Eco-Creatures: Environmental Awareness Comes to Nintendo DS

February 1, 2008 -
Seattle's KING-5 has a report on Majesco's upcoming real-time strategy game Eco-Creatures: Save the Forest for the Nintendo DS:
Majesco Entertainment says Eco-Creatures: Save the Forest is the only one of its kind to promote awareness of the perils of "…over-industrialization, deforestation, pollution, extinction and global warming."

With proper care, the creatures can evolve to learn new abilities that help complete the game’s more than 40 environmental missions.

GameSpot has more:
As the name implies, Eco-Creatures is an awfully green game... It's very environmentally friendly... The graphical style may be awfully cutesy, but it looks like there's quite a bit of depth and complexity to the gameplay, so older, tactically minded DS owners may want to give it a look as well.

Eco-Creatures launches on March 4th.

Comments

This may sound strange, but I'm waiting for two well entrenched series to start picking up on 'green' issues. A) Harvest Moon - It's nearly there as it is, but you know one day the environment is gonna become a huge issue in the game or game's plot. B) Age of Empires (or related) - Ever since playing the original I always thought it was ironic that I'm living in the age of global warming while playing a game where whomever can destroy forests faster has an advantage.

Ya know, what would be really cool to add to the Nintendo line would be updated versions of games like SimEarth, SimLife, SimFarm, and a few other similar games. I think SimCity is coming to the Wii, isn't it? But updated versions of these others would be cool too.

Nightwng2000
NW2K Software
Nightwng2000 NW2K Software http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000 Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

@ Nitherean

It's on the DS. DVDs have nothing to do with it. It is stored on silicone based circuitry that poisons the environment.

Eco-Creatures = The tree hugger's version of Pokemon

"As the name implies, Eco-Creatures is an awfully green game… It’s very environmentally friendly…"

Unfornuately, the fuel that must be spent to to ship the games, and for the end user to purchase it (since we dont all have Game Stores within walking distance). The plastic boxes they come in, will degrade by nature in about 10K years. An those nice DVDs have to be made with chemicals that are just plain toxic to the enviroment.

No no no....the message isnt coming out the wrong way or anything....

Sounds like a cuter version of a captain planet episode... I want it.

whether the manufacture of the game is green or not, the message is, and thats a good step forwards.

Wasn't there a game like that but your a robot and you build a park and take care of it?

Is the game itself environmentally friendly? Manual/box/packing made of chlorine-free 100% recycled post-consumer materials? Lead-free solder? Recyclable plastic? etc?
-- If your wiimote goes snicker-snack, check your wrist-strap...

@nightwng2000:

You basically just said Spore.

Spore is going to be like an updated verson of all those games Spore will be providing simulated Eco-System problems such as you can test the run away effects of greenhouse gases on a planet....Pump it with several kinds of gases. You can eather over heat the planet and turn it into a molten waste land or add gases that can cause the wrong effects such as a run away ice age.

if I could actually find a DS for sale, i'd rather get The Legend Of Zelda: Phantom Hourglass.

@Nitherean

Last I checked there's no way to send a message without "polluting" the environment.

BTW you polluted while you browsed, wrote, and posted your message. Even more ironic.

@ All

As for the game it does seem to be another Captain Planet type environmental awareness push as we had back in the early 1990s. Seems harmless enough and it might even be a good game.

@King of Fiji:
Chibi Robo, Park Patrol is the game you're thinking of.

Goddamn I hate this eco bullshit.

@Austin Lewis

Agreed. You know anyone who can do a spin-off where we burn the damned forest and it's wildlife?

@BlackIce, Dragunov Marksman

Rather than burning the forests (I don't hate or even dislike nature), I think there should be a game where we get to burn the damn greentarded hippies that promote global whining.

@Bill

You get the Brownie for today's best idea.

@Bill
I want to burn some hippies. I think that would be epically hilarious.

And as a boss, we could toast Al Gore. After all, he's the one who popularized this to the idiotic masses here in America and then got the Nobel Bullshit Prize (Formerly Nobel Prize, but then it became a political tool).

Hooray for someone to hate! Honestly, you guys, if you have some argument, please put it forward; otherwise you're just like those people who hate video games and everyone who plays them - mindless, childish demagogues whose only virtue is their endless capacity for anger.

Really, it astounds me how much bile gets thrown around on this site, and from people who know what it's like to be hated on for no reason, too.
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Will Target Australia sell the next GTA game upon its release?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Mattsworknameproliferation of the whole "internet movment" thing, people dont debate, they try to attack and go after peole to shut them down, casue it's easier then trying to debate the issues07/29/2015 - 11:39pm
MattsworknameWhen you break it down, what it is is the shifting of the media lanscape and how it effects news sites and other groups. once upon a time, you could have run that same article and it would have created debate, not online campagns, now, cause of the07/29/2015 - 11:38pm
MattsworknameCall it waht you wil, but thats how its viewed, not just by me, but by just about EVERYONE right now. Media, new networks, they dont' want to call it what it is, soe they call it "accountability"07/29/2015 - 11:34pm
Andrew Eisen"Gamasutra... had to pay" Yes. That's EXACTLY what it was. "Accountability" is and always was horse poop.07/29/2015 - 11:29pm
MattsworknameSo to speak07/29/2015 - 11:28pm
MattsworknameThats why this happened, you get people who felt hurt, marginalize, bettrayd, or otherwise offended, and they don't actually look at teh facts, they just attack and try to get there Blood for Blood07/29/2015 - 11:28pm
Mattsworknamefalse. Weather you think the article was right or not, there was a large group who felt taht gamastura and the other media sites had to pay for there actions, weather they deserved it or not07/29/2015 - 11:27pm
Andrew EisenTrying to yank advertising over a single opinion piece on a site that I would bet money most of the offended (if you will) didn't read, is no more an attempt at accountability than the Brown shooting's subsequent riots.07/29/2015 - 11:27pm
MattsworknameMy point andrew is that it's not about them, its about the people responding to the situation. THe brown shooting was eventually shown to be completely justified, but the "Black lives matter" meme kept on rolling despite all it's intiall claims being07/29/2015 - 11:26pm
Andrew EisenDude, you're comparing an opinion piece with someone who was shot to death. Gamasutra and Alexander already were accountable for the opinion piece in question.07/29/2015 - 11:25pm
Mattsworknamekinds of events. nor has it stopped them from being asshats in my opinion, but in there view, they have to hold someone accountible for recent events, so they are doing what they think they must, even if it's based on falsehoods07/29/2015 - 11:22pm
MattsworknameAndrew: It's really a matter of context for the people involved. For example. The "Black lives matter" thing is based on an entirely false account of events in the brown shooting, but that hasnt' stopped it from triyng to hold Polititcians accountable for07/29/2015 - 11:22pm
Andrew EisenWouldn't surprise me. A lot of words' actual meanings escape many people on the internet.07/29/2015 - 11:17pm
Andrew EisenSo, "they must be held accountable" means "we must hurt them for publishing an opinion piece we don't like."07/29/2015 - 11:17pm
Mattsworknameor me thats demanding accountability on this, it's the ones who undertook the actiosn against these sites and went after the advertisers07/29/2015 - 11:13pm
MattsworknameJust cause you or I disagree with there response, they still feel they have a right to hold Groups like kotaku, gamasutra, Gawker, ET all, to account for what they felt was a vile and inappropriate action. Regardless of your or my view on it, it's nto you07/29/2015 - 11:13pm
Mattsworknamebetrayed or insulted by the articles in question, then they will feel a need to hold those media groups, regardless of intent, to account for that action, be it right or wrong.07/29/2015 - 11:12pm
MattsworknameAndrew: :target audience or not, if a large enough portion of our audience has a given view point Andrew, then you risk aggrivating that audience at your own peril. your question has been answer. if a large enough part of a media groups audience felt07/29/2015 - 11:11pm
Andrew EisenMy original question (which I've posed to you four or five times now) still stands.07/29/2015 - 11:04pm
Andrew EisenMatt - Yes, non-industry folk are welcome to and do read Gamasutra. That doesn't change the fact that they're not the site's target audience. Which wasn't my point anyway, merely an offered clarification as you keep referring to it like it's IGN.07/29/2015 - 11:04pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician