
Crytek, the largest video game developer in Germany, may be loading up the moving truck soon.
At least, that’s the word coming from the Games Convention Developer’s Conference (
GCDC), currently underway in Leipzig, Germany.
The company is best known for its hit game
Far Cry as well as for the much-anticipated
Crysis. As reported by
Heise Online, Crytek founder Avni Yerli (left) has - once again - threatened to uproot the company if laws banning violent games are passed. From the Heise story:
The Conference of Interior Ministers (IMK) of the countries had unanimously decided on a production and distribution ban for violent computer games for the first time in the end of May. The responsible Federal Ministry of Family Affairs is presently working on a less drastic draft of a law for the protection of children and youth.
Instead of only the previous “violence glorifying” games, also the “violence dominated” games should be indexed by the Federal Department for Media Harmful to Young Persons in the future. These may then no longer be advertised and sold to youths.
Crytek is apparently eyeing relocation prospects. Said Yerli:
Budapest is a lovely city. We already have a branch office there…
He also cited overtures from England, Scotland, Austria and Singapore.
GP: This continues a theme that Crytek has been expounding upon for several months. See our previous related coverage:
Crytek Developer Offers Frightening Account of German Game Crackdown and
Far Cry Developer Threatens to Leave Germany if Game Violence Law Passes.
The story about the 2004
police raid is
especially disturbing. Talk about your police state! Who could blame Crytek for leaving after going through something like that?
Comments
Wouldn't this effectively kill any chances of having the GCDC come back to Germany? Would they get raided just for *talking* about developing games with violence in them?
Come to Canada! There's a few provinces here that are itching to entice developers to set up shop here. :)
What a world we live in.
@Snakestream
Can anyone say Idiot? Please keep your ignorant comments to yourself.
Now, now. Just because Germany is too harsh on video games doesn't mean we need to scream, "goddnam fuckin jerry kraut bastdras oprrwssni r gamz bucnha nazis LAWLZ". They have Kraftwerk. Everyone loves Kraftwerk.
I find it depressing that 1 out of 5 people do not trust Germans, simply because they used to be hardcore, conservative nutbars. That was over 70 years ago. It's 2007, not 1937. Whatever happened to "forgive and forget"? We don't kick Japan in the face for Pearl Harbour (a certain JT comment notwithstanding), and even further still, I don't see anyone calling the Italians "a bunch of fascist wops" because of Mussolini.
Seriously, dude... if you don't want people to stereotype you because you play games, don't stereotype Germany simply because they were Nazis. That's pretty hypocritical.
And I thought people learned from the "RE5 black zombies" debacle...
BTW, I wonder if the Germans are skeptical to games due to the immense number of World War II based shooters/strategy games. I know I would be pretty pissed if 20% of all games released were games where you kill your own countrymen.
Long story short; its cutting off your nose to spite your face.
SO its just poli blunderbusing that amounts to nothing? I hope so,Germany seems to be better balanced than most sure M rated games cant be sold in shops openly but the point is they still can be sold,and thats very important.
polis do it all the time to get votes!
Still, at least someone is highlighting the evils of Germany, I mean, video game legislation.
German gamers are not turned off by the Nazi's being depicted in games especially as "evil". There are very few people that have any pity for the Nazi's, there is however an understanding that people were weak and didn't stand up because they were afraid. The Government has a ban on the Nazi symbol being used for purposes other then educational or historical purposes. That bans most WWII video games, notice DoD doesn't use either country's threads.
@Amarkov
Reading the article there are a couple of inconsistencies. I am guessing that there is an error in the translation, because the "ban" only appears to effect the sales of the game at normal stores and preventing advertising to people underage. This is something that the German Games are already used to doing. Going to special "game shops" is not a big deal and the limited advertising is already in effect, in essence this is just a redundancy.
@ZippyDSMlee
Thats pretty much it, the big push was right in the area of the tragedies in the south east. Its known to be a very old school conservative and religious area. The upset only lasted a couple of weeks and is nothing. Ive told you in the past what games I found on the shelves, and since I have gone to a game store and there are a ton more titles
Excellent, niw if we can get make it where Germany would not ban/blacklist any game and just let them sale them out of sight of minors they would have a prefect system.
The example that comes to mind is that in Giants they had to turn the blood green to be able to sell it. You're telling me that they *were* conservative nutbars?
did it have the bare breasts or was that removed too :P
There is a misconspection about the way they handle games,Austrila is far more harsh baning any game they dislike altogether, do not import, do not pass go.
Again as I said before the "ban" is pretty pointless, it just prevents the sale. I went with a German family on holiday and we bounced over to the Czech Republic, where you can find everything and being a fellow EU country there is no problem with importation. I would be more worried about the EU as a whole, because they are already talking about a rating system and they want to enforce it across all countries.
It is a bad translation of a bad interpretation of a biased interview.
I just read the original interview that Heise(hawt) online is referencing, the interviewer is totally hostile and asks them stuff like: Why they don't make 'harmless' games like car racing and stuff, why make these 'killergames'? and why does there need to be blood in the fps games?
The two people being interviewed respond by asking what is a 'killergame' and saying it is the stupidest expression they have ever heard, and no gamer has ever died from playing a game. And that blood is in the game so the player knows that the enemy is being hit, or that you're being hit by the enemy, that it functions as realistic visual feedback.
The interviewer then states that blood in games scare politicians, and that (i'm not sure how to translate this, senators i think) senators want to ban fps games.
(i'm not sure where the Heise online 'reporter' got the idea of a 'unanimous decision' I'm sure i would of heard of this, i couldn't find anything in any online german news source, and its definitely not in the interview.. also by 'countries' I think he is trying to write 'counties', but what he of course means to say is 'states'. There is a lot of bad translation, the 'reporter' clearly doesn't know english well, and is picking the wrong words with his spell checker. also if anyone is confused by the term 'Ego-shooter' this is just the german word for fps.)
To which they reply with the standard: 'generational problem', 'old people don't understand video games', 'politicians need votes', 'media hype', that we are all familiar with here.
Anyway, the interview goes on to ask: If such a law ever got passed and all violent games were banned, would Crytek start making horsey games for little girls?
Yerli: Ganz sicher nicht. ('Hell no' , being the best translation)
Interviewer: What then? (meaning games)
Yeril: We would leave Germany. That would be the logical consequence. Budapest is a nice city. . . . blablabla.
There is no law like this in the works, if there were it would never pass, a few politicians are talking about it (in a scare the old people for votes way).
This has got to be the biggest piece of bullshit I have ever seen on GP, although i don't fault Dennis for re-reporting the story from 'Hot-Online' which is about as credible and factual as everybody's favorite unemployed lawyer..
But, in the future Dennis, if you need someone to verify any german language stuff, I really don't mind a little reading.
The european rating system your talking about is PEGI, http://www.pegi.info/en/index/
Which is replacing the older german one, its also the rating system that was going to allow manhunt2 come out un-altered, the way the developers intended... before the bannings in the UK and the ESRB fiasco.
ps. why does my last comment say: Your comment is awaiting moderation. ?
However, it doesn't seem far out of line with the earlier coverage we cited.
yea, the raid thing a few years back was over the top. The 'official' reason for that was to look for pirated software. This happens throughout Europe quite often with small/ medium sized companies. The Eu works for microsoft now and then, but they can't bust in without probable cause... and normally they don't bring that many cops, 3-4 maybe.
That was some kind of insane over reaction due to a recent school shooting in which one of the shooters main hobbies happened to be gaming.
German cops typically carry guns and wear flak jackets when out on this sort of thing, even just parades, I can totally see how this would freek out a British guy... but there is no excuse for their over reaction, except idiocy.
Australia has a horrible track record of arts censorship in general. There was one case a few years back where the federal government attempted to prevent the display of a work of art it had personally commissioned - purely to cater to a moral backlash they perceived would come from a very small segment of the community. Manhunt was banned a year after its release for similar reasons. I'd already got my copy though, still not sure whether I'm legally allowed to possess it anymore.
I thought Germany blocked a few games,I guess I got confued they merely blacklist games and they are still treated as mature level not in the sight of minors stuff.
GregoriusH
Probably not knowing how anal aus law is LOL
New zeland is as bad LOL
England bands and blocks the stuff blacklisted,its rather sad, I can understand regulating it and keeping ti away from children...then again nanny states like treating their citizens as pets o-o
Sorry, I forgot to add "anti-Semitic".
No matter how harsh they are on violent games, I don't think they'd ever alter the games so all the enemies became rabbis.
I think this crackdown on games is another attempt by Germany to quash violence. Germany likes to do that, because they already have a bad rap for inventing so-called National Socialism (which couldn't be further separated from actual Socialism).
We shouldn't beat up on them simply because they're censor-happy. If anyone wants to beat up on a country for being censor-happy, choose the UK. The things the BBFC have done to certain movies are, in my eyes, much more ridiculous than anything Germany could alter in a game (headbutts anyone?).
Or, perhaps, right wing morons can admit the subjectivity of their superstitious beliefs and leave freedom alone?
Thank you!!! My German is not good enough to translate larger chunks of text or understand the specifics but the English articles just don't make sense or agree with the little bit of the German counterparts that I can read.
I didn't know if they were going to use the PEGI system or a new one. All I heard was that there were talks about a "new standerdized system" and a number of countries balked because they felt it was giving to much control to the EU, but I also know that Germany said they would consider it.
@Zippy
When the ratings board "bans" a game most often it entails them refusing to rate the game, they don't often use the 18+ rating. Which just means you have to go to a specialty store to buy the game. The refusal of rating just means that they store the game out of sight and you have to ask for it or there is a separate room that they keep them in. Heres a little more on the current rating system, it looks like it was written pretty fast but appears accurate. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unterhaltungssoftware_Selbstkontrolle
theres always nuances that wiki can miss,are not 18+ and unlisted games sold the same way?
http://www.heise.de/english/newsticker/news/94784
That would be correct, the real difference is what it does to major retailers and rental places. It is my understanding the major retailers like Karstadt (like a German version of Walmart) can not sell such games, but thats ok because they wont sell the 18+ games either. Only small games store would be allowed have them, but most game stores are non-chain stores to begin with so again not a problem. Rental places would not be allowed to rent unrated games because there is a high chance that someone who is underage would be able to obtain the games. Which I also don't see as a problem.
I know SnakeStream crossed the line by mentioned Nazis, but that's only because such comparison is an offence to victims of Nazi regime and because Beckstein doesn't want to kill people or to start a war. But with him wanting to put German gamers into prison for 12 months (much more drastic measure than what Federal Ministry of Family Affairs is now proposing, right?) and considering how many gamers there are in Germany, evidently there isn't enough space in prisons for them. So I would say he need to create concentration camps for them if that wouldn't be an insult to actual concentration camp victims.
You also wrote this: "there is however an understanding that people were weak and didn’t stand up because they were afraid" - apparently, today's Germany suffer from the same problem, as gamers there don't want to fight for their rights or don't even know when they are endangered, despite all the anti-game hysteria, especially in Bavaria. I KNOW that Germany *is* a free country and that they respect human rights, but if you want rights, you need to earn them first.
Some time ago, Germany rejected anti-smoking law, claiming it violates the rights of smokers. But that's because smokers value their rights, unlike IDIOTS like Tim Partlett, who only know how to whine and bitch on the Internet but have no guts to defend their views in public, even if their basic human rights are viciously violated (the line "This is a personal commentary and does not reflect the views of my company in any way." alone proves this and it's even making me think he even made all up). If he and other losers from Crytek want to flee from Germany like cowards instead of legally and morally standing for what they do, then I say "Good riddance!" - among all countries, Germany is the least one to need citizens uncapable or unwilling to fight against oppression and intolerance. I have e-mailed Crytek several months ago, claiming they need to fight more actively for the rights of gamers and giving them few arguments on how to accomplish that, but they never replied, not even with something like "thank you for your concern". So evidently they don't care about perception of video games in German society, just on how they will make money from it. I will never buy any game made by them only because of their passiveness.
LMAO, have you ever lived in Germany? or do you just sit behind your computer in Australia complaining about all the over hyped laws elsewhere in the world? Do you know how the German legal system works? Do you know how the rating system works? I think you
I have been arguing since November after the shooting over here that the articles that are published in English are over hyped and inaccurately describe the situation. I have spent some time looking into this, and although I don't know everything, you will find that I accurately described the system that I am observing.
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killerspiel
My translation:
"Killerspiel" (Pl "Killerspiele") used as a Noun is the term for any game that allows you to shoot an opponent including games like Laser Tag and Paint Ball. In 2002 after a shooting in Erfurt the definition was extended to include virtual opponents like those in computer games. And more recently has become coined by politicians as a world describing FPS games or games that are extremely violent in nature.
or there is also this which says mostly the same thing:
http://de.wiktionary.org/wiki/Killerspiel
Its a very interesting read, but very hard to translate because it requires a complete grammatical restructuring to be accurate. The German language naturally sound very 'hard' on the non-native ear. The media uses this to its advantage to make stuff sound worse then it really is.
You comment about the smoking issue leads me to believe that you are ignorant because most of the northern states now have no smoking laws just not federally dictated. The city live in does not allow smoking in certain types of eateries. Not to mention the federal no smoking in Train or Bus stations and Airports anymore. The biggest objector to the federal law was Bayern the place that is arguing for more game legislation. Go figure ;)
I lived with a family for 2 weeks that lives in the same town as the Popes brother down in Bayern and I have to say that it is quite the opposite of what people would expect for a "religious" and "conservative" area. I saw more game shops and cyber cafes there then anywhere else.
Crytek in my opinion is going for publicity, they are the drama queen over here like Rockstar has been back in the US, except Crytek is losing its conflict that was putting it in the world spotlight.
1. Germany learned a lot from the past. That's why they changed a lot of laws so no nationalistic or racist party can get into the Bundestag.
2. How is banning violent video games characteristic for an "encroaching" government. So the USA should let everybody watch child porn for the sake of not being to encroaching? There has to be at least some control...
3. Doesn't the United States have a lot more stupid laws that intervene in the privacy of citizens? Just check out: "cuffemnstuffem.com/strange.htm" par example.
I'm not saying that the whole banning violent video games thing is right - because it is not! But is has nothing to do with Nazis!
Thanx to Nathan...