February 7, 2008 -
Writing for the SoutheastPsych blog, a child psychologist has expressed disdain for video game violence concerns.Dr. Frank Gaskill (left) takes a historical view:
In 1955, the U.S. Senate blasted comic books... Half a century later, violent video games are the comic books of our day. Testimony before our [North Carolina] state Senate included descriptions of horrific-sounding games...
One frequently cited research article criticizing violent video games includes several studies. One of these studies was a "correlational study" from which the authors concluded, "Playing violent video games often may well cause increases in delinquent behaviors, both aggressive and non-aggressive..."
Correlations are just relationships between two variables; you can never say one causes the other. We could say that during the season when ice cream sales increase, shark attacks also increase. But we could not say the more ice cream you sell, the more you cause shark attacks.
So why is Dr. Gaskill defending violent games? He explains:
Some legislative initiatives and public opinions across the country are based on fallacious assumptions, personal biases, political posturing and weak science.
Common sense tells you that you don't let an elementary school kid or an older child with a history of aggressive behavior play Grand Theft Auto. But that same common sense tells you that if 90 percent of households have owned or rented a video game every year - while the juvenile crime rate has been going down for more than a decade - then a little Halo 3 never hurt anybody...



Comments
Re: Child Psychologist Scoffs at Video Game Violence Arguments
is video game violence really an issue?
he just literally states some facts on the table and says... there you go.. now if violent games do cause violence then explain this....
Unfortunately people like this guy are ignored by critics or get criticized :/.
absolutely perfect reasoning! i love the ice cream analogy of correlation.
Also again spot on, if a kid has a history of violent behaviour dont let him play (fits in with the argument that violent people like violent games, not violent games make people violent)
And finally the icing on the common sense cake ''But that same common sense tells you that if 90 percent of households have owned or rented a video game every year - while the juvenile crime rate has been going down for more than a decade - then a little Halo 3 never hurt anybody…
''
i would love to see J Ts response to that one.
Dr. Gaskill, I raise my glass to you. Bravo sir, bravo.
It's a shame videogame critics will probably never even need to take Dr Gaskill's commentary into account, as I would love to hear somebody try to formulate an opposing argument.
I salute you, sir!
Must remember to check up on this individual's work.
Must remember to check up on this individual's work.
:: Is now stuck in infinite loop. ::
Nightwng2000
NW2K Software
i like these findings, simply because they point obvious flaws in research that is being waved around as 'fact'.
It seemed like a lot of Psycho-logiststs I've been reading regarding games lately have a knack for posturing and hyperboles.
For the rest, completely agree, obviously.
The same can be said for rough sports.
I remember a couple of rowdy guys back in high school who were recommended by the school counselor to take up a high-imp[act sport to help them dissipate their aggresive tendencies.
Makes sense some with higher levels of testosterone or angst need a release for that energy and need to be taught how to correctly dissipate it.
They always told you not to eat ice cream just before swimming!
Now I see WHY!
SHARK ATTACKS!!!
Doctor Frank Gaskill
Understands what IS science
Only states the facts
Classic example that any people with a statistics background would use. Nice.
A HUGE one!
The size of a Pizza!!!
2. why is it that he is the only one who seems to have any common sense?
However, it seems that two psychology clinicians, Dr.Frank Gaskill and Dr. Jerald Block, think otherwise. I do wonder the general consensus amongst clinicians, not academics, on the video game effects.
I knew ice cream was bad for you, but... Wow... I never saw that correlation before /sarcasm
FINALLY! A voice that speaks the truth with simple logic. Kudos!
I mean, who is gonna trust the "that's no problem!" guy? The one telling you the revelation (translations FTW) is coming prolly is right! Seriously, fact go down before fear.
Second, I love this guy. He basically says that problems with the child are not from the games, but from the parents. Who would have thought that the parents should be teaching their kids right from wrong anymore. Here I thought my parents were weird for doing that
Same here. Playing a little TF2, or commanding my army of Minions in Overlord to pillage and burn a village is oddly calming. When in TF2 you get a feeling of achievement when you win, and in Overlord you get a good laugh at all the stupid comments from the minions.
Of course, just sitting their watching the nightly news makes one depresessed, angry, fearful, and turns the brain to goo. Hmmm... tough call there.
P.S.
I love you.
( I hope my last two lines are not copyrighted)
I like what i'm hearing.
Seriously though, it is truly wonderful to find a psychologist with real common sense. Bravo! We need this guy to start helping out more.
i love this guy
Maybe you psychology retards don't have the cognitive ability to play video games do a fucking study on...
Coincidentally my Psy 102 professor was talking about the issue of Correlation vs Causation and how they are NOT the same just last week. Whats more is that he used a very similar example only it was between ice cream and drowning.
3 cheers hip hip hooray, hip hip hooray, hip hip hooray!!!!!
take that JT
and any other person who doesnt understand what there talking about. espically fox news