L.A. Times on Games & Immigration Debate

L.A. Times on Games & Immigration Debate

July 16, 2007
Do video games have a place in the current debate over immigration policy? 

Reporter Anna Gorman of the Los Angeles Times probes the relationship between games and immigration. Along the way she quotes Suzanne Seggerman, president of Games for Change:
Games are really good at exploring complex issues, and what issue is more complex than immigration?  ...A game can allow for a new perspective and, in some cases, new conviction.

Human rights organization Breakthrough recently partnered with New York City high-school students to create ICED! I Can End Deportation (screenshot at left) The game was presented at last month's Games for Change conference and will be released online later this year. Mallika Dutt, Breakthrough's executive director, said:
Especially for the age group below 35, online media has become a very central part of their lives. If we want to engage with these constituencies, we have to engage in the method and tools that make more sense to them.

University of Denver students, operating under a grant from mtvU and Cisco Systems, are working on Squeezed (video available) a game designed to raise empathy for migrant laborers. UD student Porter Schutz told the Times that members of the Squeezed team held diverse views about immigration:
It’s difficult to sort of rock the boat without vilifying anybody.

Harry Pachon, president of USC’s Tomas Rivera Policy Institute credited games with bringing the issue to those who might other wise pay little attention:
What this does is open up the world of the undocumented.

Gorman also mention the racist Flash game Border Patrol which appeared on the web in 2006. It's objective?
Keep them out... at any cost. 

Comments

@hayabusa

Not necessarily. There are a LOT of jobs given to illegals (as opposed to the euphemistic "undocumented") that people in our own country simply won't do. The very reason some places are so willing to hire illegals is that our own citizens don't want the jobs. I mean, would you want to pick tomatoes for 10-12 hours a day for minimum wage, just for example?

Now please don't take that as my defense of border jumpers. I personally believe that anyone who doesn't have the proper respect for our laws to immigrate legally should just stay put in their own country. But on the other hand, when did we get to the point that our own poor are too good for the type of work currently being offered to illegals? Maybe the whole thing can be traced to welfare...
Immigration is all fine and dandy, but I take a particularly dim view of illegal immigration. There were some stats on the Squeezed page about it, but I couldn't tell if they were defending it or not. Every job you give to someone in the country illegally is one less job available to a U.S. citizen.
Sounds like more liberal propaganda the education system is shoving down our throats.
I'm pretty sure you meant to use "its" as opposed to "it's" in that last part. As it stands, it seems like you're asking if Border Patrol is objective.
The objective is still the same, isn't it?
Could Border Patrol be a in poor taste dark satirical rant over the governmental inaction over immigration

Ever think that? must it all be ZOMG teh evil?


Once the ,entertainment news really needs to stop spinning things so the rapid sheeple dogs wont get worked into a fury...
Any sort of media should have the right to look into any sort of issue. That is the freedom of speech I fight for. To bad I lost mine on the dotted line
I myself am married to an illegal immigrant and have three kids with him. He is now finishing up a three year sentence in a federal prison for illegal passage into the country.Which I feel is unfair, and unjust. Illegals come here and do jobs that us as Americans feel are beneath us. Nobody here in the United States wouldnt even be here if it wasn't for Immigrants. Immigrants made America what it is. We are supposed to be the land of oppurtunity, yet we want to reject those that want to do better for themselves. Americans are now wanting the legal citizans here to not get the same rights as us. What is the big deal? If they are legal and do things by the book and pay taxes , then I dont see the big deal

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 07/04/09 at 06:33pm
Alyric: Of course, Mark falls into the common trap about Columbine, which had nothing to do with bullying, etc. See: http://slate.msn.com/id/2099203/?GT1=3256 for a more thorough explanation.
Posted 07/04/09 at 06:32pm
PHX Corp: Read this http://www.destructoid.com/sgc-09-liveblogging-the-jack-thompson-debate-138502.phtml#ext
Posted 07/04/09 at 05:54pm
PHX Corp: JT is afraid of such ban then advocates it That's what i call a total Hypocrite
Posted 07/04/09 at 05:50pm
PHX Corp: AE: JT is a -Bleeping- Jackass
Posted 07/04/09 at 05:07pm
Andrew Eisen: JT "knew it would be a good audience." Not what he said on Tuesday.
Posted 07/04/09 at 05:01pm
Andrew Eisen: VG cause violent behavior. VG companies influence behavior to get sales. Yeah, that makes sense. (To be fair, the Twitter feed makes deciphering JT's point pretty tough.)
Posted 07/04/09 at 04:52pm
Andrew Eisen: Yes, it's been proposed but as far as I know it has not been passed. Big difference.
Posted 07/04/09 at 04:50pm
Cheater87: http://www.gamezine.co.uk/news/formats/xbox360/all-violent-video-games-be-banned-in-germany-$1301757.htm
Posted 07/04/09 at 04:49pm
Andrew Eisen: Far as I know, Germany has not banned all violent video games.
Posted 07/04/09 at 04:44pm
Cheater87: Jack wants the US to follow Germany's total video game ban.
Posted 07/04/09 at 04:42pm
Andrew Eisen: Note to JT, it is not illegal to sell kids a ticket to R-rated movies.
Posted 07/04/09 at 04:39pm
Cheater87: Jack said we would be better with no rating sytem.
Posted 07/04/09 at 04:35pm
Alareth: So what was the introduction used for Jack?
Posted 07/04/09 at 04:31pm
JDKJ: Heard one, you've heard 'em all. He repeats the same act, with the same half-truths, over and over.
Posted 07/04/09 at 04:31pm
Andrew Eisen: Using a credit card as age verification is not illegal. Hope Mark called him on that and his made up statistics.
Posted 07/04/09 at 04:30pm
Alareth: Jack is special, his mommy always told him so.
Posted 07/04/09 at 04:29pm
Andrew Eisen: JT lied about that APA causation thing again. Wonder if Mark called him on it.
Posted 07/04/09 at 04:04pm
Andrew Eisen: Follow the JT/Methenitis debate on Twitter: http://twitter.com/jtdebate
Posted 07/04/09 at 01:18pm
Andrew Eisen: Rodrigo - A fun idea but you might want to fix the typos.
Posted 07/04/09 at 12:57pm
GRIZZAM PRIME: Happy 4th of July!
Login or register to post shouts