Colorado Church Shooter Was Kept Away from Video Games By Parents

December 12, 2007 -
Matthew Murray, who killed four people and wounded several others during a pair of horrific church shootings over the weekend, apparently wasn't permitted to play video games while growing up.

The Denver Post reports:
On another website, a poster named nghtmrchld26, believed by police to be Murray, said he rebelled against an upbringing that forbade him from buying rock music, video games and popular DVDs.

Meanwhile, the All Spin Zone has published a lengthy collection of Murray's online postings:
Growing up, TV, Internet/computers, video games, music, Christian contemporary music, movies and books were all extremely restricted.

Despite that, Murray apparently did play some unspecified video games:
Yeah Diamond girl, when I was a teenager my mother would do a pat down to check for music, DVDs and video games whenever I came out of an electronics store like Best Buy or Circuit City. I’d still obtain things anyways, it was like getting drugs from a drug dealer, EVERYTHING had to be done in secret. lol

I remember getting thrown around the room and hit while getting interrogated about whether or not I had video games and DVDs... I remember having to listen to everything in secret, at very low volume levels or with headphones, whether it was video games, TV, DVDs, or music/radio.

GP: It's always difficult to know whether to even raise this issue in the aftermath of a shooting rampage. However, since the Denver Post gives it a mention, I believe it is appropriate for discussion. And, of course, we know that certain critics will be pushing a video game connection, however tenuous, in any tragedy like this.

In the final analysis, Murray seems like a very depressed, very angry, very disturbed young man who had access to weapons.

UPDATE: All Spin Zone has more online messages posted by Murray. They reveal even more of his deeply troubled life.
Posted in

Comments

Being banned from games I can imagine. Banned from certain movies isn't so shocking. But BOOKS!? You know things are backwards when you are restricted from reading certain books.

I'd go mad too, if I weren't allowed to read things like Harry Potter or The Golden Compass*.

*Boo-yah, I went there.

@GDog

------------------------------------------------------------------------
I can’t think of a time where either a single atheist or group of atheists shot up a church, flew into a building, or shoved people into a gas chamber.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

I don't doubt that it has probably happened in history, but it is an interesting point.

What's really depressing is that there are, without doubt, groups who will now try to paint this young man as an atheist 'plant' in their society, sent purely to do this. We all know it's bull, but I've seen enough of humanities inclination to blame 'things' rather than fix the actual problem to know that it will happen.

@Paul Kerton

How do we even know that his parents did what he claimed they did? I'm waiting until more evidence turns up before passing judgement.

nightwng2000
i see now.
each one hold his own responspilty.
how did i miss that?
a fantasic point nightwng2000;)

I'd like to just throw this into the mix just to find out what possible responses can be garnered. Given the restrictions of Television, Computers and by de facto restrictions: The Internet, Video Games, Music (even Christian Music?), Movies, and Books, who's to say this kid wasn't a ticking time bomb? Given the restrictions laid around him, he's only bound to lash out at some point.

Hell, I can't see how he even got through school if he was restricted from 4 things out of that list. I know when I was in Middle School and High School - more so High School - every week, and sometimes every day, there was an assignment that required me to use atleast one of the things on that list of restricted items - and yes that does include video games.

Now I could launch into a fundamentalist rant, however, upon request, I will not. I more will take this to the line of what is bound to happen based purely upon the restrictions laid: Rebellion. I mean, hell I know if I was THAT restricted, I would rebel like crazy. I wouldn't kill anyone, but I would still rebel like mad. Such leads me to wonder, who will be the first to tie the parents to this? Hell, in some jurisdictions (see second paragraph regarding schooling and usage of resources), what the parents did could even constitute child abuse.

These are just some of the things I would like to throw out there.

----
Papa Midnight

@bloodysky
There is nothing wrong with our gun control system in the USA. The only people who think there is are people who've never worked with it, and the anti-gun crowd (and the people the anti-gun crowd has fooled into believing that all police officers are shot with Assault Rifles, those evil, evil tools of carnage).

It's not chrisitianity that's to blame, its the pentacostal lifestyle, which is terrible at socializing their young peole into American society. You can't go to the movies, you can't go to dances, you can't do anything. It's one of those sects that is just crazy when all is said and done, and as I mentioned before, people raised pentacostal have trouble later in life (for the most part).

Of course, it's not only the parents' fault that their kid ended up like this. He was, apparently, thrown out of activities in certain other religious groups because he 'talked to voices in his head' "dont' worry Richard, I won't shoot you... the voices like you" DIRECT FUCKING QUOTE.

This kid was as crazy as a hatter.

@Black Manta
In order for that shift in Paradigm for our Mental Institutes, we'd need to change the politician's views. Which would require not voting in Hitlery, Huckabee, etc., and really, it is more of a wait until the gamer generation gets into the political arena before we'll see a policy shift.

FINALLY, A POLICY SHIFT?

To quote Viktor Frankl, "... it is not the physical pain that hurts the most (this applies to adults as much as it does to punished children); it is the mental agony caused by the injustice, the unreasonableness of it all."

This kid's parents are jokes. They should be held directly accountable for their actions. Too often we lay blame (correctly) at the feet of the individual in these cases, but there is often more the one individual at fault. A part of me wishes for them to be strung up with all those other ignorant, self-righteous imbeciles; but the other part of me knows that would be wrong also. So, I'll settle for something else -- public ridicule.

Too often, I think that people should be made to pass a test of competence and decency before they are allowed to raise even their own children.

Hah, doesn't surprise me one bit. I think I can pick out a real culprit that motivated this attack: forced indoctrination in X. This is what happens when you shove X down the throat of an unwilling person who does not value X, simply because you are so arrogant in the truth of X that you do not see the enromous problems assossiated with X.

X = Green Beans, Turnips, and Dallas Cowboy Football Games.

Since Dennis forbade me from speaking my mind freely, and refuses to acknowledge the evil motivating factor behind this attack, I'll leave you to ponder over what X exactly is. I'm tired of people not taking a firm stand against the perverse X hate that is censoring, destroying, and attacking nearly every right in this country [including games]. This is a fine example of what happens when the autonomy of an individual is suppressed by X.

Keep patting yourselves on your back, wiggling your toes, and thinking that everything is okay. They'll keep chipping away at your freedoms, enforcing X status quos, and inhibiting the progression of the industry.

This story is about two parents? Just because the murderer complained he had strict parents you take his word for it and assume the killings are their fault?

He was an adult. I know quite a few people who had extremely over-bearing parents, christian and non-christian and they are not murdering other people.

None of you know what really happened in his home. You don't KNOW what manner in which he was treated. What the murderer says may have been true but we just don't know, but you seem anxious to take his word for it. The only person responsible for his actions as an adult was him. It is against the law to murder. He knew this, he diecided to break the law. It's all on him.

How long had he been out of his home? Do you know? Are you truly being rational about this making judgement on these parents you don't truly know anything about?

Well let this be a lesson that entertainment media doesn't drive people crazy, crazy parents do. Hey, weren't the Columbine kids also church-goers? But I doubt anyone's going to try and make a correlation between school shootings and church anytime soon, which seems like a double-standard.

@Pandralisk

I knew the Dallas Cowboys were evil, but not THAT evil!

@PitViper and Pandralisk
Fuck you guys. The Patriots, there's the evil football devil.

@Pandralisk

OH
MY
GAWD


I agree with you on something...

"...X = Dallas Cowboy Football Games..."

"LIES! HE STOLE THE GAMES!"

That's what i'm expecting will happen here...

chrisitianity ?
Austin Lewis am not blaming chrisitianity.
no.
like you said, diffrent sects.
exstreem sects.
as 4 gun control.
think a bout it, gun crimes, including school shotting.
why its so easy to get guns?
am not blaming the police.my dad is in this police;)

@Bill

I think it is an equal an opposite reaction to the way gamers are generally considered by politicians, who judge us by Media that they know little if anything about. Those of us who post on here have had to deal with ignorance from all kinds of sources, it can be kind of contagious.

I don't agree with blaming the parents, though the contradictions in his life, according to his posts, probably didn't help, but yeah, we shouldn't go claiming that everything this young man says is stone-cold fact without some sort of confirmation, else we sink to the same level of Thompson and others.

@ Bill

You're right, what's wrong in this instance was that he choose to break the law for the law is our only measurement of right and wrong. [/sarcasm]

I agree with you that each individual has to take responsibility for their choices. So what about the responsibility of the parents? It was his own individual choice to walk into those churches and shoot people in cold-blood -- that's his cross to bear. It is his parents' cross for their failure as parents. Instead of bringing a child into an environment of love, support, and decency, they choose to create an environment of oppression and abuse.

I'm starting to notice a correlation between depression and shootings. In the words of the legendary Mugatu...

"They're all the same! Doesn't anybody see this? I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!!!!"

I'm not trying to absolve his parents. I'm just pointing out that you don't know that

"Instead of bringing a child into an environment of love, support, and decency, they choose to create an environment of oppression and abuse. "

is true or not. You read the same story I did. You have condemned them and I have neither condemned or absolved them because, just like you, I don't know all the facts. The one I do know at this point is that he was an adult and he fucking shot and killed people he didn't know.

@bloodysky
Because parents are fucking retarded in most cases.

An FBI study including 112 inmates from violent crimes found that 109 out of the 112 had gotten their firearms illegally, often from other members of gangs in exchange for money or drugs or from houses they stole from (because contrary to popular belief, people break in during the day, not at night, so leaving a shotgun under your bed will result in your shotgun being stolen, sawed off, and used in the next break-in).

The main problem with crazy people getting weapons lies in the hands of psychologists/psychiatrists, many of whom never bothered to add the information to their record that they had been in a mental institute and were unfit for gun ownership. In one state (Arizona, I think, but I honestly can't remember) there were only 3 people in the whole state who were restricted from gun ownership because they were instituionalized in a mental care facility, although there were (obviously) many more people put in the loony bin than recorded.

Don't blame gun control, let's place blame where blame is due; with lazy fucking doctors.

Also, goddamn it kid, learn to write a fucking sentence.

@ Weighted companion cube.
"one look? ONE LOOK?"

"I remember getting thrown around the room and hit while getting interrogated about whether or not I had video games and DVDs… I remember having to listen to everything in secret, at very low volume levels or with headphones, whether it was video games, TV, DVDs, or music/radio."

And someone will still blame video games, not, for instance, that he appears to have been physically and mentally abused.

on topic: bad parenting = bad children. being beaten and "thrown around" are not ways to raise a child.

sidenote:
wow, Pandralisk. you really can't leave it alone, can you? are you going to start calling GP a stooge of the religious right now?

are you going to strike down JT and take his place at the emperor's side now that the hatred fills you?

EZK: This is the type of stuff that Dennis wants to avoid in this discussion. Please don't start it.

Pandralisk, I have heard a quote like this one before:

"Since Dennis forbade me from speaking my mind freely, and refuses to acknowledge the evil motivating factor behind this attack".

It came from Jack Thompson. It's not entirely your message, it's how you present it. Which is precisely the reason Jack has gotten banned before.

It has nothing to do with religion anymore than other shootings have to do with video games.

People are always looking to blame something other than the person who pulled the trigger. In fact, the person who pulled the trigger was to blame.

Dennis, as you requested, I wont go into any relegious stuff.

Frankly, i don't see that as the cause.

I think that what is really the cause here is the problem off indoctrination and Parental domination.

Dont get me wrong, parents need to keep certain limits on there kids of course, but the kind of isolation and indoctrination this kid went through would have made me a violent looney as well.

Religons come in an endless supply of varitions practicly. Slapping blame on them just cause the kid was a christian or something seems almost as silly as blaming games.

Anyway, Im sure some nuts will bitch that games were the cause.

We all know thats bs.

And yet again, Pandralisk completely misses the point and continues to attack an entire group of people based on a platry few.

Dennis, you should set up some kind of plan to generate revenue from this site, you know, like every time JT fails to cite a source, or every time Pandralisk fails to add to the conversation, you get a nickel. I'm sure there's gotta be someone out there willing to pay those that have to put up with morons.

*paltry.

Dammit.

"It’s always difficult to know whether to even raise this issue in the aftermath of a shooting rampage."

In the entire article this is what scares the hell out of me. The wording gives me a sensation that this is normal, like a traffic accident or somebody dying in a fire. The it's sad but it happens all the time. I know GP probably didn't intend to give this impression, but nonetheless, it scares me.

Sadly, the message that will be seen from this is "See? The parents DID their job in making sure he didn't have ultra-violent video games, yet he got them anyway by hiding from them! This is why the government must step in and ban them for everyone!"

It's the whole "you can parent your child, but you can't parent your child's friends" debate that I hate oh so very much.

There's a lot of "educators" who make a career out of selling books and videos warning religious parents about the evils of the world. Most of it is utter bull they make up to score a quick buck. I had to burn my entire collection of Fighting Fantasy books as a child after my mother watched a few such videos, including a first printing Warlock of Firetop Mountain :'( And the video wasn't even about that series, it was about D&D. As soon as I left home I started collecting again.

Pandralisk, remember one thing - It's always the insane man who screams to the world that he's sane and everyone else is crazy. That is how you come across.

@Bobby Blackwolf

Unfortunately, I wouldn't be surprised if they did. The answer to that is of course, 'If the parents had got involved with their child instead of treating them like a robot without feelings or opinions of their own, he wouldn't have had to mislead them, being a good parent doesn't purely mean making sure your child does what you tell them (and, strictly speaking, he didn't even do that). It's about understanding your child and helping your child understand you.'

It's often the second half that is forgotten

I don't think anyone's really trying to absolve Matthew of accountability in all this. I think people are just trying to understand. To an extent I can understand not allowing certain types of music, books, etc in your home if you don't like the subject matter or content. In fact I wish more parents would be responsible about such things.

Matthew made his choice. He alone is responsible for his actions. However I do think that its important to try and understand the circumstances that made him feel like this was his only recourse. I have a feeling that the lack of trust, compounded with suspected emotional abuse, and several other factors may have contributed to his mental state. Does it excuse what he did? Not at all, but it does help us understand what happened.

I agree, it's up to the parents what content is allowed in the house, it's their roof, and their child is living under it. I am saddened by the events, but I am far more infuriated by the fact the Governmental hand is used solely for pointing and accusing, they never use that hand to reach out and help.

The problem wasn't religion, the problem was an extremist take on religion. You could take ANY idea to the extreme (taking a page from Pandralisk's book, "gasp!"), push that extreme view on someone who doesn't believe the same way, and they'll be angry and/or violent.

Add the fact that the parents may have included mental and physical abuse in the mix (nothing has been confirmed 100% either way), and you really do have a ticking time bomb on your hand.

The kid was sick, weather that came from the way he was raised, or mental instability independent of anything else, is still up in the air. If he was mentally ill in the first place, for any reason, and you tack on the way he was raised, and you've got the spark to set the bomb off.

"It seemed like he was involved in his own spiritual battle against the empire of Christianity," adding that one of the screen names, nghtmrchld26, is taken from a video game in which characters battle evil demons."

And what game would that be?

"Another memorable incident occurred at a missionary Christmas party where attendees grouped together and some sang songs in the talent-show atmosphere, Werner said.

"He just went up there to sing, and one of the songs was 'I'm One Step Closer to the Edge,' which really upset people," Werner said.

The Linkin Park song culminates with the anguished phrase "I'm about to break!" "

Could it be that he just happened to like that song? I have that on my Ipod

@Sean,

The game was a game based around the Rock Group 'Kiss', who did the cover version of Argent's 'God gave Rock'N'Roll to you' in the Bill and Ted movie. It's widely considered to be an absolutely awful game.

Also, KISS, Psycho Circus - The Nightmare Child was released in 2000, so even if game legislation HAD been in place, he was 19 at the time.

Sorry, not 19, bad maths day, 17 :)

GP if you feel that my comment is out of line, feel free to delete it.

@G-dog

If your being sarcastic, mmm

If your not, I suggest you look at Soviet fucking Russia under everyones favorite Joseph Stalin. Siberiean Gulag, gas chamber, just another way to die.

@Pandralisk

Thanks for proving my point, if you shove anything down someones throat without giving them a choice, it tends to lead to rebellion, and in extreme cases violence. Go figure, taking away someones ability to choose doesn't end well. Give people a choice even the illusion of choice any you will be surprised at how easy they are to deal with.

Not to mention huge amounts of social isolation don't do anyone good.

@Broken Scope

I suspect that even more have been persecuted by China's anti-religion laws.

As for the gun control issue

Guess who stopped him from continuing he spree.

@ Broken Scope

Actually, I'm hearing two stories from friends at Colorado Spring (at USAFA)

1. He killed himself in the end.
2. Assam (the woman) did in fact end the man's life.

Well, I could argue 'guess what allowed him to start it', but I'm not American, and your gun law is your own, I"m not going to get involved in something I'm not involved with.

The thing is, it isn't the guns that are the problem, it is the fact that that people who should never own guns can get hold of them.

@GoodRobotUs
Read my earlier post on how that's happening.

@Austin

Thanks, yeah, that's a BIG problem, things like depression and paranoia don't get 'cured' merely 'controlled' and such things need to be noted on medical records, especially as far as things like Gun Ownership is concerned.

It's not the games or movies or lack there of that creates these nut cases. It's the worthless, incompetent parents. It's deep causes such as abuse, broken homes, and economic disparities. Of course, we can't go after the real causes. We need to waste time on "teh evul vidoe gamez!!1!!!11!1lim(x->0)x/sinx"

@ Pandralisk

so it can't be the fact that his parents practically censored him from reality or the fact that he was a seriously twisted individual. No, it HAS to be X.

X= Isn't it obvious?

@GoodRobotUs

because in all other countries, only law abiding citizens have guns?

My apologizes for the previous comment, I don't want to get this out of hand so I'm just going to say that I think it's rather ironic that they say that video games cause kids to kill, and yet someone was compelled to kill by being censored by it.

Gun control and medical privacy rights.

Bloody fucking mess right there.

Not to mention how do you determine eligability, is a guy who was depressed in middle school not allowed to own a gun in his twenties? The hard part with that is trying to figure out who sets the rules and who has an agenda when making the rules.
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Neo_DrKefkahttps://archive.today/F14zZ https://archive.today/SxFas https://archive.today/1upoI https://archive.today/0hu7i https://archive.today/NsPUC https://archive.today/fLTQv https://archive.today/Wpz8S10/20/2014 - 11:21am
Andrew EisenNeo_DrKefka - "Attacking"? Interesting choice of words. Also interesting that you quoted something that wasn't actually said. Leaving out a relevant link, are you?10/20/2014 - 11:04am
quiknkoldugh. I want to know why the hell Mozerella Sticks are 4 dollars at my works cafeteria...are they cooked in Truffle Oil?10/20/2014 - 10:41am
Neo_DrKefkaAnti-Gamergate supporter Robert Caruso attacks female GamerGate supporter by also attacking another cause she support which is the situation happening in Syia “LET SYRIANS SUFFER” https://archive.today/F14zZ https://archive.today/Wpz8S10/20/2014 - 10:18am
Neo_DrKefkaThat is correct in an At-Will state you or the employer can part ways at any time. However Florida also has laws on the books about "Wrongful combinations against workers" http://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2012/448.04510/20/2014 - 10:07am
james_fudgehe'd die if he couldn't talk about Wii U :)10/20/2014 - 9:16am
Michael ChandraBy the way, I am not saying Andrew should stop talking about Wii-U. I find it quite nice. :)10/20/2014 - 8:53am
Michael Chandra'How dare he ignore my wishes and my advice! I am his boss! I could have ordered him but I should be able to say it's advice rather than ordering him directly!'10/20/2014 - 8:52am
Michael ChandraIf GP goes "EZK, do not talk about X publicly for a week, we're preparing a big article on it" and he still tweets about X, they'd have a legitimate reason to be pissed.10/20/2014 - 8:52am
Michael ChandraIf GP tells Andrew "we'd kinda prefer it if you stopped talking about Wii-U for 1 week" and he'd tweet about it anyway, firing him for it would be idiotic.10/20/2014 - 8:51am
Michael ChandraLegal right, sure. But that doesn't make it any less pathetic of an excuse.10/20/2014 - 8:50am
ZippyDSMleeYou mean right to fire states.10/20/2014 - 8:50am
james_fudgesome states have "at will" employee laws10/20/2014 - 7:50am
quiknkoldIt says in the article that being in florida, you can get fired regardless if its a fireable offence10/20/2014 - 7:19am
Michael ChandraIf your employee respectfully disagrees with your advice, that's not a fireable offense. If they ignore your order, THEN you have the right to be pissed.10/20/2014 - 6:49am
Michael ChandraI... Don't get one thing. If you do not want your employee to do X, why do you tell them it's advice or a wish? Give them a damn order.10/20/2014 - 6:48am
james_fudgeA leak that had me worried about being swatted by Lizard Squad.10/20/2014 - 6:03am
james_fudgeIt should be noted that the author leaked the GJP group names online10/20/2014 - 6:03am
MechaTama31I mean, of the groups being bullied here, which of the two would you refer to collectively as "nerds"?10/19/2014 - 11:30pm
MechaTama31But that's the thing, it doesn't sound to me like he is advocating bullying, it sounds like he is accusing the SJWs of bullying the "nerds", who I can only assume refers to the GGers.10/19/2014 - 11:21pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician