ECA Opposes New Mexico Video Game Tax

ECA Opposes New Mexico Video Game Tax

January 25, 2008
Earlier this week GamePolitics reported on a New Mexico proposal which would impose a 1% sales tax on video games and TV sets.

The Entertainment Consumers Association (ECA) has now issued a statement in opposition to the New Mexico tax:
The Entertainment Consumers Association (ECA) is opposed to the legislation proposed by the New Mexico Sierra Club.  It's unconstitutional to target video games with a special tax that would unduly burden gamers, leaving out other forms of entertainment media like movies, music and books. 

This proposed tax would also stifle trade and disproportionately impact generations X and Y, who are increasingly becoming more politically aware and vocal. 

Full Disclosure Dept: The ECA is the parent company of GamePolitics.

Comments

that's not exactly why the ECA should be against the Sierra Club's tax, but sure.

yes, it's a sin tax against electronic media but it's not just games it included, at least, televisions in the list.

the reason it's wrong is that it is telling people what they should be doing with their free time and it isn't the Sierra Club (and by extension the NM lawmakers) who gets to decide if you want to spend your time after work indoors or out.
@ Conejo

They aren't really telling you how to spend your free time. THe money goes to outdoor education. SO instead of being in class 7-8 hours a day, you would be in the classroom 4 hrs the day and the other four would be in some outdoor setting, or something like that.

But they are saying that you should be punished for non school related activities to pay for school related education. It is completely stupid.

If they really want to fund those things, they just need to get a slice of the education fund. But that would be too easy as it does not require new taxes.
Key word being UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Gamer over. New Mexico loses.
Gamer over? WTF. GAME over.
Taxs and rebates from the goverment are generally bad..since they do not have a clue about anythign half the time....
@Zippy

Again, a display of complete ignorance over Ron Paul. He does not have a clue about anything.
The tax itself isn't a bad idea, except one media form being targeted makes it a "Sin Tax." If it was a blanket tax, I'd be in support.
Oh yes!! How I'd love more taxes too!!

I really hope - at some point, they just take ALL of my money and then the Government can decide for me - where I'll live, what I'll drive, what I'll eat, where I'll work, what entertainment I can partake in, and on and on and on...

Good Idea!

Government Knows Best!!

Don't they? Look - historically - at all the WONDERFUL good they've done!!
Generation X and Y? Holy crap! All the poor little Couplandites are being unfairly targeted!

Seriously, whoever wrote this release needs to get their head out of JPod.
If you really think the money gained from such a tax would really go to what these politicians say it will then you're kidding yourself.
@Simon Roberts

I don't really see where you're coming from with that statement. Are you implying that Generation Y isn't active in this regard? Because Gen Y is generally considered to be people born in 1980 through 1995, and people in their 20s and early 30s are exactly the kind of people the ECA is talking about.
Anyone want to be specific about how exactly this is unconstitutional, I'm guessing 14th amendment equal protection grounds but has there been a similar court case about a tax being overturned because it targeted a specific type of product? It seems cool to tax cigarettes, I'm not equating games as being dangerous like cigarettes but still if it's ok to tax a specific product in that case why shouldn't it be in this one. I do happen to be against the tax, but I really don't see it as being unconstitutional.
@ Marlow

Yeah, those taxesare affectionatly reffered to as a "Sin Tax." What makes this law unconstitutional, where unlike cigarettes, theres more than one form of this entertainment. Theres movies in theatures, music, dvds, blue rays. Where cigarettes, have that and cigars which for simplicity's sake, the same thing.
@ Ebonheart
Alright but can anyone cite a precedent case?
Also I'd like to point out there's all sorts of seemingly inconsistent tax laws in the states, fruits are taxed differently than vegetables, dolls are taxed separate from toys (although i think that's more an issue in the tariff realm,) and in the video game realm couldn't they legally be considered entertainment, toys, just plain old software, or some category of their own? Trust me I am very much against a sin tax placed on video games, but i just don't see what the fact that there's multiple forms of entertainment has to do with constitutionality.
Dang it, I like playing video games... I wish they wouldn't try to inhibit that. I should start a referendum that would tax the government on every decision they make. I don't know if that's actually possible, but still... I'd like to do it.
this Sierra Club, sounds like a small group of fat, british women, who never learned how to have fun!
I am almost 17, so I'll be out of school soon. I would sooner work at micky d's, and be able to play WOW all day, then go to college...but if this tax did go in, then I would probibaly go to college instead.
It's kind of a sin tax, or a Pigovian tax (thanx Wiki) but those aren't always evil. They aren't always bad ideas. I just think this one could find its ends (better child health -- a necessity for a prosperous America in the future) in much smarter and more fairer ways.
itsabovemusicvideos.com...

Gist: Nell Bedworth (Samaire Armstrong) is a smart, awkward,“ pencil- necked virgin” hoping to pass her interview to get into Yale. Her next- door- neighbour, Woody Deane (Kevin Zegers), is into loud hiphop, dates a cheerleader and wants to get a f...

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 11/08/09 at 09:02am
DarkSaber: http://tinyurl.com/yez7jyo
Posted 11/08/09 at 09:01am
DarkSaber: Oh for gods sake, the Gearbox pres is gobbing off about Valve again
Posted 11/08/09 at 08:53am
JDKJ: But cheer up, Austin. If the unemployment rate continues to double-digit as predicted for the next few years, your half-dozen stands a better than likely chance of returning to power.
Posted 11/08/09 at 08:46am
JDKJ: @DS: If he had added the line about "or hiring illegals aliens under the table to work as nannies," it would have been a completely perfect descripition. And, yes, it's about the same difference between a six and a half-dozen.
Posted 11/08/09 at 08:31am
DarkSaber: My god, that description makes them sound almost Republican. Still what did you expect, Obama is only marginally more left than republicans.
Posted 11/08/09 at 01:07am
Austin_Lewis: Health insurance, brought to you by the same kind of bureacrats who couldn't, in timely fashion, investigate the comments of any of the men Obama appointed Czars. Or their past. Or their history of not paying taxes.
Posted 11/08/09 at 01:06am
Austin_Lewis: Yes, and what a piece of crap it was. Arresting and fining people just because they don't make a personal choice to buy healh insurance, creating over a hundred new bureacracies, and worse.
Posted 11/08/09 at 12:24am
ZippyDSMlee: JDKJ:the only trouble is a bunch of witless hacks wrote it....its going to be a train wreck....
Posted 11/07/09 at 11:33pm
JDKJ: BREAKING: In a photo-finish at the wire, House passes health care reform bill. Relatedly, in a fit of pique, Austin Lewis kicks innocent dog.
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:27pm
ZippyDSMlee: man I got alot of junk and dup files too >< god I need orginization...and no not the knee capping media mafia kind :P
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:26pm
ZippyDSMlee: replaced :P
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:23pm
ZippyDSMlee: beemoh:hey its like 60GB porn,400GB anime 100GB games and crap I have took from all my DVDs, I hate waiting on dvds to install stuff..... oh and 40GB of my porn was in the found.000 folder...mostly corrupted.... least I got names of wut needs to be repa
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:18pm
beemoh: @Zip: ...and you'd have to spend all that time re-downloading that porn?
Posted 11/07/09 at 03:34pm
ZippyDSMlee: ggrrrrr......vista lost one of my hard drives and I had a heart attack thinking I lost 1TB of data....
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:58am
JDKJ: Which could be explained by both (a) and (b).
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:56am
Austin_Lewis: JDKJ: You forgot C) the fact that, for some reason, every time he did something that would suggest he shouldn't be in the military, let alone an officer, higher ups ignored it or let it slide.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:51am
JDKJ: Part of the problem is, I believe, that (a) the Army had a lot of time and money already invested in him and which they were unwilling to simply write-off and (b) an increasing need for the type of skills and services he provided.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:48am
JDKJ: And that even if he was begging not to get cut loose, he was apparently a real good candidate for being cut loose, anyway.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:11am
JDKJ: @chada: And while Kennedy once noted that there's usually more than enough blame for everyone to get a slice, the possibility that the Army was unwilling to cut loose someone who was asking to get cut loose could be a factor.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:07am
ZippyDSMlee: *noms on his feet*..nomnomnomnom*droooll* ...wuuutttttt uuu looking at?
Login or register to post shouts