Immigration Game Attacked... Publisher Fires Back

Immigration Game Attacked... Publisher Fires Back

February 29, 2008
In recent months, GamePolitics has been tracking the development of ICED, a serious game designed to publicize the issues faced by immigrants in the United States. The final version launched earlier this month.

Published by human rights organization Breakthrough, ICED examines immigration issues from the perspective of the immigrant. This is, of course, a hot-button political issue these days, so it's not surprising that ICED has generated some controversy.

An article on Alex Jones' InfoWars trashes ICED, terming it "an illegal immigration training game:"
An Indian woman, Mallika Dutt, has released a video game that essentially trains illegal aliens how to sneak across the border and avoid border patrol agents and cops...

For the casual observer, Ms. Dutt comes off as your garden variety liberal “human rights” advocate with a useful penchant for technology. But it is a bit more sinister than that...

As the average Mexican or Latin American does not have access to a video game console, let alone a television, the game is more practically geared toward an effort to inculcate middle class Americans into the belief that illegal immigration is a human rights issue, never mind open borders and the influx of third world people is a globalist plot to turn the United States, soon to become part of a North American Union, into a feudal slave labor gulag based on the China model. It has absolutely nothing to do with human rights.

Asked by GamePolitics to comment on the harsh criticism, Breakthrough's Mallika Dutt pulled no punches in her response:
ICED - I Can End Deportation is a video game about the lack of due process in the immigration system as it applies to legal permanent residents, asylum seekers and people who are here on valid visas - it’s not about illegal immigrants - as anyone who’s actually bothered to play the game would quickly realize.

One of the characters, Marc, is a war veteran - and many vets, who have legal resident status, have been deported because of unfair immigration laws. Current detention and deportation laws hold people, even legal residents, in detention indefinitely with no access to a judge. Legal residents can be deported for minor crimes - without the opportunity to make a case before a judge.

It’s interesting that those who claim to be supporting the American way of life, are the very ones who are ripping apart due process and fairness in our legal systems...

GP: The immigration issue is surely a controversial one, and there are valid points to be made on both sides. But, frankly, the InfoWars piece smacks of prejudice and stereotyping.

Making it a point to identify Mallika Dutt as "an Indian woman" and asserting that "the average Mexican or Latin American does not have access to a video game console" pretty much show where the article is coming from.

And, note to InfoWars: ICED is not played on a console or a television. It's a PC game.

Comments

...never mind open borders and the influx of third world people is a globalist plot to turn the United States, soon to become part of a North American Union, into a feudal slave labor gulag based on the China model...

I found this section of the InfoWars article to be very telling of the Author.
"ZOMG ITS R TEH CONSPRASSY!"
@yuki: what defines legal as opposed to illegal? a random arbetrary piece of paper that our government sees fit to NOT give to people. THIS COUNTRY IS BASED ON IMMIGRATION! The idea that we need to deem certain people as 'legal' and some as 'illegal' is retarded. We look back on the anti-irish imigration laws, and laugh at how stupid the concept of banning a nationality is. (Same with italians, japanese....) Now we've moved on to Mexico apparently. What's next? Laws to prevent Canadians from coming to our country? How would we feel if the Native American's had won the war for THEIR land? Immigration 'legality' is a myth to convince people that some immigrants are better than others.
I didn't know the process started that early EZK. Anti Immigration laws are laughable because of their hypocrisy as the U.S.A was built on immigrants. However I'm fine with keeping illegal immegrants out of the country.
Don't you guys have a rule where a pregnant woman can stay if she has birth on American soil? I'm pretty sure I heard a story about that, albeit something like eight or nine years ago. If this game was going to be about getting in illegally and staying, that loophole would probably be the bonus round.
@DeusPayne Says:
February 29th, 2008 at 10:36 am

@yuki: what defines legal as opposed to illegal? a random arbetrary piece of paper that our government sees fit to NOT give to people. blah blah blah no one is illegal.

We are a nation of laws that needs to count and "find" people for taxes law and other things to have thousands of people sneaking in screwing over local systems left and right.

I am sorry nothing gives them the right to come here without due process, its true the current system is messed up but that dose not make them legal.

Why don't we dissolve rules and laws and let anarchy rain i am sure chaos is better than what we have now. *rolls eyes*

the system is broken and uninterested in a fix, the best plan of action I can think of that fits in with what America tries to be and laws and rules to bind it too you start with a green card system thats set to a 10 year time out as the immigration system is totally revamped, you get people to come out of the wood work pay their dues to the country they are living off of (fine for illicit entry on thous who have entered illicitly and back taxes) this way they can be made citizens if they so wish as long as they have stayed out of trouble when the immigration system is revamped, until then at least they are counted and taxed that is all that matters.
Just because someone has been deemed illegal by the government does not automatically make the money grubbing, job stealing, crime causing criminals. Use a little common sense before ranting about nothing (that last paragraph of yours is pretty god awful to decipher what you're saying)
Alex Jones also notes, as usual with other info to back it up that cops are ordered not to arrest illegals. They are just let across the borders. I wouldn't be surprised if they were given a pat on the back and some dope to sell by border patrol on the way.

So you see, this game is ridiculous and has no basis in reality. It's probably a really funny joke to all the illegal immigrants who play it.
@F**ked up

"Whatever happen to the American Dream? nah why do I ask?"

The American Dream is for Americans, not invaders. They make a mockery of every REAL immigrant who put forth the effort to do things right.
WHAT THE FUCK.

...I'M A MEXICAN. I HAVE A FUCKING NEW MAC LAPTOP AND DESKTOP. I HAVE AN HDTV. I HAVE A FUCKING GAMING CONSOLE.

...What the fuck is up with this guy?
Mexico has big cities. It has one of the biggest cities in the world (Mexico city)
All my friends are in the same economic situation as me.

...Fuck it, this man is a know-nothing maricon faggot.
This guy must be a Fox News Sympathizer. Let's all just pity him, oy.
@Erik:
Yes, but is too much fun to blame inmigrants for all that is wrong in USA, but the big corporations you give sh*it abot they breaking the law.

And they are keeping inmigrants to break the border illegaly.

Let me know when you reach China.
A legal immigrant is the Governor of California you twit. Don't even try to say that legal immigrants can't do all of those things. One of my friends friends immigrated from Jamaica and is serving in the American Marines. So stop trying to justify the parasites that make the true immigrants look bad.
"If America is such a great nation and the nation to achieve success, then illegal or not shouldnt matter."

You make a mockery of all real immigrants who put forth the time and effort to do the right thing by supporting parasitic invaders. Furthermore you are still wearing your rose colored glasses.
Oh so negative! Even if it was a training simulator to help people penetrate the border, surely the border guards could use it to shore up their defences & practice detection & arrest tactics!
PC zero tolerance shows EVERYONE can hate you ^^

The haters call it a "simulator";
The PC nazis call it discriminatory;

oh the lulz!
Strange to see them target ICE. I mean, they've been deporting known illegal immigrants with criminal histories (violent crimes, sexual molestation, child abuse).
"Strange to see them target ICE."

You didn't read her response then, I gather.
Alex Jones, your stupid is showing:

As the average Mexican or Latin American does not have access to a video game console, let alone a television...

So the implication in the language you used is that people are more likely to have access to a video game console then a television. Hey genius, how would they play it?

That's the thing about stupid people - they tend to believe stupid things.
You know, Living as I do in a border state, and having grown up in one, i'd like to just make a quick point to both sides of the line.

1. Enforment first Advocates are NOT Anti Imimgration. We are ANTI ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION!!!!!

2. Pro Imigrants need to Realize that until they stop backing ILLEGALS, they wont' get ANY form of respect in BORDER STATES! I know that better then anyone. Arizona, where I live, Enacted some of the more strict Employer Sanctions bills EVER. Why, cause the Pro Illegals gave the rest of the IMMIGRATION REFORM people a BAD nam.

Until people start understand these points, this debate is gonna get more and more lopsided till the borders look like prison fences. It's already happening in Arizona. WHile IM a big enforment first proponent, Im also one of the biggest critics of the current Immigration system.

Just my 2 cents.
@Yuki, and what does that have to with this game?
Wow, so racist.
@Pix

It doesn't really, Just just pissed that these 2 groups fight so much that nothign ever gets accomplished. Didn't mean to derail things.
Is it just me, or does the InfoWars site feel disturbingly racist, with a tad bit of LaRouche's trademark paranoia?
@ Twin-Skies

I took a look at the comments on the linked article. It seems that the readership is no better than author. A very bigotted crowd.

It really does boggle my mind that people can be that racist.

You can also obviously see that the author has not even seen any thing about the game beyond the premise.
This guy seems uneducated and paranoid as hell. Nothing more can be said about him hes just another mindless drone. To agree with Yuki this game isn't the problem its two sides bickering and getting nothing done. I'm all for immigration because thats how most of us got here. However I dislike those who would sneak across our borders and then not work to become a citizen.
@ Scolar

Actually the work to become a citizen starts before you even cross the border. But you and Yuki are right. The problem is that people won't talk about this issue in a civilized manner, as is apparent from the bigotted article.
clarification: don't really want to argue here. Just pointing out the hilarity in the hypocrisy of anti-immigration laws in a country founded by immigrants.
@EZK, that's how it works for EVERY important issue in this country lately. You're either with us or against us.
Does anyone have the character bios? I tried looking at their site and didn't feel like waiting ten minutes for the flash to load.

I was able to read one of them, the girl has a green card and is being sought by the FBI because they think she is a suicide bomber.

After reading that, I started wondering. What does that have to do with immigration? Its just Government paranoia.

http://www.mtv.com/news/photos/i/iced_080215/03.jpg

I dunno, maybe I'm off base here?
@ Yuki

I see where you're coming from. I myself am baffled why people spend their time bitching about pointless crap like this supposed "training" game. The unfortunate thing is that people would much rather use tax dollars to highlight the problem with a bigger pen rather than using the funds to streamline the immigration process so that people wouldn't HAVE to cross illegally.
And on the other side of the spectrum are these people who consistently argue that the idea of border patrols and walls stems from a racist belief- it doesn't. The fact is, it's ILLEGAL, no matter how you look at it. If the problem were as severe with people coming in from Canada, the same ideas would be applied- but they aren't.
You know, when I read that "response", my immediate thought was of somebody screaming "THE BEANERS ARE TAKING OVER!!!!!!!".

As a response to some of you, illegal immigration is not new. Been happening ever since the Mexican-American War, if not before.

@DeusPayne

There are some clear differences here. The main one being that the Latinos are bringing criminals with them, don't want to be citizens, aren't spending most of their money here, and come from countries (especially Mexico) prone to rioting at the drop of a hat. Then there is the small issue that they are not sticking to jobs that Americans won't do. You can find illegal electricians, plumbers, and construction workers just as easily as you can find crop pickers and factory workers. Plus, you seem to have forgotten that even though we are based on immigration, too many people in one place can become a big environmental problem. Does the system need reform? Yes. If it was, would it stop illegals from coming over anyway? No. Worse yet, they're stealing identities to get here now.
The commenters on that article are all talking about a new world order and being "awake", can people like that be taken seriously on anything?
"Then there is the small issue that they are not sticking to jobs that Americans won’t do."

WHAT!?!??!?!?! So... the only way someone can come to this glorious nation is to do menial work that no one else wants? Well, I guess it's a good thing that there are nothing but white doctors, professors, and engineers.

"Plus, you seem to have forgotten that even though we are based on immigration, too many people in one place can become a big environmental problem."
Uh... why? Are the mexicans so dirty that they're smelling up the border states?

As for 'illegals' commiting crime and whatnot for all those related arguments. What about people born here that do the same thing? They're still allowed to stay. And someone breaking the law is by no means reason to deem others criminals as well.

And i'll just ignore your racist comment about Latinos.... before I end up punching something.
I played the game...it doesn't teach you how to "sneak across the border." It shows you how unbalanced the American judicial system is, and how easily they can deport you even if you have a green card, visa, were born here, etc.

Charlie:
That's how most of the characters are based. Anna served time for smoking weed, but was arrested again on the way home for a school trip (abroad), and was held for 3 years. Suki has a student visa, but didn't know he needed a full course load to maintain the visa. Ayesha wrote an an anti-Patriot Act paper, and go busted as a suspected suicide bomber (she has a green card). Javier is an illegal immigrant (their visitor visas expired), but they're unable to apply for legal residency. Marc is an asylum seeker, has a green card, and was in the army.
@ Scolar

Yeah, before you can come to the US to work, go to school, or to become a citizen, all the paper work starts outside the US. You have to apply for VISAs and a green card. You have to get special work permits and education permits (these are a part of the VISA. There are several types you can get).

If you are coming to the US to become a citizen, you apply as normal and specify tht you intend to nationalize. Then you have to live in the US for a certain number of years before actually getting your citizen status.

But if you come here on a work or education VISA, you cannot just apply for citizenship. You can do so while still here, but there is a different process to go through.

It is a lot of red tape, no matter which path you go through, but it is necessary.

Personally, I don't like the idea of illegal immigrants. If they really want to come t othis country and live, they should do so properly. There is also the fact that the majority of them send the money they recieve here, to their family back where they came from.
After reading the wiki on InfoWars, I've lost all taste for even trying to comment at their site.

Their fear-mongering doesn't need any more attention than it's getting now.
@EZK

I had some understanding of the process but obviously not as much as you.

@ Simon Roberts

I'm pretty sure that thats a law here in the U.S., a pretty stupid law if you ask me.

This just seems like one giant cluster fuck and nobodies doing anything about it. They just figure that if you argue enough the problem will be solved.
What I meant to say is:

The name of the game is "ICED", an obvious play on the Immigration and Enforcement Customs, or "ICE". I've been reading the news stories related to ICE, and for the most part, they're targeting illegal immigrants that have criminal histories in both the United States and their former countries. Crimes involved include gang affiliation, numerous violent crimes, sexual molestation, and many other serious crimes.

The only illegal immigrants being deported without criminal histories are people who are found incidentally during the arrest of the criminals (usually living under the same household).

Sure, let's make fun of ICE, and end deportation...of violent criminals.
"open borders and the influx of third world people is a globalist plot to turn the United States, soon to become part of a North American Union, into a feudal slave labor gulag based on the China model."

What? That's a crazed, paranoid conspiracy theory if I ever heard one. Only this time it's coming from a so-called "Patriot," not some so-called "Rebel."
Yeah, infowars is hilarious like that. I used to love listening to his crazy conspiracy theories because they were just so batshit insane.
@Twin-Skies

Is it just me, or does the InfoWars site feel disturbingly racist, with a tad bit of LaRouche’s trademark paranoia?

That's Alex Jones for you. He makes his money marketing conspiracy theories to the tinfoil hat crowd.
"Sure, let’s make fun of ICE, and end deportation…of violent criminals."

ICE is in charge of deporting ALL immigrants, including the legal ones. That's why the game is named like that.

And even if they did only deport illegal immigrants that doesn't change the fact that some of ICE's practices are inhuman, immoral, unethical, probably even illegal, should someone challenge them in a neutral court. The game is targeting those practices, not ICE itself.

Read up on sedating deportees with psychotropic drugs against their will, for example. Supposedly ICE has stopped doing that, however, since they DID get blasted by a judge over it. But to think someone at ICE seriously instituted such policy at all is just incredible. You don't even treat animals that way.
And, note to InfoWars: ICED is not played on a console or a television. It’s a PC game.


Ouch, InfoWars just got handed the "False Advertising" card, unless of course they're at war with information.
I loved this comment in particular:

"LOWERY/PENTAGON VET Says:
February 28th, 2008 at 7:41 pm

SORRY, BUT…GAMERS BECOME MORONIC SLAVES. They can’t think, eat, drink, sleep, or shit without ALWAYS/CONSTANTLY daydreaming and fanaticizing about CONTROL/POWER.

Why in the FUCK…do you think it’s called a JOY stick. GAMING DUMP-DOWNS OUR YOUTH !!!

FACT"

------------

Video games are dumping down our youth. We have got to act quickly.
We are a nation of laws that needs to count and “find” people for taxes law and other things to have thousands of people sneaking in screwing over local systems left and right IS NOT A GOOD THING.

blah my brains(or whats left of them) for a edit button!
wow zippy, way to completely miss the point of my post. Unless you think that we should still have Japanese quotas, and anti-irish work laws in place.... in which case... die in a fire.

Additionally, illegal border crossing is only 1 form of illegal immigration. People come over here on work visas, then when they run out, they stay. Bam, they're illegal. But they're still just as productive as the day before they were deemed 'illegal'. I'm not saying all immigrants should be allowed with not borders whatsoever, I'm just saying the the term illegal and legal immigrant is a fairly absurd distinction is many cases, and you can't just say "all illegals are criminals and don't deserve to be in the US"
and sorry for the tripple post, but what about all the LEGAL citizens that don't pay taxes, and break the law and mooch off of the generous tit of america. Should we deport them to too? Maybe to australia, like one giant penal colony?
DeusPayne
Being illegal is breaking the law and doing damage to local economies but like some laws dose this mean it needs to be enforced to the full extent, we can merge them with the citizenry in a temporary way(10-15year span) as we fix the retarted immigration system as so we can fully merge them if thats what they want.

Hell we should just move to the fair tax disband the IRS and ignore the boarder, paying 25-40% retail tax(with state tax) that will keep most of them out and get rid of excess populace right there ^_~
DeusPayne
Oooo mabye because they are born citizens who earned that right to mooch, and most crimanils lose a lot of their rights, and if you do not pay taxes you are either under the tax radar because you do not make enough or the IRS is looking for you.

Again you are mixing immigrant with illegal immigrant, its like the diffrence in illicit drugs and legal drugs.
When it is said "we are a nation of immigrants," I usually assume that means we are a nation of people who come from other places, or whose ancestors came from other places, to live their lives and raise their families here. I do not take it to mean that "we are a nation of undocumented workers, foreign students on Visas, and temporary legal residents."

On the Breakthrough homepage, it's claimed that the game represents laws that affect "all immigrants: legal permanent residents, asylum seekers, students and undocumented people." But doesn't this statement exclude one very important group of immigrants -- those who have become U.S. citizens? That seems like a conniving oversight to me, especially since the stated goal of the game is to be come a citizen.

This is the only thing that really bothers me about the game, and especially about the way it is being defended here. It holds citizenship up as the ultimate goal but seems to almost go out of its way to blur the line between "legal immigrants" and citizens of the United States. To me, that is a very important line.

Don't get me wrong -- judging by this comment board alone, the game has obviously been successful in raising issues of human rights abuses, and in informing Americans (like me) about the different sorts of legal challenges people who are not citizens face.

However, if the game or its publishers were to suggest in any way that a non-U.S. citizen deserves the same legal status and rights in a U.S. court that a U.S. citizen has, I could not disagree more.

@DeusPayne
From you comments so far, it sounds like your position is that there should be no discrimination between legal and illegal immigrants, nor even between citizens and non-citizens. I imagine there is more to it you have not yet revealed, but I find this view extremely naïve, at best, and maybe just a little bit unpatriotic.

The only way to get rid of the "illegal" distinction to which you object would be to make all immigration legal. I am not a racist, and I am not against immigration, but I do believe in the sovereignty of the United States, and I am proud to claim both my rights and my responsibilities as a U.S. citizen.
"Oooo mabye because they are born citizens who earned that right to mooch"

Yeah, because you get to chose where you're born, and who your parents are. Seriously... fuck you. It's this kind of rampant ignorance that politicians feed on.

And do we even need to talk about drugs. Oooh.... you have pot, you're a criminal. Oooh... you have an OPIATE.... oh, but you're wearing a white coat....

The point that you still have completely missed is that the term illegal is just an arbitrary word that the government decides to put in place. It used to be legal for lynch mobs to hang blacks, that doesn't mean the law that was in place is just. It also used to be illegal for blacks to use 'white' bathrooms. Does that mean that just because it's the law, you MUST DEFEND it? I know many immigrants both legal and illegal (coming from a family that fled the vietnam war). Many of my relatives ended up coming over illegally, but they never broke any other laws, and after a set amount of time of living in the country, you are allowed to apply for citizenship, regardless of your immigration was legal or not. But you're saying just because some crack head rapist was BORN in the US, he deserves to continue mooching off the government, while someone else who has done nothing illegal except not attain a piece of paper are imprisoned without legal representation, and deported to their home country, regardless if that means they're returning to a death sentence. Like I said, think before you speak.... you're coming off like a HUGE jerk who's sole basis of judging a person is where he happens to squeak out of their mother's vagina.
GAH! READ WHAT I TYPE! I"M NOT SAYING ALL IMMIGRANTS SHOULD BE LEGAL. ALL i'm saying is that just because someone is labeled as "ILLEGAL" doesn't make them criminals. There are plenty of illegal immigrants that follow all the other laws in place, and there are plenty of people that are legal that break a lot of laws in place. Just because someone didn't renew their student visa, or the paperwork for their green card got lost is no reason to treat these people like animals. THEY ARE PEOPLE! They deserve the same rights as other people, regardless of nationality. Imprisoning people without due process just because they don't have citizenship is a really really hypocritical thing to do.

Now... if you're here illegally, and you end up breaking lots of laws, fine, send their asses back home. But just because they arrived through nefarious means doesn't make them a liability to the rest of the public.
And please, can ANYONE tell me how the HELL you can think that just because you happened to be born in this country, that you deserve any more basic human and civil rights than someone who has lived here their entire life on a green card.
Deus(everyone is legal)Payne

oh ya its a arbitrary word like legal..law..tax..citizen...sovereignty ..state..country government, I am sorry if you dislike how reality works go to Mexico or other places and they wont let you be a citizen so easily if at all.

My point is its a rule that protects the country from collapse and over population,it has more to do with populace control and services balance than "ooo lets
keep them peoplz out".


"regardless of your immigration was legal or not. But you’re saying just because some crack head rapist was BORN in the US"
yes because he was born here and thus slotted to be taken care of if need be, the family of 5 that snunk in should go back that are not part of the system and should be denied its benefits.

You seem to fail to understand the reality of it we do not need a large populace in the population to be "hidden" and the main group we can deal with is the illegal immigrants, I am not interested in deporting them if they have stayed out of trouble all I want is 3 things for them to be counted and taxed and the retarted immigration system fixed, that way that family of 5 wont be harmed by the system other than being forced to pay their fair share of the burden of being a citizen.
The only way to that is to put in place a temp system(10-15 years the way government works), expanding the green card system to do this while the immigration system is over hauled is not a bad idea.

Now the 2nd main group of "hidden" people are the rich and criminals, those that dodge the tax system, a fair tax would deal with this forcing everyone who buys goods to pay a tax.
OH MY FUCKING CHRIST!!!!!

LETS SAY IT TOGETHER

I NEVER said all immigrants should be legal. HOW MANY TIMES HAVE I REPEATED THIS!?!?!?!?!!

The point is that just because someone is labeled 'illegal' doesn't instantly turn them into a criminal mastermind who's screwing everyone else. There are ILLEGALS who are productive, and there are ILLEGALS who aren't. Yes, deportation does need to happen. Yes, illegals need to be kept in check. But just because they happened to be born on some other soil is NO REASON TO TREAT THEM LIKE CATTLE!
Deus(benefits is a human right)Payne

WTF?!?!
its comments like that that make me want to side with the deport them and forget them crowed, government,state and location/job benefits IS NOT A HUMAN RIGHT.......................

by sneaking in and letting employers abuse them, they become hypocrities, you are wanting a free ride to a job and government benefits and complain they abuse you yet are unwilling to pay taxes or be a part of the system, you can not have it both ways.....
DeusPayne
""
I NEVER said all immigrants should be legal. HOW MANY TIMES HAVE I REPEATED THIS!?!?!?!?!!""

No enough apparently.
zippy... read up on the deportation process. There's even been some description in it here. Imprisoning people without due process IS A HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION!!!! I've never said that they should get access to government hand outs, I never said that illegals deserve the same benefits as citizens. But treating people like cattle, herding them in massive detainment centers, there's even been reports of deportees being drugged so they wouldn't be as much of a 'problem' while they're being deported. I don't care where your from, if you're being treated like an animal, that's a HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION.

Draining the US via illegal means sucks, yes, and needs to be stopped. But that's no reason to throw out the bill or rights in the process. Legal representation, due process, and NOT BEING DRUGGED AGAINST YOUR WILL... I think everyone can agree that those ARE basic human rights.
Alex Jones, your stupid is showing:

"As the average Mexican or Latin American does not have access to a video game console, let alone a television…"

So the implication in the language you used is that people are more likely to have access to a video game console then a television. Hey genius, how would they play it?

That’s the thing about stupid people - they tend to believe stupid things


I was about to comment on this. Completely off topic, but I am soooooooo sick of seeing people who don't know how the phrase "let alone" is supposed to be used abuse it the way they do.
@DeusPayne
People are considered "illegal" immigrants because they have broken the law and entered the country illegally. It is a crime to enter the country in such a way. So when you say that "just because someone is labeled as 'illegal' doesn't make them criminals," you are essentially saying that "Not all people who commit crimes are criminals." That is a self-contradicting statement that does not make any sense to me.

I'm guessing maybe what you mean to say is that people who break the law by entering our country illegally do not necessarily break additional laws once they are here. That's true, but it is beside the point. The point is that people who enter the U.S. without following the due processes of paperwork and registration required by law are called "illegal immigrants" because they have immigrated here illegally. They have broken the law. They are criminals already, regardless of any other crimes they may or may not commit once they are here.

As I tried to say above, a non-U.S. citizen absolutely does not deserve the same legal status or rights as a U.S. citizen in a U.S. court. Furthermore, because these "rights" are a matter of U.S. law to some extent, an illegal immigrant does not deserve the same rights or legal status as a legal foreign national resident.
Stinking Kevin: At one point in time it was considered illegal for a black person to use a 'white' persons bathroom. Does that mean that it should still be that way now, just because it was the law.

"Furthermore, because these “rights” are a matter of U.S. law to some extent, an illegal immigrant does not deserve the same rights or legal status as a legal foreign national resident."

I'm sorry, but that is something that I just can't deal with. You believe that American's are so superior to the rest of the world, that we deserve basic human and civil liberties, and the rest of the world doesn't?
Maybe we should just kill all illegal immigrants. They don't have rights... so who cares? Why waste the money deporting them, it'll be cheaper just to gas them all.

/sarcasm....


Human rights are just that, HUMAN rights. They're not American born citizen, or legally obtained green card rights. HUMAN rights. Have I mentioned human rights?
DeusPayne
thats the price they pay for coming here illegally and refusing to leave when the government finds them one can be a adult and treat the situation maturely or be a child a run and fuss and cry.

Illegals should have human rights yes, civil rights not so much, they are not part of the system and should not be entitled to ALL of its benefit's legal or otherwise.

I do not like them not begin part of the system.
I do not like them being deported.
I do not like employers taking advantage of the situation.
I do not like government inaction and endless politics.

we can absorb them and build a system that is not slow and cumbersome on letting people in, the root cause of this issue is a poor and broken immigration system and not the immigrants LEGAL OR OTHERWISE that find themselfs in the middle of it.

We can simply stop all deportation operations and move to tracking operations, make way for the overhaul and find these people and give them a choice either you leave or you get a green card that will be vagauly checked but frankly I am more worried for stability over current details , get them cards so that they are tracked and counted for this with overhauling the immigration system will be about the only way to move things forward, but I doubt it will happen both sides of the argument want to much.
DeusPayne
Human rights are humane, thus humanely deporting persons who are not int eh system is both humane and legal.

""“Furthermore, because these “rights” are a matter of U.S. law to some extent, an illegal immigrant does not deserve the same rights or legal status as a legal foreign national resident.”

I’m sorry, but that is something that I just can’t deal with. You believe that American’s are so superior to the rest of the world, that we deserve basic human and civil liberties, and the rest of the world doesn’t? """

The point he is making is that they do not have full rights of a citizen,they have basic human rights to be treated fairly as they are processed by the law, you want to bring in a strawman over the old racial laws of the 50s thats all well and fine however the diffrance is they are/were citizens illegals are not....

you can not remove borders and claim the higher ground because people are hurt or separated by the government when they came here willingly and illicitly in the first place it is not oppression or a crime when the government fines you to be in contempt of its laws and comes to get you.

I am sorry there is no pass go on the illegal part.
I will agree deporting dose not work and is a messy process its overused due to the crappy immigration system we have.
@ zippy: thank you for that response, it was MUCH better worded, and organized, and thought out than most of your other posts.

Yeah, I agree with a lot of what your saying even. I just feel that violating human rights is just FAR too much. Yeah certain civil liberties we take for granted they might not deserve. Legal representation isn't something that's free, yeah holding them in a cell is probably necessary in many cases. It just bugs the crap out of me that people are being treated like animals ANYwhere, let alone on US soil. Our country is founded on freedom, and human rights, and immigration. All 3 of those things are thrown out the window in most cases of 'illegal immigration' when the only law broken was immigration laws. The concept that anyone is less human or less deserving of being treated like a human, is something that I just can't take sitting down.

Once again, I appolgize for any flipping out I've been doing in this thread. This topic hits very close to home for me as I have relatives that had to flee from the vietnam war. Yeah most were able to get refugee status, and work visas, and my mom even got a student visa originally. But I do have relatives that arrived illegally, and over the course of the past 30 years have PROVEN that they can be productive members of society without breaking laws. The fact that one relative of mine is considered by the government a productive member of society, and another relative, who is essentially the same person, in the same situation, just without that piece of paper can be considered a wanted criminal, who doesn't deserve basic human rights.

And honestly, can anyone say that they wouldn't try to come to the US, even if they had to do it illegally, in a country that was so backwards that they had you shot for going to college?
okay, that was a response to the first post. And the second one you're just misreading what I said. If the deportation process was completely 100% humane, I'd have no problems with it. Unfortunately, that is not the case, and is the basis behind my whole burst of rage here. Deportees have historically been treated inhumanely just because they're not citizens.

I feel this strongly about any human rights violations (don't even get me started about guantanamo bay.... holy fuck that's a messed up situation) It's just unfortunate that i decided to chose such a grey area topic, that has so many facets that my argument was generally lost in the void of immigration laws. My problems aren't with the laws, just the way the criminals are brought to 'justice'.
Sorry to nitpick here, i'm more just making a joke than anything, don't read too much into this:

"however the diffrance is they are/were citizens illegals are not"

What about when they were considered 3/5ths of a citizen, does that mean they only deserve 3/5ths of the benefits that america has to offer? :p

Okay, i'm kidding. Not a real point, I just couldn't pass up bringing up the 3/5ths rules. Such a hilariously misguided part of our nation's past.
I'd agree that the U.S. is a neat place, and that to enjoy our rights as U.S. citizens we have responsibilities to observe. That's why the way we address illegal immigration in this country bothers me so much. Something is seriously wrong when our zealousness to address illegal immigration results in us ignoring and violating our own rules.

For instance! The U.S. Bill of Rights is a very old document, highly influential on our justice system and central to the identity of our country. The BoR is not just a guarantee of rights for U.S. citizens, however! It's specifically a set of instructions informing the U.S. government as to what it can and cannot do. The United States government cannot, constitutionally, deny a person the right to a speedy trial with a jury of peers.

So just what is happening when ICE detains people for extended periods of time and denies them trial before deporting them? Well, that there would be a violation of both the Bill of Rights and the Constitution of which it is a part. As an admirer of both documents, I find that scary, and as someone who considers the responsibilities of citizenship important, I'd say 'holy shit it's time to get off the internets and see what I can do about this.'
Yay for diane for being able to put into words, what I clearly cannot. That was a very concise, and i believe very clear explanation of everything I've been complaining about... except without all the hysterical ranting peppered through out everything. Thank you Diane.
For those of you who believe that this is strictly an American problem should take a look at any civilized country in the world. You are not free to get up and live wherever you want without undergoing some sort of immigration process. The United States legally accepts more than ten times as many immigrants than Mexico. In fact, Mexican politicos encourage (through pamphlets, maps, and the lack of a decent welfare system) illegal immigration.

I'm absolutely fine with Mexico wanting to dump it's poor people in America...so long as they write us nice fat checks to cover the welfare of each individual here illegally. Yes, illegal is just a word, but so is money, welfare, and population density. Just remember that you can only take on so many people before the boat begins to sink.

Now, I know that most people try to remain ambiguous when they debate illegal immigration, but we all know that the pertinent issue at hand is illegal immigration "from Mexico". Instead of migrating over here, to a foreign and strange land, why are none of these illegal immigrants interested in solving the actual problem? Actual problem you say? The reason why they that immigration is necessary. Stuff like corrupt politicos in Mexico who pocket hundreds of millions of dollars. The lack of a structured welfare, and the stable economy to help people escape from poverty. Make no mistake, Mexico is NOT a third-world country. It's a first-world country that's performing like a third-world country. Corrupt police are backed by even more corrupt court systems. In fact, immigrants from South America are shaken down as they venture northward until either they are out of money or are dead.

I fully agree that everyone in the world is born with certain rights. However , there exist governments and nations that can choose to restrict or relax those rights. The United States has no power to enforce nor grant rights to the people of Mexico. In fact, it's partially Mexico's responsibility to keep their own people in their country (doing a bang up job at it too). In addition, children born here due to natural birthright (anchor babies) are also up for debate.
@DeusPayne
I am not in favor of discrimination among American citizens. I am in favor of discrimination between citizens, and legal foreign nationals, and illegal immigrants. Not as human beings, but simply as residents of our sovereign nation.

I do believe that we should strive to protect basic human rights around the world. I believe that overall, the U.S. does a better job than most at affording those basic rights to all people, regardless of their citizenship or status.

I also believe the government has a responsibility to comply with and enforce the agreements it makes, including agreements with visitors to our country. I believe that foreign nationals should not be allowed to vote in U.S. elections. I believe that illegal immigrants should not have the same legal right to government assistance programs that registered, tax-paying citizens have.

No need to apologize again, but I'm not sure why is that is so difficult to deal with.
@ Stinking Kevin

Honestly, I see absolutely nothing wrong with what you just said. I can't agree more. I just get more riled up I think when I hear about human rights violations. Illegal immigrants DO need to be dealt with, and draining US resources because you don't like your own country is always terrible. Really the only thing I've been trying to say (EXTREMELY poorly i realize) is that citizenship does not determine human rights. When I hear of anyone's human right being violated, I just flip out I guess. And that makes my arguments extremely incoherent sometimes. :p
I think I see where you're going with this, Deus... putting the pieces together, are you saying that just because the person is or became an illegal immigrant doesn't mean they a criminal leech? Indeed, while these illegals can indeed be good-natured people looking simply to improve their lives, they are still breaking the law and thus should still face consequences. It's like the tale of a poor man who stole bread to feed his family - while he may have had good intentions, that doesn't justify what he did. It was a crime nevertheless.

While I will agree it's not right to punish good people, I also feel that just because their intentions are good, they shouldn't be let off the hook with a slap of the wrists. These illegals are still sapping America, taking US money to help themselves and not paying the government anything back in return (i.e., taxes). These illegals, who may or may not have gone through the same trials as a legal immigrant, are breaking the law and bankrupting America while taking jobs from legal citizens by working for much less.

I know that it's a sad issue - these illegals may not be criminals by heart, but if they're going to live in this country, they need to make sure they abide by US laws just as they would if they were living in any other nation. By failing to renew their green cards, sneaking into the nation (an activity akin to spies, criminals, and terrorists, may I add), and failing to pay the proper tax money to the US government, they are breaking the law. They may not be criminals by heart, but they are criminals by law.
Meleedragon: you missed the point. the argument is the horrific human rights violations during the deportation process. Not that they shouldn't be punished.
@DeusPayne
I consider myself a staunch civil libertarian, and I like to argue a lot too. I am glad to know we agree much more than we disagree. Cheers!
Geez, this site is fast... by the time I finished typing in my personal opinion, the whole debate started to make more sense. I hate when that happens... makes my views seem all null and dated. I'm not a politician nor a diplomat, as you can tell...

I was never good at finding the key point in an argument, though...
Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed, to me:
I lift my lamp beside the golden door


Maybe it should be changed to...

Dontgive me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
Leavethe wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed, to Death:
I lift my ltorch beside the golden doorTo burn their house down


WOW what a hot button issue.

I wonder how many people actually have left the United States or their home country and actually traveled to these 3rd world or impoverished areas?

But I digress.

The funny thing about immigration is that it is wanted when their an economic boom and it is hated when there is an economic depression.

Hmmm does that mean America is in a depression right now?

I remember reading about Americans going over to Asia during the gold rush, and for the railroads, telling Asians that they have jobs for them. Then once again during the industrial revolution. After all it was the Chinese that built the railroads not the Americans.

Hmm I wonder if the problem with immigration is also connected to the problem of Companies no longer having factories in America. After all our toys, clothing, tools, are produced in China, Malaysia, Taiwan, Haiti. and other places where we can pay for cheap labor.

Hmm another thing I have been wondering about. Those pesky H1B visa, you know the ones that people from India have no problem getting. I wonder if this can also tie into the immigration problem as well.

Of course then this Discourse is about being illegal. Hmmm I wonder what would happen if the shoe is on the other foot. Passport anyone? Have you lost it? No the America Embassy cant help you? hmm. Going to Mexico for a vacation Oh no you have been arrested. Want America to help you. Why? Well your treated like Crap in a foreign country. Why? your not Citizen of our country so why should be treated as human?

Hmmm maybe should make a connection with another problem with the Justice System. Ever since the inclusion of DNA evidence, how many people were set free? But before that how many people actually believe they committed the crime? So should we treat all people once they are guilty as criminals? Just Kill anyone that is guilty. Tie them um restrain them? Use them to test new drugs? Torture them just because you were found guilty by your peers. And then say sorry when evidence shows them to be innocent. Yes lets do that. Hey Lets do that again, Wasnt it fun when we did it to the Duke lacrosse Players. As Nancy Grace would say, Their Guilty Guilty Guilty. Ahh isnt being the 3rd party, we can pass judgments and not hold any responsibility.

Maybe I m reaching. but eh.

Whatever happen to the American Dream? nah why do I ask?

nah no one really cares until it happens to them.
Slow news day GP? Alex Jones is a kook...
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ryZkx7AY2Uw

How about sending a bill to Mexico for when crap like this happens?

They are encouraging their own people to migrate here, right?
...is more practically geared toward an effort to inculcate middle class Americans into the belief that illegal immigration is a human rights issue, never mind open borders and the influx of third world people is a globalist plot to turn the United States, soon to become part of a North American Union, into a feudal slave labor gulag based on the China model.

faceplam.

What a joker. I wonder if they send out a free tinfoil hat with every copy of 'Crazy Conservatives Weekly'?
yes and we should send Okinawa a big fat check for this

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h9wMUypR_mY

Yes our soldiers are doing a good job of representing America

http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2008/02/japan-says-repeated-crimes-by-us.php

or how about this

http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/07/07/africa/web.0707iraq.php


And well whats their excuse? Are they poor? Didnt They volunteer themself?
"“the average Mexican or Latin American does not have access to a video game console” "

And this is a discriminatory statement . . . HOW?

Do you honestly think that most Mexicans have accsess to a video game console? I don't and I think the same is true for those living in Central America.

And even if it weren't true it's not opinion, it's something that can be proven wrong or right.
A lot of people seem to think that immigrants are to blame for making our economy worse. I say nay to that!

Don't blame immigrants for taking over our jobs. Blame the employers who'd rather pay cheap under the table labor instead of paying someone a decent wage. Because alot of the jobs are paid under the table, alot of that money doesn't get taxed, which means less money for our government, ect....I blame the citizens here who just want to save money through illegal means.
There really are so many parallels between the UK and the US immigration problem, they actually outweigh the differences between them.

Take, for example, Drink Driving. In the UK we have nearly 3000 deaths caused by DUI, of those 3000, maybe 200 are reported, of those 200, probably at least 50% of those will be about non-white offenders, it leaves the question hanging, 'Is this statistics or presentation?'.

Illegal Immigration is a real problem for both our countries, not so much because all illegal immigrants are here for dubious reasons, but because people will assume that they are. It causes problems for the natives and the legal immigrants, who are often forced to bear the brunt of the anger and fear of the illegal immigrants.

The problem is, it's got into a cycle, in an attempt to stop immigration, it was made much more difficult, this caused frustration and disappointment to those who had genuine reasons to want to start a new life, which creates desperation. That desperation leads to more attempts at illegal entry, which heightens paranoia and so the cycle repeats.
Final para., there should be an 'illegal' before immigration in the first sentence.
'Lotta good points here. I'm honestly not gonna comment. Not sure it's my place anyways. The reason I'm in this country anyway is 'cuz my old man did his "red tape duty" then brought me and my mother here. I was a citizen without any problems.

Instead, I'll take the safe route and say that the article sucks and the guy who wrote it needs to get his head checked. A few times. Just to be safe.
"But it is a bit more sinister than that."

You know, every time someone uses a phrase like that, the rest of what they say tends to be idiotic. I must make a note to never use it myself for fear of being stupid.
@Majestic_12_x

No. Mexico´s goverment don´t encourages people to risk their lives crossing the border. But culturally, people thinks USA is a better place to make money because ther own communities are broken and goverment doesn´t help them. Yeah, it is an irony.
No one ever bitches about Canadian immagrants.
@Rodrigo Ybáñez García

http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/2/26/164611.shtml
(Mexico Encourages Illegal Immigration)

http://www.vdare.com/bevens/Guia%20Del%20Migrante%20Mexicano.pdf
(Guia Del Migrante Mexicano)

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,143433,00.html
(Mexico Provides Guide to Illegal Immigration)
-I know it's FOX NEWS, but it lends credibility to the guide posted above.

http://www.letxa.com/guiamigrante.php
(THE GUIDE FOR THE MEXICAN IMMIGRANT)
-This is for those who want to view the handout simply as a "survival" guide.

http://graphic.pepperdine.edu/perspectives/2005/2005-01-13-border.htm
(Guide promotes illegal immigration)

http://www.diggersrealm.com/mt/archives/001551.html
(Vicente Fox's Remittance Numbers)
-Mexico is doing so much to help the economy, eh?

The discovery of this guide is similar to a pedophile being asked why they showed up at the house by Chris Hanson. Of course they're going to say "nothing".
Yeah everyone on the site seems extremely racist, among other issues, save for the people from this site who decided to go post. And on that note I'd just like to point out how much I love the GamePolitics community and props to Twin-Skies and anyone else who went over there and posted (I only briefly read over the first page of comments over there so if i haven't mentioned you, nothin personel.)
@jason

1. Have you even played the game?
2. Are you being sarcastic?
@Deus

Like it or not Buddy, your coming off as a person of high ideals, and no experiance.

Lemme break it down for you.

I FUCKING LIVE IN ARIZONA!

I see every god damn day what illegal immigration has done to this state both socially, economicly, and in terms of crime.

Yes, the current immigration system is broken, and YES it does need to be fucking fixed. I'm 100 percent in agreement, but UNTIL THE BORDERS ARE SECURE, nothing else should be given any CONSIDERATION.

DO YOU FUCKING GET THAT?

Right now, arizona has 2 excellent Border patrol guards rotting in JAIL cause imbeciles like you want to fight for the supposed rights of a drug Dealer who broke the law by crossing illegally just so that they can use those illegals for political fucking gain. THATS BULLSHIT!

If you can't understand that, screw you, shut your mouth, and don't open it till you can justify putting the rights of a drug dealer against BORDER SECURITY!.

I won't hold my breath on that one you IDIOT!
governments also regulate immigration to stop bits of their country from up and joining another country due to nonviolent invasion (bunch of people immagrate to one place and start a vote to breakaway from their country and join another country all prim proper and legal.) illegal and legal are ways also to tell weather or not one persons vote counts in such a situation if you are going to say shouldnt everyones vote count? I would ask you would you like tourists voteing on public policys and any other citizen voted happenings?

Is the system broken? Yes. Can it be fixed? Dunno. Should the system be destroyed? No.
Yuki: wtf are your ranting about? I have yet to mention anything about border security or immigrant drug dealers..........

But.... are you saying that just because we have a border issue that we're allowed to strip people of basic human rights? Yes, we have an immigration problem, yes we have border problem, yes we have a problem with illegals committing other crimes, but that in no way gives us license to treat them like animals. I don't care if they're legal, illegal, minor drug offender, or racist violent murderer, they all deserve BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS, and do not deserve to be jailed without due process or drugged against their will.

What I said to make you explode like that, I have no clue. But calm the fuk down... jeez
"Right now, arizona has 2 excellent Border patrol guards rotting in JAIL cause imbeciles like you want to fight for the supposed rights of a drug Dealer who broke the law by crossing illegally just so that they can use those illegals for political fucking gain. THATS BULLSHIT!"

Care to explain that too? I have no idea what you're trying to say, or why Border Patrol would be in jail.
Why do people think it's ok for people to just ignore laws and cross over as they wish?

Sure - I agree the stupid laws need changed.

But on the other side of the coin....

Right now - these "poor, innocent immigrants" and being screwed by corporations, investors, and other who are MORE THAN HAPPY to exploit the cheap labor - without providing minimum wage, health care, not even workmen's comp if they get injured on the job.

You think our LOVING government is letting this go just out of the kindness of their hearts??? ROFLMFAO. COME ON!!!

But that's ok, huh?

So you people who say illegal immigration is ok - are you making some $$$ from it? The only person I know that's in favor of just leaving the system like it is - IS making tons of money for just these reasons - exploiting them.

What of all the people who have immigrated LEGALLY? I guess it's just 'tough luck' they spent some much time, energy, money, and resources going about it legally, while others just immigrate freely.

It's AMAZING how blind the press gets people. Gets them thinking the government's letting this go just to be 'fair'. FAR FROM IT. But it sure makes the rich happy :)))
@ Majestic_12_x

The "Guía del Migrante Mexicano" (The Guide for Mexican Inmigrant) says in its first paragraph:

"This consular protection guide doesn´t encourage mexicans to cross the border without legal documents required by U.S. goverment. Its objective is to give information about the risks, and to inform to migrants about their rights, even if they are legal or not."

Even in this link you gave me:

http://www.letxa.com/guiamigrante.php

... explains too well about the real mission of this document.

"A Border Patrol spokesman said he does not think the book encourages illegal crossers. "If they've already gone ahead and made that decision to cross illegally . . . then anything that helps protect lives is worth it," said Andy Adame, spokesman for the Border Patrol's Tucson sector."


This another:

http://graphic.pepperdine.edu/perspectives/2005/2005-01-13-border.htm

I don´t think that "survival guide" is even official.

Vicente Fox was an useless president for Mexico.

But there is people in our goverment at least thinking in the security of the inmigrants. They don´t want the people cross the border illegaly, and they don´t want either they die in the desert.
Wait... so someone who decides to do something illegal, who is being fed information from their government about how to do these illegal activities, isn't the government promoting illegal immigration?

Why don't we just hand out guns to everyone that's already decided that they want to rob people for a living. Or maybe we can provide the means to get in contact with 4 year olds with negligent parents to all the people who decided to be pedophiles.
There is an old saying, "The people in power choose to make things illegal"

Aka Gay Laws, Slave Laws, Copyright Laws (MAFIAA).

Honestly I see people throwing illegal this and illegal this, I just wanna say shut the fuck up.

Yeah the Law is the Law. Just wait till they make playing video game illegal, oh wait arnt they trying to do that already?

They could make a Law that people can only eat with their left hand? go ahead break the law.

Hell I believe its illegal to drive a car in reverse in Arizona. I guess all the people that have cars are well illegal.
Don't get me wrong here i'm for immigration if u wanna come to the u.s. do it the right way not sneaking across our borders. The borders are also a national security threat as well. Terrorists are actually diguising as illegals and are sneaking into our country, our borders need protection more than ever. The 9/11 hijackers did the same thing. Were they stopped when they got caught?...nope. They ended up training for their jihad in Tucson going to flight school that ended up killing thousands of Americans.
Also when u get paid check your stubs check under where it says federal income tax withheld. Its the cash u earned but u don't keep (darn) Then think of this:
2.1 billion: To lock up illegals in prison
2.5 billion:medicaid
2.2 billion:unisured med costs
1.4 billion:fed aid to schools
1.9 billion:food stamps, WIC and free lunches
All goes to care 4 illegals and their kids. 10 billion dollars! and we're paying for the bill. This has to stop!
Has anyone here ever dealt with an IRB? Humans rights, by their terms, means "benificence" and "non-malfiencence" (I hope I spelled those correctly) - "do good" and "do no harm." So what does that mean?

If there's reasonable expectation of undue physical harm or death, it's a violation. If the individual cannot understand what's happening, it's a violation. If psychological factors are too damaging, it's a violation. If they cannot communicate, it's a violation.

Applying this to deportation:
You can't let them die. You can't hurt them (not saying if they start fighting you have to accept their perpetrations). You CAN restrain them by physical means (appropriate handcuffs at the most), IF NECESSARY. You have to communicate with them effectively. They must be made aware of any and all available options. They have to know and understand all consequences and results.

This doesn't mean they can vote. This doesn't mean they can avoid the system.

As for the game, it has merit. The InfoWars guy isn't prejudice, he's downright discriminatory. Video games CAN be used to teach, but no more than books, videos, or any other form of media. Passing information about the issues we face is part of that. Fearmongering is so much fun.

-Mike
@Iniquus

Spot on. Spot on.
@DeusPayne

Yes, someone who is an "illegal" immigrant is a criminal. Why? Because being here illegally makes them criminals. It is illegal therefore you are committing a crime, and if you commit a crime, what are you? Exactly.

Now that that is out of the way, I have no problem with legal immigration. None whatsoever. As for your comment on our country being based on immigration. Yes, it was. It doesn't mean it always will be. Remember that America is not an old country. It is fairly young compared to the old sods out there, and immigration was great to start the country, but at some point we draw a line on our country being based on immigration and allowing people to continue to immigrate here in droves. It has slowed exponentially. Things change. Deal with it.
@Erik


The term was first used by James Truslow Adams in his book The Epic of America which was written in 1931. He states: "The American Dream is "that dream of a land in which life should be better and richer and fuller for everyone, with opportunity for each according to ability or achievement. It is a difficult dream for the European upper classes to interpret adequately, and too many of us ourselves have grown weary and mistrustful of it. It is not a dream of motor cars and high wages merely, but a dream of social order in which each man and each woman shall be able to attain to the fullest stature of which they are innately capable, and be recognized by others for what they are, regardless of the fortuitous circumstances of birth or position."


However, the concept of the American Dream goes back to the 16th century. As 16th and 17th century English promoters were attempting to persuade Englishmen to move to the colonies, their language and promises about what the colonies were like were simultaneously laying the groundwork for three separate, but interrelated persistent myths of America: America as the land of plenty, America as the land of opportunity, and America as the land of destiny.[3] America as the land of plenty figured more prominently in 18th and 19th century definitions of the American Dream than it does today. Central to the dream was the presence of the (still untamed) American land, along with the question how to deal with nature and how to live with other people on the land.

So tell me Is the American Dream really just for Americans? HMMM? tell me huh?
@F**ked up

You seem to forget that we are a country, and at that point the United States did not exist yet. New countries grow. Do we still need to grow so badly that we should just let anyone walk into our country without going through the proper legal channel? Some immigrants come over legally you know.
"So tell me Is the American Dream really just for Americans? HMMM? tell me huh?"

Yes, yes it is.

I'm curious to just how you think you can justify illegal immigration. It boggles the mind.
So America wasnt a country yet, Well the roots we all became to believe came before the Country was even started, Hello Can you say Declaration of Independence? If England Didnt treat us harshly and impose such ridiculous taxes would we be the country we are today?

I see your stupidity, The American Dream was pitched to the Japanese, Chinese, and Europeans as a reason to come to America for work. The belief that everyone could become successful no matter who they are, where they were born.

Hell Lets treat the Mexicans like the Chinese when they built the railroads, tell them to do the work, then treat them like shit afterwards. Wait we already do.

Well lets people have justified Jim Crow Laws, people were against suffrage for women, against labor unions, people were for child labor, and etc etc etc.

What are you so worried about hmmm? Like in the Jim Crow laws people were worried about blacks taking over? Are you racist towards Mexicans?

People were scared what the women could do when they voted? Are you scared that is the same with Mexicans?

America is built on immigration, and built on cultures and societies coming together. From the British, to the Irish, to the french, to Germans, to the Spanish, to chinese, to the japanses, to the Koreans, to the Vietnamese, to the Africans, and to the Mexicans. Either we show that America is a great nation that will take care of any and all people or we becomes those that we rebelled against. We become no better than King George, the Nazi's, Soviet Russia, and else where.


Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed, to me:
I lift my lamp beside the golden door



But then there are too many stupid people out there, caught up in blaming everyone and everything instead of focusing on improving quality of life.
@F**ked Up


"America is built on immigration"

Wrong. America is built on LEGAL immigration. And by quoting the poem that is a part of the Statue of Liberty you are insulting all such legal immigrants by putting them down on the level of invaders.

So, what do YOU have against legal immigration? Or does your rose colored glasses prevent you from deferentiating between a legal and illegal immigrant?
@Tony:

Paranoia on my Gamepolitics? Bleeh...
All I am doing is showing the hypocrisy of America by quoting what is on the statue of America. It does not in anywhere say anything about Legal Immigrants or imply it anywhere.

As for Legal immigration sure sure. Keep believing that. Because the Puritians Came here legally. Wait werent they refugees? Escaping a country from being persecuted, but then I dont know if the word refugee existed at that time.

Why arent the LEGAL Immigrants Invaders. Did you forget about the Native Americans? We Did Steal their land. Or do you not want to remember that Information.

Maybe you should read up on how Hawaii became a state. I am sure you think that was legal too.

Legal and illegal as I mentioned is what we make illegal and legal. Hell I was reading multiple history books on the Chinese who built the railroads and once the railroads were done, the same people who brought them over wanted to deport them back to China. What did they do? Try to push laws to make them illegal Immigrants. There is the law for you. What are we such a totalitarian state that we cannot question the law?

What do I have against Legal Immigration, nothing. I have something against people like you. Who are actually viewing the world through your rose colored glass and fall into the endless cycle that has happen through out history.

Well as they say the ignorant will be ignorant and stupid will be stupid doom to follow the same History over and again.
"All I am doing is showing the hypocrisy of America by quoting what is on the statue of America. It does not in anywhere say anything about Legal Immigrants or imply it anywhere."

It doesn't have to be stated, or even implied. A scrap of common sense tells you that the rights granted to CITIZENS are for citizens only. Contrary to your belief, meandering across a border does not make you a citizen.


Furthermore I can only guess from your post sthat you wouldn't care if I broke into your house. I mean you would treat me as any invited guest now wouldn't you?


So tell me, do you think that people should just be able to walk into the country and that is that? Again you make a mockery of all the people who put their effort into obtaining the American dream by putting all immigrants into the level of border hoppers.
Also:

"Why arent the LEGAL Immigrants Invaders."

The idiocy of this statement is amazing. Its the same reason you aren't breaking an entering when you go to a store during its business hours, but would be so in the middle of the night if you forced your way in with a cinder block.
A Scrap of Common Sense? Like the Same Common Sense that Said Saddam Hussein is making weapons of Mass destruction. The same common sense that the Creationist use to say everything was placed her on earth by a divine being? perhaps a Flying Spaghetti monster? The Same Common Sense that says that are gods chosen are White People? That they should rule over the blacks as Slaves? And Kill all the Jews? The same common sense that says every arab is a terrorist?

Break into your house? Ohh Now I see why your so upset. You have and then before that it was the Italians and there organized crimeattached race to crime. I see now, I see your stupidity. Well now I see who is wearing the rose collared glasses.

So what are you afraid of a little competition from Mexicans in persuing the American Dream? Thats why you want it for only Citizens? Hmm I know your actually made about crime seeing it to blame it all on Mexicans. Ok rewind lets go back to the 1970s to the 1990s wasnt it all the black people being blamed? Oh wait and Lets Blame the gays for AIDS? oh wait they are doing that already.

"Why arent the LEGAL Immigrants Invaders." was actually met rephrasing what you wrote. Unless you dont know how a paragraph works. And once again your showing your racism. Attaching Mexicans to crime. And I bet every arab are terrorist? hmm now who was it the last time? oh yeah it was the Blacks, and before that Vietnamese, and and before that it was the Japanese and Germans, and then before that it was the Jews, and so on and so on and so on.

Now I see your problem. You dont have rose colored glasses you have Bigot glasses. Quick to scapegoat. Quick to blame. Doing nothing to improve the situation just throwing stones.
"Break into your house? Ohh Now I see why your so upset. You have and then before that it was the Italians and there organized crimeattached race to crime. I see now, I see your stupidity. Well now I see who is wearing the rose collared glasses."


Wow, that one just sailed right over your head. Okay, let me simplify it for you. The house is America. Guests would be legal immigrants, illegal immigrants are those who are breaking and entering.

So again I ask. How would you react to someone breaking into your house?

"So what are you afraid of a little competition from Mexicans in persuing the American Dream?"

I have no problem with Mexican-Americans pursuing the American dream. But then invaders are not Americans, thus can't follow the American
dream.

"And once again your showing your racism. Attaching Mexicans to crime. "

Racism? Now you're just putting words into my mouth. Where, before this post, did I even mention Mexicans? This isn't a racial issue, even if you are Canadian, you don't sneak in and live here illegally.

"And I bet every arab are terrorist? hmm now who was it the last time? oh yeah it was the Blacks, and before that Vietnamese, and and before that it was the Japanese and Germans, and then before that it was the Jews, and so on and so on and so on."

This isn't a race issue, so stop playing the race card. This is about people of all races and religions who would come here to try and steal the "American dream".

"Now I see your problem. You dont have rose colored glasses you have Bigot glasses. Quick to scapegoat. Quick to blame. Doing nothing to improve the situation just throwing stones."

Fail. Point to anything I've said that is racist. Come on I dare you.
But (and don't be a stupid-ass and fail at analogies again) again, how would you react to someone breaking into your house.

And to compensate from your inability to seperate race from this (just WHOM is the racist?) lets say the person breaking into your house is whiter than Larry Bird.
Well lets see the whole context of this argument has been about race. Especially the Mexicans. Hell the article is about racist and even makes racial comments. And yes u have been careful with the use of the word Immigrant but in the context of things here it can read as Mexican. Hell there was a guy I was arguing with earlier talking about crimes Mexicans commit.

Well anyways maybe learn succinct writing, it would help with your argument not that calling a country a house is a great analogy. Hmm thats like calling a firecracker a Atom Bomb. They maybe similar but due to scale they are treated differently. Well an yes my house holds millions of citizens and I am elected every year to maintain my household of millions of people. I make decision they must abide by and if they dont I can have them detained and treated like shit. Hmm maybe I can a couple over and then detain them in my home and drug them, beat them, take their money, go over to their home and ransack the place. Yes after all a country is just like a house.
I don't know how to make this more brief. Again I ask, how would you handle someone breaking into your house?
@Erik.

The "house breaking" metaphore is too little to explain this issue, don´t you think?
No, I don't think its too little actually. A trespasser honestly can't expect to be treated fairly in the place they are tresspassing in. As opposed to house guests that is.
What would I do if I treat someone that broke into my house? Well what would you do if someone tossed a pop-pop firecracker at you? Is it different that tossing a stick of dynamite? Once again your analogy of house to country is the difference between public vs private space. A country is a private place, A country has a constitution on how to treat people, a system of government.

Someone else has recognized that your house to country is completely stupid.
As i said its like comparing a Nuke to a Firework. If you cant see the ridiculousness of your analogy answer this, What do you do to people that blow up nukes instead of lighting some 4th of July Fireworks?
"Well what would you do if someone tossed a pop-pop firecracker at you? Is it different that tossing a stick of dynamite?"


Actually no. If I survived the dynamite attack the result would be the same as the firecracker tosser. An ass beating.


So I ask you again, how would you react to someone breaking into your house?


The point that invaders should be treated the same as citizens is an insult to citizens.
Also, am I to understand that your only qualifier for being a citizen of a country is walking in? Doesn't that sound kind of fucking stupid to you?
@Erik

I think there is a big differece between a house and a country. People maybe don´t have the right to enter your house, but a country is a complex entity and needs people to keep running. And not only USA, bot every country on the planet, needs people from other lands. USA is not Cuba or Imperial China.

Inmigrants are not barbarians planning your destruction. They cross the border illegaly because inmigration laws are unfair and slow and hypocrit.

People don´t have the right to choose in which country want to live (and work) anymore?

They are working, not living for free, exactly.
Erick says: Actually no. If I survived the dynamite attack the result would be the same as the firecracker tosser. An ass beating.

So, your solution to illegal inmigration is "ass beating".

I´m done with this.
"but a country is a complex entity and needs people to keep running."


Countries have these people, they are commonly referred to as citizens. Illegal immigrants are not citizens.

"And not only USA, bot every country on the planet, needs people from other lands."

That is where legal immigration comes in.

"Inmigrants are not barbarians planning your destruction. They cross the border illegaly because inmigration laws are unfair and slow and hypocrit."

Tough shit. It still doesn't give anyone the right to invade. Sorry, but a noncitizen cannot honestly expect the rights of citizens. Its only common sense.

"People don´t have the right to choose in which country want to live (and work) anymore?"

Again, legal immigration is the option.
"So, your solution to illegal inmigration is “ass beating”"


You people seriously suck with metaphor you know that? The answer to being attacked (dynamite/fire cracker) is an ass beating. The answer to an uninvited invader in your home is to try and expel them in the most practical way available.
So your solution is to beat someone up? Hmm Not call the police? have them tried as in court? You are sound like a great citizen to me. Taking the law into your own hands. Good Job. Its Martial Law now. I shouldnt feel bad if someone then just beat you up for stepping on their shoe.

I keep pointing out that your analogy of house to country is a poor. There is no point in answering it. Its like asking I saw some men walk out of your house late one night, is your mother a whore? What? I m not saying your mother is a whore I just thinking out loud.

What qualifies to be a citizen? Hmm good question, I dont know the answer to it but there are many americans that I wish were not citizens or are citizens but dont do shit.
@Erik:

No the answer to being attacked is call the police, not to take the law in your own hands.

And you don´t even understand what a metaphor really means.

(ass beating, you think you are a superhero or what?) (can you survive an attack with dynamite too? lol: that´s scary stuff)

And maybe they don´t have rights as citizens, but they are still people with rights.
"Taking the law into your own hands. Good Job. Its Martial Law now."

Self-Defense is legal.
"No the answer to being attacked is call the police, not to take the law in your own hands."


So what do you do while you are being attacked and are waiting for the police? Yeah, so while you are taking the pacifist route and hoping the cops can identify your body I'll be, legally, defending myself.
@Erik:

You have been attacked physically by an inmigrant? I don´t think so.

You can´t attack an inmigrant jumping the border because he is not attacking you in any way.

And now you don´t understand the self-defense concept, either.
So wait let me get this right? After someone those like 4th july fireworks at your like pop-pops, those red fireworks that make popping noise, your going to run over their and beat their ass? How is that self defense? Your going to attack after the threat is over? Thats actually assault.
"You can´t attack an inmigrant jumping the border because he is not attacking you in any way."

The attacking was the solution noted in regards to having explosives tossed at a person, not in regards to border hopping.

I reiterate, you are both horrible with metaphor.
"And now you don´t understand the self-defense concept, either."

And you don't understand the illegal immigrant concept.
Actually you dont understand the concept of illegal immigration. Well you just proved it since you are putting a country and a house on the same level. After all fireworks and dynamite are on the same level as well.
And you clearly don't understand metaphor or analogy.


And I still state that neither of you have any understanding of illegal immigration, as apparently both of you think that the illegal aliens should be treated no different than actual citizens.

Your position is not defensible.
Actually you dont understand metaphor or analogy. Your analogy here doesnt taken to account scale. And thats where it fails. And no you dont get my point, I m not talking at the citizen level, I m talking about the human level. No matter where they came from, what race, what gender, they should be treated as human. And why cant we treat them just as much as a citizen of the United States of America? We are supposedly the greatest nation in the world, Why dont we live up to it? is that too much to ask? well apparently it is.
"And why cant we treat them just as much as a citizen of the United States of America?"

Because they aren't citizens.

And they should be treated with respect, as they are being deported.

"We are supposedly the greatest nation in the world, Why dont we live up to it?"

Being "the greatest nation in the world" doesn't mean you have to let undocumented people into your nation.
@Erik:
Being “the greatest nation in the world” doesn’t mean you have to act like an a-hole just because you don´t like foreing people and expend tax-money building an useless wall around the country.
"Being “the greatest nation in the world” doesn’t mean you have to act like an a-hole just because you don´t like foreing people and expend tax-money building an useless wall around the country."


Fail. I don't have a problem with foreign people. I fully support legal immigration. This is not a issue of racism, its an issue of parasitic invaders.

Using tax money in this argument is rather hilarious though. How many illegal aliens do you think are going to fill out their tax forms this year?
Erik says:
1. "I don’t have a problem with foreign people."

2. "its an issue of parasitic invaders."

3. "Using tax money in this argument is rather hilarious though."

Answers:
1. ORLY? I can´t believe...

2. Yeah, they are sucking you blood off, I guess. I guess to get up at 4 am to work on jobs anybody really wants in America qualifies like "being a parasite".
Let me guess, you parents are still supporting you, right?

3. This isn´t a tax issue? So I guess is a race issue, after all.

4. You failed harder.
"1. ORLY? I can´t believe…"


It always amuses me when people try to turn this into a race issue. Pulling the race card is not any kind of defense against an invader coming in illegally and undocumented.


2. "2. Yeah, they are sucking you blood off, I guess. I guess to get up at 4 am to work on jobs anybody really wants in America qualifies like “being a parasite”."

Do they pay taxes? No. Are they registered with the Draft? No. And there are far far too many programs it seems to support them, despite them not actually paying taxes.

3. "3. This isn´t a tax issue? So I guess is a race issue, after all."

Again you fail. It doesn't matter if the illegal immigrant is from England, Zimbabwe, Australia, or Mexico. An illegal immigrant is an illegal immigrant. Face up to the fact you have taken up an indefensible position.


Entering a country you are not a citizen of is not a right, its a privilege.

But out of amusement, do you think that the only qualifier for being a citizen of a country is walking into it?
Ahh but How many illegal Aliens pay a sales tax and other taxes? And how many citizens dont pay taxes? Hell how many companies are not paying taxes because they are paying people under the table? How many Companies figure out that if they setup their business on some remote island just so they can avoid paying taxes?

Heres a shovel, keep digging your hole.
Other criminals breaking a law doesn't mean that the law doesn't have to be followed. Especially by those without the rights granted by citizenship. Just come to grips with the fact that you have no ground to stand on in this issue.


Again, you are the one whose position is on shaky ground. You support criminals who have no right to be in this country. None at all.

Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed, to me:
I lift my lamp beside the golden door


By re-quoting this, we have just show we are no longer the country that we once were. Dont give me no shit about implying that its for citizens or that common sense argument again since you failed to argue back earlier.

And once again your stating IT IS THE LAW AND PEOPLE SHOULD ABIDE BY IT. And I have argued it over and over again. People can create whatever Law they want. As I have said after the Chinese built the railroads, they tried to pass numerous laws to get deported back to china. In this sense the law, was created by the people in power to find away of getting rid of their problem of the Chinese. Just Because it is a law doesnt mean it is always the right thing to do. Hell in your opinion it was the right thing to do to beat someones ass after they threw a pop-pop firework at you. Good Job in following the law there.
By continually quoting the poem on the Statue of Liberty over and over again you do nothing more than show your ignorance of legal immigration while insulting real immigrants.

Being welcoming to immigrants does not mean one has to be welcoming to illegal aliens. Once more, setting foot into a country does not make you a citizen of that country.
You ARE aware that immigration, done correctly is legal right?
And you are aware that companies that store their money in off shore bank accounts to prevent from paying taxes legal right? Also Paying wages to factory workers in impoverished conditions just to keep wages down low in foreign countries is also legal as well. Ask Disney they know. Ever heard of Haiti?

I m tired of this same argument again and again. Legal and illegal. dont even have anything to say besides trying grasp at air. Same argument same stupidity. Well as they stupid people will be stupid.

All it seems like, is that he is trying to get the last word. lot of good it is doing.
"And you are aware that companies that store their money in off shore bank accounts to prevent from paying taxes legal right? Also Paying wages to factory workers in impoverished conditions just to keep wages down low in foreign countries is also legal as well. Ask Disney they know. Ever heard of Haiti?"

And this validates parasitic invaders how?
@F**ked Up

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7qKD-Ph7ds

This is pretty much close to what Erik believes is illegal migration :lol:
No, I think illegal immigration is when someone wants all the benefits of citizenry, without all that pesky stuff like jury duty, taxes, and registering with the draft. Hence, parasites. There is no defense for these people legally or morally.
Well he keeps going back to illegal vs legal. And its the same circular argument. If A company does it right they can not pay taxes by locating their bank accounts on some off shore company. Just like if you do it right you can become a legal immigrant. Just like how if you do it right you can keep 3rd world countries in impoverished conditions by using economics and well since it is not on US soil its legal right? It keeps going back to the same argument about what is legal and not illegal. same thing over and over again. All he is trying now is to get the last word.


Parasitic invaders? looks like his true colors, I see your Xenophobia showing.
"Parasitic invaders? looks like his true colors, I see your Xenophobia showing."

Are you completely fucking oblivious to legal immigration?
Hmmm well even legal immigrants cant register for the draft, cant do jury duty, they cant vote, as far as taxes well they have a different taxes rules that they have to follow. So in your definition legal immigrants are parasites.

There is no explaining his stupidity besides well he is stupid.
Actually The Governor of California is a Citizen. He got his Citizenship in 1983, Dumbass. Legal Immigrants, you twit, are people on H1B visas, Student Visas, you know the Green Card.
He immigrated to the US, thus he is an immigrant. And obtaining citizenship is what I've been talking about the whole time. The poor huddled masses coming to become citizens.

But you would prefer illegal aliens who would steal from us. You would give them rights and keep them from responsibility. You are no better than a parasite yourself.
"Stupidity knows no bounds"

You really dont know anything about immigration do you?

He Immigrated to the US, but during his time he probably had to be on a work visa. From their he had to live in the United States for a certain period of time to qualify for his citizenship. So what was he during his time in the US before he became a citizen? Hmm? An illegal Alien?

Hell do you know anything about work visas? By your very definition Jackie Chan, Jet Li, Shakira, and other international Celebrities without Citizenships are well parasites. Those that do not have citizenship to America must be parasites in your books.
"So what was he during his time in the US before he became a citizen? Hmm? An illegal Alien?"

If he had a visa he was not an illegal immigrant, stop being a moron.

"Hell do you know anything about work visas? By your very definition Jackie Chan, Jet Li, Shakira, and other international Celebrities without Citizenships are well parasites. Those that do not have citizenship to America must be parasites in your books."

If they have work visas then they are not illegal immigrants, stop being a moron.


What I have a problem with is the people that come here with NO work visa, NO student visa, not even a passport, or paperwork of any kind or even the right to step a single foot into this country who expect all the benefits of citizenship while hiding from the responsibilities.

Apparently you don't even know what an illegal immigrant is.

Erik said:

No, I think illegal immigration is when someone wants all the benefits of citizenry, without all that pesky stuff like jury duty, taxes, and registering with the draft. Hence, parasites. There is no defense for these people legally or morally.


Well if you didnt know people on work visas, student visas, and etc; cant vote, cant register for the draft, cant server jury duty, and follow different tax codes . So that must make them parasites. Even though they are an legal immigrant, they got the visa to prove it.


Erik said:

A legal immigrant is the Governor of California you twit. Don’t even try to say that legal immigrants can’t do all of those things.


So for the Govinator to be come a US citizen he had to be able to enter this country on some type of Visa. So during his time while filming movies he was a Legal Immigrant without Citizenship so he was getting paid for doing movies, but could not vote, could not serve jury duty, and etc, thus making him a parasite in your book. Using his visa, he spent the time require to become an American Citizen. So that makes him a Legal Immigrant with American Citizen, he now can vote, can go to jury duty, and etc and etc.


Erik said:

If they have work visas then they are not illegal immigrants, stop being a moron.

What I have a problem with is the people that come here with NO work visa, NO student visa, not even a passport, or paperwork of any kind or even the right to step a single foot into this country who expect all the benefits of citizenship while hiding from the responsibilities.


As I state earlier people on Work Visas, student visa, and etc, come to this country and dont have do "Citizen thing" they have the visa and get none of the "responsibilities" as he puts it.


Well those international celebrities, H1B visa and etc, can just work in the US, dont vote, dont register for the draft, just make money from working. Then go back home with the money they made. Yet these people are legal immigrants, they dont have American Citizenship they have their visa though

And yes every American votes, pay taxes, serves Jury Duty, etc etc, [/sarcasm].

Well apparently this wont get through his head.
"Well if you didnt know people on work visas, student visas, and etc; cant vote, cant register for the draft, cant server jury duty, and follow different tax codes . So that must make them parasites. Even though they are an legal immigrant, they got the visa to prove it."

No, it doesn't make them parasites, it makes them visitors. Visitors are okay.


But you don't even care if someone has any kind of papers do you? You are totally okay with someone living out their life here and taking from this country without giving back to it. A TRUE illegal immigrant. You support their right to steal from the US don't you?
Also those on student and work visas are not immigrants, they are visiting on a temporary basis.
But at this point I'd like to amend my "You don't know what an illegal immigrant is" to, "You don't know what an immigrant is."

Erik said:

No, I think illegal immigration is when someone wants all the benefits of citizenry, without all that pesky stuff like jury duty, taxes, and registering with the draft. Hence, parasites. There is no defense for these people legally or morally.

Then he said

F**ked up said:

“Well if you didnt know people on work visas, student visas, and etc; cant vote, cant register for the draft, cant server jury duty, and follow different tax codes . So that must make them parasites. Even though they are an legal immigrant, they got the visa to prove it.”


No, it doesn’t make them parasites, it makes them visitors. Visitors are okay.


Anyone else see the hypocrisy?

Want to know what I believe? I believe that anyone one, no matter where they are born, where they come from, what religion they are, what they skin color, or what how they look should prevent them from succeeding in life. As long as they have the drive to work hard, (I will say this loosely due to the fact that well any thing can be made illegal) follow (just) laws, and improve the quality of life for everyone (Again I say this loosely, with the optimistic thought that every person is doing the right thing), If America is such a great nation and the nation to achieve success, then illegal or not shouldnt matter. We are supposed to be a great country where everyone and anyone can succeed. But apparently not.

As for stealing from the US, maybe you should look at your politicians and wasted government spending than at the immigrants. After all they did lose a Trillion dollars, 315 million dollars for a bridge to nowhere, frivolously lawsuits, wasted money in defense contracts, creating laws that are blatantly unconstitutional and then having to fight them in court, and so on and so on.

But then again lets just scapegoat the Mexicans for our problems. And lets justify are wasting of money to Arab terrorist, because we know if there Arab they are a Terrorist. [/sarcasm]
Same argument again. Just stop. The more you keep trying to argue back the stupider you look. And this is going to keep going since all you want is the last word.

I have constant dissected your argument and shown its fallacies. All you keep doing is repeating the mantra of the "sky is falling." And you have proven that America is no longer the country it once was. The supposed great nation where anyone and everyone can succeed if they work hard. Ahh America, what have you become.
Oy.

This is a simple problem, if not ideal. We cannot allow anyone and everyone who wishes to enter this country and stay here to do so. We couldn't support that. So we put a system in place and said "this is the process you must go through to become a legal citizen, with everything that entails."

Fine, great. The thing is, you must now enforce that system with EVERYONE. You can't make an exception for one person without compromising the integrity of the system. So yes, by definition, anyone who comes here without the proper paperwork is here illegally, even if he works hard, never commits another crime, etc. The rule is there for a reason, and it needs to be enforced consistently. Let these people go through the proper process for immigrating to this country, at which point they can enjoy all the rights and responsibilities they claim they want by coming here in the first place.

It's pretty simple, really.
@lumi

Then the question is What is the proper process? People say the proper process is what we have now. Other people would argue otherwise.

Besides not everyone that will enter America will all stay here either, similar to people moving from company to company. Not everyone will stay in the company for the rest of their life, but some will, the choice is theirs. And maybe just maybe when these people go back they will take what they have learned and start making their country a better place. Who knows?
"ll you keep doing is repeating the mantra of the “sky is falling.” And you have proven that America is no longer the country it once was. The supposed great nation where anyone and everyone can succeed if they work hard."


1. America has never been a country for illegal immigrants. Before you fire off your lip about the poem on the Statue of Liberty why don't you actually visit the museum on Ellis Island.

2. Work hard? No, you are not talking about working hard, you are talking about parasites wanting HAND OUTS. If they were truly interested in hard work then they would put for the effort to doing things right.


Your argument has no legal basis.

Your argument has no moral basis.

Your argument has no historical basis.


You want us to bend over and give out hand outs to whomever decides to wander across the border. Bullshit. No, I will not stand for such THEFT of our resources.
Hey look, I've come up with a new Poem for you for "Your" America.

We lazy and thieving shall sneak in whether they want us or not.
Parasitic masses yearning to bleed the system for all its worth.
We invaders shall cross your laughable border in legion.
Whether you want us or not we shall come.
Under the cover of night, what is yours shall be ours!
And, ahem:



EVERYONE THAT COMES HERE STILL CAN WORK HARD AND SUCCEED YOU MORON. ITS CALLED LEGAL FUCKING IMMIGRATION.

YOU MIGHT TALK TO AN AUSTRIAN IMMIGRANT WHO IS A FUCKING GOVERNOR.
Same old bull shit.

Thanks for showing your stupidity once again.

I addressed each one of your topics earlier and you still have failed to argue a valid point back.

Wow typing in all caps I am threatened.
@ F***ed Up:

"Then the question is What is the proper process? People say the proper process is what we have now. Other people would argue otherwise."

There are two questions here. The "proper" process is the ideal solution. There is a disagreement over the question of whether or not what we have is ideal. But regardless, the question of what is the LEGAL process is very simple. And ideal or not, the current legal process is what must be adhered to until such time that it changes.
@Lumi

"And ideal or not, the current legal process is what must be adhered to until such time that it changes."

I have stated this many times, What is legal and illegal is what we make legal and illegal. Yes the Law is the Law, but doesnt mean the law is just or right, for example the Jim Crow Laws. Things wont start to change unless there is catalyst to start the change. We would probably still have the Jim Crow laws, and other such laws if lots of people didnt break them, you cant arrest everyone. It similar to what is going with piracy not exact but do hold similarities.
"I addressed each one of your topics earlier and you still have failed to argue a valid point back."


I disagree, it is YOU who have failed to give an argument, or at least an argument not worthy of laughter.

I say "Illegal immigrants are stealing from us"

Your reply is, "Yes, let them."


Bullshit.

Also, go back a couple hundred years and ask the Native Americans just how THEY felt about unwanted immigrants. The second that the Pilgrams landed on Plymouth Rock they should have been tossed right back off.


This used to be a country people could come to work hard and succeed. But thanks to scuzz like you we have become a country of hand outs.


Also, "We make the laws and we can choose what is legal and illegal" is the most idiotic argument you have made. A country can NOT survive if they allow a segment of the populace able to just mooch off the rest of the population. So your plan is to make illegals, legal and just let them live here for free? Bullshit.


Your big plan is to let illegals steal from us. How fucking gullible are you?

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 11/22/09 at 12:06am
JDKJ: You should get Phil McCraken to help you spackle those banisters.
Posted 11/21/09 at 11:57pm
ZippyDSMlee: Oh in the pirate hunter article I need my song ieda heckled DS,JD,Beemon sic im !!!
Posted 11/21/09 at 11:56pm
ZippyDSMlee: JD:no I am tried from prepping the banisters for painting , worked on them from 12 to 4 and 6 to 8...after I got back from the store...got up early got ready...blah...been up all day..I need a nap...
Posted 11/21/09 at 11:42pm
JDKJ: No. You gonna stay up late tonight soldering?
Posted 11/21/09 at 11:41pm
ZippyDSMlee: JDKJ:Don't you mean Mctite?
Posted 11/21/09 at 11:33pm
JDKJ: @Zip: Neil, Bob, and Lik McTaint. The McTaint brothers. LOL!!!
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:44pm
Flamespeak: I still think military personell, killing other military personell, on a military complex should be handled by military courts.
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:43pm
Flamespeak: I could see this a mixture of the two charges rather than just one or the other.
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:43pm
Flamespeak: I think this was mainly a person who snapped, but evidence is showing he definitely had strong inlinations to islamic-extremism.
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:41pm
Flamespeak: People are trying to claim that Hasan's actions were not terrorism. I don't jump on the 'terror train' like others, however
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:38pm
mentor07825: Britain certainly does deserve it! And the French! God damn it, it was a hand ball!!!
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:34pm
ZippyDSMlee: mentor07825:Well Brittan dose deserve it....
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:33pm
ZippyDSMlee: Alyric:I don;t hasliburton having to pay back billoins... don;t you love it when the rich roll over the goverment without a care?
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:32pm
mentor07825: I say we nuke the whales, for the benefit of both mankind and the environment.
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:28pm
Austin_Lewis: I say we try Al Gore too. I always said he was in on the racket.
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:16pm
Alyric: The leaked information proves these organizations knowingly defrauded governments (i.e., taxpayers) out of billions of dollars. Yet there will probably never be a trial.
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:15pm
Flamespeak: working on other things makes me angry. I might have had a jet pack by now. :p
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:14pm
Flamespeak: Just thinking of all the time and manpower wasted to try and make things emit less CO2 emmision that could have been spent
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:07pm
Alyric: @Zip: FYI, the construction of solar panels puts out more pollution than any form of energy production. To say nothing of the toxic components of the panels that cannot be recycled.
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:04pm
ZippyDSMlee: I know I know not the point.
Login or register to post shouts