With Election Looming, ESA Plans to Spread Some Cash

January 15, 2008 -

Few things capture a politician's attention like campaign donations.

That's why, as the New York Times reports, the Entertainment Software Association will soon begin spreading money around to candidates for federal office. The video game publishers' organization has created a political action committee (PAC) to facilitate its campaign donations.

Regarding the move, ESA boss Michael Gallagher told the Times' Seth Schiesel:
 

We will be writing checks to campaigns by the end of this quarter. This is an important step in the political maturation process of the industry that we are ready to take now. This is about identifying and supporting champions for the game industry on Capitol Hill so that they support us.


Gallagher said the ESA's PAC would most likely donate $50,000 to $100,000 in 2008. Federal election law prevents giving more than $5,000 to any single candidate. In flexing the ESA's political muscle, Gallagher also touted the Video Game Voters' Network:
 

If I can walk into the office of a member of Congress and tell them we have 20,000 voters in their state who are already signed up to write letters and act based on game-related issues that concern them, that’s powerful.


GP: While the NYT's Schiesel writes of "a much more favorable and tolerant attitude toward video games both among the general public and politicians," we're not so sure we agree. Games seem under attack as much as ever.


Comments

My name is Jerry Odom, and who am I. I am an unknown 2008 Presidential Candidate “independent”. Before you dismiss me, let me tell you a little bit about my background and I am truly unique in the field.
I can offer something no other Presidential Candidate can. I truly understand how much gaming does benefit us. I am 39 years old and I have been playing games since the Atari 2600. I also owned a gaming center for 3 years and I watched families come together and play every day, from all walks of life. Gaming is the ultimate unifier, and as President I would veto anything that would threaten this unifier.

I encourage you to look at me; I offer the kind of outside the box thinking that made gaming great in the first place and I will apply this to the government.

Here is my quote from my website

“Videos games and movies etc. are not the problem”

“There is one concept that can bring family together and promote family time is playing games together. Gaming is for everyone and with the new Game Systems available the grand kids can play with their grandparents, the nieces & nephew can play with their Aunts & Uncles. What better way to get the families back together? Its fun and the wave of the future”

It is not the role of the government to dictate which games can be played. It is the responsibility of the parents!
With video games our broken families can find common ground and can be brought together once again.

I am not a politician. I am just a guy who sees major problems, and has the vision to fix it, no matter how impossible others might think it is.

And ideas like this must be stopped, before they regulate our freedom out of America.

“The high-water mark of political dudgeon about games came in 2005 when scenes of mild sexual provocation were discovered hidden with the code for the game Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas. In the wake of the controversy Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton proposed legislation to increase federal regulation of the game industry.”

http://www.odom2008.com/id.html this video is what I am trying to do.


Jerry Odom
2008 Presidential Candidate “independent”
To regain our independence from ineffective way doing things
Info@odom2008.com
www.odom2008.com

I think that it's the schism that seems to have formed between media and the videogame industry that's really causing the problem. On one side you have a group warning people that some games aren't for their kids, and that adults play games too, while the other mistakenly screams that every game is made for kids, but 90% of it is porn. It really ires me to see this sort of misinformation being spread, especially so close to election when political lines are being drawn.

I just hope that some politicians out there know what to say and how to say it to avoid angering those vocal gamers out there who don't like their media of choice being attacked. It sickens me when so many out there talking about protecting family when in reality, they are just trying to censor out an art form they don't understand (Clinton, Yee, Schwarzenegger, I'm looking at you). If all you gamers out there care enough to vote, you'll make sure, just like me, that these wads know that we have a loud enough voice, and we will be heard.

They do seem to be under attack as much as usual. And as usual they're poorly researched but cleverly worded to appeal to the public.

zOmg Mass Effect Butt Secks!

Woot, our industry is now mature enough to start bribing politicians, like all the other lobby groups do. Go us..

While I am glad to see the ESA use their position, I am upset to see them start off in the general direction of lobby.

So arethey planning on a blanket campaign contribution? By that I mean, donate to every candidate on the board, or just certain candidates.

I am wondering how Hillary and Romney will take to receiving campaign money from the filthy games industry.

I don't see it so much as a bribe, more of an effort to get in touch with the candidates and say "We are here. We are not just a topic that you can whore to try and get the soccer mom votes. We represent large blocks of voters whose support of you can disappear based on your decisions regarding this form of entertainment."

I approve of their intent to "find a champion" on the Hill. Not someone who will jump out and oppose the anti-game idiots, but someone who is reasonable about games. Someone who will act in the same way as all of the senators who have gotten behind the ESRB, and who will use common sense to educate the public.

Don't give money to Nanny state candidates ESA.

its called being frugal. the're doing anything to survive. if that means bribing canidates, sure do that.

"its called being frugal. the’re doing anything to survive. if that means bribing canidates, sure do that."

Not bribing, but the effect is the same. Once videogames have a human face on capitol hill, much ground will be gained. There are special interest groups for everything under the sun, and it's about time the videogame industry do the same.

@Blade Decivre

Their doing it is no mistake. It's an agenda.

What caught my eye in the article was the description of the Hot Coffee incident, which is described as, and I quote, "scenes of mild sexual provocation."

Ah campain contributions, the stuff platforms are founded on. But even if they donate to said politicians it will not matter if competing industries (junk food, movie studios) donate more.

am I the only one who read "maturation" as "masturbation?" I think the term is far more accurate in context.

I know that it's the way business is done, and I know that just about every industry does it, but I can't help but feel a little dirty about all this.

Its sad that this is how politics really works in this world- just give enough $$ and you can get a politician to march to your drum. While I would love to see games be accepted as a legit medium, it is painful to see that the ESA essentially has to bribe the snakes (politicians) to lay off.

Buying out politicians... I love it.

Sends some cash to Hillary and Romney and see what they do. It might make for a good laugh!

This is disgraceful. I'm glad I'm not associated with the ESA. I guess it reflects their character though.

@Terrible Tom:
Amen, my friend. The ESA is starting to become EPIC FAILURE, oy.

[...] GamePolitics | Few things capture a politician’s attention like campaign donations. [...]

I think videogame industry is tired of being the ultimate scape goat about almost everything.

I don´t like either they have to give money to politicians but I can´t see any other way to this industry to say "here we are".
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Who's responsible for crappy Netflix performance on Verizon?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Sleaker@MP - Looked up hitbox, thanks.07/24/2014 - 9:40pm
Matthew WilsonI agree, but to me given other known alternatives google seems to the the best option.07/24/2014 - 6:30pm
Andrew EisenTo be clear, I have no problem with Google buying it, I'm just concerned it will make a slew of objectively, quantifiably bad changes to Twitch just as it's done with YouTube over the years.07/24/2014 - 6:28pm
Matthew WilsonI doubt yahoo has the resources to pull it off, and I not just talking about money.07/24/2014 - 6:15pm
SleakerI wouldn't have minded a Yahoo purchase, probably would have been a better deal than Tumblr seeing as they paid the same for it...07/24/2014 - 6:13pm
MaskedPixelanteIt's the golden age of Hitbox, I guess.07/24/2014 - 6:08pm
Matthew Wilsonagain twitch was going to get bought. It was just who was going to buy it . Twitch was not even being able to handle the demand, so hey needed a company with allot of infrastructure to help them. I can understand why you would not want Google to buy it .07/24/2014 - 5:49pm
Andrew Eisen"Google is better than MS or Amazon" Wow. Google, as I mentioned earlier, progressively makes almost everything worse and yet there are still two lesser options. Again, wow!07/24/2014 - 5:43pm
Andrew EisenI don't know. MS, in my experience, is about 50/50 on its products. It's either fine or it's unusable crap. Amazon, well... I've never had a problem buying anything from them but I don't use any of their products or services so I couldn't really say.07/24/2014 - 5:42pm
Matthew WilsonGoogle is better than MS or Amazon.07/24/2014 - 5:33pm
Sleaker@AE - I've never seen youtube as a great portal to interact with people from a comment perspective. like ever. The whole interface doesn't really promote that.07/24/2014 - 5:28pm
Andrew EisenNor I. From a content producer's perspective, almost every change Google implements makes the service more cumbersome to use. It's why I set up a Facebook fan page in the first place; it was becoming too difficult to connect with my viewers on YouTube.07/24/2014 - 4:50pm
Sleakerwonder if anyone is going to try and compete with google, I'm not a huge fan of the way they manage their video services.07/24/2014 - 4:41pm
Andrew EisenIt happened. Google bought Twitch. http://venturebeat.com/2014/07/24/googles-1b-purchase-of-twitch-confirmed-joins-youtube-for-new-video-empire/07/24/2014 - 4:28pm
MaskedPixelanteI hope Nintendo actually follows through with the DS Virtual Console, that sounds like it could be cool.07/24/2014 - 2:15pm
james_fudgePeople don't deny it persay, they bristle at the idea that it's a "problem" that nneds to be "fixed."07/24/2014 - 2:15pm
Papa MidnightRacism and Misogny are heavily prevalent in the gaming and online arena. Getting people to actually admit that, however...07/24/2014 - 11:42am
Papa MidnightThat very thing is somthing that anyone who has been subjected to racial-based targeting online could actually state that they've experienced.07/24/2014 - 11:41am
Papa MidnightPerfect example: "I have yet to talk to a man who has had to call a police officer due to a stalker, only to be told nothing can be done until they are physically assaulted."07/24/2014 - 11:40am
Papa MidnightNot that said communities are mutually exclusive. Even the very first comment on that last article equates women in the gaming industry with being the n-word. Despicable, aetestable, and (sadly enough) this is not an uncommon presence in either community.07/24/2014 - 11:35am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician