
Although there has been some recent talk around the Net about the use of the
Halo series to attract kids to church activities, Saturday's New York Times coverage (see
GamePolitics write-up
here) seems to have crystalized the debate over the practice.
A lively discussion at the blog site of bible scholar
Ben Witherington nicely captures the opposing views. Witherington - who pretty clearly is not conversant with video games - doesn't like the idea of using
Halo to attract youthful congregants:
This whole sorry approach to youth ministry smacks of absolute desperation and fear - fear that if we are not relevant, we cannot attract a crowd. Is this really what Jesus would do? I don't think so...
If you have so little creativity or imagination that you imagine that the only way to appeal to youth is by appealing to their most base and basic fallen instincts, then get out of youth ministry - you haven't got the tools for the task...
Lisa, a reader of the site who describes herself as "a reasonably avid gamer," weighs in to disagree:
Playing, say, Grand Theft Auto in a church would be a vastly different story... If a church has specifically made it its mission to be culturally relevant to today's youth, if you're eliminating video games as an option, you're highly limiting the tools you can use to reach out.
Another reader, Jake, adds:
[Perhaps] you're judging video games as a medium more harshly than films... A second possibility is that you are equating the violence in Halo with vengeance or senseless violence - which is debatable given the narrative the game follows...
Witherington replies, but his lack of familiarity with games is evident:
When you play a 'Versus' sort of game, or in that sort of mode, you are in the first place setting up a scenario for individual winners and losers. There is nothing about this that builds community...
Secondly... I do have a major problem with a game that takes endless hours to play, or win, and is so absorbing that it encourages the worst sort of narcissism...
Thirdly, there are numerous studies out there to be had about how these games affect and indeed encode violent images on young brains in various ways that going to a movie that lasts an hour or so would not do.
Jake replies:
I disagree completely that community cannot be built around a game like Halo... I've... formed friendships with people online as I've played, as well as enjoyed the community when I get together with friends in person and play...
Marc Axelrod weighs in:
My Super Nintendo helped me through a lot of seminary nights when I just didn't feel like studying... As a pastor, I've had great times playing NFL Blitz and other games with the young people... But I wouldn't feel right playing a game with gratuitous violence. I don't know if Halo 3 is a case example or not. I did play Virtua Fighter 4 at church with a couple of my confirmands last Sunday night. Maybe that was a borderline call...
Comments
IMO, children shouldn't go to any church at all, being left to make their own decisions when they are grown up enough to question and choose which religion, if any, they'll pick up. I've been raise as a catholic by influence of my family, and the way I see, the interest of the churches in children indeed lies in the ease of manipulation, especially throught fear. Fear of going to hell eternally because you didn't want to go to mass in one weekend, because you took communion without confessing (a rite that wasn't even created by Christ). I've managed to become a free-thinker and leave this behind, but no matter how much I discuss this stuff with my mother and my grandmother, they can't see a different point of view (which is, in fact, because of a life of belief, or brainwashing).
And I also have to deal with things like this: I'm preparing an RPG session, looking through the D&D Monster Manual, and my grandmother sees the illustration of the flesh golem, then she says I'll end up as a satanist (despite the fact I've already explained to her that satanism has nothing to do with worshipping the devil - she answers me that's it's what she believes so it doesn't matter if I explain or not). By playing a game.
A little more on topic, religion alienates me like the way I've explaines, so I don't like it at all, and I like it even less for using our media to lure the young and possibly do to them what they tried to do to me.
Sorry if the post is disperse, I'm quite sleepy right now.
1. Big bang theory? I believe you are referring to a scientific assumption concerning the expasion of the universe from a point of sigularity [which has yet to be explained]: a claim with universal and binding connotations, a claim that attempts to describe. The claim itself is supported by a limited collection of emperical observation. Emperical observation, due to our limited scope and metaphysical indeterminancy, cannot be trusted to establish, with certainty, the origins of our universe.
Consequently, as you've said, our minds are not capable of passing judgment (with the current facts and "truth finding" methods avaliable to us) on a naturalistic theory rooted in emperical unity. Thank you for implicitly illustrating the absurdity that occurs when we jump from natural judgments to supernatural judgments.
2. The question is not concerned with the free will argument. The topic on hand is that God personally commited actions that define our conception of evil. Even if I were to entertain the free will argument, you will eventually fall into a critical delimma: the human condition does not permit or logically allow the existence of a diety that claims to possess ALL of the following attributes: all-knowing, all-good, all-just (all attributes are posited on God, by man, in the Bible; the contradictions are too numerous to list).
Christian dogma penetrates virtually every facet of society: http://www.godlessgeeks.com/LINKS/AntiXtian.htm (my favorite parody). Allowing supersition to exist without critique, when it exists solely because it is indoctrinated or terrorized into the ignorant, is not a viable option for an ethical person.
"This whole sorry approach to youth ministry smacks of absolute desperation and fear - fear that if we are not relevant, we cannot attract a crowd. Is this really what Jesus would do? I don’t think so..."
im not very religious, infact i down right hate christianity, or atleast the way it is being taught but thats not what im talking about. jesus did make his points relevant to people because without relevance people do not learn, he used parabols, like the mustard seed and all that other crap.
personally i find it hilarious because whether gamers like it or not and im a gamer by the way. the game is violent, you shoot people, people die. the game premotes teamwork and community but it is still violent. again i went to the midnight launch so dont get angry with my comments i love the game. christianity is about community, but using games as a medium to spread their beliefs is not the way to do it.
the declining of religious youths means one thing, we as a society are becomming more and more detached from spirituality, even those that say they are christian or muslim or hindu or buddhist arent following because they chose to but because it is tradition, because their parents or community believed one thing and gradually the little voice in thier heads that questioned what they truly believed was squashed and follow the crowd because they cannot deal with change and frankly dont give a damn
So, by this logic, kids who play or cheer for a certain team in baseball are taught to... what? That there are winners and losers? That games are only fun if you win? I remember playing little-league baseball, and even if we lost, we were still awesome about it and didn't gloat. I think THAT was what games taught us to do- even if not everyone acts that way. But a community CAN be built on such thinking.
Let's even step away from that line of thinking and consider Co-Op mode, and metagame scoring, where you need to work with others to progress, while at the same time competing for a score throughout the game.
"Secondly… I do have a major problem with a game that takes endless hours to play, or win, and is so absorbing that it encourages the worst sort of narcissism…"
2 hours a day, you could beat Halo 3 in about a week. That's not endless.
"Thirdly, there are numerous studies out there to be had about how these games affect and indeed encode violent images on young brains in various ways that going to a movie that lasts an hour or so would not do."
Name one such study, by a reputable research group. And then tell me they said there was a direct link and actual causation between the two. No? Move on.
"My Super Nintendo helped me through a lot of seminary nights when I just didn’t feel like studying… As a pastor, I’ve had great times playing NFL Blitz and other games with the young people… But I wouldn’t feel right playing a game with gratuitous violence. I don’t know if Halo 3 is a case example or not. I did play Virtua Fighter 4 at church with a couple of my confirmands last Sunday night. Maybe that was a borderline call…"
At least this guy admits he doesn't know enough about the game to make snap judgements. The violence level in Halo 3 is significantly less than alot of other titles. Unless you count the flood, there's no dismemberment to speak of.
My aunt, whom I really hold no love for, goes with members of the christian church community and places bets on survivor, trying to figure out who's going to be kicked off, who is going to win, etc.. Gambling is considered a sin by most religions, but it brings them together as a community. So what are you trying to say? That there's a right way and a wrong way to bring people together as a more tight-knit community? That certain ways are invalid because they don't conform to someone else's standards? That the means of doing such a thing have less importance than the ends of such a method? We could do a WHOLE lot worse. You could bring people together for an ORGY for the benefit of the religious community, but that wouldn't really conform to most people's views, first of all, and it's not really the best way.
Second, you seem to have some beef with the idea of "it's a game, people die in it" when the people who die are fictitious- lemme say that if it's okay for Franklin Delano Roosevelt to say "And let us beseech the blessing of Almighty God upon this great and noble undertaking," in regards to the D-Day invasion, or for political leaders to believe it to be "god's" will that a war be fought and won, where REAL people die for uncertain reasons, then a church using a science-fiction game to bring a community together is tame in comparison. Are we going to say "Hey, let's have a Lan-Party on X-Wing: Alliance, because people in those ships don't die!"? Or watch a science-fiction movie where people die but you don't really sympathize because their the bad guys?
Didn't he miracle up loaves and fishes for them?
At a church I use to go to the pastor actually played Halo 2 with some of the younger kids and even made jokes about it during a Sunday service.
Even in the youth hall we use to have game nights, with football, basketball, and two xbox systems hooked up to both television sets with two teams of 4 battling via the network setup.
One of the biggest thing churches have now is they don't have a good outreach program, and when one church tries something different everyone is kinda shocked, but I for one applaud them, this is a way to reach a broader audience and a way to get the message across, whether or not the message gets across depends on the person listening.
How long would it take someone to read a book that was as long as say, oh, THE BIBLE?
Or is my first impression more accurate...that this clown has NO clue what he's talking about?
It should be if you fight against games for years, THEN you get a superiority complex :P
Then again he may just be crap at English.
Oh wait...
"I think his violence is *artfully* done."
For example: When He recruited Peter He talked to him about fishing; with the woman at the well He talked about water. It was always in context and relevant to what the people were doing. Using a video game as a means to introduce the Gospel and Christ's message in not only relevant but precisely what Jesus WOULD have done. At least in my opinion.
Gamer: Right on J-man.
I don't see it somehow.
Mmmmm! Christian values at work, baby.
I suppose when screaming about the ravings of a genocidal, child-killing, "God" are not enough.... on top of the threat of eternal torture if you do not acknowledge a ficticious diety as master.... the only form of truth left is:
KILL THE ALIENS, IN THE NAME OF JESUS CHRIST!
"Didn’t he miracle up loaves and fishes for them?"
I think the modern equivalent would be if he could miracle up a finished copy of Duke Nukem Forever. That might get people listening.
If that was your opinion, then I have to say you are the mirror image of JT.
Dude, please just stop. You're as bad a bigot as JT and its just as productive. If you have something relevant to say, please do; but if all you're going to do is troll and spout your typical myopic vitriol please do it elsewhere.
That being said I believe the church may be "rolling with the times" so to speak. If it helps draw people in I am all for it. It is ultimately up to the parents to know where their kids are spending time. We have a skateboard church here in Seattle that uses the same methods to get kids to identify with them.
As to Pandralisk's biggest fan. Anonymity is a treasure on the internet. But it is also the Zero card: The fool, the beginning and the end of seriousness and ridicule (take your pick). In short, I think you're Pandralisk, and you're only making things worse.
If you're not Pandralisk, then chose another nick for yourself. Establish an identity and don't be an ass. That's all I ask.
On a brighter note, at least kids are getting free Halo parties.
"All Christians have an IQ less than 10, and I don't stereotype! I have nothing against Christians, but I hate them! They are all brainwashed from a young age, even though many question and even leave the church when they are older! They secretly ran the KKK AND the Nazis! And why? Oh, it’s all because of their Bronze-age war-god, who EATS BABIES, and TORTURES PUPPIES.
Their God also secretly lives on earth, as a profoundly gay black man with a hot pink afro and baby blue facial hair named Stan. He lives in Downtown New York, is married to a dustbin called Jim-Bob, and plays STRIP POKER WITH THE DEVIL on saturday nights.
It’s all proven in the bible. Really.”
:D
I have no idea how you came upon the ideas of Christianity. I never went to a church like that, and none of the people i know went to a church like that. I am so sorry that you had to experience that sort of thing, but the majority isn't like that. The majority also doesn't make headlines, because it isn't like that. Again I am sorry you had bad experiences and had to go through that. And if you haven't stop talking out your ass.
Wtf? LOL
But not an M-Rated game.
Master Chief is fighting a war against religion...
It's still just adding crap to the forum in my opinion.
Halo 3, well while the game itself is violent, I really do not have any problems with kids playing it. No one is necessarily capable of doing half the things on their to begin with (jumping high off a cliff with a vehicle and live, even without a vehicle its impossible).
The whole thing is meant to reach out to kids. It's not meant to train kids into becoming killers or anything. If the church in my town was doing this, I would go for the fun of it.
I played SOCOM online, and even though the game was competitive, I met a lot of cool people on there, and we had an awesome time. I think thats possible with Halo 3 in a LAN party.
The fellow running these games to get childrens attention sounds a lot like the guy I'm talking about in that sense. The brother used to run all sorts of events to draw in kids...HUGE water gun fights where he would buy a ton of water guns for any child who couldn't afford his own or walked in off the street. Just all sorts of things like that to get childrens attention because at the time thats what kids did. Kids are playing video games now...so its only common sense.
My name has a self-spiritual meaning to it. I know full well what neko is and what my name translates to. And so what? Is it any worse than we posts? Or when JT trolls? Or other anonymous people? If I want to parody an asshole, I will whether you may like it or not. It's not something I often do, either.
@Adam B.
And that's why I don't. I don't mind someone who is atheist; it's when they push it too far, like him. There's a difference from intelligent argument, and simply bashing and flaming. Apparently, both fanatic religious and atheists don't seem to understand the difference.
This is wrong, both ethically and theologically, and again shows the depravity the megachurches have cultivated through their seamless and uncritical wedding of unbridled capitalism with what they call Christianity.
Playing violent video games is a vice. We all have our vices--mine is a fondness for Oatmeal Stout--but to encourage and facilitate them through youth ministry is beyond the pale.
To the article: I'm ok with Churches playing Halo or whatever, as long as they own-up to the fact that many, many mainstream games are not Christian (including Halo, really). I really detest the Christanizing of things not Christian, like the dumbass in the previous article making a Tolkien allusion. Tolkien has gone on record in his forward to the Fellowship that anyone reading symbolism into his books is looking for things he didn't put in there, calling his books, "Just good stories." I guess I'd be grasping at straws, too, if I was a member of a dwindling, increasingly sectarian, congregation.
So in other words, larger, um..."richer" churches squeeze out membership of the smaller one, right? But what exactly are you against? The church using games to get younger members, or the act of pressuring the smaller churches? So then, if you prefer members to come in on their own accord and not be appealed to?
Cause I have a question. What if it's more of a community thing, not necessarily trying for new members, but appealing to those already there, not really for donation or membership, etc, but rather as entertainment? Or do you simply not agree with holding any kind of event like this regardless of reason?
He exagerates like some people exagerate about, say, religion.
And he pulls facts out of his ass. Back them up boy.
You'd love Baptist Christianity. Exactly the same point.
So they are trying appeal to the youth with something thats popular. Well thats what parents try to do with there children but anyways.
The argument here seems to be based around whether religion is good or bad thing. And of course the Christians will say its a good thing. But then it would be a different story if it was the Muslims or the Hindus.
I bet people will have a problem with Muslims relating to the youth through halo.
Remember just replace Christian with Muslims, Democratic with Republican, black with white, and vice versa. And then see if u get offended.
Sorry, but I need to point out that I am Christian and I oppose this wholeheartedly. The difference is between people who confuse Capitalism with Christianity (the megachurches) and the people who actually know what Christianity is.
As firefly stated, my issue isn't that they're using videogames as a medium to lure youth for the purposes of propagandizing them. My issue is the fact that they're luring them using exactly the kind of game that they've been saying is evil and horrible and "super-duper bad" ...
I've apologized for any direct attacks I've made on ChristianS. I will not apologize for simply positing Biblically explicit values on the diety contained in your religious tradition: as I've said many times, I apologize that your religion is so full of contradiction, hate, and superstition. Please do not mistake my critique of your superstition as an attack against intellect. Most Christians are mentally competent people; they have simply been threatened, coerced, indoctrinated, or remain ignorant of a religious tradition. Ignorance and stupidity are two entirely different concepts. And yes, most Christians are ignorant of the fact that the bronze age tribal war god they worship does kill children, command rape, endorses slavery, and commits acts so ethically deplorable that few dieties can approach his horror.
I think that exposing a child to religion before they so much as graduate high school is as deplorable, exploitive, and presumptious as exposing a child to hardcore porn and violence.
Luring them in with the "candy" of the day represents an unethical, contradictory, and ridiculous action... especially when a game like Halo explicitly contradicts Christian superstition.
I'll say the same thing to you that i say to Jehovah's Witness... quit trying to force your beliefs onto other people...just live your life or go back to /b/.
I know some will say "Violence" and simulated killing but are these not the same things we say have no affect on people in real life? Suddenly when religion comes into play violence affects us?
Now for the people talking about brainwashing, when I was little my parents took me to church and we were heavily involved, did I continue to keep going? No. It wasn't until about a year ago that I decided to go back to church and get my life back together thanks to a good friend of mine. You will actually find me to be a very open minded Christian, I refuse to judge anyone by their religion and accept people for who they are and what they want to do with their life, like I tell alot of people it's not my place to interfere in someone's life, I will act as a example and if they choose to follow and learn more that is their choice.
Man that reminds of that episode of South Park, Starvin Marvin Gets a Space Ship. With the CBC hot on there trail because they havent heard about the word of god.
Ha I wouldnt be surprised if Churches tried to become the new "mall" as a way to attract the youth because in the end even Religion needs money to survive especially in this day and time.
No, I won't allow the Judeo-Christian artifical (and contradictory) value of "turn-the-other-cheek" dispatch my right to subject the beliefs of other people to fair and unbiased critcism. I'll say to you what I say to all dogmatic theists: defend your butchered, warrantless, arguments in a way that either makes your belief in "God" logically, ethically, metaphysically, or epistmologically valid.
Good luck accomplishing this task under the tenents of Judeo-Christian superstition.
Would it be too much to ask of you to comment and say something that doesn't involve religion, or lack thereof?
1. Big bang theory, completely true. Now ask where that explosion came from. The world was not created in seven days, it was written that way so that people thousands of years ago could understand. After all, the bible was written my man. There are certain things even we at our stage of evolution cannot understand. For example, try to wrap you head around something that has no beginning...for our brains it's unfathomable, but we aren't exactly to most intelligent beings now are we.
2. "How can God allow this to happen?" Gave humans the freedom of choice. If someone chooses to kill a bunch of people, that's his choice and it affects others, God is no where in that equation. Even though he has the power to stop it, it would affect our freedom of life and choice, and that would be a little biased don't you think. I wouldn't want a biased God, would you?
See, that was easy, considering I'm an Agnostic Theist. Though I fail to see your logic in trying to force your beliefs onto others if you so oppose Christians doing the same thing... a little hypocritical I think.
Quoth the Phoenix, evermore...
Touche mate. Touche.. (Anyone have the alt code for the french E that I should have used there?
Very well said :).
@Korax
And I completely agree that religion can be taken too far, but that is usually push by the family of said person. I've known a few people like this in my life, but in the end isn't the message most churches are trying to give "be a good person"...personally I don't see anything wrong with that message. Though I will say that free thinking should also be encouraged, but that is the job of the family of the child. It appears that most of your problem with religion comes from the fact that your family made you feel pressured about it...and that I will agree is bad.
"Chatty bitch can go on IRC if he wants to talk!"
Is that Monty Python? 'Cause it sounds to be in that Calibre.
Those few points I've mentioned are some of the things taught before first communion, not by family, just to clarify. As has been said in other posts, those are personal experiences being shared.
Being a good person is nice, but again, when you see churches worrying more about "luring" the "fish" with the "bait" than about charity, there isn't much to believe in the institution, is there? Of course, there was a time, when christians were hunted down and killed, and even then they tended sick people in the roman empire (lepers, if I'm not mistaken, but maybe others as well) who were left isolated to die (and also to avoid spreading the diseases). That was the true spirit. But then they started to accumulate power, and it pretty much went to hell. (I might me horribly mistaken about those words, but I remember being told this story in a history class some 12 years ago. If I'm wrong, please correct me and I apologize).
For last, I think that the "evil" is exactly what's mentioned in one of the first posts. Most religions stereotype and alienate games and gamers (I'm aware I can't escape stereotyping as well while making this statement). It's hypocrisy.
It's from a Penny Arcade comic :)
Anyways, let's get back on topic:
"When you play a ‘Versus’ sort of game, or in that sort of mode, you are in the first place setting up a scenario for individual winners and losers. There is nothing about this that builds community…"
Honestly, Halo is one of the best community builders out there. Everyone has fun and connect with one another during a match. My friends and I used to get four xboxs, four TVs, four rooms, and 16 people and we would all get into one match through system link. As fun as online is, it is better when you hear your friend shout out a random vulgarity from the other room right after you smack him down with the sword.
I also have no problem with churches sponsoring events with appropriate video games. We did all kinds of activities in my youth group that weren’t religious in nature. It was simply a safe environment for kids to have fun. If the kid is having fun at a youth group function, he’s less likely to be hanging out at some party with booze and sex (not that I have any problem with either :) ).
Notice that this is “News.” The news tends to focus on the far ends of the wacky spectrum. If they reported about reasonable people with reasonable opinions, no one would be interested. We watch news for entertainment. I don’t take anything I see in the news as representative of the group as a whole. My opinion of Christians is based on the people I’ve met, and generally that opinion is good.
@ Pandralisk: You should read ‘A History of God’ by Karen Armstrong. A fairly [imo] unbiased view of how Judaism/Christianity/Islam changed over their history. Granted Christianity started pretty nasty & violent (that is historical fact), the religion changed significantly between old and new testament. I personally believe you should educate yourself as much as possible before aggressively throwing around your beliefs.
Piss and vinegar indeed, although as many big words as he just said, there are actually sentences in there. I understood him, though like I said..."Ignorance with big words is still ignorance."
"You should read ‘A History of God’ by Karen Armstrong. A fairly [imo] unbiased view of how Judaism/Christianity/Islam changed over their history. Granted Christianity started pretty nasty & violent (that is historical fact), the religion changed significantly between old and new testament."
I should read that too, sounds like a good educational read. Thanks for pointing that out, smeagol23.
Well it seems we will just have to agree to disagree. While my experience with the church was relaxed and not so bad yours wasn't so great. So we are drawing off different experiences and coming to different conclusions. Doesn't mean either of us are right or wrong we just see things differently.
But then again, violent content seems to be a more self-centric judgement, so there's bound to be debate on the matter. Some people view Halo's multiplayer as senseless violence that'll make people beat random old ladies over the head with their own walkers, others (including myself) see it as a contest of hand-eye coordination skill.
*shrugs* Everyone's got their own views, and everyone's going to throw it out as truth.
Truth is, it's a video game, and God's not going to strike you down if you or members of your youth group play Halo (as a Christian and a gamer for 15 years or so, my church youth and I are living proof of this).
On the one hand, I think Pandralisk has some valid points, though they are not presented in a manner that engenders them to acceptance by the undecided. For example, exposing someone to a belief system and threatening them with eternal damnation/torture if they question it before they're of an age to logically decide on their own what they want to believe is morally wrong, in my opinion. I know many people accept Christian beliefs as fact, and so then have no problem showing little Billy "The True Way" or whatever. I think this is a failing not with religion in general (though it is common with religion), but with the difficulty humanity has in stepping outside its own limited point of view.
On the other hand, many of Pandralisk's comments about the history of Christianity do not apply to Christians today. Like any belief system, it has evolved with society - thus the various sects. I don't know of any Christians these days that espouse the killing of children or rape. Historically that may be accurate - I don't know. I do know that currently, many of Pandralisk's accusations are out of date and therefore irrelevant.
Yeah. I'm bored, so I felt like saying something random. No hatin' now.
But ya know what? I bet when they're in their LAN party group in the church basement, they're not screaming the usual kind of racist, sexist, homophobic vitriol that's become the standard argot of online gaming. If the church can inject a little civility into the experience, who am I to tell them they shouldnt?
As for Pandralisk ... how about we stop feeding the troll?
If you have so little creativity or imagination that you imagine that the only way to appeal to youth is by appealing to their most base and basic fallen instincts, then get out of youth ministry - you haven’t got the tools for the task…"
So as a chruch if I do not limit myself to your limited imagination I can not be relevant to what you think preaching to the community is?
And you wonder why people think of some as brainwashing hives... "ZOMG burn all fiction tis evil...."
------------------------------------
"
When you play a ‘Versus’ sort of game, or in that sort of mode, you are in the first place setting up a scenario for individual winners and losers. There is nothing about this that builds community…
Secondly… I do have a major problem with a game that takes endless hours to play, or win, and is so absorbing that it encourages the worst sort of narcissism…
Thirdly, there are numerous studies out there to be had about how these games affect and indeed encode violent images on young brains in various ways that going to a movie that lasts an hour or so would not do."
So endlessly mindlessly going over the version of the bible you belive is somehow better than taking a break from it and being a community that can enjoy them selfs... not only do you not understand games but do not understand community dynamics....you can't keep the godly warth and fear on them all the time...they tend to become anal over new thoughts and ideas losening up and relaxing is not a bad thing ya know...
===========================================
"
My Super Nintendo helped me through a lot of seminary nights when I just didn’t feel like studying… As a pastor, I’ve had great times playing NFL Blitz and other games with the young people… But I wouldn’t feel right playing a game with gratuitous violence. I don’t know if Halo 3 is a case example or not. I did play Virtua Fighter 4 at church with a couple of my confirmands last Sunday night. Maybe that was a borderline call…"
Depnds on if the violence is in context games like VF/DOA/Tekken have realistic based martial arts(Soul cab has more power based) so its no worse than a R rated fight film with ultra low gore/blood, Halo is pretty much the same ,gears of war might be a bit OTT so would god of war all in all it depends on what the consisus is,don't rush to avoid it without knowing it.
-------------------------
chuck
nicely said for me it should not be abotu the context of the games/films but the mentality of the players/watchers if its civil and respectful and fun whats so bad about it.
Wouldn't Gordon Freeman fit the bill better?
He's part-carpenter (The crowbar is a dead giveaway), he's got a matching beard, and he did liberate humanity from the foul clutches of the Combine. Now, tell me that isn't a close match
@ Pandralisk haters
Since his posts are obviously intended to be inflamitory and are frequently off topic, I propose we ignore them. By writing long detailed agruments for him to respond to, you are only empowering him. He has some ‘need’ for attention and keeps coming back here because we give it to him.
This is a gaming website, not a religious philosophy (or history) site. If we ignore him long enough, he will move on to a better suited site to post his flaming rants.
I think the analogy to him as a religious JT is very apt with one difference. I find JT entertaining (in a sad way). Since I don’t enjoy Pandralisk’s rants (and he’s certainly not changing anyone’s opinion), I would rather not have him (or replies to him) clogging up the post.
"On the other hand, many of Pandralisk’s comments about the history of Christianity do not apply to Christians today. Like any belief system, it has evolved with society - thus the various sects. I don’t know of any Christians these days that espouse the killing of children or rape. Historically that may be accurate - I don’t know. I do know that currently, many of Pandralisk’s accusations are out of date and therefore irrelevant."
Speaking as a Catholic, I'd have to agree. While a lot of the old guard up in Rome are still pretty conservative, I'm under the impression that the church is trying to reform itself towards a more modern setting....albeit at snail's pace. The second Vatican Council's one example of their efforts.
And while it's a faith that I agree to be be somewhat flawed in some of it logic, it's a religion I grew up in.
It's part of my core beliefs - and while I dn't always agree with my own faith, I'd prefer to think my theology professors meant well in their efforts to indoctrinate us in Catholicism's the finer mehcanics.
-Whiny, reactionary young lady host
-Some guy with slicked-back hair who thinks it's a bad idea
-Some guy who is admittedly "not a gamer" and is slightly unsettled by the idea, but thinks it could work in a certain context
-Some churchy guy who thinks it's a bad idea
Wow! Fair AND balanced!
Yea, I noticed that too...like the Covenant are going on a Crusade to "cleanse" this world/universe...
And I don't give a damn that you don't give a damn. So let's all not give a damn, dammit. :-D
Sure, the military desperately hoped virtual practice would be effective enough we could switch to that instead of more expensive real ranges, but no such luck. Real guns with real targets are necessary, along with war games involving real people and play guns, to condition soldiers to fire to kill a threat that happens to be another human being.
I am so tired of people claiming normal videogames can teach us to become killers when even games designed for that purpose fail to do so.
No matter what else can be discussed and pointed out, there is one single principle that I think makes this a good thing: socialization. Anything that fosters positive socialization among youth is a good thing in my mind. This does it in two ways:
1) Attracting kids to do something in the first place. If they're out playing Halo as the church, they're not sitting at home rotting (socially, emotionally, in personality), or out buying drugs or something on some street corner.
2) Churches are amazing places of social support. They provide people with groups, friends, support, things to do, etc. If kids go play Halo and decide they like the church while they're at it, it kind of creates a continuous effect of my first point.
Honestly, as long as those two factors remain positive and secure, I don't care about violence or indoctrination, or anything else anyone wants to argue about. I'd rather see the younglings getting some kind of social support other than Facebook or MySpace. Or those stupid "blog" things. Who seriously spends time on those things.....
-Mike Schwinger
PS - Much love to you all. The last like two lines are the only jokes in my post.
It isn't difficult to respect other's beliefs, whether you think they're wrong or not.
As for Halo... I think the church could've found a better (read: less ironic) choice for entertainment.
i know there not real, i am a gamer, i know the difference between reality and fiction
Would most certainly apply to a few posts here, lol. Un-freakin-canny how much so. Twain was a genius with words.
But on the subject - I have no problem with either Halo or Christianity, I like both. But I don't see how it really has any 'synergy'. Not because of ethics.
I mean - I like Ice Cream and Jim Beam - but a Jim Beam float it just out of the question... :) lol
That's absurd. Kids today play games. If providing a safer place for them to do so, and a place where they might recieve moral support gets them into church, gets them help or just plain sets them straight, then I don't see an issue.
And it's Halo 3. It's apparently violent (he goes around with assault weapons, what do you expect) but it's not gleeful like GTA. It's a war. And in a war, people die.
An earlier article mentioned that Master Chief fights a hopeless battle against an unstoppable foe, but merely the act of resistance gives his people hope... Yeah, a little too much like Christ for my tastes, but hell: If they want to spin it that way, let them, I say.
As long as the game dosen't eclipse the worship, nothing bad's happening in my mind. But then again, I've been outside of religion for awhile.
Jim Beam float, eh?
/me jots that down.
The focus upon Pandralisk here seems to be a convenient way to deflect attention from the hypocrisy that many Christians indulge in America.
Jesus went to Samaria. 'Nuff said.
this is a desperate move from a way of life that will be obsolete in the next hundred years.
They are molesting young minds, religious people are worse then pedophiles. Willingly exposing and teaching your child MYTHS AND LIES, that have long been disproven by evidence is INSANITY, human beings, especially religious people are fucking psychotic, we have to tolerate them because they outnumber us. If we had more power there would be laws against lying and idealogical and religious indoctrination, that is basically a form of child molestation, molestation of a child's mind.
Go read some of the horror stories on ex-christian.net of kids almost committing suicide over being exposed to the psychotic god of judeo-christian barbarism!
" 'Nuff said."
The fact that you assume that your allusion is enough to settle this arguement smacks of the arrogance Pandralisk and others (myself included) are quite tired of. Guess what, a great many people have differing views on just WWJD (to coin the phrase) amongst the myriad Christian sects, let alone outisde them. The question of how to apply ancient, frequently dogmatic, texts (the Torah, Bible, Koran, Book of Mormon, etc.) to an modern-era problem is not one so easily brushed aside.
Oh wait, it is easily brushed aside if you are a member of the only 'correct' answer to an age-old question with literally hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions, of anwsers. This absurd arrogance that pervades the underlying Judeo-Christian traditions in the US (and elsewhere) is the very reason for the backlash from people like Pandralisk (even though he is abrasive), who, for whatever reason, don't buy into the, "Because my belief system includes the 'We are the one true faith' clause, that means eveyone else is wrong," idea.
"Blessed is the man who does not walk in the counsel of the wicked or stand in the way of sinners or sit in the seat of mockers. But his delight is in the law of the LORD, and on his law he meditates day and night." - Psalm 1:1-2
It would seems counterproductive to encourage boys to meditate on these games when the goal should be to meditate on the law of the Lord.
"But, these boys might not ever come to church otherwise," you might say. But when the church adopts the ways or the world to attract the world . . . the end result is that the church just looks more like the world.
My eight-year-old son, who is homeschooled and does not watch television, might think you are talking about three angels if you asked him if he wanted to play "Halo 3". And, in this case, ignorance is bliss. God might be better served by encouraging by encouraging this type of innocence.
1. Women wearing makup
2. Women wearing pants
3. Television and movies
4. Various forms of musical expression
5. Other misc fads, cultural shifts and trends
I am 37, but when I was 17, the leaders at my church were convinced that listening to any form of rock/metal (even the Christian variety) was a first class ticket to hell. My mom wore makeup when she was a girl ("barn paint" to the old folks of the day).
The scenario changes, but human nature does not. New things scare old people. Old things bore young people. Weak arguments like "thou shall not kill" are thrown out in desperation. I do believe the commandment means "you will not murder" - yet the failure to make contextual distinctions in human behavior mucks it up.
Humans are inherently competitive, clever, social creatures. We like violence - it is dramatic and compelling - so much so that it is woven into the threads of our religion. The language of Christianity is the language of war and battle. Young people long for heroes and the chance to prove themselves in a conflict of some form.
Why should we be surprised that Halo is so compelling? Why should we be afraid to enjoy it?
The real danger in video games comes when we use it as a proxy for success in real life. Maybe we beat Halo or amass vast wealth in WoW, but if we use that as our vehicle for finding significance in the world, then we are wasting our lives.
While I don't necessarily agree with all your views, you seem very intelligent and know what you believe, for that I commend you. I would be interested in learning more about exactly what you believe and how you came to this beliefs.
@ everyone who is a 'christian' but who decided to bash Pandralisk because his views differ than yours
Is your faith really so weak, that you can't take some criticism. Do you really have to lash out, and defame another person because your so insecure about your own beliefs that you don't know how to defend them. He brings up valid points; the church is not perfect, never has been never will be. I've been in church's where the youth function one month would be to have a halo party. Is it wrong? Maybe. I don't know, it's one of those gray areas where the Bible isn't clear. What I do know is that I have never once felt guilty or convicted for pwning a friend, or a stranger even, online. So I guess that's what it comes down to personal conviction. There are other extraneous factors(Read 1 Corinthians 8 if you want an example) but for the most part it comes down to this. Can you love God while going around killing covenant troops? I don't see why not. But then again that's just me.
@ Everyone
The Bible says "Thou Shall Not MURDER", not "Thou Shall Not Kill", King David was a man after God's own heart, and he decapitated a dude. God never once in the bible condemned a person because they was killing in order to preserve their life, their country, or their family.
The issue, for me anyway, isn't the criticism about our beliefs. The issue is how some people like Rob and Pandralisk word their points, making them offensive to the point that it puts off other atheists as well. The same goes for Christianity as well, with people like Jack Thompson and Fred Phelps. Pretty much every statement they make offends Christians as well. That's just my point of view, though, so take it as you want. All I'm saying is that, while I'm perfectly okay with criticism to what I believe, I'd rather not have a part of the opening statement calling us "f***ing psychotic." That tends to be detrimental to debate.
As far as fragging people online, I feel no remorse doing so. Why? Because it's a game and it isn't real.
So you've opted to raise your child to be not only socially inept, but also completely unprepared for reality. Kudos. Ignorance is NEVER bliss, asshat. Innocence isover-rated. Kids don't want it until they've lost it, and then they try to force it on their kids. It's a false, impossible ideal.
I'll agree with you that he isn't doing anything good by completely shielding him from reality, but he does mean well. However, it was said that some of the worst things in history were born of the best intentions. He would do well to take that into consideration.
Actually, I'm fairly certain the Ten Commandments say "Thou Shalt Not Kill", but I guess I might be wrong...
"I’d rather not have a part of the opening statement calling us “f***ing psychotic.” That tends to be detrimental to debate."
Matthew 8:30-34 (New International Version)
30 Some distance from them a large herd of pigs was feeding. 31The demons begged Jesus, "If you drive us out, send us into the herd of pigs."
32He said to them, "Go!" So they came out and went into the pigs, and the whole herd rushed down the steep bank into the lake and died in the water. 33Those tending the pigs ran off, went into the town and reported all this, including what had happened to the demon-possessed men. 34Then the whole town went out to meet Jesus. And when they saw him, they pleaded with him to leave their region.
ANYONE WHO BELIEVES THAT MASTER OF THE UNIVERSE EXERCISES DEMONS INTO PIGS AND TEACHES THAT TO CHLDREN IS... WAIT FOR IT....
FUCKING PSYCHOTIC!!!
Religion is only responsible for causing the most amount of deaths in human history.
LOL
=^0^=
Are you even willing to engage in a serious discussion?
Scratching your head as to why? So will they be about this one day.
Anyhow, my church group has international lan matches with partner churches in other continents, and it's brilliant :)
"Religion is only responsible for causing the most amount of deaths in human history."
http://frankwarner.typepad.com/free_frank_warner/2006/05/dictatorships_d...
http://freedomspeace.blogspot.com/2006/05/20th-century-mortacracies.html
262 Million deaths in the 20th century due to dictators who were primarily *Athiest*
Oh - and that does not count deaths from wars which totaled about 35-40 million. So its all nice to be anti war or anti religion, but if you really care about human life, you should be anti dictator:
MORTACRACIES
The Deka-Megamurderers ... 219.634 million
China (PRC) 1949-87 .... 76.702 million
U.S.S.R. 1917-87 ........ 61.911 million
Colonialism .............. 50.000 million
Germany 1933-45 ....... 20.946 million (including 5.291 million Jews)
China (KMT) 1928-49 ... 10.075 million
The Megamurderers .... 19.180 million
Japan 1936-45 ............ 5.964 million
China (Mao Soviets) 1923-48 ... 3.468 million
Cambodia 1975-79 ........ 2.035 million
Turkey 1909-18 ........... 1.883 million
Vietnam 1945-87 .......... 1.647 million
Poland 1945-48 ........... 1.585 million
Pakistan 1958-87 ......... 1.503 million
Yugoslavia (Tito) 1944-87 ... 1.072 million
Fatal regimes. Add the mega-massacres with the other genocides, purges and mass killings, and Rummel comes up with a 20th century death toll by abusive governments of 262 million.
He points out that of the bloody total, 20.9 million were murdered by the Nazis, and 148 million were killed by Communist regimes. Rummel says:
"The sheer massive ignorance and denial of the 262,000,000 people murdered by government is revealed by these facts: this total is over 6-times those killed in combat in all domestic and foreign wars (including WWI and WWII, and the Korean and Vietnam Wars) over the last century, and laid head-to-toe the corpses of all these murdered would circle the earth about 10-times."
Lethal legacy. It’s enough to make you push for the rapid end to all despotic regimes. The fact is, dictatorship is war. Dictatorships kill, and at their whim, totalitarian dictatorships can kill by the tens of millions.
Leaving tyrants alone is not pacifism. It is callous indifference to the suffering of others.
Frank Warner
--------------
Religion has a lot of catching up to do.
Radical Islam is trying. Hard.
I agree - Government has them far, far, far, far outnumbered.
Governments/Dictators usually start wars, not 'people'. How many people died in the World Wars? Civil War? War of 1812? Spanish-American War? Punic Wars? French Revolutionary Wars? Sino-French War? Spanish Civil War? That could literally go on for hours on end.... Most - not all - are directly caused by Governments.
Plus, religion and belief in God can be two vastly different things, don't presume because one has a belief in God that he/she is 'religious'. Religion and Government are concepts of Man, and the root of both of those lies in a lust for power. Too many people blindly follow a religion and don't look any further into it that going through the motions every now and then.
The big problem is, people in power always twist and bend the truth. Who can even say how much old writings have been modified for 'political' endeavors? Personally, I think if I was to just go blatantly believing what 'science' or 'religion' tells me, I'm no more of an intelligent being that a sheep. I don't agree with 'religion' or 'science' 100% in either way - everyone's got an agenda and need for 'research' or 'donation' dollars.
Although, I do guess I'm pretty cynical overall.
My credentials however are Gamer and Pastoral intern. Yes, I work in a Baptist church AND I am a gamer.
my response: http://mrkniceguy.wordpress.com/2007/10/11/the-church-and-halo-evangelis...
The Bible is pretty clear, however, on condemning violent acts such as killing another person, which is the entire premise to Halo 3. The point of the game is to kill the opposing team as many times as you can as quickly as you can. I don’t think that it is at all appropriate that the church is using such a violent form of media to attract younger people to its following. Given the church has been pressing its beliefs onto those who don’t believe like they do with violence for generations, but times have changed and the time of religious crusades are over.
There's a halo 3 community called Saved By Grace (http://sbgclan.com) that's one of the most prominent communities in the game and (if you couldn't tell by the name) a Christian community. They're popularity is so vast that they were even able to schedule a match with the makers of Halo (Bungie Studios) and have the match report posted on the Bungie homepage. They're in a very effective ministry position.
I see this as just much cultural divide than religious. It is more common to find people who believe that guns are the root of all evil and cartoons such as Bugs Bunny or Tom and Jerry may cause their kids to become violent. The church has bought into this too. The false notion is that if we get rid of all guns and all influence of violence people will be peaceful. This is absolutely false. Cain murdered Abel and he had no influence of Halo. It is a heart problem.
Due to political correctness, Halo would be more acceptable 30 years ago than it is today. As a boy we played army with fake guns. We pretended to kill each other with play knives in battle while wrestling to the ground. We understood the difference between fiction and real. These games didn't make us become murderers. We were pretending. It was fun.
For those who don't want their kids to be exposed to any violence, I suggest you don't read the Bible because it is full of violence. David cut off Goliath's head with a sword. Deborah did a number on a guy's head with a tent peg, and when you think about it Noah and the flood, all those people were killed in massive numbers. Perhaps that is the most violent of all. We teach our kids this story like it's a nice little story with animals. God killed these people. My point is, not all violence is evil. I don't think shooting pixels on a television screen hardly qualifies someone to become a murderer.
Come on church, lighten up.