Irish Censorship Board Censors Out "Censor" From its Name

Irish Censorship Board Censors Out "Censor" From its Name

January 7, 2008
When last seen by readers of GamePolitics, the Irish Film Censor's Office was in the process of banning Manhunt 2 from the Emerald Isle.

But the Irish Independent reports a name change is in the works for the IFCO, which feels it no longer does much censoring. Said IFCO head John Kelleher:
The Minister (for Justice) is planning to change, at my request, the name of the office. I understand that an amendment is in the pipeline which will change our name from the Irish Film Censor's Office to the Irish Film Classification Office. I think for most people, that would be a very welcome change.

In 2007 the IFCO reviewed more than 8,000 items and only Manhunt 2 and four porn films got the chop. Speaking of the Manhunt 2 ban, Kelleher said:
You are doing the stabbing, the mutilation and the killing. With this particular game it's non-stop.

Films banned or forced into edits by the IFCO over the years include Casablanca, Woody Allen's  Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Sex and Oliver Stone's Natural Born Killers...

Comments

This is the same thing the tax and war departments do, calling themselves "revenue" and "defense" to hide their true objectives.
To be fair, Kelleher has been pretty good as the head of IFCO, taking a very moderate line when it comes to most things. I remember him being interviewed when that film Nine Songs was released (that psuedo-arty one with all the actual sex scenes between a music loving couple.) He released it without an edit if I recall correctly, taking the position that over-18s (i.e. Adults) could basically watch what they wanted.

Tbh I'm glad Manhunt 2 was banned - not only does it give anti-game lobbyists another stick to beat us about the head with but it's also a REALLY bad game. But then again I'm painfully aware of the precedent banning it sets, which doesn't sit too easy.

Thanks for taking an interest in us over this side of the pond GP.
The fact that Manhunt 2 was banned did not have any effect on me. I wasn't going to be buying the game, nor were any of my friends.

What did get me very angry however, was the reasons they gave for it's banning. They stated that the reason it was banned was due to the violence having no context, where strong violence is sometimes permissable if it has a context within a story. Manhunt 2 was never going to win any fiction awards for story telling, but the fact remains, it did have a plot and story, no matter how trite or poorly done, and therefore a context within that story. It seemed to me that they had banned it simply because Britain had, perhaps to make it seem like "If it's unacceptable to them, it must be the same to us".

What made me even angrier still was the response I got from them when i enquired about the ban and the reasons behind it. I quoted their reasons for the ban, and pointed out that the movie The Texas Chainsaw Massacre had very little plot (just like Manhunt 2), featured callous and gruesome violence (just like Manhunt 2) and was an example of violence out of context (just like Manhunt 2), yet the IFCO saw fit to release it with an 18's certificate. I asked them why had Manhunt 2, which is very similar in many ways to this movie, not been released with the same, appropriate 18's rating.

In answer, they repeated to me the very same reasons I had already brought up and quoted in my mail. No explanation of why one example of violence with little or no context is given a pass while another is banned outright. No effort to explain further their reason. It felt like a form response letter which had been sent without reading mine and simply going by the subject header.

If a GOOD game had been banned, I would still be writing to them. But even though it was a pretty poor game, their reasons and replies to me has made me see them in a very bad light.
And here I thought we were making progress. They have begun allowing Playboy and contraceptives without a prescription in Ireland. The cover girl from an issue a while back is actually from my hometown.
My thoughts:

When you change the name of a pile of crap to 'fluffy marshmallow pies' it's still a pile of crap.
Ministry of Truth, anyone?
I somewhat feel it, that They seem to aim for some kind of revisionism, don't you think?
i'll only take it seriously if they actually classify everything.
refusing to classify something is practically a ban (though not in theory). therefore, so long as they do their job of 'classifying' stuff properly, i've no problem with this change.
though the moment they refuse to classify something, then its a lie.
Censorship is still censorship no matter what terms you want to use.
Censorship is still censorship no matter what terms you want to use.

I agree wholeheartedly. There is no reason to ban Free Speech on the sole basis that it is offensive and nothing else. I despise censorship and i am glad that where i live in Ontario the film ratings board here can no longer outright ban films, just classify them.
It seems to me that the main reason they're changing the name is that having "Censor" in the title causes people to have a knee-jerk negative reaction. Exhibit A: the comments here by CyberSkull, E. Zachary Knight, Benji, The_None and Zerodash. Despite the name, IFCO does precisely the same work as PEGI and the ESRB, two organisations that seem to enjoy a considerable amount of goodwill from gamers.
Incidentally, I love underhanded spin as much as the next guy, but the three films mentioned at the end of GP's post are freely available in unedited form in Ireland and have been for many many years. Putting them there is the equivalent of ending an article about contemporary US politics with "Groups who have had elementary civil rights withheld by the American people include Negroes, women, homosexuals..."
"Casablanca, Woody Allen’s Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Sex and Oliver Stone’s Natural Born Killers"

I'm sure by now we can get this movies uncut, I mean Casablanca came out in the 40's around the time Ireland was beyond prudish, Any bans and edits that where placed than are long and truely dead.

I bet I can go to the local Xtra Vision and rent any of them films without edits. And was the banning of Manhunt 2 really that bad you can still buy the original game for 15euro in Virgin.
@ emordino

The ESRB and the PEGI have never refused to classify a game nor do they have the ability. That is the difference. The BBFC and the IFCO have the ability to refuse classification and have used that to bar the games from release.

So to say that all these organizations have the same function is a little naive on your part.
To follow your point EZK. The ESRB is NOT government run or sponsored. I think this is a concept many people both domestically and abroad have trouble understanding. The government CAN'T dictate content either by creation or omission. Any and all attempts to bring government control over media content have been ruled unconstitutional. If I'm reading this right then the IFCO is a government body and that makes a very big difference.
So does this mean they are going to stop censoring stuff and actually give it a rating?
If you call a horse a monkey... it's still a horse.
This whole thing reminds me of some music exec or something who said they should change the name of 'Digital Rights Management' to 'Digital Consumer Enablement'.

Crap by any other name is still crap.
Casablanca? In need of an edit? BS.
@ Blackadvent

I guess, "Here's looking at you kid." was simply to tasteless for them.
Changing the name makes it all better?

Sorry Zach, gotta steal your idea.

Paint a turd pink and stick flowers in it, it's still a turd.
@ Laughing man

Well, if you then cloak it with a SEP field, then no one will notice.
I agree with everyone...

A spade is a spade. Change the name all you want it still doesn't change what you're doing it just confuses what you do. For those who disagree I ask this, what exactly does a Sanitation Engineer (aka garbage collector), engineer?
@ E. Z. Knight

god bless you for the Douglas Adams ref. I had to mouse over the link to verify that was what you were really talking about :)
Films banned or forced into edits by the IFCO over the years include Casablanca, Woody Allen’s Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Sex and Oliver Stone’s Natural Born Killers…

Oh come on, our own MPAA was a lot stricter early on and has gradually grown less strict (or so it seems), and I've heard the BBFC was the same way.
I bought Manhunt 2, and it's crap.
The BBFC used to make LOTS of cuts to movies so they could get an 18 rating. The original Texas Chainsaw Massacre is banned in the UK.
@ emordino: Well, the ESRB has a degree of goodwill because they will not refuse to classify anything submitted to them.
I love PCness lets change the name but not the game...er definition.

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 11/08/09 at 08:53am
JDKJ: But cheer up, Austin. If the unemployment rate continues to double-digit as predicted for the next few years, your half-dozen stands a better than likely chance of returning to power.
Posted 11/08/09 at 08:46am
JDKJ: @DS: If he had added the line about "or hiring illegals aliens under the table to work as nannies," it would have been a completely perfect descripition. And, yes, it's about the same difference between a six and a half-dozen.
Posted 11/08/09 at 08:31am
DarkSaber: My god, that description makes them sound almost Republican. Still what did you expect, Obama is only marginally more left than republicans.
Posted 11/08/09 at 01:07am
Austin_Lewis: Health insurance, brought to you by the same kind of bureacrats who couldn't, in timely fashion, investigate the comments of any of the men Obama appointed Czars. Or their past. Or their history of not paying taxes.
Posted 11/08/09 at 01:06am
Austin_Lewis: Yes, and what a piece of crap it was. Arresting and fining people just because they don't make a personal choice to buy healh insurance, creating over a hundred new bureacracies, and worse.
Posted 11/08/09 at 12:24am
ZippyDSMlee: JDKJ:the only trouble is a bunch of witless hacks wrote it....its going to be a train wreck....
Posted 11/07/09 at 11:33pm
JDKJ: BREAKING: In a photo-finish at the wire, House passes health care reform bill. Relatedly, in a fit of pique, Austin Lewis kicks innocent dog.
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:27pm
ZippyDSMlee: man I got alot of junk and dup files too >< god I need orginization...and no not the knee capping media mafia kind :P
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:26pm
ZippyDSMlee: replaced :P
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:23pm
ZippyDSMlee: beemoh:hey its like 60GB porn,400GB anime 100GB games and crap I have took from all my DVDs, I hate waiting on dvds to install stuff..... oh and 40GB of my porn was in the found.000 folder...mostly corrupted.... least I got names of wut needs to be repa
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:18pm
beemoh: @Zip: ...and you'd have to spend all that time re-downloading that porn?
Posted 11/07/09 at 03:34pm
ZippyDSMlee: ggrrrrr......vista lost one of my hard drives and I had a heart attack thinking I lost 1TB of data....
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:58am
JDKJ: Which could be explained by both (a) and (b).
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:56am
Austin_Lewis: JDKJ: You forgot C) the fact that, for some reason, every time he did something that would suggest he shouldn't be in the military, let alone an officer, higher ups ignored it or let it slide.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:51am
JDKJ: Part of the problem is, I believe, that (a) the Army had a lot of time and money already invested in him and which they were unwilling to simply write-off and (b) an increasing need for the type of skills and services he provided.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:48am
JDKJ: And that even if he was begging not to get cut loose, he was apparently a real good candidate for being cut loose, anyway.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:11am
JDKJ: @chada: And while Kennedy once noted that there's usually more than enough blame for everyone to get a slice, the possibility that the Army was unwilling to cut loose someone who was asking to get cut loose could be a factor.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:07am
ZippyDSMlee: *noms on his feet*..nomnomnomnom*droooll* ...wuuutttttt uuu looking at?
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:05am
JDKJ: I'm no psychologist, but I'm told that crazy people have a tendency to do crazy things.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:03am
chadachada321: Whoops, was out of the convo for awhile. I do wonder what type of ammo he used etc, but the real issue is WHY he did it, not HOW
Login or register to post shouts