Former ELSPA Chief Smells Politics in U.K.'s Manhunt 2 Ban

Former ELSPA Chief Smells Politics in U.K.'s Manhunt 2 Ban

June 30, 2007
While current  Entertainment and Leisure Software Publishers Association (ELSPA) president Paul Jackson is okay with Manhunt 2's U.K. banning, his predecessor is not.

Roger Bennett (left), in an op-ed penned for MCV, wrote::
Putting aside for a bit the various opinions on whether adults should or should not need to be told by a State sanctioned censoring body what they can and can’t watch or play... I hope that ELSPA’s response to the BBFC’s decision not to grant a rating to Manhunt 2 was not made without recognising the long term possible effects of such an action...

It is most interesting to note that the guidelines used in reaching this decision by the BBFC includes the assumed criteria that because games are interactive, they are different to other forms of screen entertainment and should be rated accordingly.

There is no evidence for it to make such a flawed assumption and concerns should be apparent that through pressure from Government, games are becoming increasingly and wholly unjustifiably separated from other forms of screen entertainment...

GP: Point scored by Bennett. Here at GP we've similarly taken issue with the more recent - and completely unsubstantiated - idea that the Wii controller somehow makes game violence more egregious.
We know of course from other legislation in recent years, that many politicians vote for it based on their own narrow and often ignorant opinions and from media pressure – not listening to evidence at all, even to official research reports instigated by themselves.

It seems to me that the Government and thus the BBFC have become heavily influenced by previous events which in no way have any link to our industry, other than the fact that someone with a certain opinion stated that there is, without a shred of knowledge or fact to justify such a claim...

GP: Since Bennett is operating in the U.K., he is likely referring to the 2004 murder of Stefan Pakeerah, which some blamed on the original Manhunt.

Comments

@PlayItBogart

'A government department doing things based on politics? Oh say it ain’t so ;-;'

I think you'll find that the BBFC is actually (quoted from their site):

'an independent, non-governmental body, which has classified cinema films since it was set up in 1912, and videos since the passing of the Video Recordings Act in 1984.'

The only political aspect behind the BBFC is that in 1984, Parliament passed the Video Recordings Act, which stated that video recordings offered for sale or hire commercially in the UK have to be classified by an authority designated by the Secretary of State, which he then chose the President and Vice Presidents of the BBFC, and charged with applying the new test of 'suitability for viewing in the home'.
A smart man questions authority while a dumb man blindly follows.
*sniff, sniff* Ahh, the pungent smell of motor oil and human fecies mixed with rotting pig intestines. The smell of politics at work.
Its not liek it is in Aus or Germany where they have ban lists,if its not approved it still can be imported and sold.

Silver_Derstin
I already have mine =^^=
A government department doing things based on politics? Oh say it ain't so ;-;
I wouldn't be suprised if what this guy is saying is true. Shit like this is happening in the U.S. all the time but fortunatly we have the First Amendment to protect us from government regulations, restrictions and censorship. (although it doesn't protect us from corperate based censorship a.k.a - retailers not carrying the game due to it's AO rating ect.) I've always felt that censorship and regulations on Entertainment are wrong without proof that the Entertainment in question is truely harmful (which in this case there is no evidence for that).
I think the BBFC or any other Classification Board has gone overboard when banning a game outright just because it's content is offensive. This is esspecially when movies like Hostel Part 2 and Saw 3 (which are more realistic and way more gruesome then Manhunt 2) get an 18 certificate uncut and are allowed to be screened and seen but this game is not.
Really, it's the cigarette smoking man. He's been manipulating everything from behind.

Also, I have tinfoil hats for everyone. Any takers?
I smell politics all over it here in America too...Take Two wasn't out to make an AO rating. They know what goes into an AO rating. I strongly believe them when they say R-rated movies are gorier. I've seen some nasty stuff in R-rated films.
The BBFC have stated several times their decision was not politically motivated. In the past they've also downplayed any connection between Manhunt and the Pakeerah case.

The guidelines to which Bennett refers have nothing to do with the Wii-remote, it was both versions of the game that were refused a rating.

Whatever you think of the Manhunt 2 decision, the notion that the UK government are pressuring the BBFC to increasingly separate games from other media doesn't stand up when you look at recent history.
It does not seem to me that it is the BBFCs job to tell adults that they can not have access to content created by other adults. If they were so certain that this game is likely to cause harm to people I suggest that the issue be taken to a public court hearing. If they are worried about children playing an 18 rated game, then they should make more effort to reinforce the standards within the public eye and not ban games that adults could otherwise play.

I agree however, that it is more likely they are responding to media frenzy and political pressures in both the UK and US.
I think this guy should try and get his old job back and the current moron in charge of ELSPA should go work for mediawatch UK or something like that.
As long as there are no animal cruelty in this game. If not, these politicians are just up to nothing but trouble.

Amigos! We must protect our freedom and human rights, if they chose to use force and fists, we use our torches and swords!
GamerDad joins Game Politics in support of the idea that the Wii remote makes things worse is a ludicrous notion. But, in talking to nongamers in the mainstream, I have to say that they think it is. (Mime strangling someone for your grandma or whatever and you'll see what I mean.)

That said, I agree with Mr. Bennett. The implications of this banning and AO rating, and repurcussions on future games, are very bad news for the videogame community.

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 11/08/09 at 09:02am
DarkSaber: http://tinyurl.com/yez7jyo
Posted 11/08/09 at 09:01am
DarkSaber: Oh for gods sake, the Gearbox pres is gobbing off about Valve again
Posted 11/08/09 at 08:53am
JDKJ: But cheer up, Austin. If the unemployment rate continues to double-digit as predicted for the next few years, your half-dozen stands a better than likely chance of returning to power.
Posted 11/08/09 at 08:46am
JDKJ: @DS: If he had added the line about "or hiring illegals aliens under the table to work as nannies," it would have been a completely perfect descripition. And, yes, it's about the same difference between a six and a half-dozen.
Posted 11/08/09 at 08:31am
DarkSaber: My god, that description makes them sound almost Republican. Still what did you expect, Obama is only marginally more left than republicans.
Posted 11/08/09 at 01:07am
Austin_Lewis: Health insurance, brought to you by the same kind of bureacrats who couldn't, in timely fashion, investigate the comments of any of the men Obama appointed Czars. Or their past. Or their history of not paying taxes.
Posted 11/08/09 at 01:06am
Austin_Lewis: Yes, and what a piece of crap it was. Arresting and fining people just because they don't make a personal choice to buy healh insurance, creating over a hundred new bureacracies, and worse.
Posted 11/08/09 at 12:24am
ZippyDSMlee: JDKJ:the only trouble is a bunch of witless hacks wrote it....its going to be a train wreck....
Posted 11/07/09 at 11:33pm
JDKJ: BREAKING: In a photo-finish at the wire, House passes health care reform bill. Relatedly, in a fit of pique, Austin Lewis kicks innocent dog.
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:27pm
ZippyDSMlee: man I got alot of junk and dup files too >< god I need orginization...and no not the knee capping media mafia kind :P
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:26pm
ZippyDSMlee: replaced :P
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:23pm
ZippyDSMlee: beemoh:hey its like 60GB porn,400GB anime 100GB games and crap I have took from all my DVDs, I hate waiting on dvds to install stuff..... oh and 40GB of my porn was in the found.000 folder...mostly corrupted.... least I got names of wut needs to be repa
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:18pm
beemoh: @Zip: ...and you'd have to spend all that time re-downloading that porn?
Posted 11/07/09 at 03:34pm
ZippyDSMlee: ggrrrrr......vista lost one of my hard drives and I had a heart attack thinking I lost 1TB of data....
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:58am
JDKJ: Which could be explained by both (a) and (b).
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:56am
Austin_Lewis: JDKJ: You forgot C) the fact that, for some reason, every time he did something that would suggest he shouldn't be in the military, let alone an officer, higher ups ignored it or let it slide.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:51am
JDKJ: Part of the problem is, I believe, that (a) the Army had a lot of time and money already invested in him and which they were unwilling to simply write-off and (b) an increasing need for the type of skills and services he provided.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:48am
JDKJ: And that even if he was begging not to get cut loose, he was apparently a real good candidate for being cut loose, anyway.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:11am
JDKJ: @chada: And while Kennedy once noted that there's usually more than enough blame for everyone to get a slice, the possibility that the Army was unwilling to cut loose someone who was asking to get cut loose could be a factor.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:07am
ZippyDSMlee: *noms on his feet*..nomnomnomnom*droooll* ...wuuutttttt uuu looking at?
Login or register to post shouts