause Youth Violence, Says USC ...

You have a good point of view; this gives us the idea on how we should view video games effect on youth. Well many would probably involve video games or even computer games to many violence and crimes that is happening to our society now days. This is part of factors that affecting the behavior of many children. Also many other factors like television, immoral movies and other media related technologies. But poverty as you have said is also a factor involving to terrible way of living of many youth. Hundreds and thousands of jobs that are on the chopping block are reported every day, and the unemployment rate seems to climb another hundredth of a percentage point every day.  Mass layoffs have come from nearly every company that previously were thought of as bedrocks of industry, like Boeing, Microsoft, Bank of America, and the list goes on.  Many experts have said that it will hit a peak by the end of 2009, and then a decrease in unemployment by the beginning of 2010.  For so many people afflicted, this will be too long a wait, as the effects of mass layoffs only make the economic woes so much worse.

Re: Violent Games

If you’re fortunate enough to be living in an industrialized country, poverty may mean you live below a certain level of income and must be creative in order to make ends meet. Outside these countries, poverty means the difference between eating one day or not, residing another day or not. It’s a trouble all of us should be more aware of and working towards a solution.
Go to the local shelter or community outreach center and give your time this weekend. Prepare some sack lunches and drive to the corners where some homeless men and women beg for food. What ever you choose to do, include your kids. What a great learning opportunity for children! licensed and bonded payday loan lender

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 07/04/09 at 04:52pm
Andrew Eisen: Yes, it's been proposed but as far as I know it has not been passed. Big difference.
Posted 07/04/09 at 04:50pm
Cheater87: http://www.gamezine.co.uk/news/formats/xbox360/all-violent-video-games-be-banned-in-germany-$1301757.htm
Posted 07/04/09 at 04:49pm
Andrew Eisen: Far as I know, Germany has not banned all violent video games.
Posted 07/04/09 at 04:44pm
Cheater87: Jack wants the US to follow Germany's total video game ban.
Posted 07/04/09 at 04:42pm
Andrew Eisen: Note to JT, it is not illegal to sell kids a ticket to R-rated movies.
Posted 07/04/09 at 04:39pm
Cheater87: Jack said we would be better with no rating sytem.
Posted 07/04/09 at 04:35pm
Alareth: So what was the introduction used for Jack?
Posted 07/04/09 at 04:31pm
JDKJ: Heard one, you've heard 'em all. He repeats the same act, with the same half-truths, over and over.
Posted 07/04/09 at 04:31pm
Andrew Eisen: Using a credit card as age verification is not illegal. Hope Mark called him on that and his made up statistics.
Posted 07/04/09 at 04:30pm
Alareth: Jack is special, his mommy always told him so.
Posted 07/04/09 at 04:29pm
Andrew Eisen: JT lied about that APA causation thing again. Wonder if Mark called him on it.
Posted 07/04/09 at 04:04pm
Andrew Eisen: Follow the JT/Methenitis debate on Twitter: http://twitter.com/jtdebate
Posted 07/04/09 at 01:18pm
Andrew Eisen: Rodrigo - A fun idea but you might want to fix the typos.
Posted 07/04/09 at 12:57pm
GRIZZAM PRIME: Happy 4th of July!
Posted 07/04/09 at 12:44pm
Yuuri: Happy Blow Crap Up Day!
Posted 07/04/09 at 11:09am
Rodrigo Ybáñez García: I designed this shirt for Jack debate today: http://i44.tinypic.com/2552t89.jpg
Posted 07/04/09 at 11:06am
BearDogg-X: There's a one minute and a half preview of the video game episode of Penn & Teller: Bullshit! up at http://www.sho.com/site/ptbs/home.do
Posted 07/04/09 at 10:08am
Arcanagos: Happy 4th all
Posted 07/04/09 at 09:32am
Firebird: Greetings GP community, and HAPPY 4th of JULY!!!
Posted 07/04/09 at 03:48am
Michael Chandra: I missed out on Jack? =(
Login or register to post shouts