Columnist Fears Nanny State in Upcoming Byron Report

Columnist Fears Nanny State in Upcoming Byron Report

February 12, 2008
There's good news and bad news about Telegraph columnist Jim White.

The good news is that White has criticized the nanny state approach to dealing with video games which he sees looming with next month's release of TV shrink Tanya Byron's (left) British government-sponsored report.

The bad new is that he seems to support banning certain games and buys into the "games are kid stuff" stereotype. White writes:
Tanya Byron... is the latest of [Prime Minister] Gordon Brown's battalion of advisers to add to the incipient condition of panic gripping our daily lives...

The issue here is a pretty simple one: legislate fiercely to ensure that the uglier, nastier, sadistic end of the games market cannot gain distribution and then step back and stop worrying about the rest.

Ms Byron's report has not yet been released, but it seems from pre-publication leaks that she takes a different approach, one that will involve nannying ourselves into a state of sustained alarm about the nature of these games...

Here comes the stereotyping:
[Games] are overwhelmingly the preserve of adolescent boys... as yet no one has conclusively proved that playing games damages your health. Since we occasionally hear of some maniac shooting up his high school in middle America after a marathon session on some gory game, the assumption is they are entirely corrupting.

But in such cases it is more the easy availability of real guns, rather than their virtual counterparts, that lies at the heart of the problem.

Comments

The U.K. has a gun problem? I thought the U.K. had guns under control and just had a knife problem?
@Gift

Thou art old. Tell the wankers that you play games too, and we might get somewhere.
Andrew
What they are trying to do is nitpick what their adult populace can do, they should relax and let "the boxing tits" alone(sex and violence) stick with kiddy porn,snuff films and weapons building(?).

That or do what the Japanese do and censor porn.....0-o
As I've said elsewhere, our "newspapers" aren't worth the paper they are printed on. The Torygraph deserves as much scorn as any other rag IMO. Newsflash for Mr. White, libitarianism lite isn't libertarian at all.

Seriously how can anyone condemn a nanny state while simultaneously suggesting the state censors games? One or the other, it cannot be both.

Oh and it's nearly a decade since I was a teen, that goes for my gamer girlfriend too... stereotypes are so tedious.

Gift.
"...overwhelmingly the preserve of adolescent boys"? Ridiculous! I mean has this guy not seen any of the demographic information? Most gamers are in their 20s and 30s. Heck, I'm in my mid 40s. Or is he saying that 40 year-olds are adolescent boys too?
According to ESA:

Sixty-seven percent of American heads of households play computer and video games.

The average game player is 33 years old and has been playing games for 12 years.

Thirty-eight percent of all game players are women. In fact, women over the age of 18 represent a significantly greater portion of the game-playing population (31%) than boys age 17 or younger (20%).

In 2007, 24 percent of Americans over the age of 50 played video games, an increase from nine percent in 1999.
He's a Telegraph columnist. In other words, a nobody. This is just further proof that these self-important media types are out of touch with us modern gamers.
I don't get it. If games are "just kids toys", then why does he even care at all? It's like he's using the issue to rail against the "nanny state" in general, and is using the games issues as his segue.

"legislate fiercely to ensure that the uglier, nastier, sadistic end of the games market cannot gain distribution and then step back and stop worrying about the rest."

Isn't that being a nanny state? I mean who decides which are the uglier, nastier, sadistic ones? Him? Or buh-dah-buh! The STATE!
i hate the" video gamez r for teh teenaze boyys" rap that everyone spews now of days. in not a teenager, and im definatly not a guy, but im still a GAMER
Wow. People will stereotype anything for that little string of publicity...
"But in such cases it is more the easy availability of real guns, rather than their virtual counterparts, that lies at the heart of the problem."

Didn't expect to see that there.

-P
Oy. It's possibly even more frustrating when someone is only HALF bass-ackwards in his views than if he's just flat out idiotic.
"Since we occasionally hear of some maniac shooting up his high school in middle America after a marathon session on some gory game"

Really? Did he really just write that? Would he care to cite these occasions?

He's a pretentious jackass who shouldn't be allowed near a typewriter, let alone a computer and the internet. If he's so completely unable to understand the topic that he's writing about and to do the tiniest bit of research then he shouldn't speak in a public forum and his editor should fire him or, at the very least, refuse to publish this baseless crap.
This is where some of the Brits who post here come out and pretend there isn't something rotten happening...
Here's our problem. We get offended when someone says video games are kids toys, so we tell them how violent or sexual a game is and we say "This is not a kids game". Then, they force on us about how the violence in the game is going to cause us to go on shotting rampages and what not....

So, no matter what, gamers are going to always lose an argument.
I don't hear good things about British print news anyway, and this serves to remind me why; they're mostly gossip rags so full of themselves, they can't see over their brandy snifters to see the things they're mocking. What makes this particular op-ed column (and don't mistake it for anything but) particularly infuriating is that he also takes a swipe at American gun ownership (which is a touchy subject for me, but my diatribe on that doesn't belong here)
sigh.
But in such cases it is more the easy availability of real guns, rather than their virtual counterparts, that lies at the heart of the problem.


While he gets the assumptions wrong about gamers as many often do, at lest he acknowledges where the real problem lies.
FOR THE LAST TIME GAMERS ARE OF ALL RACES AGES AND SEXES!!!
@Black Manta

"While he gets the assumptions wrong about gamers as many often do, at lest he acknowledges where the real problem lies."

Not really. As much as it would be easy to say "it's the prevalence of guns, stupid", it's deeper than that. There are so many factors.
But in such cases it is more the easy availability of real guns, rather than their virtual counterparts, that lies at the heart of the problem.

Oh, spare me, Mr. White. Guns can do nothing without some whacked-up nut job pulling the trigger. What need is to watch for the signs and conditions that produce the kind of psychopaths that will shoot up a school.
@ Chalts

Guns don't kill people
Gamers with guns kill people.
"But in such cases it is more the easy availability of real guns, rather than their virtual counterparts, that lies at the heart of the problem."
Though I like her assertion that video games are not the problem, I don't blame guns either. I agree with Jabrwock that this is a multi-faceted issue that no one has taken the time to explore.
fucking stupid idiots. This report better not affect the rating of gta 4
@ chrislovespills

i doubt that it will be allowed.
The UK seems to hate rockstar
Let's summarize: How can people think this way? Oh... btw... I do.
"nanny state approach"

What a nice way of saying "A oppressive, controlling, tyrannical police state"
*headdesk* GET A CLUE! GAMES ARENT THE PROBLEM!*pounds head on desk repeatedly in frustration*
I love that for so long they've been ignoring the fact the the majority of gamers are closer to 30 than 15.

I was going to go off on a huge point here about society, violence, etc., but then decided I just don't have the heart at the moment. Screw it. They never learn.
"Ms Byron really should not panic herself or us. That's usually what happens with kids and computer games: they grow out of them."

Not to sound like an echo or anything, but I really would appreciate at least some research being done by the journalists before they put pen to paper. It's this central assumption that forms the basis for all the erroneous and fatuous opinions expressed in this article. It's also pompous and more than a little patronising, even if it were true (which it isn't).

What can we do? Journalists like this don't even want to be educated - it seems they'd much rather just reach for the low hanging, out-of-date stereotypes. I dount they even pay much attention to their own comments field.

I just console myself that by 2015 or thereabouts, gaming will have become an accepted part of mainstream British culture by dint of it's sheert pervasiveness. That's not to say, though, that I don't find the bumps along the way uncomfortable in the extreme.

Anyway, here we go again:

@ Americans: Ignore his poorly expressed opinions on gun control - he's just playing to the choir, so to speak.

@ Zerodash: "Pretend"? Is this where we have to go into the whole schpiel on respecting other people's cultural values even if you don't agree with them? Again?

@ Shaesco: You rwalise that GTA4 is a British-made game, right? Scottish, to be exact.

@ Hawkeye: The only British newspaper wiorth its salt is The Independent IMHO, feel free to use the rest as loo roll.
Between the last few Game based reports from the Times, and this, I'm now certain taht the broadsheets as a whole are utterly not the sort of publication who considers Gamers as a major part of the readership.

Whcih is bizarre as the Guardian, Herald and teh Scotsman are all fairly Gamer-friendly. (it's a relative concept sadly)
@ Verbinator

Britain has a gun problem insofar as owning a gun is illegal (except in very rare circumstances, like farmers) and yet we still have horrible gun crime - especially within young, urban ethnic minorities. But you're right - there are more incidents of aggravated assault with a knife than there are of street shootings.
I really can't say anything polite on this subject right now.
@Monkeythumbs
"Is this where we have to go into the whole schpiel on respecting other people’s cultural values even if you don’t agree with them?"

I do not appreciate your continuing attempts to silence critics by way of politically-correct appeals to respect for cultural diversity.

We should respect those cultural values that are worthy of respect, but none others. Some values are not worth defending. Let us never become so tolerant of other people's cultural values that we tolerate indefensible policies.
@Monkeythumbs

that makes them the perfect example
@ Sea Dog

Whilst I'm sure a simple "fuck off" would suffice, allow me to explain my position. There are many areas of American culture that I (and I would imagine I'm not the only one) find abhorrent, but I don't feel it necessary to either rub it in your face or cast aspersions as to your character every time I have the opportunity to do so. It's impolite and it doesn't serve to further intelligent discourse.

Once you can come back to me with a conclusive argument on what makes you so incredibly sure that your beliefs accurately reflect what is and what is not objective morality, then I'd be happy to chat with you until the cows come home. Until then, I for one would greatly prefer these comments fields were free from under-researched jingoism.
@ Shaesyco

I think you may have a point there, mores the pity. If only Westmister would realise what an artistic and economic goldmine they were sitting on, then maybe they wouldn't be so reactionary.
There isn't anything rotten happening in Britain. Um. With regards to gaming. Numerous other aspects of the country are more pear-shaped than Bristol-fashion but the only thing lurking on the gaming horizon at the moment is the anticipated results of the Byron report, which will not result in games getting banned.
@ Monkeythumbs

hind sight is 20/20(I hope i spelled that right)
@ Monkeythumbs

hind sight is 20/20(I hope i spelled that right)
@Matthew

for the sake of arguement lets say that is does lead to a ban on video games of all kinds?

What happens to the gamers there?
@Shaesyco:

That won't happen though. I could ask you what would happen if the US banned alcohol. The Magna Carta might not be as easy a read as the Constitution but the UK still has a guarantee that the government won't stiff the people.

I'm tired of feeling like I need to defend the UK all the time. It's not a perfect country, and people are chipping away at the civil liberties of its citizens (highest CCTV-to-people ration in Europe, looming national identity cards, etc.) but that's hardly a reason to come down on it so much all the time. The UK has some slightly more restrictive laws than the US does, but freedom is not an "all or nothing" concept. See also: DMCA, PATRIOT, extraordinary renditition.
@ Matthew

I hope you're wearing asbestos underwear...
@ Matthew
a)they did ban alcohol

b)Im not slamming the UK. I was saying what happens if a country bans video games and the only reason i used the UK as an example because thats where the article came from

c)You never actually answered my question. I wanted to know what you thought would happen if it did.
@Shayesco:

a) Quite. What if they did it again? Would it work any better this time?

c) Mass bans on games would be protested by the public, the industry, and other government members and bodies. It could happen but would not last. The UK has more wiggle room than the US for introducing stupid laws.

b) I know you're not, and I'm sorry if it sounded like I was sounding off against you. It was more disdain at seeing a UK-based article in the RSS feed and already knowing what 30% of the comment thread would be about. Time for a table!

US: Bans on any example of any media deemed unconstitutional. Games sometimes censored or heavily targeted when sex is involved (e.g. Fahrenheit/Indigo Prophecy, Mass Effect). Much lolling and money wasting when someone suggests a ban.
UK: Some media may be restricted for sale if it fails BBFC tests, but ownership is OK. Bans are appealed and generally lifted, or followed with tedious to-ing and fro-ing in the news and Westminster.
Germany: Games may be censored for particularly brutal or mid-1900's content. Citizens import.
China: Personal freedom is so hot-button that a sentence on a GP comment thread really can't do it justice.
City 17: Total ban on video games. Citizens not overly pleased with the decision; attempts made to go outside and play old-fashioned sports tend to result in violent beatings.
@Monkeythumbs:

Can't. British health and safety regulations have removed my freedom to wear asbestos underwear as it constitutes a risk to myself and others around me. So I'm going commando instead.
the funny thing is if you go to the ESA site or (and this is hilarious) even google 'average age of gamer' you get the ESA site in the first few entries that says:

Fact 3 -The average game player is 33 years old and has been playing games for 12 years.


Fact 8- Thirty-eight percent of all game players are women


wow.. guess we arent all adolescent boys are we. Nice you did your research Jim White
@ Matthew

a)Of course not. most politicans drink heavily

c) if there are protest would the government use armed force to keep control?
@Shaesyco: (Sorry for Shayesco before. No idea where that came from.)

c) I doubt it would be like that, but yes. Restriction of liberties tends to result in that sort of thing. As does having more than three British people outside together at any one time. It would be pleasantly ironic to violently protest a ban on violent games too, so I'm sure the public would jump at the chance.
@Matthew & Shaesyco

You both have very little grasp of the soul-crushing policies of Labour. We're far too demoralised to do anything against them.

The Tories and the Lib Dems on the other hand.. That could make for a very interesting situation.
I like the fact that people run their mouths about video games, but then they keep running away from the research.
This is just the tip of the iceberg, leaked proposals in the press today state that the government wants to be able to force the ISPs by law to have to disconnect people who download illegal files. Going after games is bad but now they are also looking into controlling the net and destroying privacy as well.
@dbroad

This is why we gotta fight for net neutrality. If you disconnect everyone on the internet for downloading something illegal, I could make for certain that about 75% of the people who populate the internet would be disconnected.

Althou, if you think about it, this is the tightest part of the crap tunnel gamers have to go through to be accepted as an art and a medium that can be left alone, like movies or music. I think in a few years, games will stop taking so much flak. The retaliation of the Mass Effect story is a good start for gamers to start sticking up for themselves, but now more then ever, we need to stop playing defense and go on the offensive on these unlawful and unconstitutional movements on the industry we love and support.
http://open.bbc.co.uk/newmediaresearch/2006/01/bbc_uk_games_research.htm...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/spl/hi/sci_nat/05/state_of_play/html/1.st...

I think he and well need to read this (again)

This is the moist current I have (from 2005).

It clearly shows that in the UK the average gamer now is around 30+ or a little older and that women also play games.

-ehm-

Most gamers that do a lot pirating etc. (not a recommendation, though!) will know to to work around such a ban from the government if they indeed sut their internet down. Just like the people who pirate the games still do it, regardless of what ever draconian efforts taken to prevent them from doing it. (still not a recommendation, though).

I don't how see how it would be possible to do what they're suggested - disconnecting people that doesn't do as the state tells them to do. Are we becoming much more like China each passing day?!? I hope not.

/Karsten
Sorry if I'm missing something, I don't know much about who is on the Telegraph journalist team, but isn't Jim White, a sports editor? Maybe he should stick to that subject, as he clearly doesn't know anything about gaming if he goes to the age old sterotype.
sorry for the double post, I just meant sports journalist, not editor.
sigh....its getting harder to keep listening to these morons
i loose IQ points every time
Ya know guns are not the problem take them away from sane people and insane people will still find a way to have them the black market will not disspaer the day you take the guns away.

I would comment on the article but theres so much contradiction I don;t feel like pointing them out...I have enough time doing it with my own trains of thought...

and there goes another of the tracks....
@Zippy

Yeah, I know, right? If video games get banned, there are only gonna be people who work around that and will get them anyway. Honestly, politicians need to update their information and stop being misinformed d-bags.
"There are many areas of American culture that I (and I would imagine I’m not the only one) find abhorrent, but I don’t feel it necessary to either rub it in your face or cast aspersions as to your character every time I have the opportunity to do so. It’s impolite and it doesn’t serve to further intelligent discourse."

Would you spare me all the BS about cultural sensitivity if I were British instead of American?

I'm sorry you feel it's impolite, but I honestly don't care. If you think about it long enough, this is not so much about the UK as it is about *any* government's alleged right to restrict their citizens access to expressive media. You are free to take refuge behind the notion of cultural sensitivity, but doing so gets us no closer to the facts about the merits of regulating video games.

Quit focusing so much on nationality and culture, and focus instead on the issue at hand.
Oh sorry. I thought we were picking up from where we left off last time. My bad.
"Since we occasionally hear of some maniac shooting up his high school in middle America after a marathon session on some gory game"

When has that happened? Never in the history of school shootings has anyone said the killer(s) played videogames right before the shooting. I have heard that the Columbine shooters went bowling just before the incident, though.
Um Dennis at the end of the article she clearly says the whole thing is much ado about nothing (although not in those words). Why don't you report that?

Methinks you enjoy stirring us up since this isn't the first time something like this has happened.
Like I said several times: The days of games that have some level of realism are limited. By the time Metal Gear Solid 4 comes out, politicians will be up in arms about how "violent" it is.
hmm I like what he said...but I don't at the same time...damn...anyway related but slightly separate question is there some kind of youth crime spree or something in Britain cause the more I find out about the Mosquito the more cruel it sounds and after hearing it I got angrier like feeling violent angry really making teens less trustful and angrier is supposed to STOP violence...what kind of idiots...actually its a lot like video games stupid precedent thats completely wrong but believed because its easier to accept then reality also fun reminder to all: everyone who has ever eaten food has died so starve your babies XD
@Kitsu

I doubt they would even understand the point of Metal Gear and how, ironically enough, it's pretty anti-war when you understand hat the game is trying to say.

@Zippy

Like that would do anything. Althou it was kinda funny when one of the characters in Bible Black goes "with no mosaic, obviously."
Andrew
About 30-50% of new hentai video is censored in japan and released stateside in a uncensored state, Japanese Porn is censored twice as much if not more thats why the underground stuff took off because its uncensored.

Censored(mosaic) porn is the most oxymoronic divide by zero stuff I have ever seen.


Father Time
because she wont let off on the subject and furthers misconceptions over it.
I guess that no matter what that Byron report says and how the Politicians try to use it against the Videogame Industry, it is most important for us and every other gamer to know the real truth that Videogames are just games...and there is nothing wrong with having fun.

Also understanding that no matter what they say, those people in the media will never understand videogames...
The sad part is that we can't even say that it is democratic considering the Gordon Brown took the reins off Tony Blair, yes we voted the party in but on the basis of the ideals of the old leader, so we now have an unelected man, losing in the opinion polls trying to bolster his political standing, or even worse he'll make it so that the new laws come into effect just after an election so that the new parliament has to deal with the fallout. Not only is it censorship but effectively it is a sad point in democracy where the person crafting the laws only cares about trying to make a splash so that it is acknowlegded that he was in power, especially as if you think about it, by the next election it will of been forgotten by the general public making him blameless.
Britain is currently in the crisis of the government losing the trust of the police due to pay rises which didn't happen(the police are meant to be given pay rises in accordance to the findings of an independent review which the government promises to follow but now haven't due to giving themselves a pay rise) and the realisation that the parents and education system have failed miserably at giving the youth a sense of culpability, mixed in with media hype. Nevermind the fact we messed up when it came to the fine details of human rights (yes humans have rights but the whole system in britain has become silly due to citizens having less rights than the criminals). We are also in the grip of a compensation culture where the criminals are more likely to sue the victims. Thus meaning the populace have lost faith in the government, prompting the government to create illogical laws to try and appease the situation.
@ZippyDsMLee


"Ya know guns are not the problem take them away from sane people and insane people will still find a way to have them the black market will not disspaer the day you take the guns away."


yeah but that argument fails on the fact that if you treated everything like that, say for example drugs. If for instance we apply that logic we'd have to legalise all drugs because just on the rationale people can obtain them illegally anyway. BAD IDEA. it still makes it HARDER for them to get hold of an item if it is illegal. And (IMO) any method put into place to make it harder will have SOME effect (not total eradication but a step in the right direction)
@ father time

i thought at the end of teh article he said
"That's usually what happens with kids and computer games: they grow out of them."

.. i mean i find the fact that the media repeatedly misrepresent a group, whilst claiming knowledge, is an important issue :S

(sorry if you meant the actual womans report instead! may have got wrong end of stick!)
@ BlackIce

When did 30 become old?! Life expectancy has risen considerably since my Birthdaye. Thirtye is ye newe fifteene. :P

And I've tried telling anti-game-paranoids that I'm a gamer, it makes no difference I'm afraid. If anything, the response is to view me as an immature moron.

The only compensation for enduring this snobbery is watching the gaggle of contradicting emotions play across the offending person's face (as they try to reconcile my age with their prejudice). It gets even more fun when I tell them my Dad is a gamer too (nearly 60) he's a real armchair general which is great as it makes Christmas and birthday presents easy :D

Gift.
@Gift

When I make 30, 40 is old. When I make 40, 50 is old. And so on.

To answer your question, it is, because i'm not there yet. Fucking 26 is old.
@ BlackIce

That hurt, you bastard.
Visit the Peak Oil online communities and if you're 30, you're considered a young pup.
@NovaBlack

No she talks about her adventures as a kid torturing ants and plastic army soldiers, she then says that if those games existed back then they would simply replace those activities and that it wouldn't be a big deal.
@Monkeythumbs

:D
Okay...Any other girls feel like hunting this guy down and hurting him!? "Games] are overwhelmingly the preserve of adolescent boys" you gotta be kidding me! >__
It really beggars belief, when the world economy is coming off the rails and we are involved in two wars, that the Government is putting time and energy into suppressing video games. When there isn’t any problem.

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 11/08/09 at 09:02am
DarkSaber: http://tinyurl.com/yez7jyo
Posted 11/08/09 at 09:01am
DarkSaber: Oh for gods sake, the Gearbox pres is gobbing off about Valve again
Posted 11/08/09 at 08:53am
JDKJ: But cheer up, Austin. If the unemployment rate continues to double-digit as predicted for the next few years, your half-dozen stands a better than likely chance of returning to power.
Posted 11/08/09 at 08:46am
JDKJ: @DS: If he had added the line about "or hiring illegals aliens under the table to work as nannies," it would have been a completely perfect descripition. And, yes, it's about the same difference between a six and a half-dozen.
Posted 11/08/09 at 08:31am
DarkSaber: My god, that description makes them sound almost Republican. Still what did you expect, Obama is only marginally more left than republicans.
Posted 11/08/09 at 01:07am
Austin_Lewis: Health insurance, brought to you by the same kind of bureacrats who couldn't, in timely fashion, investigate the comments of any of the men Obama appointed Czars. Or their past. Or their history of not paying taxes.
Posted 11/08/09 at 01:06am
Austin_Lewis: Yes, and what a piece of crap it was. Arresting and fining people just because they don't make a personal choice to buy healh insurance, creating over a hundred new bureacracies, and worse.
Posted 11/08/09 at 12:24am
ZippyDSMlee: JDKJ:the only trouble is a bunch of witless hacks wrote it....its going to be a train wreck....
Posted 11/07/09 at 11:33pm
JDKJ: BREAKING: In a photo-finish at the wire, House passes health care reform bill. Relatedly, in a fit of pique, Austin Lewis kicks innocent dog.
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:27pm
ZippyDSMlee: man I got alot of junk and dup files too >< god I need orginization...and no not the knee capping media mafia kind :P
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:26pm
ZippyDSMlee: replaced :P
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:23pm
ZippyDSMlee: beemoh:hey its like 60GB porn,400GB anime 100GB games and crap I have took from all my DVDs, I hate waiting on dvds to install stuff..... oh and 40GB of my porn was in the found.000 folder...mostly corrupted.... least I got names of wut needs to be repa
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:18pm
beemoh: @Zip: ...and you'd have to spend all that time re-downloading that porn?
Posted 11/07/09 at 03:34pm
ZippyDSMlee: ggrrrrr......vista lost one of my hard drives and I had a heart attack thinking I lost 1TB of data....
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:58am
JDKJ: Which could be explained by both (a) and (b).
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:56am
Austin_Lewis: JDKJ: You forgot C) the fact that, for some reason, every time he did something that would suggest he shouldn't be in the military, let alone an officer, higher ups ignored it or let it slide.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:51am
JDKJ: Part of the problem is, I believe, that (a) the Army had a lot of time and money already invested in him and which they were unwilling to simply write-off and (b) an increasing need for the type of skills and services he provided.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:48am
JDKJ: And that even if he was begging not to get cut loose, he was apparently a real good candidate for being cut loose, anyway.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:11am
JDKJ: @chada: And while Kennedy once noted that there's usually more than enough blame for everyone to get a slice, the possibility that the Army was unwilling to cut loose someone who was asking to get cut loose could be a factor.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:07am
ZippyDSMlee: *noms on his feet*..nomnomnomnom*droooll* ...wuuutttttt uuu looking at?
Login or register to post shouts