Wisconsin Targets Gaming While Driving

July 14, 2007
Recently, GamePolitics reported on a New York bill that would outlaw playing video games - and conducting other distracting activities - while driving.

As reported by Land Line, a magazine for truckers, Wisconsin lawmakers are considering similar legislation. As proposed by Assemblyman Garey Bies (R, left), AB215 would:
...prohibit drivers from watching any device capable of displaying live or recorded television, cable or satellite broadcasts, DVDs or video games that is located within the driver’s view.

The restriction wouldn’t apply to dashboard readouts or other displays of information about a vehicle’s operation or conduct. Drivers found in violation of the rule face fines up to $400.
Buzz It

Comments

I'd give props to anyone that manages to get cable in their car.

I guess supplying channel information via satellite to XM and Sirius units is going to be illegal as well. As would be any device with a color screen, since you can pretty much expect a hack that will obviate original functionality for the purposes of illicit viewing...

Stupidly broad bill is necessary because of rapid technological progression that makes maintenance of a banned-items list tedious and expensive.

And yeah, the bill seems necessary.

@Papa Midnight,

You would be surprised at how ignorant people can be. This bill is necessary.

Another dumb New York Gaming Bill... What now? Someones going to play on their DS or PSP while behind the wheel? You gotta be kidding me.

lovely... A blow struck for common sense...

I can play DOA 4 with one hand. ;)

The thing that amazes me the most is that we have to tell people not to play games or watch TV while driving. I'd like to think we don't need laws like this, but I realize that most of humanity is little more than sheep. What's that saying? A person is smart, but people are idiots.

@ finaleve

The only game I ever played that could be set-up, so that you could play it with one hand was Breath of Fire 3 (on the PlayStation). It was really convenient when I wanted to continue playing it, but was also hungry. Still, it was generally easier to play with both hands on the controller, but it was possible to play reasonably well with just one.

Because certain activities are more evil

Nothing bad with that, if such law doesn't exist already then The Law system is flawed. Because there are endless ways of distracting one's attention from driving - reading books or newspapers, writing, having sex, playing a guitar, wearing a blindfold, watching TV, cooking, changing clothingand so on. Why not make one law which would incorporate all of those, instead of having separate law for every activity?

Oh I see, cable would be limited to locally recorded content while satellite can be live or pre-recorded. Okay, that makes much more sense.

It's actually quite a simple concept, give one rational and common sensible person and you'll find at least 4 that will do the exact opposite... they have to make laws like this the general population has little common sense at all.

Kincyr, the words you left out were the clue. It talks about what the device is capable of rather than what the device is doing at the time. A TIVO enabled motor home that recorded a show from a cable hookup would be covered, for example.

Yea, I definitely agree with the idea, still on my permit and the idiocy that goes on on the road amazes me. I don't need some moron watching DVD's or somehow playing a video game anywhere near me.

"prohibit drivers from watching ... cable or satellite broadcasts"

Satellite I can understand, but how in hell someone can get a cable hookup to their car is beyond me, and by extension, any sane person on Earth.

The law itself makes perfect sense, but the NEED for such a law makes me ponder on the sheer idiocy of mankind... :/

Tempo,

It's not so much that you need a law to prevent somebody from doing something that common sense dictates they should not be doing, but you DO need the law if you wish to prosecute unsafe drivers.

In the past month I've seen the following on the 5 mile stretch of expressway I drive too and from work:
1) A woman with a laptop computer balanced on the steering wheel and her lap while trying to drive.
2) An older gentleman with a small TELEVISION sitting on his lap and pinned between himself, the door and the steering wheel. (Noticed this because he damn near swerved into me.)

I live in Ohio and under current law they could possibly have gotten driver #2 for an unsafe lane change, which is a minor moving violation.

So as silly as these laws seem on the surface, I'm all for them because there are a lot of asshats out there driving cars who deserve to lose their licenses and be parted with some of their money.

@mottom22
actually in some states, it is illegal to use a cell phone while driving. new york for example, does ticket people for just talking on a cell phone while driving. In Minnesota, where i live, it is illegal for someone with a provisional license to use a cellphone while driving.

//Does “satellite broadcasts” include the GPS systems most cars have now? Because if they don’t specify that then a cop who is bored and a prick can pull you over for having the GPS on in your car and use that to meet his quota.//

Like the guy who made it said already: The restriction wouldn’t apply to dashboard readouts or other displays of information about a vehicle’s operation or conduct. Drivers found in violation of the rule face fines up to $400.

What he means with the satellite broadcasts is if you hooked up your satellite dish to your car or something like that and your watching a tv show instead of paying attention to the road. Something like a GPS doesn't count since it's not entertaining, it's informative.

@finaleve

Actually they can't pull you over for just being on the cell phone. what they can do is pull you over for swerving, speeding or anything else while you are on the cell phone. if you are doing anything unlawful in a car while on the cell phone it makes the ticket more severe. so instead of a 150 dollor ticket you may get a 300 dollor ticket and so on.

So if you're on a highway doing 70-75 in a 65 (which is what everyone does) and you are on a cell phone, it is more likely a cop will pick you out of the crowd and pull you over instead of the others. not because it is a higher ticket, but because it's more dangerous.

Does "satellite broadcasts" include the GPS systems most cars have now? Because if they don't specify that then a cop who is bored and a prick can pull you over for having the GPS on in your car and use that to meet his quota.

@tempo: Think of it this way. The law isn't designed to protect the safety of the idiot playing WoW and watching movies in his SUV, it's designed to protect the safety of the people that idiot in the SUV might crash into while he's watching his movie and playing WoW.

It's not like it would help. I've seen so many people drive with cell phones and no cop pulled them over (and they are supposed to i think), so what would make this any different?

And I still can not fathom being able to drive and play a game. You'd need both hands on the wheel, or at least one, and yet you mostly need both hands on the game as well. How will this be actually happen (I think you can play RPG's fairly well).
I think the only time I was able to drive and play games was when I was riding my mount in WoW while playing a little Pokemon =P

Is gaming while driving actually a serious problem? Not the actuality of doing, but who games WHILE driving? I can't even fathom doing it.

True, it should be obvious, but people are stupid, and honestly with all the SUVs with DVD Players and such coming out, I think it's a good thing.

Do YOU want someone watching "The Need for Speed" driving around your neighborhood?

Finally, a "restrictive" bill that isn't ridiculous.

@Athest: People have been caught watching movies, applying makeup, and all kinds of stupid crap while driving. Once I saw a man steering with his knees while he used a match to light a tobacco pipe-- while going 65 on an interstate. It honestly wouldn't surprise me.

lol.

do you really need a law to stop people from gaming and watching movies while driving.

does anyone remember personal responsibility?

"Warning high bridge, jumping may cause injury and/or death"

Sheep. =)

Actually, I agree with the idea. Most people I see are already crappy enough drivers without being doubly or triply distracted. But maybe that's just how it is in California!

Since this is driver safety we are talking about, I think this is a good plan. But on the other hand, current law should be efficient.

ahh this is unrelated to law but kinda reminded me when those vans (kind of like a luxury aimed at middle class i think,...) that had the small tv inside (remember mid 90's so it was CRT) and I do believe it came with either NES or SNES ( I do believe it came with only the NES or it was originally NES then later SNES or not at all...... come to think of it I am not really sure at all) I think quite a few kids wished that their parents owned that line of vans.... I remember when my friend's dad got one ....... I was so jealous ( I have had very very few times where i was jealous or envious [ conscientiously because I do believe that sub-conscientiously we all are but I believe the frontal cortex or lobes inhibit our ability to convey or act on it {i.e. also experience the thought of doing so due to re-enforced mental suppression or long story short /impulse control/} sorry i know tl;dr]) and wished that i had one or otherwise my mom did (single parent).... I remember actually his da turning on the van and idling it in the drive way wasting gas so we could play zelda on the NES just because of the enjoyment of both the game and the novelty of being able to play a console on a tv in a van... Jeez such good times, this article really brought a big smile to my face. What a terrific way to start my day!!1 =) oh btw sorry for jacking the coments for my long nostalgia moment I was sharing more or less to hopefully spark the memory for others... Hopefully I did...

This bill is absolutely neccessary.

A real-life example is that we recently had a member of our (Minnesota Timberwolves) basketball team rear-end a parked car at high speeds while masturbating to a porn video in his car. We've had several accidents with people playing PS2 and Xbox in their car- while driving. Kind of strange that they can't just charge them with "inattentive driving..." though I'm sure that doesn't get a high enough penalty for what this bill would do.

It happens. I'm glad there's finallyvideo game legislation that doesn't make me want to vomit.
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Uncharted NESCritics: 'Left Behind' game glorifies violence- http://tinyurl.com/wu64s02/12/2012 - 4:34pm
ZenI felt Brutal Legends was a funny & beautiful look at the world of rock from Double Fines point of view. The only parts I wasn't hot for were the RTS bits as it felt forced. Otherwise fantastic.02/12/2012 - 1:34pm
DorthLousPassed 1.5M$. And I'd also say that Brutal Legend is far from being a bad game. I just think it was a few levels under what people expected from the people working on the project.02/11/2012 - 8:25am
TechnogeekBrutal Legend wasn't bad so much as "marketing had no idea how the game actually played", causing it to suffer accordingly.02/10/2012 - 10:38pm
RedMageIt looks the CIA's website has been DDOS'ed. Anon?02/10/2012 - 7:52pm
RedMageBrutal Legend.02/10/2012 - 7:52pm
ddrfr33kHas anything Tim Schafer ever made been of crap caliber? I'm struggling to think of one...02/10/2012 - 7:37pm
GuamishI think it is in good hands. Tim did a game for the GDC award show and that was fun for how short it was.02/10/2012 - 12:22pm
Andrew EisenIt'll be tragic if the game ultimately sucks.02/10/2012 - 12:17pm
james_fudge$1.3 million02/10/2012 - 11:32am
Uncharted NESGermany Says It Won't Sign ACTA [Update: ... Yet]- http://tinyurl.com/7r2twrg02/10/2012 - 11:21am
Andrew EisenDamn. Double Fine's Kickstarter fund has already passed a million dollars.02/09/2012 - 8:16pm
Andrew EisenAudrey didn't quote the sassy parts. Here's IGN's article: http://wii.ign.com/articles/121/1218359p1.html And here's my original post: http://tinyurl.com/7y68a3902/09/2012 - 7:50pm
james_fudgeI hope you some said something sassy! Where's the link?02/09/2012 - 7:46pm
Andrew EisenHey, neat. IGN quoted a blog I had writen only two hours earlier. I certainly timed that one pretty well.02/09/2012 - 7:38pm
Andrew EisenToki Tori has been added to the Humble Bundle for Android.02/09/2012 - 5:11pm
james_fudgeThanks for the heads-up DorthLous02/09/2012 - 4:33pm
DorthLousWill do, my apologies.02/09/2012 - 4:14pm
Andrew EisenI appreciate the heads up but please keep typo alerts to the specific article's comments or PMs.02/09/2012 - 3:33pm
DorthLousThe title says 30, but in the article, the developer says it's like a 20% net tax http://www.gamepolitics.com/2012/02/09/developers-call-facebook-currency-transaction-fee-thirty-percent-tax02/09/2012 - 2:43pm

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician