Congressmen Want More Openness in ESRB Rating Process

December 5, 2007
For years, Rep. Joe Baca (D-CA) has been a critic of video game violence.

Now Baca has been joined by fellow Congressman Frank Wolf (R-VA, seen at left) in a call for greater openness in the game industry's rating process.

As reported by GameSpot, Baca and Wolf have drafted a letter to ESRB president Patricia Vance in which the pair request that the rating board make content videos submitted by game publishers available online for public review. The videos in question are part of the ESRB rating process and are supposed to include the strongest content found in a given game.

From the Congressmen's letter to Vance:
Parents must have access to consistent, accurate, and objective information about video game content so they are able to choose games that are right for their children. By posting clips of T-rated games and above, parents and consumers will be better informed of the content of the games.

A joint statement from Baca and Wolf said:
We believe that posting comprehensive clips of T-rated games and higher online is advantageous for both consumers and the ESRB. The public will be more accurately informed of the substance of games before making purchasing decisions, and the rating process of the ESRB will be brought to light and given more credibility.
Buzz It

Comments

I'd like to renew my suggestion that politicians and others be required to take a 100 or greater question quiz on any given subject. If they fail, are are forbidden to create or sponsor bills or make publicized political statements regarding that issue and must abstain from any votes regarding that issue.

Lawyers have to take a test to get a license.
Doctors have to take a test to get a license.
Even drivers have to take a test to get a license.

So should politiicans.

Nightwng2000
NW2K Software
Nightwng2000 NW2K Software http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000 Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

I think this legislation would be defeated on economic grounds. Like if the MPAA had to post a film in it's entirety on their website, game developers could argue that giving away all the key plot points and sub plot points would unfairly hurt their sales.

As someone else said, www.gametrailers.com is the place to go...

Baca and Wolf are quite the morons...

The ESRB is credible, it's just all those asshole parents who don't bother to read the rating or the contents labelled on the box.

I'm with jonwanker. If they're not checking the games website or sites like GameTrailers they're not going to check the internet for that information.

Where's this openness within the MPAA's ratings system?

Wow, if something like this passes, I guess I wouldn't need to buy any video games, ever! I could just go online and see all the 'ultra' bits of any mature game (disregarding that you can almost already do that with youtube and such); whew, this is gonna save me some money!
Oh...wait...if everyone decides to do the same, you say? Naaah, developers aren't in it for the money, they'd love to do it completely free of charge because they love their jobs so much, right? /sarcasm

Can someone please inform the good Senators, that such information is already readily available on the intertubes? Seriously, have these people never heard of Google?

The ESRB should just reply by sending them the url to Gametrailers...

Or someone could point out that movies do the exact same thing. The MPAA is extremely closed off. Also I don't know a lot of parents who screen the movies their kids are going to watch, I highly doubt that the same parents are going to watch a half hour movie of a videogame.

Are they aware just how much content is in a video game? What parent would actually sit through it all?

The publishers aren't going to like having the full content of the game on public display some time before the game's release either.

ummmm... but wouldn't that give out spoilers for the game?

I can only see this working if they publish them after the game is released.

Back to the real world

How many parents can actually be bothered to do so, especially when they can't be bothered to check the rating on the box.

Why don't they just come out and say what they really want: no more violent videogames, have them all candy colored rainbow fluffy clouds, unicorns, etc.

"Parents must have access to consistent, accurate, and objective information about video game content so they are able to choose games that are right for their children."

Christ on a bike, it makes you want to scream in his face with a megaphone: "THEY ALREADY DO HAVE ACCESS TO THIS INFORMATION! IT'S ON THE GODDAMN BOX! LEARN TO READ!"

It's as if the internet doesn't exist for them and they haven't figured out that the footage he is screaming for already exists out there. It doesn't matter if you put it on a website called www.parentshavetowatchthis.com, if parents aren't going on the net to look at these games already, they won't do it then either. The problem isn't the lack of information about the games and their content, it's the lack of effort and knowledge on the parent's side.
Like an analogy I posted before, I let my child off to play on a construction site or farm because I am illiterate and cannot read or understand the warning signs and the child is killed. Who is to blame? The site, for not posting up enough information? Or me, for being too dumb to understand the information available, or being too lazy to go and find out what it means.

According to these people and all the others jumping on the ESRB criticism bandwagon, that farm/site has a lot to answer for...

All I had to read was that he was a Democrat Congressman from California...... Just another idiot... Who wants to look up his campaign contributors?

I really have nothing to say that hasn't already except that as a bit of an Otaku the fact the Representative's surname is Baca amuses me greatly with its appropriateness.

"By posting clips of T-rated games and above, parents and consumers will be better informed of the content of the games."

Most parents can't even be bothered to read the back of the box. Do they seriously think that they're going to take the time to look things up online and sit thru videos? I don't think so.

Are they going to ask for age verification to see the clips? Do they seriously think that if they put the content that is submitted to the ESRB (all the worst bits, by requirement), that all these kiddies aren't going to just go WATCH THE VIDEOS?? Wow, now they don't even have all that annoying gameplay to get in the way of watching violence. Perfect.

Seriously, has NO ONE explained to these lobotomy recipients how video posted on the 'net works?? How has a semi-literate intern not pointed out how ridiculously bad this is?

I accutaly don't think it is that bad of a request. It only sounds reasonable; H's only asking for more info from the game.

This is the funniest request I have ever heard. I agree with JustAnotherLass that this is clearly a move to expose our children to more violence and pornography.

If the most extreme content is made available for parents viewing, what makes them think that kids won't be able to find and view that information.

What are they thinking?

Zachary,
"What are they thinking? " (I wish I could underline "thinking".)

You're giving them waaaaay too much credit. :/

Nightwng2000
NW2K Software
Nightwng2000 NW2K Software http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000 Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Sounds like a great idea....if they do the same with movies too, I will never have to go to the cinemas again.

Doing this and making the process more 'open' won't reduce scrutiny - more likely it will increase because now all the critics can point to specific things they don't like as opposed to just generally disliking a game. Lots of "well, THIS is in the game but not the rating video and I think it's highly objectionable" and "that only prompted an M rating, not an AO?"

I wonder how he feels about making bills available for public review before the legislature votes, and also how everyone voted. That would certainly help the public.

I wonder f politians actually believe the crap they spew. Or if they get a letter in the mail saying "Videogames are evil!11! hax0rs11!" with a check for $2 and say "Well, i don't even know what he's talking about, but he gave me money, so I must denounce it!"
Why do californians even elect these people?

What this guy wants is the ability to nitpick. He wants to see the stuff they rated "M", so he can cherry pick it and bandy it about saying "*I* would have rated it AO!!!"

The MPAA doesn't do this. The RIAA doesn't do this. THE FREAKING WHITE HOUSE doesn't do this (but you guys should really get to fixing that ;) ).

Why are games so special?
-- If your wiimote goes snicker-snack, check your wrist-strap...

Whenever I hear about a congressman's latest reaction to something like this, I'm often reminded of the quote from Shakespeare...

"Much sound and fury signifying nothing."

They can hem and haw and beat their chests all they like. As has been pointed out, the ESRB is a private entity. The govenrment can do nothing. Baca and Wolf can send their letters and the ESRB - rightly - can politely say "fuck you" and nothing will change. The congressmen in the backs of their minds know this. It's all just for show as it is with most politics.

This falls in with all those other requests, like 'All new game systems will be required to have parental controls!' It's not really a dumb request... in and of itself... except that it's already been done! It's like passing a law saying "All cars must have brakes" Reasonable, but stupid.

To be fair, the guy did say 'clips' of the games, like the clips of a movie you see in a movie preview, but I doubt he meant that... Too bad, I mean, a quick google search or trip to a game store would fix all this... I wonder if senators get to go on field-trips, preschool style. "Everyone hold onto the rope, you too, Hillary, we're going to EBGames today!"

Ha.

I'm not overly opposed to this, in fact have suggested it as an idea to help clear up the ESRBs public image that politicians like to fling mud at to keep it tarnished.

What we're talking about isn't a game trailer, but the Video clip submitted by the game publisher to the ESRB which the raters view when rating the game itself. This would give the parents who bother, a means to determine if the views of the raters are in line with their own view on violence.

The other method would be for the ESRB to give clear, concise definitions to it's content descriptors (which it does not do very well at).

Also you could lock behind content to an age verification area of the site.

Until the Gaming Industry can get out of the sites of politicians as an easy target to garner votes, it is going to have to tip toe around certain topics. The Movie Industry did this for years under the Hays Code before moving to the current ratings system. Even under the current system the MPAA has only gradually lessened the strictness of the ratings.

I would just *love* to see them try the same thing with the MPAA... I can just see it now "Check out SAW V on MPAA.com. Now we don't even need to see the movie, we can see all the violence at home!!!"

Not to mention, would parents even understand the subtleties here? You post a video of, say, Mass Effect showing some of the shooting and the sex scenes. Will they get that this 10 minute or something video (if it's even that long) is only part of a game that I've been playing for 25 hours and *still* haven't beaten???

I assume that Uncle Sam will be footing the bill (and a little more) when it comes to the increased cost of server space and manhours?

I do not like this idea because it would hold game video game industry accountable to a completely discriminatory and different standards. The problem with the ESRB lies in the "for the kiddies" stereotypes and connotations that hang around video games. We need to obliterate this stereotype by publishing truely adult games, and shifting the meaning of MA to "Adults Only."

If you're too stupid to allow your child to aquire and play a MA game, and take problem in their gaming habits, you probably should not have had a child in the first place. Stop killing the demands of adult gamers and defining the artistic limits of this industry for the damn children; most gamers could give a shit less about the needs of the children. We've faclititated them enough already: the MA rating means that a child SHOULD NOT HAVE THIS GAME. It's quite simple, really.

Um...the movie industry isn't forced to do this. Why should the video game industry?

And honestly, if a descriptor that says stuff like "Violence and gore, sexual situations," PRINTED RIGHT ON THE BOX, aren't enough for parents, why the hell would they run out to a website to check out a game?

@ Wraith
I really have nothing to say that hasn’t already except that as a bit of an Otaku the fact the Representative’s surname is Baca amuses me greatly with its appropriateness.

Damnit, someone beat me to it! Seriously, "Baca and Wolf" sounds like some cheesy comedy cartoon for Japanese kids on Sunday morning =)

Patrica, careful not to step in the Bullshit.

they are old they dont know how to use the enternet so they cant find the descriptors on the esrb.org website

The problem is that the ESRB doesn't own the copyright and the distribution of clips at the level that is being asked for might well surpass fair use. Beyond that I don't see a problem with people asking for a more comprehensive review so long as it doesn't come from Congress. Someone might need to send the good congressmen a primer on compelled speach.

This is the basic equivalent to placing a bottle of wine on the highest shelf. If that kids wants it, I guarantee you... he will get it.

----
Papa Midnight

I'm writing a letter to my Representative (Mike Ferguson, NJ), asking him to urge Baca and Wolf to write similar letters to the MPAA and RIAA. If you're going to go after one medium, you ought to go after them all.

I have no problem with them asking the ESRB for more openness in their process, and I'm confident that, if they have the legal power to do it, the ESRB would happily oblige. My problem is that no one talks about more openness in the MPAA's process, which is much, much shadier than these congressmen claim the ESRB's system is.

All of this information and more can be found on ign, gamespy, the list goes on. There are gameplay videos already in existence. Is it the ESRB's fault for not pointing this out? I think not.

Last time I checked aren't there already game trailers on the web?
Leaking footage of any kind would not might but would hurt sales.
Senators are obviously computer illiterate.
This is proof that even the dumbest 10th grader is smarter than any of theses senators.

Oh sure... We'll do that for the Congressional members...

...right after they publish EXACTLY which special interest groups have given them campaign contributions on a nice little web page like the ESRB does for ratings.

In fact I further propose that we start a group that gives ratings on members of Congress that we the general public can easily understand based on their content (aka criminal records). All in favor?

@Skyler -- It's not just a matter of leaking footage onto the internet, the senators want all of the naughty bits up on the ESRB site so THEY (I mean, the parents who are already too lazy to read the back of a box) can see if a game is bad for kids.

@ Loudspeaker

That is an excellent idea. I wonder how they will like being rated by the general public

@ Dog_Welder
So are you saying that the only reason they have a problem is because they are bad lazy parents?

My mom knows very little about video games but she does understand the ESRB. I think I was the one to explain it to her. So the only thing that parents need to know is the system and how it works. Anything else is completely pointless.

@ Dog_Welder

No. They want all the naughty BMX XXX videos without having to buy the game.

I don't think that we will ever have politicians who actually do research on the things they talk about.
It always seems like they are talking out of their asses.

@Shaesyco

They do talk out of their Arses.

@ BlackIce, Dragunov Marksman

Thanks for clearing that up for me.

They just don't get it, do they?

Read.
The.
God.
Damn.
Box.

Guess what? When it says "violence" on the rating, there will be violence! It's really not hard to figure out. Read words, understand words... I wonder which step they're missing.

@Shaeysco -- well, the motives of the politicians are to score brownie points by "protecting the children." But the problem with inappropriate games getting into the hands of children generally stems from the lazy or uncaring parents not doing the difficult research on a game, like reading the back of the box. If the parents are lazy or don't care, why would they seek out a website like the ESRB's and view the naughty stuff from a game?

So, what it comes down to is:
1) Politician trying to get some votes and look useful.
2) Power grab over the ESRB, a private entity like the MPAA or the RIAA, neither of which have any Congressional oversight. (Conversely, the MPAA and the RIAA have a number of politicians in their pocket.)

If I were running the ESRB, I'd happily tell these senators where to stick their letter.

"Parents must have access to consistent, accurate, and objective information about video game content so they are able to choose games that are right for their children. By posting clips of T-rated games and above, parents and consumers will be better informed of the content of the games."

How about the big freaking pamphlet that comes with the damn system?

"We believe that posting comprehensive clips of T-rated games and higher online is advantageous for both consumers and the ESRB. The public will be more accurately informed of the substance of games before making purchasing decisions, and the rating process of the ESRB will be brought to light and given more credibility."

Right, because the internet is the answer to EVERYTHING... this all assuming that parents today are computer-literate. There's just one thing parents need to know, and it takes literally 30 seconds out of your day.

READ. THE. DAMN. BOX.

It doesn't get any clearer than that, unless you don't have above 5th-grade reading level.
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
DorthLousPassed 1.5M$. And I'd also say that Brutal Legend is far from being a bad game. I just think it was a few levels under what people expected from the people working on the project.02/11/2012 - 8:25am
TechnogeekBrutal Legend wasn't bad so much as "marketing had no idea how the game actually played", causing it to suffer accordingly.02/10/2012 - 10:38pm
RedMageIt looks the CIA's website has been DDOS'ed. Anon?02/10/2012 - 7:52pm
RedMageBrutal Legend.02/10/2012 - 7:52pm
ddrfr33kHas anything Tim Schafer ever made been of crap caliber? I'm struggling to think of one...02/10/2012 - 7:37pm
GuamishI think it is in good hands. Tim did a game for the GDC award show and that was fun for how short it was.02/10/2012 - 12:22pm
Andrew EisenIt'll be tragic if the game ultimately sucks.02/10/2012 - 12:17pm
james_fudge$1.3 million02/10/2012 - 11:32am
Uncharted NESGermany Says It Won't Sign ACTA [Update: ... Yet]- http://tinyurl.com/7r2twrg02/10/2012 - 11:21am
Andrew EisenDamn. Double Fine's Kickstarter fund has already passed a million dollars.02/09/2012 - 8:16pm
Andrew EisenAudrey didn't quote the sassy parts. Here's IGN's article: http://wii.ign.com/articles/121/1218359p1.html And here's my original post: http://tinyurl.com/7y68a3902/09/2012 - 7:50pm
james_fudgeI hope you some said something sassy! Where's the link?02/09/2012 - 7:46pm
Andrew EisenHey, neat. IGN quoted a blog I had writen only two hours earlier. I certainly timed that one pretty well.02/09/2012 - 7:38pm
Andrew EisenToki Tori has been added to the Humble Bundle for Android.02/09/2012 - 5:11pm
james_fudgeThanks for the heads-up DorthLous02/09/2012 - 4:33pm
DorthLousWill do, my apologies.02/09/2012 - 4:14pm
Andrew EisenI appreciate the heads up but please keep typo alerts to the specific article's comments or PMs.02/09/2012 - 3:33pm
DorthLousThe title says 30, but in the article, the developer says it's like a 20% net tax http://www.gamepolitics.com/2012/02/09/developers-call-facebook-currency-transaction-fee-thirty-percent-tax02/09/2012 - 2:43pm
Uncharted NESIf they actually release Final Fantasy XI for PlayStation Vita, then I will consider buying one.02/09/2012 - 12:13pm
Uncharted NESCustomers Petition Apple to End Worker Abuse with 250,000 signatures- http://tinyurl.com/6vpuom202/09/2012 - 11:28am

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician