Research Project to Explore Student Gaming Habits

December 2, 2007 -
Three Misericordia University grads are embarking on a study of the gaming habits of 7-12 year olds as part of the research toward their Master's degrees in occupational therapy.

As reported by the Standard-Speaker, the survey, distributed to nearly 4,000 students in the Hazleton, Pennsylvania area, is titled Exploring Children’s Video Game Use. It aims to examine gaming habits, the types and ratings of games preferred, and the accessibility of games amongst elementary students.

Dr. Ellen McLaughlin, interim dean for Health Sciences at the university, approved the project:
With the rapid increases in video gaming, and the emergence of a computer culture, we are beginning to be concerned about how too much time spent in this type of activity might potentially influence other areas of their life.

The 8-page survey asks parents about such things as how much time children spend on social activities, sports, leisure, or work, and whether the child would rather be playing video games instead. Actual game time on weekdays and weekends is also noted. Parents are asked if the child has complete discretion on game use, or whether there are rules or limitations imposed. And finally, the survey wants to know if certain behaviours were observed, such as whether gaming has impacted any relationships the child had.

Superintendent Frank Victor approved the circulation of the surveys, and said he was interested to see how much of an impact there was on local students.

- Reporting from Canada, GP Correspondent Colin "Jabrwock" McInnes

Comments

Sorry, to me something doesn't sit right with people who take issue with not only Jack Thompson, but similar industry topics of non-importance such as this one. It's almost going under some pretense of nerd righteousness. Just to let you know guys, gaming isn't going anywhere.

I am optimistic about this. Usually students don't hold the biases of their professors and would be more willing to let the research speak for itself.

I am a little concerned about the Social activities part of this. Would they consider MMO's and Xbox live as social activities?

I'll try to remain optimistic, but I am guessing that it will turn out that games make people apathetic and lazy or something to that effect.

I'm sure once again video games will be disregarded as a social activity.

@Broken Scope:

Judging by the "The 8-page survey asks parents about such things as how much time children spend on social activities, sports, leisure, or work, and whether the child would rather be playing video games instead."

I think they will...

I feel so relived that it's the parents that are gonna answer this, and not the child itself.

/end sarcasm

they'll probably say 100% of the kids are just playing M-rated games.

Sill researchers, parents are too busy to parent.

And some have already made up their minds on this, no matter what any researcher says. Looks like our ex troll gets more ammo.

@kurisu7885

Don't talk about him. I'm enjoying the week away from him.

I'll remain optimistic, because if kids are in fact playing M-rated games...it'll prove that it's because the parents aren't stopping them...

There is some good questions there....but as other readers mentioned.

I'm worried this will turn video games in a negetive light again.

I wonder how this study will turn out :/ ?

"... we are beginning to be concerned about how too much time spent..."

It sounds like they've already got their conclusions in mind.

[...] Research Project to Explore Student Gaming Habits [...]

Aw, shucks, Jumbo, don't spoil their fun. If the gaming community doesn't get riled up about the value of videogaming towards society, then the terrorists win!

Besides, these researchers are grad students. They're doing this as much for the marks as they are for the public benefit. If I were them, I'd hate the extra lens of scrutiny that they're being put under, especially by a community that loves to put bets on what the results are going to be. ($50 on "we don't let Jimmy play the Manhunt but he gets his fix at a friends house." What's a parent to do, eh?)

/sigh.... well this sounds bad in my opinion. When I was this age I mostly did just play games. Not because the evil games made me, but because I wasn't into sports much, didn't have much of a problem being social, then again I was overweight so it wasn't exactly easy either, and work... well, I hate school with a passion, but that has nothing to do with video games. Instead of asking why the children undergo such problems in these areas they seem hellbent on making sure video games are the reason. To say the least, I'm not very optimistic for this research.

I hope they get the survey questions correct. I've seen a lot of poorly worded surveys.

I hope he makes clear that 12 year olds don't represent the average gaming community.

To be honest I am expecting the worst with this one. It could be
a good, unbiased, balanced, well thought out study. But considering
they are only studying young kids (which they may claim to be
the 'average' gamer) and with questions like 'would the kids prefer
to play games or work?', I don't have high hopes.

Who's the guy in the photo? He looks like Dr. Strangelove.

After doing alot in my videogame essay (one that I am still writing on) I am around 50/50 on this,

If the researches are gamers themselves, I would be more positive.

Of the researches are older people who have never played videogames before, then that is when I will be afraid.

Because, from my own research in my essay, sometimes Psychologists only observe the behaviour of children and they focus on an hypothesis and try to see if they can prove it right or wrong.

But in Psychology, it is hard to prove wheather a hypothesis is right or wrong and therefore it is hard to make a generalization.

Sadly when it comes to videogames, many psychological reaserches are sometimes biased because they try to focus on what the game might be doing to a child's behaviour but they don't take in the account of a child's enjoyment of playing videogames.

Unless if they can take that feeling of enjoyment the same way as watching TV or reading a book that shows a similar attention from readers and watches and also gamers who delve into an activity that requires so much attention and focus.

Sadly, if these researches don't take in other aspects like how a certain child might suffer from bullying at school and therefore are afraid of playing sport because of bullying, the researches might manipulate this stereotype of isolation and try to link videogames to isolation when in actural fact it could be school bullying that is more to do with a child's isolation more than being addicted to videogames has.

As a gamer who loved to play sport, I had been teased and bullied when I was in school and to tell you the truth, videogames made me stronger and that is why I love videogames and I would always say that school bullying has more to do with a child's isolation more than just videogames themselves.

Sadly I don't think reaserches would ever take the school bullying issue or family abuse issue into account to why many kids love to play videogames.

And placing more stigma about the negative affects of playing videogames is only going to make things worse than better because it shows that the research is biased and also because that non-gaming adults don't understand videogames at all if they have not played videogames at all.

Thus this is where the bias lies.

So this "study" is already fundamentally flawed. The primary problem with videogames and children is that parents have no friggin' idea what games their kids play, because they don't give a crap.

So asking parents about their children's videogame habits is like asking a 5th grader about a day in the life of an African villager. You'll get "conclusions" based on guesses and conjecture.

Unless there's a box on the survey marked: "I have no idea what my kids do in their rooms. I'm watching Grey's Anatomy. Leave me alone!"

If they conclude that video games are anti-social for a 12-year old well, that's because there is no one willing to participate. That is, families. We grow more conservative ever year we age. Most people grow too conformist to bother catching up with a lot of new technology, so while kids are playing video games, parents will prefer to toss the pigskin, read books to them or go on carnival rides.

But most parents will not try to butt in when their kids are playing videogames. If they don't give a crap on their video games, let's use substitution and we can say they don't give a crap on one of their child's favorite activities. If parents can adapt to the technology maybe they will give a crap. A common complaint is that parents find most of the games to be fast paced and their hands can't catch up to what they see on the screen.

The technology rift is alienating to people, and will only get bigger as it our science progresses. So video games may not be your thing, but if parents want to understand it, they should get into it themselves. Maybe they should try to get in touch with some gamer parents that get their kids' hobbies, because otherwise they'll remain Luddites when it comes to videogames and Pokemon will be as easy to understand as an HMO.

As a student I don't do most of my school work. I rather listen to music. I don't play video games usually until after 9.

Pigskin...

Good work. Keep it up....

I play games for hours every day.

National Honors Society and vice chair of the Appreciation and Recognition committee.

Accepted into an honors university.

Going for a double-major.

I laugh at you silly people who think gaming affects grades.
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Matthew Wilsonyes it help a sub section of the poor, but hurt both the middle and upper class. in the end way more people were hurt than helped. also, it hurt most poor people as well.04/16/2014 - 12:13am
SeanBJust goes to show what I have said for years. Your ability to have sex does not qualify you for parenthood.04/15/2014 - 9:21pm
NeenekoSo "worked" vs "failed" really comes down to who you think is more important and deserving04/15/2014 - 7:04pm
NeenekoThough I am also not sure we can say NYC failed. Rent control helped the people it was intended for and is considered a failure by the people it was designed to protect them from.04/15/2014 - 7:04pm
NeenekoIf they change the rules, demand will plummet. Though yeah, rent control probably would not help much in the SF case. I doubt anything will.04/15/2014 - 1:35pm
TheSmokeyOnline gamer accused of murdering son to keep playing - http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Crime/2014/04/15/21604921.html04/15/2014 - 11:50am
Matthew Wilsonyup, but curent city rules do not allow for that.04/15/2014 - 11:00am
ZippyDSMleeIf SF dose not start building upwards then they will price people out of the aera.04/15/2014 - 10:59am
Matthew Wilsonthe issue rent control has it reduces supply, and in SF case they already has a supply problem. rent control ofen puts rent below cost, or below profit of selling it. rent control would not fix this issue.04/15/2014 - 10:56am
NeenekoRent control is useful in moderation, NYC took it way to far and tends to be held up as an example of them not working, but in most cases they are more subtle and positive.04/15/2014 - 10:24am
PHX CorpBeating Cancer with Video Games http://mashable.com/2014/04/14/steven-gonzalez-survivor-games/04/15/2014 - 9:21am
Matthew Wilsonwhat are you saying SF should do rent control, that has never worked every time it has been tried. the issue here is a self inflicted supply problem imposed by stupid laws.04/15/2014 - 8:52am
E. Zachary KnightNeeneko, Government created price controls don't work though. They may keep prices down for the current inhabitants, but they are the primary cause of recently vacated residences having astronomical costs. Look at New York City as a prime example.04/15/2014 - 8:50am
NeenekoI think free markets are important, but believe in balance. Too much of any force and things get unstable.04/15/2014 - 7:25am
NeenekoWell, the traditional way of keeping prices down is what they are doing, controls on lease termination and tax code, but it will not be enough in this case.04/15/2014 - 7:24am
Matthew WilsonI said that already04/14/2014 - 4:22pm
E. Zachary KnightMatthew, The could also lower prices by increasing supply. Allow high rise apartment buildings to be built to fulfill demand and prices will drop.04/14/2014 - 3:48pm
Matthew Wilsonthe only way they could keep the price's down, would be to kick out google, apple, amazon, and other tech companies, but that would do a ton of economic damage to SF, but I am a major proponent of free markets04/14/2014 - 2:54pm
NeenekoThe community people are seeking gets destroyed in the process, and the new people are not able to build on themselves. Generally these situations result in local cultural death in a decade or so, and no one wins.04/14/2014 - 2:09pm
NeenekoWell yes, that is the 'free market', but the market is only a small piece of a much larger system. The market does not always do the constructive thing.04/14/2014 - 2:06pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician