Study: Gaming has Minor Effect on Reading, Homework, none on Social Interaction

July 15, 2007
Ars Technica recently reported on at a study which appeared in last month's Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine. The research examined three aspects of children's lives - reading, homework, and sociability.

The study looked at 1,500 adolescents who were already participating in a more ambitious longitudinal study which has been keeping tabs on the same 8,000 families since 1968. Researcher found that less than half of its subjects were gamers, and of those, time spent gaming versus other activities was negligible. They also reported that over 80% of adolescent gamers were boys.

For its part, Ars Technica took issue with major media reporting of the study, which was partially due to the tag-line the publication gave it:
Compared with nongamers, adolescent gamers spent 30% less time reading and 34% less time doing homework...

...which led to sensationalized stories such as "Video Games Cut Into Teens' Reading, Studying" over at Forbes. But Ars writer John Timmer dug deeper into the results, and found that while boys did indeed spend 30% less time reading, it was 30% of 8 minutes per day.

And although 34% less time was spent on homework, this only applied to girls, and only on weekends, although the authors point out that this shouldn't be taken as an indication of a drop in academic effort, but could show better time management.

In terms of social interaction, gaming fell in line with more traditional activities. If a teen played more games in a group, they tended to also do many other activities in a group, and vice-versa. The same held for teens who gamed with their parents. If the parents weren't very involved in their children's gaming, they tended to not participate in other family activities either.

Timmer concludes by asking if parents are concerned about adolescents' reading habits, instead of asking why boys spend 30% less time reading if they are gamers, they should be asking why non-gamers only read for 8 minutes a day...

- Reporting from Canada, GP Correspondent Colin "Jabrwock" McInnes
Buzz It

Comments

Video games improve your social life. Playing Super Smash Bros. with friends skyrocketed my social life.

Actually I do have access, thanks to Ars Technica who linked to the journal website and my university library.

@ ~the1jeffy

The two tables don't show it, but it appears on table 4 in the journal article. However, I am not taught on how to read regressional analyses tables, so I have no clue at all.

Remember, folks, this is a study of averages. It is useful info, for sure, but not an indication of "If you play video games, you don't read." Just like in grades, a C average means there are just as many A students as students with failing marks. So you have your avid readers making up for those who don't pick up a book outside of school.

But, I'm not sure how to interpret these two-charts:
1
2

The study says:

For every hour boys played video games on the weekdays, they spent 2 minutes less reading. Because boys spent an average of 8 minutes reading, this represents a 30% decrease. There were no significant relationships between reading and video game play on the weekends among boys, and there were no significant relationships for girls on either day type.

But I can't find any corresponding data in those tables, which are the only data linked from that study that seems relevant to that statement. Can any deduce where that is coming from?

ah yes, I remember hearing that news some time ago. I couldn't get my hands on the journal article however. But it was quite clever that the authors pointed the 30% decrease from reading was 8 minutes. Well depending on the definition of "reading", I think it's about right during my teen years. Spent much time reading game faqs and mangas.

Let me see.....I read 4 thousand pages in June, maybe another 4 thousand in July.....Hell, in 6th grade I was reading at a college level, why? Because video games got me into the sci-fi fantasy genre.

Books I've read in the past 2 months:
1st two of the Inheritance Trilogy
Eregon
Eldest
3 of the Dragonlance Chronicles
Dragons of Autumn Twilight
Dragons of Winter...... (I forget the exact title)
Dragons of Spring Dawning
The Belgariad
Pawn of Prophecy
Queen of Sorcery
Magician's Gambit
Castle of Wizardry
Enchanters' End Game
Sequel to the Belgariad, The Mallorean
Guardians of the West
King of Murgos
Demon Lord of Karanda
Sorceress of Darshiva
Seeress of Kell
Prequels to Belgariad
Belgarath the Sorcerer
Polgara the Sorceress



I think that s all....

For all those that keep asking if 'reading' also included reading text *in* a videogame... no. No, it did not, for the purposes of this study. The full article of the study says the category was for 'reading or being read to (from books, magazines, newspapers, and letters)'. It also mentions elsewhere that any time period where the subject was doing two things at once - such as studying while playing a video game - wasn't counted for either category and was dismissed completely.

Did they check to see what kind of games were being played? Many games have a lot of text dialogue in them. Perhaps they are getting their reading there?

I rarely read BOOKS for pleasure. About 10 years ago, when I was in middle school, I would read lots of books. For about two months I was reading 300+ page books in 3 or 4 days. This was mainly because I would take the book to school, and read between assignments.

Then, summer reading happened. I'm sorry, but I felt like those were the worst books in history. A guy literally told me he skipped every other page in "Old Man and the Sea" and still passed the test. True, there were a few good ones, but by and large they were terrible (in my opinion).

However, I am constantly reading. I read the newspaper and GamePolitics regularly. Some of my favorite video games held no voice-overs, that means I gotta read to know what's happening, and I read the subtitles in the ones that do. I've even been know to... read the instruction manuals for games *gasp*. Standing in line? Time to read a poster, or magazine covers. When you break it down, I spend more time reading than I probably spend sleeping. Yet, in that study, I'd probably clock in at zero minutes of reading a week. Sorry, but you couldn't pay me to read "Old Man and the Sea" again.

I'm not really surprised that someone would use a percentage for shock value, but not reveal the numerical value. Its a common practice. They use whatever statistic agrees with what they are trying to say more.

how do they define reading? after all theres lots of text everywhere how many people can list games with no text at all?

When I first saw the study, there was a little voice in the back of my head that was telling me that something was up. I read constantly and I mus say, I love reading. I know of no other member of my group of friends other than one of them who does not read books on a reguar basis. 8 min of reading is nothing, and the statistic is missleading.

I agree with Timmer, the problem isn't that gamers aren't reading enough books because of games, it's that people in general aren't reading enough books just because they don't find them interesting. THAT is the real problem with our society. Nobody cares about reading. Maybe if the media would discuss this issue in more detail than just holding up another media as a scapegoat, we might find out why. But no, it's much easier to sit on your high horse and blame others for all of society's problems.

I guess old school RPGs (like the old Final Fantasies) or even text-based games (MUDs) don't count as reading... Hell, whenever I went to a game store, I always hear parents looking for games for their kids, with the guy working there suggesting Pokemon and the parent replying that Pokemon is too much reading for their child.

i wanna see the exact study itself

Which is why I'm glad there are some text based games around (Phoenix Wright for instance).

The effect of gaming doesn't decrease it. If anything it doesn't increase or decrease the reading ability, because theres still some minor reading invloved.

[...] Statistics are only meaningful when you look at the underlying data. A recent study shows that video game playing among adolescents has a minor effect on reading and homework, and no effect on social skills. Earlier coverage tried to scare us by reporting that the drop was over 30%, a closer read showed that “while boys did indeed spend 30% less time reading, it was 30% of 8 minutes per day. And although 34% less time was spent on homework, this only applied to girls, and only on weekends….” Yeah, I think the more important point is that the typical adolescent boy spends only 8 minutes a day reading, not that if he were a gamer he’d only spend 5.6 minutes. [...]

Ah, sensationlism.

Because nobody likes headlines that might make the reader feel GOOD.

At least the good studies are finally starting to trickle down, though the media will continue to spin things the way they like.

And people wonder why I've largely stopped watching TV...

Well i was watching Lucky Star (The new Anime) and a similar topic popped up on there show. Konata was talking to Tsukasa about this study about Japans citizens amount of reading. He said Omit Japanese Comic books and limit it to regular books, then he goes on to talk how Japan is becoming more illiterate. This is pretty much the same case here becuase i highly doubt any of you read only for a total of 8 minutes. Why?

Because most likely these people that do the tests probebly don't include comic books, Blog Posts, and other forms of reading mediums. im pretty sure for all of you it takes longer then 8 minutes to read all the stories on here on a regular basis, which is about 3 stories per day. also add up reading the comments and you probebly spent somewhere around 10-15 minutes. now it looks like you spend 10-15 minutes a day reading right?
wrong. If your a gamer then you probebly go to game sites where its essentially an essay collection on one topic, games. where you can pretty much spend 10 minutes to how ever long you wish to stay there, which adds up for me spending 2 hours reading that site alone. long story short include all the short bits of reading through out your day, i don't care if its reading the box of a game add it, and you will find that one of the only times your MAINLY not reading is eating, and sleeping.

Heck, I used the non-voiced over rpgs of the ps1 to help push my son into reading when he was younger. I had gotten tired of "Mommy, what does that say?" I would reply "You know your letters, figure it out. I'll help on a tough word. But the rest is up to you."

With that and the help of his desire to read the Harry Potter books, my son now loves to read, and reads at 2 grade levels above his own. (He has since the 3rd grade, he's now going into 7th.)

Gamers read 30% less than non-gamers, but is that factoring in text in video games?

My brother and I both read and almost always have books in hand. WHAT'S WRONG WITH US!!!! [/sarcasm]

I don't get it, I play games and read a lot. Am I just a statistical anomaly or what?

Stupid sensationalism.

I read Game Politics everyday...does that count?

We only read for 5.4/8 (depends on if you're a gamer) minutes a day because books are becoming less interesting. Why would you read a book, when the end is an inch away? TV and movies were probably less too. The end was in sight. From an internal view-point, I can say teens like to be engaged in such things like MySpace (where they create the content) and video games (where they are doing everything). Link two cultures together, such as music and video games, and you have a wildly popular game called Guitar Hero.

I couldn't understand some parts of this article Study: Gaming has Minor Effect on Reading, Homework, none on Social Interaction, but I guess I just need to check some more resources regarding this, because it sounds interesting.

[...] Relation of time spent on video games and other activities (Cummings & Vandewater, 2007) This is to follow up on the previous post about video game use and academic performance. This article was also referred by gamepolitics.com. [...]

ok people i read alot like 6 or 7 hours on the weekends and i play videogames almost the same so what does that make me???? huh

in summer i read almost 40 thousand pages
eragon
eldest
the demonata all the book out so far
perseur jackson and the oliumpins sorry i cant spell
halo series
the cronicales of narnia
the cronicales of amber
everyone hurts
black juice
and a lot more
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenThat article is over five years old, Uncharted. A fun blast from the past though.02/12/2012 - 10:47pm
Uncharted NESCritics: 'Left Behind' game glorifies violence- http://tinyurl.com/wu64s02/12/2012 - 4:34pm
ZenI felt Brutal Legends was a funny & beautiful look at the world of rock from Double Fines point of view. The only parts I wasn't hot for were the RTS bits as it felt forced. Otherwise fantastic.02/12/2012 - 1:34pm
DorthLousPassed 1.5M$. And I'd also say that Brutal Legend is far from being a bad game. I just think it was a few levels under what people expected from the people working on the project.02/11/2012 - 8:25am
TechnogeekBrutal Legend wasn't bad so much as "marketing had no idea how the game actually played", causing it to suffer accordingly.02/10/2012 - 10:38pm
RedMageIt looks the CIA's website has been DDOS'ed. Anon?02/10/2012 - 7:52pm
RedMageBrutal Legend.02/10/2012 - 7:52pm
ddrfr33kHas anything Tim Schafer ever made been of crap caliber? I'm struggling to think of one...02/10/2012 - 7:37pm
GuamishI think it is in good hands. Tim did a game for the GDC award show and that was fun for how short it was.02/10/2012 - 12:22pm
Andrew EisenIt'll be tragic if the game ultimately sucks.02/10/2012 - 12:17pm
james_fudge$1.3 million02/10/2012 - 11:32am
Uncharted NESGermany Says It Won't Sign ACTA [Update: ... Yet]- http://tinyurl.com/7r2twrg02/10/2012 - 11:21am
Andrew EisenDamn. Double Fine's Kickstarter fund has already passed a million dollars.02/09/2012 - 8:16pm
Andrew EisenAudrey didn't quote the sassy parts. Here's IGN's article: http://wii.ign.com/articles/121/1218359p1.html And here's my original post: http://tinyurl.com/7y68a3902/09/2012 - 7:50pm
james_fudgeI hope you some said something sassy! Where's the link?02/09/2012 - 7:46pm
Andrew EisenHey, neat. IGN quoted a blog I had writen only two hours earlier. I certainly timed that one pretty well.02/09/2012 - 7:38pm
Andrew EisenToki Tori has been added to the Humble Bundle for Android.02/09/2012 - 5:11pm
james_fudgeThanks for the heads-up DorthLous02/09/2012 - 4:33pm
DorthLousWill do, my apologies.02/09/2012 - 4:14pm
Andrew EisenI appreciate the heads up but please keep typo alerts to the specific article's comments or PMs.02/09/2012 - 3:33pm

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician