New Parental Gaming Site Relies on Parents

New Parental Gaming Site Relies on Parents

January 15, 2008
Last year GamePolitics brought you news of a game content site aimed at parents.

Founded by former EGM editor John Davison and former Ziff-Davis colleague Ira Becker, What They Play aims to provide parents with "neutral, objective information" on games.

Yahoo! tech blogger Dory "The Mom" Devlin checked out What They Play at the recent Consumer Electronics Show (CES), and came away impressed. Combining game information and user-submitted review, Amazon.com sales charts, ESRB ratings, game categories, and age groups, the site works at being a complete resource for parents looking for information about any game, on any platform.

What wowed Devlin most was the community participation factor:
The real value of the site will be in the comments, where parents (and, obviously, anyone else) can ask questions of each other and post their opinions about the games.

CM: What They Play's information on games was surprisingly neutral and detailed. As an example, the info for Manhunt 2, described on Common Sense Media as "an appalling choice" and "a mediocre yet disgusting experience", was very descriptive, but made no judgment either way about the content. ESRB descriptors were expanded on, describing scenes, language, and actions that may have contributed to the ratings, and it even touched briefly on the controversy surrounding the rating. But I found it tried hard to stay neutral, aiming to provide as much information as possible to allow the parents to make the decision for themselves.

The only flaw I noticed in the community involvement theory was the idea that parents "vote" on age appropriateness for each game. Each game spouts a "Parents agree. [Game] is OK for kids over the age of : [age]". Somehow I doubt parents are voting for Manhunt 2 to be 14+...

- Reporting from Canada, GP Correspondent Colin "Jabrwock" McInnes

Comments

Looks to be a very helpful site in a similar vein to GamerDad. The value of the community participation factor will of course depend on the size of the community that sprouts around the site.
At last! We need sites like this.
If you have a sane and mature 14 year old(least mature enough to handle "media") then 14 is not that surprising, you also have to remember that film is much more graphic ad TV is nearly as graphic as well, if the game was uncut it would probably be shot up to 16-17.
I took a look at the Parents Approved age bit. It only goes to 17. Why is 18+ not the oldest age to choose. I mean, if a parent thinks that a game is not appropriate for any child of any age, why do they not have that option?

Not trying to criticize, but critique.

I like the site. I have not gone in depth into it, but I have looked around.
"Watchdog" websites are mainly subjective rather than objective, even though they'll never admit it. Then again, the target audience of places like "Common Sense Media" is the lowest common denominator-parents who can't or won't think for themselves.
see, there finally using the common sensor- THE PARENTS!
A certain lawyer claimed awhile back that John Davison is a whisteblower on the games industry because he made this site.
I'm kind of surprised that Johnny Bruce Thompson isn't trolling around here as usual.
@ gs2005

He's banned at the moment, I believe, what with the trial still going on.
Yeah, the community voting thing is not a good idea. Just another poll for Anonymous to mess with.
....Like this maters? its not that parents arnt given a chance to find these things out its that they choose not to

Sarcastic Gamer did a little story about it a little bit ago
http://sarcasticgamer.com/wp/index.php/2008/01/too-simple-for-parents.ht...
@MonkeyFace:

This is a pretty good clearing house for finding out "these things" if they choose to. After all, the ESRB descriptors on the box, though more detailed than film descriptors, can still be elaborated upon so that parents can truly understand what's going on in a game in as much detail as possible.

I have no idea what your beef with this website is, not at all.
to tell the truth I'm rather pleased with this site. while the reviews written on the site seems sometimes to exaggerate how violent some games are. like this excerpt from the CoD4 review:

"Bullets tear through body armor and into flesh, explosions throw combatants around like rag dolls, and corpses litter the battlefield in the aftermath of each skirmish."

while anyone who's played CoD4 knows that the blood only shows if the person getting shot is standing directly adjacent to a wall, and even then its nothing more than a simple blood decal on the wall that fades after a few minutes, and a grenade exploding at your feet only throws you back.

For the most part though they stick to a very literal interpretation of what is actually in the game.

we've all heard the many people claiming that the popular game
Mass Effect has a explicitly graphic sex scene, and you can even have
a homosexual sex scene (heh that sounded funny). While lawyers, politicians, and online "journalist"

(I quote journalist because while a journalist is supposed to do research on his or her subject. All to often online "journalist" in place of actually doing research they simply jump to conclusions, make up "facts" and start the article with the preconceived notion of 'all games are bad, and game developers want nothing more than to ""corrupt todays youth"")

Anyway, while most of the recent articles that have been posted here on GP about Mass Effect have been some lawyers, politicians, and online "journalist" personal crusade against sex in games and how this game has been marketed to little 15 year old boys and now their little minds are ruined because they saw about 10-15 seconds of bare HIP.

Needless to say I was surprised when the review from "What They Play" had this to say of the scene

"While described as “the sex scene” by anyone that’s heard of it, what the player actually sees is little more than the naked hips of one of the female characters as she moves up the body of her lover. The scene then fades to black."

in the same paragraph the author goes on to say that in order for you to even get the option of sex in the game you have to create a relationship between characters in the game and continue it through out the entire course of the game. The Author also notes that it is entirely up to the player to chose to or not to pursue a relationship.

all and all i was glad to see a site that was honest and even the reviews of the parents were very fact-based and truthful
I would find it better if they brought review averages from metacritic or gamerankings.com.

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 11/22/09 at 12:06am
JDKJ: You should get Phil McCraken to help you spackle those banisters.
Posted 11/21/09 at 11:57pm
ZippyDSMlee: Oh in the pirate hunter article I need my song ieda heckled DS,JD,Beemon sic im !!!
Posted 11/21/09 at 11:56pm
ZippyDSMlee: JD:no I am tried from prepping the banisters for painting , worked on them from 12 to 4 and 6 to 8...after I got back from the store...got up early got ready...blah...been up all day..I need a nap...
Posted 11/21/09 at 11:42pm
JDKJ: No. You gonna stay up late tonight soldering?
Posted 11/21/09 at 11:41pm
ZippyDSMlee: JDKJ:Don't you mean Mctite?
Posted 11/21/09 at 11:33pm
JDKJ: @Zip: Neil, Bob, and Lik McTaint. The McTaint brothers. LOL!!!
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:44pm
Flamespeak: I still think military personell, killing other military personell, on a military complex should be handled by military courts.
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:43pm
Flamespeak: I could see this a mixture of the two charges rather than just one or the other.
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:43pm
Flamespeak: I think this was mainly a person who snapped, but evidence is showing he definitely had strong inlinations to islamic-extremism.
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:41pm
Flamespeak: People are trying to claim that Hasan's actions were not terrorism. I don't jump on the 'terror train' like others, however
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:38pm
mentor07825: Britain certainly does deserve it! And the French! God damn it, it was a hand ball!!!
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:34pm
ZippyDSMlee: mentor07825:Well Brittan dose deserve it....
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:33pm
ZippyDSMlee: Alyric:I don;t hasliburton having to pay back billoins... don;t you love it when the rich roll over the goverment without a care?
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:32pm
mentor07825: I say we nuke the whales, for the benefit of both mankind and the environment.
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:28pm
Austin_Lewis: I say we try Al Gore too. I always said he was in on the racket.
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:16pm
Alyric: The leaked information proves these organizations knowingly defrauded governments (i.e., taxpayers) out of billions of dollars. Yet there will probably never be a trial.
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:15pm
Flamespeak: working on other things makes me angry. I might have had a jet pack by now. :p
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:14pm
Flamespeak: Just thinking of all the time and manpower wasted to try and make things emit less CO2 emmision that could have been spent
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:07pm
Alyric: @Zip: FYI, the construction of solar panels puts out more pollution than any form of energy production. To say nothing of the toxic components of the panels that cannot be recycled.
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:04pm
ZippyDSMlee: I know I know not the point.
Login or register to post shouts