Well at least he didn't single games out.

I don't really have a huge problem with him saying this although I can imagine there will be some out there that think that it's the end of the world and the politicians are trying to ruin videogames again or something. Cameron makes a few interesting points and also a few concessions. He says that he respects the cultural impact that games can have, almost like he respects them as an art form.

He's not blaming the media. He's saying 'there there is a lot of blame to go around here.' Hell, he even says that the politicians are at fault here too.

Also, GP, it wasn't really a 'Slam'. The headline is rather sensational!

Before Jack Thompson and others go bezerk, most of the famous serial killers like Dahmer, Gacy, and so many others did those murders before very violent video games even existed.

@Jack Thompson
At least before you blow your stack answer to why all of these things happened even before very violent video games.

Those people acted because of the way people in America started changing. Today people in America are getting ruder and ruder to innocent people for instance. That is the reason why all of the school shootings so on and so forth are happening.

And as for the situation of some of the shooter playing video games, most kids these days play video games.

FUCK THIS IS JUST SHIT THIS IS WHATS GOIN TO STOP MANHUNT 2 EVER COMMING OUT IN THE UK

FUCK THIS IS JUST SHIT THIS IS WHATS GOIN TO STOP MANHUNT 2 EVER COMMING OUT IN THE UK




What a calm and measured response that aids in proving that gamers are not socially mal-adjusted lunatics.

> "What has become of our society when we have this spate of children killing children?”

Oh for crying out loud. Our society hasn't *become* that way! It's *always been* that way!

Yeah, I don't know, but isn't Britain the worst Western country to grow up in ?
Let me see: Ah yes: http://society.guardian.co.uk/children/story/0,,2012512,00.html

And surprise, surprise, which country is second to last ? Good ol' USA. Seems there are more problems then the media in the UK.

(And I'm proud that MY country is the BEST to grow up in.)

Wolf,

Well, to be fair, Cameron is blaming society as a whole for perpetuating a culture where bad things like this can happen. Video games are a part of that culture but as Cameron points out, so are other forms of media, guns, drugs, alcohol, and crap parenting.


Andrew Eisen

Wolf.

Education and the financial background you come from effect the culture that you are exposed to. Richer more well educated folks will like more well read subjects and more intelligent programs. That's why you never hear someone say 'I've saved up my unemployment benefit so I can go and see the Vivaldi concert tonight' or why you never hear upper class people say 'Oh, turn off the blood Bronofski and put on Pop Idol would you?"

Culture, Education and Finance are utterly inseperable.

The problem here in the UK is that the parents of problem kids give up and allow their kids free reign. The best part is that the government agency who are meant to step in and help the families regain control of their kids are too busy removing children from families for no reason other than to meet adoption quotas put in place by the government.
I've been in stores and seen 14yr olds trying to buy a game rated 18. In one instance the store refused so the kid got his Dad who went ballistic at the fact they had denied sale to his kid and then purchased the game and gave it straight to his son. Rather than blaming the industries they should blame the parents.

Damn conservatists! Really there is more to the murder, so he should actually wait for the police to capture the killer then he can blame media. GOD!!

"I believe that it is time for the games industry to act in a responsible and sensitive way and play their part in the prevention of unsuitable material falling into the hands of children. It is essential that manufacturers take seriously the messages sent out by violent and increasingly life-like video games and I believe that most currently do so."

They do. It's called the ratings board:

ET, E, E 10+, T, M, A/O

Industry job done.

How about we all cut the bullshit and stop trying to have the government make laws for things the parents should be doing their-damn-selves?

This is true but we have the BBFC . Ratings still apply and the great thing about using the BBFC is that thry have been rating movies for years so there can;t be any excuse for not understanding the ratings.

The BBFC use the same set of ratings for movies as they do games yes. Its not really ass backwards as movies have been banned in the past too, they aren't ganging up on the games. Most banned movies do see release down the line though as attitudes towards violence settle and new extremes are reached, i would imagine games would enjoy the same treatment as I've found the BBFC to be pretty fair in their affairs.

The BBFC is an independant review panel who charge for each submission they rate. If you are refused a rating you have to pay to have it re-evaluated.

I was thinking after i put up my previous comment. Now that there are both a British and European ratings on game boxes. mabye it wouldnt be a waste of time for an awareness campaign for the european ratings system (although its a fairly standard set of ratings)

No government has been able to prove that video games have caused any violent crimes. So how does he get off pointing the finger in this particular incident itself? No, first try to prove a link exists before you go linking individual cases. People fucking died and you are wasting your time mentioning video games, truly pathetic.

Yes, but bringing it up in individual cases, in which it may have NO bearing is asinine.

Well its still not the only thing cited, he basically questioned all the major cultural influences asking whether they are contributing to violence.

all he is doing is doing the vague politician schtick untill the investigation is ongoing. or at least I hope he is.

I juststarted to like the guy due to reading this site yesterday and now he's blowen it.

Well, now, here we come to another fan of the nanny state, albeit this response is somewhat more coherent than many have been up to this point. However, this constant string of crap from people who look upon freedom and intelligence with disdain irritates me to no end, so I am going to craft my anger into a response that I hope makes some sense to those critics who might read it. Puritanical thinkers might want to skip this entry.

How the fuck have we come into this century when we keep celebrating democracy like it's the greatest thing apart from oxygen and water, and yet, we still LONG and DEMAND for a motherfucking, all-encroaching government. I'll admit this, Cameron doesn't single games out, however, he just advocates what can only be described as a Lenin-like naivety, believing that everybody will band together and work for the good of society. STOP DAYDREAMING AND GROW THE FUCK UP. They already invented that: They called it Communism, and it crashed and burned. This kind of optimistic bullshit:

"To me this is what social responsibility is all about. Not just sitting back and saying that the Government must act, but all of us saying, ‘This is my country, my society, my responsibility, and I must play my part."

Will never fly because, let's face it, that kind of work ethic, determination, and loyalty exists in relatively few of us.

"What has become of our society when we have this spate of children killing children?”

Yeah, society has JUST become like this, ignore the fact that people have been killing other people for as long as there have been other people that just fucking piss them off. Ignore the fact that kids have been killing kids forever. Ignore the fact that gangs have formed, and that kids have joined them, for goddamn ever. NO. Society has JUST transformed into that godless age when children kill children. Goddamn man, try to think back to when YOU were a kid. Didn't that one guy just piss you off so much that you dreamed of getting even? Now imagine that your parents pretty much ignore the fact that you exist, or worse, they beat your ass like there's no tomorrow because they're too much of pussies to go talk back to their boss. Add on the fact that the other kids don't like you because you look weird, or talk weird, or maybe you're just a dumb fucking piece of shit. Layer on that all-so-human desire to fit in, and to top it off, throw on that cocktail of hormones they call puberty. Yeah, it must be fucking SOCIETY that causes you to go out and join a gang or blast that jock asshole who's been beating your ass everyday in school.

On to the nanny state. Old fucking concept, get a goddamn new one. I'm not that familiar with the gun laws in the United Kingdom, but from what I have gathered, it is pretty damn hard to get a gun legally, and then you have to jump through hoops to show them that you're storing it well (or you have to keep it at the local hunting club). Either way, it is supposed to be damn hard to get a gun and even harder to get something like a handgun which has been permanently banned if I'm not mistaken. So how the FUCK is it society's fault when one little bastard gets a weapon and rides around on a bike, blasting other little kids? Answer this: Near the top of the responses, DoggySpew posted an article listing the best places to live. Topping the chart was the Netherlands, a hotbed of liberality with liberal outlooks on practically everything from drugs (I believe you are allowed to purchase small, recreational amounts of marijuana from the local cafe) to prostitution (it's legal). In fact, unless I'm mistaken, the number of violent deaths (that's including other forms of killing such as knives and drowning) is remarkably LOW compared to the UK and the US.

http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/cri_mur-crime-murders

How is this possible? Could it be that, when the government isn't stamping their boots into your face and telling you what to do, people actually have to be RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR ACTIONS?! OH MY FUCKING GOD. It's like a motherfucking bolt of inspiration, glowing warmly on the faces of the ignorant and naive. Bottom line, government CAN'T tell people how to live every aspect of their lives; government exists as a general guideline and boundary to prevent extreme cases.

Parents who did not know where their children were and what they were up to at night should not only be helped to do their job properly, they should be shamed into it, [Cameron] said.

Well holy fuck, if the bastard doesn't contradict himself. Is anyone dumb enough to think that, if the parents are too lazy to fucking keep track of where their children are on their own, government regulation will make them care any more? The cold truth is that this world, while it does have a large number of people who are level-headed, rational, and generally decent, is largely populated with bastards. Bastard-coated bastards with bastard filling. Especially with the explosion of life-lengthening medicines and liberal free-speech policies. You see, in the old days, these bastards would have simply died off because they needed SOME people to like them and help them out. But nowadays, these sons-of-bitches can live completely separate from society, ordering their food online, and doling out criticism while experiencing nothing firsthand that would soil their plastic bubble. Even worse, is when these fuckers find each other and procreate for some reason. Then, they raise a herd of little fuckers and beat them when "the world just ain't fair, never mind that I didn't pay attention in school or job training..." Then they get mad when their little fuckers go out smoking and boozing and generally fucking around. That is when we get goddamn complaints about the government not doing shit to control the population of deviant motherfuckers.

IT IS THE PARENT'S FUCKING JOB TO CONTROL THEIR OWN KIDS.

End of that discussion. And when that kid goes out and blows some other guy's head off, that is THAT KID'S fault. Oh yes, you see, no matter how fucking retarded you are, if you go out and kill someone, that is a CONSCIOUS choice. At that point, all blame goes to THE KILLER. Nobody else but THE KILLER. I am so fucking tired of all the goddamn bullshit "Society made me do it" fuck that people try to pull nowadays. Oh no, it was a video game's fault that I went and gunned down that elementary school. Oh no, it was the Matrix's fault that I pushed that guy out of the window to see if he could fly. Oh no, I read a bad BOOK, and it made me want to CUT A MOTHERFUCKER INTO TEN PIECES. Spare me your scapegoating shit. I am NOT deceived by your ridiculous crap, it was YOUR FAULT. ONLY YOUR FAULT.

Oh yes, and at Dennis, It wasn't Cameron who said the second part:

The UK video games industry is obviously a vitally important part of our economy. The Government needs to do all it can to support the video games sector and allow it to flourish.

I would, however, place equal weight on the cultural influence that games can have. As children and young people make up a significant proportion of video game users it is important for the industry to act in a responsible and sensitive way.

Issues involving content have largely focused on the negative aspects associated with games. The arguments around Resistance: Fall of Man and Manchester Cathedral being the most recent example. The industry needs to accept it has a duty to act responsibly when it comes to appropriate content and politicians and the media needs to realise that the industry can have a positive impact on young people’s lives…

I believe that it is time for the games industry to act in a responsible and sensitive way and play their part in the prevention of unsuitable material falling into the hands of children. It is essential that manufacturers take seriously the messages sent out by violent and increasingly life-like video games and I believe that most currently do so.

It was some guy named Jeremy Hunt.

*End Angry Tirade*

In a country where gun ownership is pretty much outlawed [with the exception of farms etc] A teenage kid allegedly shoots and murders a random child. Of course its the films/TV/video games that are to blame. Honestly.

@Ben Yaka

Oh don't worry, this is how political opposition works over here. As long as they're not in power the whole of society is doomed.

Cameron understands what teen gamers do not: That adults are in charge of this world and should be. Further, everyone on this planet who has power has a responsibility to exercise it for the common good. Heck, even Spiderman gets that.

Thank God for MP Cameron, as adult leaders on both sides of the pond are understanding that pop culture is by and large raw sewage in which teens are drowning.

Once you kids grow up, you'll understand. Until then, pay attention. You'll learn something. Remember, I was once as ignorant as you. I grew up.

Jack Thompson

PS: Hooah!

I would also like to add that only the 18-year old should have been playing games with any real level of violence in them, the 14 year old wouldn't even be able to buy a 15 Certificate game legally. So, if these boys were all playing violent games or watching violent movies, some of them were doing so illegally.

'What a calm and measured response that aids in proving that gamers are not socially mal-adjusted lunatics.'

Oh shut up and grow up Jack, you're no better than the guy who types in capitals, as your own comment proves.

Actually, I'd like to delve more into what I said about religion causing more deaths than video games.

It goes on everywhere. People killing infidels so they can go to heaven. Madmen interpreting the bible to justify horrific actions.

Do I pigeon-hole all religious people as violent psychopaths with no regard for human life?

No, because it's a big tent and I know better than to compare Ned Flanders to Islamic Fascist #435429.

Get where this is going?

HINT: It has to do with video games.

Jack Thompson, Attorney Says:

August 25th, 2007 at 5:24 pm
Cameron understands what teen gamers do not: That adults are in charge of this world and should be. Further, everyone on this planet who has power has a responsibility to exercise it for the common good. Heck, even Spiderman gets that.

Thank God for MP Cameron, as adult leaders on both sides of the pond are understanding that pop culture is by and large raw sewage in which teens are drowning.

Once you kids grow up, you’ll understand. Until then, pay attention. You’ll learn something. Remember, I was once as ignorant as you. I grew up.

Jack Thompson

PS: Hooah!

Funny, I don't consider becoming a bitter old man who wants to censor and/or ban everything he doesn't like as growing up and admitting to trying to destroy companies he disagrees with. Maybe thats because I have better morals.

That's right, Jack, Cherry-pick one immature post and generalize half the world for it.

What's that? Almost all the other posts are well constructed and mature?

Oh, don't let that get in your way.

Love how you lied about the whole 'I'll try not be be sarcastic anymore' thing.

"Cameron understands what teen gamers do not: That adults are in charge of this world and should be. "


Oh they are? Okay as I am 27 years old I decree that you shall stop trying to interfere with my hobby. I am in charge after all.

@GoodRobotUs

Check his wikiquote page. Its full of slanderous, hateful, racist, garbage.

Guys! I got quoted by Jack Thompson! I'm a celebrity, get me out of here!!

David Cameron talking like he understands the circumstances and culture that end up with kids running amok in the UK and commit crime like this (yes, I live there) just makes me laugh. How can an old etonian who sends his kids to private school ever understand how these kids think.

It would be wonderful if all families could be loaded and upepr class - but funnily enough it doesnt work that way. How about setting some *serious* examples of persistant youth offenders so they have a little respect for the system.

Desperation, boredom, knowing no other way and a lack of consequences for actions are the real causes of antisicial behaviour and crime over here.

(I prefer the idea of kids that have nothing better to do playing games than hanging around and causing trouble tbh, irony indeed.)

@ Jack Thompson

One more thing:

You're the last person who should be talking about "pop culture being raw sewage", when you've dipped into that so-called "moral sewer" everytime you mention Paducah, Columbine, Red Lake, Virginia Tech, that bullshit case in Alabama, the Cody Posey case in New Mexico, etc.

Come to think of it, you're an enabler, since everytime you go on TV whining about any video game, you advertise said game and its sales go up because of your whining.

Practice what you preach, you petulant, childish assclown: Grow up and get a life.

Guys, I don't like JT as much as you guys do, he's vain, self-promoting, and let's be honest, a bit of a numpty when it comes to knowledge about matters to do with video gaming. But he does bring one point across that, although I'm gonna hate myself for doing this, I have to agree with:

Swearing profusely doesn't get your point across.

I mean lets face it, you have a brilliant idea for the company you work for, you're about to present it to your boss, it'll mean promotion and lots of extra money to get what you want. And you begin presenting it by saying:

'Yeah, I think this idea is going to be f**king brilliant, because...'

At this point, he'll immediately stop you from talking, and probably fire you from the company as well for unprofessional conduct.

Seriously guys, if you want to get a point across...less of the swearing okay? It just shows you as a foul-mouthed hooligan with nothing important to say rather than someone genuinely concerned and genuinely having a valid point to add to the topic...

@ Ivresse

"Show me a man who's never said 'shit' and I'll show you a man full of shit."- Chris Rock

Your example is weak, since cursing has been pretty much legitimized to an extent, and the boss isn't going to fire a person for one word.

"If you're going to tell a story about an ambiguous, ugly, brutal experience, I think one needs to be able to use ambiguous, ugly brutal language."

Besides that, if the current President and Vice President of the United States can curse during official duties and not be punished for it, why should anyone else?

man JT must have the biggest set of blinders on known to man. I wish I could look through his rose colored glasses, although something tells me I wouldn't like what I see.

All the regulation and efforts by the video game, music and movie industries and the governments of the world are not going to come to much use if the problem isn't nipped in the bud. Parents need more educational resources and programs made available to them by the community, not a nanny state who tells them how to control their children or an industry making their entertainment choices for them.

Many people are having trouble with dealing with the incessant surge of technology and parents are having a worse time of it, whether they themselves grew up with video games or not. The only recourse many feel that they have is screaming at their federal member of parliament or whatever you may call your government member for regulations and stricter laws because they themselves don't know what to do.

Parents are looking to teachers to teach their children basic values and a whole host of subjects that those children will need in future because our society has become "live to work" instead of "work to live". The prospect for many of getting home and cooking a wholesome family dinner and sitting down with their loved ones to share quality time is a distant memory for many of us, parents working so hard to survive in our society that their children are screaming for attention, acting out and turning to video games as both a source of something to do and a way of stirring the pot. I was a rebel myself as a teenager exactly for that reason because my own parents were always busy working to keep our family going.

And it does seem like as soon as children hit school age, they're dropped off at school and that's where they learn everything from reading and counting to how to cook, clean and balance a budget while their parents try to keep all the bills under control. I'll admit very freely that today's society is becoming a very lonely place to live.

I do believe that there needs to be an element of social responsibility within these companies and their products, but there also needs to be more awareness from society as a whole. I also believe there needs to be more support for parents, and more education available for them. Our own parents have either been so busy or so absent (in the case of single parent families) that the opportunities enjoyed by previous generations are no longer available to us now. I learned how to cook and clean as a stroke of luck than as a typical everyday chore like it was for my mother, I learned how to balance a budget purely through trial and error rather than growing up seeing how my parents did it.

If our governments truly want to help the youth of the 21st century, they'll stop jumping on the bandwagon of every moral panic that the media and other sensationalists create and start looking at how they can help the typical family, whether it's through tax cuts, parenting courses or simply providing services along the lines of someone you can call at 2am because little Jimmy's not home or little Sally's got a cough, someone you can talk to about how to bring up a kid when your own parents don't have the answers or you just don't have the support there.

I'd happily pay twice as much tax if parents were given the tools and resources to raise their own children and teachers were given the opportunity to teach what they should be teaching (ie english, maths, science etc) while the government stops making laws which are unconstitutional or just plain stupid (see Australia's latest "net filter" for another example of a complete waste of money).

All a nanny state is going to do is slowly turn our society into total anarchy and all pushing these companies is going to do is make them less inclined to go along with every new law and regulation. Responsibility is a two way street, parents need to get involved too and without the right tools at their disposal, the situation's only going to get worse, no matter how much the governments lean on these poor companies.

Ah, typical hypocritical conservative garage. Don't you love when someone who worships a ficticious, genocidal, bronze-age war god claims to know what is "good" and "just" for children? You think people like Thompson and Cameron would be opposed to forcing children to be indoctrinated in an extremely complicated and violent religious tradition that lacks the most basic forms of evidnece.

But, of course not, it is all the fault of "teh evil videoz gamez." What I would give to see a strong leftist establishment crack down on religious practices (for the children, of course) so these Bible-thumping morons might sample a taste of their own medicine. It's time to show these superstitious pigs how relative and subjective their bullshit "values" really are.

@ Pandralisk

I generally try to avoid commenting on things such as this but your arguments are so far over the top that it is painful to read

first off, for the most part the people writing the Anti-video game legislation are on the left side of the political spectrum, while there are some on the right that are forerunners in the fight against violent video games (such as Brownback) most of them seem to be from the left

secondly religious belief is not a republican exclusive trait, especially when you consider that the majority of the country follows some form of Christianity, or Catholicism

your comments about the Cristian deity, whether you truly believe that or not, are at best very insensitive, and do not help to bring anything to the cause of protecting the rights of video game players and developers, and if anything hurt the cause as it paints gamers as combative and aggressive at the very least

please note that these comments are not coming from a religious person, so don't think I'm trying to just blindly defend a faith that i don't actually have

Wow…an atheist version of Jack Thompson…

Way to go Pandralisk, you and Jackie boy both make bad arguments with black and white attitudes, and make each of your religions look bad in the process. Nice job, feces stain.

What is the social responsibility of a country in terms of the wars we support and the hostile coup d'etats we back, good and important as they are.
===============================================

I'm paraphrasing but far be it for most normal democracies to dictate what morale compass should be used and followed.

Well, he's never going to get elected so no problem. I mean, he's getting beaten by a fat Scotsman, thats how full of crap he is :P

@ Jack Thompson,

I honestly agree with the concept of keeping young children safe from violent videogames. Little Billy certainly doesn't need to garrote people with his Wii Remote + Nunchuck every day when he gets home from school. But the fact is, no offense, in my opinion you are going about it the wrong way.

First off, the personal attacks and broad (and often false/unproven) generalizations REALLY do a poor job of getting people to agree with your cause. It just makes you seem ridiculous, and doesn't help your cause in the slightest.

Secondly, I think the methodology you are using to try and solve the issue is suboptimal. (My opinion, I am sure almost as many holes if not more could be poked in my point of view by someone who went to the effort)

Trying to govern media through censorship and government age limits and all that still doesn't solve one major problem: More often than not, these violent videogames are being bought by the parents, not the minors themselves. (Unproven, but I have never seen anyone aside from people who appear to be either late teens or nonminors purchasing violent videogames without an adult present)

I think the more effective way to solve this problem would be this: Educating the parents and providing them the appropriate information to choose for their family what is acceptable. After all, who is giving the children the money to buy said violent videogames? Who is driving them to the store? Who sees said videogames sitting on the shelf/being played every time they come home? The parents. They know their children, and it should be there responsibility to decide what is or is not appropriate for their children. BUT, the parents need to KNOW about the content of the games their children own/want to buy, through impartial ratings systems such as the ESRB and PEGI, possibly with government backing (HERE is where your bill-writing expertise could really become useful), so that they can make educated decisions on what is best for their family. And if the child's parents don't care enough to do that much, there is FAR more wrong in that household than the fact that minors are playing violent games.

[/soapbox]

JT:

"Thank God for MP Cameron, as adult leaders on both sides of the pond are understanding that pop culture is by and large raw sewage in which teens are drowning."

Of course this is the same MP Cameron who wants to cut red tape in this contry by getting rid of health and safety and maximum working hours with standard pay.

He is just trying desperately to be a Tory version of Tony Blair, who incidently is a pretty hated figure this side of the Atlantic.

@Pandralisk

Ok, deal with the bigots, that much I can agree with, but leave the ones who are decent alone.

@JT

"Once you kids grow up, you’ll understand. Until then, pay attention. You’ll learn something. Remember, I was once as ignorant as you. I grew up."

O' rly? Did you now? Yes, someday, those of us who are not already adults (either mentally or considered so by legal standards) WILL grow up and become adults. However, the difference between us and you will be that we will be the one's in power, while those who hold/abuse it now will be in retirement homes.

BlackIce is certainly right there, there's basically no chance of the Tories getting the next election, however, when the Tory Party Leader brings up an issue such as Media, the Presiding party has to respond to it in some way. I don't expect the Labour party, when faced with a popularity play, to be any more accepting or less stereotyping of Video Games than the Tories are, this is about votes, not about facts.

@Ivresse

Yes, I understand that profuse swearing may detract from an argument, but sometimes, when I see the same ridiculous junk being thrown out over and over, I just get really pissed off. I'll admit that my previous post was a little excessive, but I usually try to refrain from excessive swearing when I am making an argument. However, swearing is common English, and if used properly, it can enhance an argument by conveying proper emotion and severity, although I will admit that my above post did not use it to that effect. Still, with so much worse in the world, I don't personally feel that the world is going to stop just because people swear too much.

@Mike

Jack's logic has more holes than swiss cheese.

A CTRL+F search on this article returns nothing about parents, so gg Hunt and Cameron.

@ gs68

.... are you sure your not Jack Thompson? Its like he typing through you.

Back on topic. Parent's should be responsible for their children. It takes very little effort to prevent a child from playing an M-rated game. That's what parenting is about, takeing care of your child. They brough the child into the world, and they have the responsibility to look after thier child.

Jack Thompson, you yourself are a father, and I hope you understand that it's your responsibility to police them. The game industry provides entertainment for a wide variety of different audiences, from toddlers to adults, just as the movie industry targets different audiences with different movies. Just as it's the parents responsibility to prevent children from watching porn or violent movies, it is their responsbility to choose the games appropriate to their children. The game industry even provides an easy way to identify games that are for mature audiences through ESRB and their rating system, which is largely viewed as a reliable rating system.

I AM NICK GRIFFA FROM DEAF, SO I AM BNP AND I AM PROUD AT UK. WHAT FOR UK ARE REALLY SHIT? GREEDY TAX AND CHILDREN TAX WHY??? AND UK WANNA BE HIGHER PRICE LIKE PERTOL ONE POUND SAME AS VERY HIGHER PRICE GAME £50.00 CHILDREN CAN'T BUY THAT AND CAN'T AFFORD CHILDREN WOULDN'T BUY IT. WHY UK IS REALLY FAT PEOPLE AND HIGHER PRICE ANTI-BEHAVOIUR MORE DRINK AND BEER AND WHY UK IS BAD WEATHER EVERY DAY RAIN FLOOD FUCKIN BRITISH IS NOT GOOD! BRITISH IS NOT NUMBER 1 UK IS A SHIT ALL VERY EXPENSIVE CAN'T AFFORD FAMILY WORRIED ABOUT GOVERNMENT ARE PIG AND GREEDY AND TOO HIGHER BEER DRINK AND BANNED SMOKE IN PUB I DON'T LIKE UK! I WANNA BE FREE NO TAX AND FREE UNCUT MOVIES AND I AM FREE IN PEACE IN STOP RACIST. WHITE PEOPLE ARE NOT GOOD SO BLACK PEOPLE ARE BETTER THAN WHITE BECAUSE WHITE ARE THIEVE AND MANY TROUBLED DRINK AND DRUNK BEER ANTI-BEHAVIOUR OK CAN YOU SEND ME EMAIL YASAR_313@HOTMAIL.COM YOU CAN ANY QUESTION TO ME TAKE CARE URSELF DON'T WORRY ABOUT GOVERNEMENT I KNOW IT IS VERY GREEDY OK