GP Poll: Gamers Disappointed, Won't Be Buying Manhunt 2 Edited Version

September 14, 2007
Gamers don't appear to like the edits Rockstar made to Manhunt 2 in order to avoid an adults only (AO) rating from the ESRB. 

Late Wednesday night we fired up a poll regarding the edited, M-rated version of Manhunt 2. So far, the results are not promising for Take Two/Rockstar.

As I write this (late Thursday night) only 18% of poll respondents say they plan to purchase Manhunt 2 when it launches on Halloween. 52% say they definitely won't buy, while 30% are undecided.

We'll leave the poll open through Friday, so be sure to vote!
Buzz It

Comments

I voted "will not buy", but that was on the basis of the game content as described, not the cuts.

I might buy it if it gets pretty good reviews, oy.

I wasn't really planning on buying it in the first place. I don't have a problem with violence, but I think Manhunt is Rockstar's "look how controversial we are" game. Maybe a rental, if the reviews are positive.

Put me in the 'Never planned to buy the game' category as well.

... not sure you can draw very many sensible conclusions from that. All we know is that somewhere between 18% and 48% of respondents will be buying Manhunt 2. Aside from the obvious sampling issues, it doesn't tell us anything about the reasons for wanting to buy, or not buy, the game. And it certainly doesn't tell us how many have decided to not buy the game because it's been scaled down to get an M rating.

All in all, a pretty useless poll, if I may say so.

Personally, I think this speaks more to those of us at GP than gamers as a whole. Not all gamers are as well versed or up to date on things as those of us on gp tend to be. Not saying that it's not a good poll, just saying that it might be a bit hard to get an accurate guess of sales rates for Manhunt 2 from just those of us here.

Should be interesting on halloween

This doesn't leave much room for those of us not interested in Manhunt either way.

i never planned on purchasing manhunt in the first place, so any changes that were made were not of any consequence to my 'no' vote. i say that the question is flawed

I'm still buying the game, cuts or not. I loved the original manhunt and I'm fairly confident that I'll enjoy this one as well.

Meh its my style of game I prefer FPS, or fantasy style 3rd person,modern settings for games even WW2 stuff is a turn off.

I voted no, but I do intend to rent it.

I don't care for Manhunt in any case.

I'm not much into gore for gore's sake.

Give me a game from the Silent Hill series anytime where the blood and disturbing images actually have a function.

I was not going to buy it anyway it's hl2 ornage box all the way for me.

I personaly think the poll lacked the opption "I never intended to buy manhunt 2"

As pointed out already, the poll is poorly designed in that it doesn't give an option to those who wouldn't buy in the first place. Secondly, a website poll is not exactly a Zogby poll, in that it's not random. So you really can't draw conclusions from a poll of readers of this website, given that they are clearly much more intelligent than your average perso. :)

A good idea for the poll would also be to ask why they are taking the action (buying/not buying because of the censorship?)

GP, the poll did not have a "i wasn't going to buy it anyway" option.

you can put me in that column.

I was thinking the same thing when I saw the poll. I wouldn't buy Manhunt 2 period. Not that the poll is flawed, necessarily, but this happens all the time. Unless a poll is worded perfectly it fails to show the image of reality that it was designed to show.

Same here. I had no intention of buying it in the first place.

I was never planning to buy it AO or not. I think the game is a terrible idea. I never bought the first one. SO I didn't vote because there was no never was option.

I had no intention of buying Manhunt 2 in the first place.

Well, quite frankly GP, I wasn't going to buy Manhunt 2 in the first place, it's just not my type of game.

How many people who voted 'no way' did so because they were in a huff about the ban and not would have bought it before the ban happened?

Uncut or edited manhunt 2 was at best a curious rental for me and nothing in the last few months has changed that.

That said I strongly encourage the efforts of the industry to inform the media and lawmakers that computer gamers have grown up and with it the industry and while every effort should be made to protect children from experiences intended for adults banning out right is not the way to go.

Yet another vote for "I voted no, but it's nothing to do with toning it down." I've never liked a Rockstar game. I've simply never found one to be fun. I'd rather spend $135 on Nomad Soul and the World Eaters (huge collector's edition... I'm such a sucker) than $50 on Manhunt 2. One will be fun for me, the other won't

I don't let the content of the games determine what I buy. Although I wasn't planning on byuing Manhunt 2, I think it is a bad image for gamers of all ages to let content be the top factor in purchasing games. I believe it is the overall gameplay that counts in a game, not its brutality.

BTW, when I say content, I mean violence.

Well, I said I wouldn't buy it, but I wouldn't have either even if the rating hadn't changed, so...

I also voted I wouldn't buy the game, but I never intended to.

I wasn't going to buy that crap one way or the other ...

I have Metroid Prime, Twilight Princess and WoW to keep my free time not so free. This is a niche market game to begin with, and watered down just makes their target audience less interested.

I might as well chime in too and say I voted no because I'm just not interested in playing it, cuts or not.

I've wanted this game since finishing Manhunt years ago.

I don't want an edited version desiged to make Hillary Clinton happy. That is not the point of the game. The original was excellent in that it really (and I mean really) made a statement about the times we live in, what we find entertaining and how we treat people.

I was sure Manhunt 2 would have been a continuation and possibly an expansion of the theme.

More importantly the idea that R* and TT would release the game despite all the cries of pop moralists was important for the industry and for consumers. Changing the game to placate the self riteous 'critics' was a terrible move.

And I won't be buying it. If R* takes a loss on this one I hope that it and other developers understand that it isn't controversial games that don't sell - its changing the content of a game that ruins its original intent and thus makes it less playable.

@GP

Yeah, sorry but I have to go with the "What about those of us who weren't going to anyway" group. While I did vote, I was never even planning on buying it, ever.

Does my vote count if I wasn't going to buy it in the first place?

I'm another one who was never going to buy it anyway.

I'm with E. Zachary Knight. I never planned to buy it, so I didn't vote due to a lack of a "wasn't going to buy in the first place" option.

I never planed to buy it in the first place. Like the rest of the topic commentators. This game had its balls ripped out though, and I'm not talking about have the ball rip being ripped out (that was bound to happen). I'm talking about censoring the 'good' kills.

Oh well, back to Persona3. All that game has is teenagers who repeatedly blow their brains out. Suck it, ESRB.

No offense, but i think the poll should be redone with an option for people who were never going to buy it in the first place. I voted to not buy it and I didn't base my decision on the new rating.

@Yuki: Personally, I think you may be right that it speaks to the GP population - which in terms of Gaming as a whole, is realistically a relatively small populous - and the decisions they may make, however, one may note that GP readers are typically more informed than others.

----
Papa Midnight

@Zigs

There you go with the ESRB again; give it a bloody rest. They are to rate, nothing else. They do not force censorship; Rockstar decided that ON THEIR OWN. They could have left it as is and tried porting it to the PC, and selling it through their site.

I'm joining in the chorus here... I wasn't interested in Manhunt 2 before, and I'm not interested in it now. I never bought the first one.

I'm very much against anti-video-game legislation, and support the freedom of game developers to express themselves. But that doesn't mean I approve of this crap.

But maybe it'll be good for us in the long run. This kind of controversy that raises public awareness (even if in a temporarily negative way) may help shift the general view of video games being an entertainment medium for all ages, not just children (as too many people over 40 seem to be locked into believing).

There was no option for wasn't going to buy the thing in the first place.

Uh . . . this is a pretty pointless exercise.

I don't know if I'm going to buy it or not. I couldn't give a s**t about all the media crap that's been going on, the re-ratings etc.

The only thing that affects my decision is if the game is any good or not.

I'll see what it scores on metacritic, then decide if I want to buy it or not - circus's are for children.

Actually, I'm not buying it because I think the game looks like shit. That wasn't an option in the poll, I believe.

I'll still be buying it. I'm not so sure Rockstar should be villainized for cutting. Did they really, really have a choice? Sometimes you have to compromise instead of being some iron rod who won't bend for anybody. Sometimes it doesn't work (David Lynch's Dune) sometimes it does (Stanley Kubrick's Spartacus), so I think we should wait until people actually play the game before we throw a big hissyfit about it.

I bought Bully (limited edition, too) only to show support for the game being released. The game turned out to be quite good.

The only reason I have to buy Manhunt 2 is because the "Culture Warriors" don't want me to.

Yeah, the poll doesn't tell much about the cuts, at all.

So I normally don't do this, since it's bad form to cross-post, but if GP came to the ridiculous conclusion that this poll was somehow "valid" it makes me question whether or not they saw my original rant on this poll. If so, GP just shrugged it off, which is worrisome because that means GP is more interested in spreading their own agenda than telling the truth. So I'm reposting it at the bottom of this post, since it's something that I really think GP needs to take to heart.

The poll was biased and broken, like most GP polls are, and the results say nothing about peoples actual opinion other than a good number of people just don't want to buy Manhunt 2.

Lets crunch some numbers for a moment:
52% won't buy
30% are unsure
18% "will" buy?

18% of the gaming public will buy Manhunt 2? If this was true, this game is going to be the best selling game ever! Lets consider the 30 million PS2 systems in the US... that means 5.4 million copies will sell in the US on PS2 ALONE. Not counting Wii or the European markets... if this poll were accurate, R* will soon be the most successful game company on the planet.

Or maybe those numbers are stacked by the fact that many of us (myself and EZK) who won't buy the game didn't vote because we weren't represented in the poll. Those us us who would rather see Manhunt 2 die silently instead of getting constant publicity from both the pixel-anti and GP don't have the option of "I have better games to play" in the poll.

Yes, I'm frustrated. I was only slightly frustrated when I saw the poll was broken yesterday. But the fact that the results of said broken poll are now being used to make the exact argument that I feared they would: "See R*, you shouldn’t have censored it!", this just pisses me off.

GP, your site is the best place on the internet to get news on the current state of game controversy. But in this instance you really dropped the ball, by using the results of a poorly written poll to try and push a biased agenda. You're better than this.


--------------------------------
Cross posted from:
IGN: How Rockstar Toned Down Manhunt 2 for an M Rating

On a somewhat different topic: I think GP needs to have somebody else make the polls that show up on the front page. They are often written in a way where all answers display a knee-jerk reaction.

The current one is especially bad, though many others often exhibit these traits:

“Given what you know about the changes Rockstar made to the game, will you be buying Manhunt 2?”

- I’m Buying
- No Way
- Not Sure

The wording of the question is specifically discussing it as if the decision to buy the game is affected by the changes currently made to Manhunt 2. These answers are directly interpreted as:

- Yes, I’m buying it despite the changes.
- No, I’m not buying it because of the changes.
- Not sure if the changes will affect my decision to buy Manhunt.

In other words, the answers assume that we were already going to buy Manhunt 2. What about those of us who have no interest at all in the game? We’re not represented in the poll.

While I know that internet polls aren’t really “official”, polls written with this sort of bias help feed the common misconception that we’re all frenzied in anticipation for the next Rockstar bloodfest, when I say “No Way” it will be interpreted by the pixel-anti and gamercore alike as being another vote toward “See R*, you shouldn’t have censored it!” when my actual reaction is “I don’t give two shits about this game.”

If it was just this one poll I wouldn’t feel the need to comment, but more often than not the polls on GP give me this same impression. I always want to put my vote in on the poll, until I realize that my vote will be biased toward the opinions of the person who created the poll. So usually I just look at the results and wonder “How many of these people actually meant what they said here, and how many just didn’t read the poll closely enough?”

Enough ranting, carry on with the otherwise good work. :)
-------------------------------

This forum needs an edit feature:

...many of us (myself and EZK )...

I never planned on playing Manhunt 2 anyway. The game just seems TOO violent for my liking.

Oh, son of a crap!

…many of us (myself and EZK INCLUDED)…

:)

I said "Not sure" simply because FPS isn't my first choice of game genre. Horror and violence are ok, but I'd rather have an RPG.

Nightwng2000
NW2K software
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenThat article is over five years old, Uncharted. A fun blast from the past though.02/12/2012 - 10:47pm
Uncharted NESCritics: 'Left Behind' game glorifies violence- http://tinyurl.com/wu64s02/12/2012 - 4:34pm
ZenI felt Brutal Legends was a funny & beautiful look at the world of rock from Double Fines point of view. The only parts I wasn't hot for were the RTS bits as it felt forced. Otherwise fantastic.02/12/2012 - 1:34pm
DorthLousPassed 1.5M$. And I'd also say that Brutal Legend is far from being a bad game. I just think it was a few levels under what people expected from the people working on the project.02/11/2012 - 8:25am
TechnogeekBrutal Legend wasn't bad so much as "marketing had no idea how the game actually played", causing it to suffer accordingly.02/10/2012 - 10:38pm
RedMageIt looks the CIA's website has been DDOS'ed. Anon?02/10/2012 - 7:52pm
RedMageBrutal Legend.02/10/2012 - 7:52pm
ddrfr33kHas anything Tim Schafer ever made been of crap caliber? I'm struggling to think of one...02/10/2012 - 7:37pm
GuamishI think it is in good hands. Tim did a game for the GDC award show and that was fun for how short it was.02/10/2012 - 12:22pm
Andrew EisenIt'll be tragic if the game ultimately sucks.02/10/2012 - 12:17pm
james_fudge$1.3 million02/10/2012 - 11:32am
Uncharted NESGermany Says It Won't Sign ACTA [Update: ... Yet]- http://tinyurl.com/7r2twrg02/10/2012 - 11:21am
Andrew EisenDamn. Double Fine's Kickstarter fund has already passed a million dollars.02/09/2012 - 8:16pm
Andrew EisenAudrey didn't quote the sassy parts. Here's IGN's article: http://wii.ign.com/articles/121/1218359p1.html And here's my original post: http://tinyurl.com/7y68a3902/09/2012 - 7:50pm
james_fudgeI hope you some said something sassy! Where's the link?02/09/2012 - 7:46pm
Andrew EisenHey, neat. IGN quoted a blog I had writen only two hours earlier. I certainly timed that one pretty well.02/09/2012 - 7:38pm
Andrew EisenToki Tori has been added to the Humble Bundle for Android.02/09/2012 - 5:11pm
james_fudgeThanks for the heads-up DorthLous02/09/2012 - 4:33pm
DorthLousWill do, my apologies.02/09/2012 - 4:14pm
Andrew EisenI appreciate the heads up but please keep typo alerts to the specific article's comments or PMs.02/09/2012 - 3:33pm

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician