
Last week
GamePolitics broke the news that Federal District Court Judge Paul Huck had rejected controversial attorney Jack Thompson's suit against Gawker Media, parent company of popular game blog Kotaku.
Yesterday, Judge Huck refused to accept Thompson's request to reinstate Gawker as a defendant. The decision would appear to end Kotaku's involvement in the federal court case in which Thompson is also suing the Florida Bar and Florida Supreme Court.
In his
ruling Judge Huck wrote:
Plaintiff may not, time and again, add more and more distinct and unrelated claims into a single lawsuit. This action will not serve as a repository for any and all real or perceived claims that Plaintiff has against various entities...
Although Plaintiff, in his motion, characterizes the actions of the Defendants as a "collaborated assault" against him, it is apparent that... Plaintiff's accusations against Gawker Media... are wholly separate from his claims against the remaining defendants.
Thompson could opt to pursue other legal avenues in the matter which stemmed from comments written by readers of Kotaku. Case law, however, would appear to be on Gawker's side.
Comments
Probably already noticed, but there is a dead link on the Judge's denial PDF.
I won't be surprised to see JT file a separate suit against Gawker.
From the Judge's comments in the article, it's clear that he believes Thompson is making things up ("real or perceived claims"). It is also apparent that he knows, as do we, how ridiculous his claims of a grand conspiracy are.
This is funny, instead of losing one lawsuit, Thompson will suffer the indignity of losing 2 :) I wonder if it will cost him more in the long run, having to pay out for 2?
When has this stopped JT before?
Video games and the Constitution: 1
Jack "the massacre chaser" Thompson: 0
Actually, that scorecard should be higher, but I've lost count of all the cases that Jack has lost and all the Jack penned laws that have been overturned. What are we at now? 18? more?
@ Nigh_Towl
I would say I doubt it, but he never fails to surprise with how low he'll stoop for attention.
By the way, the link to the ruling is broken.
This is a man who freely admitted, in his book, to having failed the Florida Bar exam the first time. Nevermind the fact that he doesn't exhibit ANY sane aspects a lawyer might actually possess, but he doesn't seem to have any idea as to procedure.
It's funny how he claims that gamers live in a fantasy world, and yet his own world is filled with an over-arching conspiracy where gaming companies, Industry watchdogs and Consumer Watchdogs (Who, in all industries get along like cats in a bag) are all in cahoots purely to target a lawyer who's total success rate against video games is....zero.
I'd say the person out there living in the biggest fantasy world of them all is Jack Thompson.
-P
Most lawyers fail the Bar exam the first time. It's a tough test, and failing it isn't uncommon enough to be used as a barometer as who's going to be a good or bad (or successful) lawyer.
This reminds me of the Milkman conspiracy...only not as believable or funny.
I'd almost like to send him a link to the work I'm doing with video games and kids, just so he'll see some positive video gaming, but I doubt it'd do anyone any good. He'd say it is horrible and we're horrible people, blah blah blah. Actually, I wouldn't be at all surprised if he tried to get us shut down, using claims that could NEVER beat our documented scientific proof of the good we've done so far.
honestly..who didn't see this comming...?
- Warren Lewis
I doubt a class-action on behalf of gamers would hold much water. It is a group defined by a pastime, and not a more tangible thread. JT also has the right to say whatever he wants (though he believes himself to be the only person who has these rights).
I am just amazed at how much this guy yearns to be in the spotlight.
I wager 7 virgin sheep that it wil take 5 days.
Ahhh Today's gonna be a good day i can tell
Sounds like Jack took the Bar exam like a lot poeple take their drivers test. It's so easy to fail a drivers test, especially if you got a strict judge. A lot poeple will practise hard for the test and follow every rule to the letter; stay below the speed limit, a nice stop at a stop sign and so forth. And yet, the moment they get their license they drive like they casually do, even if it's not how their supposed to drive...
Jack studied hard to pass the 2nd time, obeying every rule to the letter, but the moment he got his licence he forgot everything and became the arogrant, delusional, paranoid, conspriacy nut we know and loath today... guss he forgot that rules on the exam and everything they teach in law school were things a lawer was supposed to keep following throughout his career; not just stuff you should memorize to pass the next test
i'LL see your 7 virgin sheep and raise you 4 soccer moms that he does it in 2 days
well that judge is damn wrong i tell you its a vast conspirecy leading all the way to the head of mcdonalds!
why wont anyone believe me?????
I predicted that people would drink milk
He will not sue him directly. You see, the judge is all part of the conspiricy.
Nevermind the fact that his wife passed the first time. While they were married. Apparently, her study habits didn't rub off on him.
Hilarious!
Anyway, thanks for a center of fair Game information that I dreamed about as a kid reading negative articles from Politicians and Organizations that live on scare tactics and unfair accusations of the PC/Console Game Industry.
Oh, and I hate Jack Thompson, he's a leech and his Law Career before entering the PC/Console Game Market is downright shameful. I do hope he gets what he deserves.
if you dont like JT, please check out this link, gajt=gamers against jack thompson!!!!!
btw, someone please buy him some G.A.M.E.S.!!!!! (GTA, Sims, Manhunt, any of them would be gurd!!!!!!!!!)
hehe, Chris long says ;) KILL HIM!
Man, it's no wonder this moron hasn't won a case yet, he eve insults and stereotypes gamers to a high degree just because he doesn't get things the way he wants