August 1, 2007 -
This must be Capcom's day for troubling ethnic issues.This morning, GamePolitics reported that Resident Evil 5 was receiving harsh criticism over its depiction of African villagers as zombies to be mowed down by a white protagonist.
This afternoon the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), which describes itself as America's largest Islamic civil liberties group, issued a press release announcing that the phrase Allahu akbar ("God is most Great") would be removed from Capcom's Zack & Wiki: Quest for Barbaros' Treasure. The puzzle adventure is scheduled for release on the Wii in October.
From the press release:
CAIR contacted Capcom after receiving a complaint about the use of the phrase in Capcom's "Zack & Wiki" game. The Arabic phrase is one of the most frequently repeated religious statements made by Muslims and is used often in daily Islamic prayers...
In an e-mail to CAIR, a Capcom spokesperson wrote: "We have already contacted the team working on the game, and the phrase has been removed from the game and will not be heard in future videos released to the public."
Said CAIR Communications Coordinator Amina Rubin:
We appreciated Capcom's willingness to address Muslim concerns and applaud the company's swift and appropriate actions.
The offending phrase may be heard in this E3 video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ziV03wLGDnY



Comments
Though I fully expect that there will be hundreds of comments along the lines of "those damn stupid moslims, how dare they tell Capcom what to do, dirty bantha riders!" filling this comments page.
what is mroe offensive is that PCnazis where black boots and march across the world bashing common sense everywhere they go.....
By the sound of it, that's pretty much what they did do - Capcom just chose to change the music in response.
http://gonintendo.com/?p=21676
That is an excellent viewpoint to have.
I do agree with Capcom removing it. In my personal opinion(and I apologize in advance to anyone offended) the muslims are way overly sensitive when it comes to, well, Everything. But the context was indeed a bit over the top, though the way it sounds it may have been completely accidental.
"...I know its probably hard not to flame a person whose only response on these boards are Muslims suck and Islam blah blah blah."
I've found that people who already hold such negative, ignorant opinions are vehemently fond of keeping them, so I generally don't even bother to argue. It ends up amounting to little more than a waste of time on my part.
I really can't say anything else.
The fire temple music was offensive to them, true. But they also got annoyed with the Guerdo's symbol, which was a cresent moon and star.
Truth is subjective? That CONTRADICTS the definition of truth.
If truth is subjective, then are not Christians and atheists both correct? Christians believe in God, and atheists believe there is no god. That's not truth, that's Bah'ai gibberish.
Please, read a dictionary.
Well, it boils down to the fact that there were major differences between the content and style of this and the RE5 complaint. First off, this is actually somewhat offensive - allahu ackbar plays as primitive monkeys drink soup out of bowls shaped like human skulls? - although I agree it was probably accidental. By contrast, when you consider that:
- The past ten or so RE games contained almost exclusively white zombies
- The player character in one of those games was black, and no-one cared about a black character killing white zombies
- RE4 features almost exclusively Spanish zombies, and the basic reaction of Spanish people to the whole thing was "Hey, cool, Spanish zombies!"
- Zombie mythology does, in fact, *originate* from Vodou, which originates from Africa. So setting a zombie-themed game in Africa makes perfect sense anyway
RE5 really seems pretty tame by comparison.
You also have to look at the scale of things. CAIR are asking Capcom to alter a background tune. Crazy RE5 lady is asking Capcom to revamp the entire plot of the game - which realistically means changing most or all of the textures, and probably a significant part of the gameplay - pushing a release back by at least a year.
Let's also look at decorum. CAIR sends a private letter politely asking if Capcom could maybe see their way to making a change. Crazy RE5 lady denounces RE5 as KKK propaganda or worse (from her article: "Start them young… fearing, hating, and destroying Black people"). She also demonstrates pretty much every single misconception of video games that endangers the legal status medium (she says RE5 is marketed to children, and in her followup she calls us all crazy Columbine-shooter types).
Finally, when the crazy RE5 lady's website always capitalises "Black" and never capitalises "white", and says in comments that “Yes… I am more comfortable with the zombies being white. In fact, ALL zombies should be white from this day forth”, questions are pretty much bound to be asked about her racial objectivity.
Hence, I feel totally happy with CAIR's request and Capcom's response, while simultaneously calling the RE5 complainant crazy. Hope that helps explain things.
Clarification: The removal was not a big issue, not the use of the phrase.
@ Falcon4196
"You have to learn that there is a diffrence between a Muslim and Muslim extremists."
Yes, but there is no allowance of separation of church and state in Islam. So, the number of Muslims that are ready and willing to accept the existance of other religions in their country are very small. In fact, this CAIR organization has stated goals of bring the US under Shari'a, so I'm not so certain we should be applauding their 'cooperation' with capcom.
The fact of the matter, is that Capcom and Sony both know how each group will act: Representing the Manchester Cathedral without permission? Protests, official condemnation. Danish editorial representation of Mohammed? Riots, burning effigies, inciting of murders, etc. So which group are you going to capitulate to? Which one do you know you can choose only an apology?
(I can't see the clip from here at work, but it's obvious from the descriptions here in the comments that the phrase was being used out of context, flippantly and isn't approaching a significant part of the game. It doesn't damage the playing experience to remove it, so why get worked up?)
@ DarkeSword
Like many others, I'd like to thank you for commenting. Your comments were well written, polite, and informative. It would be a pleasure to read more comments like yours.
@ Ohma
Honestly, I think it has to do with subject matter. Sure, religion is pretty hot-button, but race is far more so. We all have our opinions on that, whether we admit it or not. That and most of can at least understand where CAIR is coming from (especially with DarkeSword's comments) more easily.
Besides, the regular posters here are generally intelligent and open to other ideas. We don't like censorship. But that doesn't mean we are completely insensitive, either.
The previous article, while being a critique of gaming in general, was still just someone's opinion on a *possible* interpretation of a video game trailer. This on the other hand, is about how a game was *altered* as a result of the efforts of a group fairly similar to a group that seemed to be oft demonized in the previous comments.
Now, while it would fit very nicely with the overall picture of gamer culture I've developed over the past several years, I still hesitate to boldly declare that it's because the previous article was written by a woman (though it *would* fit uncomfortably well with my prior bad experiences with...well online communities in general really).
There are other factors which could be likely as well, the RE series has a larger fanbase than this game, people are more hesitant to bash a religious group than an ethnic one, or even that the people who would be trolling these comments are still in the previous mess.
Still, the difference in the attitude between the comments on these articles it is very curious.
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/017609.php
If people still believe that injustice is happening then we need one group working together to sort these issues out.For when we are united we something yous get the point.
Last thing we need is another Don Imus thing happening.
are you kidding me?! When one group bitches about the most mundane thing it has to be taken out of the game...please. Grow up all you religous people out there (I am one of them acctually) it's just a damn phrase that acctually praises your god! Political Correctness....learn to cope people.
"Everything we hear is an opinion, not a fact. Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth."
Marcus Aurelius
"Truth is what works."
William James
"There are various eyes. Even the Sphinx has eyes: and as a result there are various truths, and as a result there is no truth."
Friedrich Nietzsche
As for CAIR, I'm not sure I'd have done anything other than send a note over to Capcom that I thought it was inappropriate. In general, Muslims should probably be seeking to be more accepted in the West, and being publicly prickly about religion isn't going to help them do that. Think about how many inappropriate places one sees excerpts of Handel's "Messiah" (especially the Hallelujiah) or "Hava Nagila". CAIR should have lightened up and be glad that some Westerners are getting to that level of comfort with Islam, because it's clear even from a post or two here that they still have a long ways to go.
And though I find it annoying that once again a Muslim group is getting involved in censorship and the stifling of freedom of speech, I have to applaud them in the approach they took. No violence, no jihads, just a reasonable hey we find this offensive would you take it out and a thank you letter when it was done. Now granted the proverbial shit might have hit the fan if Capcom had said no but at least they took the most reasonable approach I have heard of in a long time that involved a Muslim group and something they didn’t like.
Now on to the comments
@Everyone who is having words with Freedom
I noticed that many people are insulting Freedom saying he has no knowledge of Islam and what not. I hate to say it but I understand most of Freedom’s viewpoints not because I want to believe that all Muslims believe in raping their daughters and cutting off body parts but because the only time we hear anything about the Muslim community is when a group does something insane like rioting because cartoons were drawn about your religious icons and leaders. We rarely hear about the events that put Muslims in a better light, we only hear about the atrocities that are being committed in the name of Islam.
The problem frankly stems from the fact that we basically have two groups of Islamic in this world. We have the educated reasonable understanding westernized Muslims, who usually understand that people once in awhile are going to do something they find offensive and if they can get them to stop great if not you don’t necessarily strap a bomb to your chest and try to kill them. Then we have the Middle Eastern Muslims, who vilify the west (like we do them), who are taught from the day they can speak about how it is great to die in the name of Islam; that being a martyr is a great thing; and that all westerners and Jews are their enemies. These people you can’t expect to reason with as much, you have to understand that they have been brainwashed since childhood to believe a certain thing.
@DarkeSword
Thank you for your insight, its nice to actually read some view points from a Muslim. Especially since the couple of times I have seen a Muslim issue involved a suppose Muslim insulting everyone because they were having a problem with what the Muslims were complaining about. I hope you can keep the calm responses I have seen coming, I know its probably hard not to flame a person whose only response on these boards are Muslims suck and Islam blah blah blah.
letter when it was done.
So... if a religion is persecuting others... is that also religious persecution?