
Australian officials will soon join their counterparts in the U.K. and Ireland in banning Manhunt 2, according to
Smarthouse. From the site:
"We don't want to preempt the decision of the Office of Film and Literature Classification Review Board but it is looking very doubtful" [a source] said.
The original Manhunt was released for Playstation 2 in Australia in 2003, receiving a MA15+ classification for "Medium-level animated violence". It sold 18,000 copies on PS2 and Xbox.
The news is not unexpected. Australia's Office of Film and Literature Classification (
OFLC) has been fairly aggressive in banning games in recent years.
Actually, the term the OFLC uses is "refused classification" and, among other games, it has been applied to Grand Theft Auto III, NARC, the Postal series as well as the graffiti-oriented
Marc Ecko's Getting Up: Contents Under Pressure.
Comments
Australians are usually pretty laid back about most things, it's strange this thing about computer games, but maybe you have to live there to understand the attitude. I suppose, in a sort of 'Croc Dundee Steretype' type of way, I can understand that in Australia 'Video Games are for kids' is a difficult concept to get rid of, but, knowing a few Australians, I know that most Autralians aren't anything like that.
Australians love their country very much indeed, it's a beautiful place, at least, the bits that aren't trying to bite/stab or poison you, and they do strongly promote community and active living as far as I understand things. Maybe that's why they have a problem with a more sedentary pastime like gaming?
That doesn't mean I'll stop questioning the rights and wrongs of banning it though ;)
"Maybe that’s why they have a problem with a more sedentary pastime like gaming?"
It's an interesting thought, but I think that's reading too much into it. Most Aussies don't seem to have a problem with laying on the beach all day. I wouldn't either, if we had beaches like that here in California. I think it's more likely due to the sensibilities of the people currently in power.
@Terrible Tom:
I'm curious, why do you have such a big problem with Rockstar? I mean, I know they're not the game company you'd bring home to meet your mother, but...
I love Rockstar. They have some guts trying to release a game such as this. I love the fact they are standing by their product as well. Sounds like a wonderful company, I'd think about cutting of one of my fingers and eating it raw to have a chance to work for a company such as that(not really but I'm sure you get my point).
I'm just not seeing it being released anytime soon. My problem is with Nintendo and Sony for not allowing AO rated games on their systems. And with retailers for not allowing AO rated games in their stores. And at the ESRB for having a M 17+ rating and a AO 18+ rating instead of one 18+ rating. I don't like people preventing other people from releasing their art that a team was dedicated too for who knows how long(probably around 4 years or so) to make only to have it denied. Not to mention the millions of dollars spent to make it and the money they now have to spend to re-cut it to give it a M rating.
Anyway there you go.
They've banned guns, too, so we can't have an armed uprising against an oppressive Government, like the American Bill of Rights says "y'all" should do.
Indeed it is. Governments have a habit of changing the naming of what they do to something more polite to make it go down better with people.
I think the reason why any of this even happens is that people dont really see the bad side of it because they dont play video games, and the government is offering to do something for them when they should be doing it themselves.If they censored books, or television like they do video games today, then people would be in an uproar. Although, people have made this point many many times before.
Its kind of funny to see countries that bill themselves as free countries do this kind of thing.
The weird thing is game ratings are not enforced here but movie ratings are. With means that right now any 12 year old kid can walk into a game shop and buy Manhunt 1 but cannot buy Saw 3. They are however planing to change that after the release of Manhunt 2
The AO rating was created to prevent M from being the highest rating. If M was the highest rating, stores wouldn't want to carry it. Although, now that there is so many it probably wouldn't matter.
If the highest rating for video games wasn't MA15+ and was instead R18+ this wouldn't have happened.
An R18+ rating for video games was proposed in 2002 but Michael Atkinson, South Australia's Attorney-General and Daryl Williams, the Federal Attorney-General each voted against it, preventing it from being introduced.
Daryl Williams has moved on but Michael Atkinson is still the Attorney-General of South Australia, so if it was proposed again it might still be stopped.
In addition to this, in some of the other States and Territories of Australia there are new people in the position of Attorney-General and I don't know where they stand on the issue.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070621/ap_on_re_au_an/australia_aborigines;...
Australia may be a great country, but with stories like these sometimes I have to question their government's policy on how they decide what their people can and cannot watch/play/do.
Sorry, I guess I misconstrued some of your comments on earlier threads, my apologies. I too, agree that much of the blame must be laid at the retailers' feet. I have no beef with the ESRB, however.
Since 2000 the OFLC has banned fifteen games. Of those fifteen, seven were able to be released or re-released after some (usually minor) changes had been made. There is also GTA: Vice City which wasn't banned but was modified before being submitted to the OFLC. So even though it sucks, the OFLC hasn't banned that many games.
For the record, it is doubtful that any of them would have been banned if the highest rating for video games was R18+ instead of MA15+
One of our "current affair" style shows tried to run a feature on it a while ago, and completely failed to generate the level of controversy that they wanted (AFAIK).
And yet despite that, the OFLC certainly bans a lot of games. Going on what happened in other countries, this was pretty much a given.
You have to understand that most aborigines in the communities you are talking about spend all their money on alcohol and Aboriginal elders themselves have stated 'it is ruining their culture/community'. Porn was banned because of a study that said the majority of aboriginal children have been sexually abused, with acts involving children as young as 3. This isn't even necessarily abuse from adults but other children - who were abused by elder children also. The ban is to try and prevent this cycle continuing (no porn maybe no thought to commit these acts).
You can't just say 'Look at that' without at least having a look at the reasons. Admittedly that little bastard Howard isn't the biggest supporter of aboriginal equality and freedom... The government does have to ban some things. Porn and alcohol (prohibition anyone...) are fairly (*underline, bold*) different to video games also. The ultimate question with these things are, if it doesn't assist the cause the bans in question should be lifted.
The Queensland premier gave a multi-million dollar grant to the games industry a couple of years ago, and there are art exhibitions, specialised uni courses and games companies popping up everywhere or setting up studios from overseas. So, despite what the OFLC and a couple of AGs might think, there is definitely going to be a big change in the near future.
Also, you can just pay to download the unedited games mostly online now through Direct2Drive and other initiatives, so the OFLC ban isn't really going to stick.
@Sam: Are you talking about the infamous "ACA Kid" Cameron? Now that was a funny piece of trash journalism. For those of you who don't know, ACAKid is an alleged "16 yr old WoW addict" who plays for upwards of "18 hours a day".... and yet was still in terrible gear, guild wasn't even raiding high end instances and was obviously acting very hard on the show so he would get paid. Hilarious. :D
On a final note, it is interesting to me how all the politicians, OFLC etc etc make all these laws about censoring games, movies and TV when you can go to any beach and see a great pair of bronzed breasts. Ironic, no? That our country is one of the worst offenders with government censorship.... but the people really don't care, because we're too busy living a fairly trouble free life :D. Same goes for games, go to the Australian Games Developers Conference or the Australian Gaming League and that's a true indicator of where our country is positioned towards games.
P.S.
I haven't heard of a single person any of these bans have affected, there may be some out there but the ban is based on sales. You cannot sell these games in Australia but you can own them and get them in the mail (which leads to buying the games overseas and importing them into Australia). I'm sure people have done that with games on the banned list even before now so those who avidly want to play will just buy Manhunt 2 online and get it shipped in.
Freedom of Speech aside since it doesn't apply here, I think my local EB and Harvey Norman could do without having this particular game sitting on the shelf. The Suffering (another quite violent and quite psychological horror game) was rated M in the States, here it was rated MA 15+ (only suitable for those 15 and older), a two year drop compared to what the ESRB considers appropriate for the American public. Manhunt 2 looks like it's going to get the US AO kiss of death, and here it's going to be banned.
Taking a look at the last sentence of that paragraph....aren't we just being more honest about our feelings towards this game? Word is, we're saying No outright to RockStar, and the UK has too. Looks to me like the ESRB is saying No but not wanting to hurt feelings or have people scream Freedom of Speech at them. It's a different kind of censorship but censorship all the same.
*shrug* I prefer to live in a country where someone who isn't looking at the money that a game's able to generate is looking at the content and whether they feel it's appropriate in the society here. If it's one of the few where they say no, I say good on 'em for having standards.
the best way to deal with this is fight it while redoing the game for PC as a AO title while your redoing the game for the consoles as a M game all while riding the wave of "free advertising" if anythign it will try and break the stigma on adult games any movement made on that ground is a start.
Well, it depends on what you call a "lot" in this context. I'm not trying to imply that they ban, say, 10 games a year, or something like that. Maybe I should have been more specific.
@Juggernautz
No, actually ... I didn't even no about that one! The one I am thinking of was a lot broader. It was a few years ago now though. But I'll never forget the reporter trying to get parents angry, and the parents just going "meh ... it's not too bad".
Australia shouldn't ban this game just because its violent, what about all the boxing and wrestling games?
they're violent too.
this is absolute bull$#!%.
your all a bunch of f#@%ed up pussy's
...