RPI Controversy Continues Following Cancellation of Artist's Video Game Exhibit

March 10, 2008 -

Last week GamePolitics tracked the story of Wafaa Bilal, an artist whose Virtual Jihadi exhibit at Rensselaer Polytechnical Institute was cut short following protests from some students and alumni, as well as a visit from the FBI.

In the wake of the campus flap, Inside Higher Ed reports that some RPI faculty members were outraged by school president Shirley Jackson's decision to abruptly cancel Bilal's visit. Art professor Branda Miller, from whose classroom Bilal was pulled by college officials, said: 
 

This isn’t just shutting down an exhibit. This is an assault on my classroom, an assault on academic freedom and freedom of expression.

I thought, ‘this must be what it feels like to be in Iraq.’ A moment of compassion crossed my mind. I was imagining professors attempting to teach their students in countries where academic freedom does not exist, where even their lives are at risk.

I think this is a very complex discussion.He’s an artist. He’s very intelligent, very serious, very kind. He is trying to make a point. My students play these games. Some of these games are embedded with violence and racism and the ability to dislocate your sense of self when you kill someone. [Bilal was trying] to get people to think about the games.

 


Comments

@Neeneko

"Incorrect. This is no more the ‘point’ of terrorism then shooting point is the ‘point’ of invading a country. Terrorism is a weapon, but it’s a weapon to use towards actual goals. The leadership really doesn’t, in the end, care how we feel or our society operates or our ‘way of life’ as long as they get the things they are asking for…."

Yes, terrorism is a weapon, but the way that weapon works is to undermine a group by provoking fear. The point of 9/11 was to destroy what Bin Ladin saw as the capitol of the western world. The point of terrorism in Iraq is to make the Coalition troops and public feel like it is not worth it to be there. In most cases, people are making changes and compromising on something to try and prevent more terrorist attacks. In the case of the US homeland, we are eroding our founding rights like freedom of speech.

"The various organizations like alkida have very specific things they want out of the US and the US has not budged on a single one of them."

I think compromising multiple rights is one hell of a budge. What Bin Ladin wants, and has said several time, is the fall of western civilization. We are doing the US is doing a hell of a job undoing all the advancements we have made as a western country in the name of protecting ourselves. PATRIOT Act, illegal wiretapping, torture, and jailing whistle blowers are steps back for this country.

@ jkdjr25 "He may have the right to speak but the college has the right to shut down an exhibit on their property that they feel is disruptive and the republican club also has every right to make their displeasure at this display known. People spoke out and the college decided to pull the plug on it.

There’s no great conspiracy here, its just how the system works. Just because you have the right to say a thing doesn’t mean that people are forced to give you a forum to do so. "

As I said earlier, "I am not arguing that the university doesn’t have the right to pull the exhibition, but I do believe that doing so is detrimental to the learning environment more so than any controversy that may arise for it. Controversy creates conversation and debate, and through that learning and understanding. By canceling this exhibition, the school is effectively saying that an opinion or idea that pisses people off is less valuable than one that doesn’t."

In short, the university has every right to pull the event, but I personally believe that doing so is a bad thing for their students and the country in general. I also agree that the CRs had the right to protest, but I think it would have been far more productive to bring on a counterpoint artist to show as well. They could even ask for a show of student and community art that is critical of the exhibit. There are so many options, but I am disappointed that they picked the one that involved the breakdown in communication.

The university has every legal right to shut down the exhibit, but they also have every moral and academic right to support it to the end.

If we can't have a piece of art that stirs up controversy and initiates debate with a fresh perspective on an existing subject in a UNIVERSITY, then where can we? Are these not centers of learning, of knowledge, of understanding? Is not the reason for academia to open our eyes to the world around us?

Those of you who agree with the exhibit being shut down because of the 'controversy' it would have caused, I have news for you: you are not free. You live in a suit made of bubble wrap with green-tinted sunglasses and think the world is little more than cheerful sitcoms and margarita nights at TGI Fridays. Whenever something evenly remotely sharp enough to burst those bubbles comes along, you turn your head and cry bloody murder until some caped hero swoops in to smash it with a hammer.

Wake up, folks. I would think that people who read GamePolitics - a website that reports on political stories involving video games and the free speech they deserve - would be more than a bit miffed at stories such as this.

...something even* remotely...
Typing too fast.

Hmmm... Much I want to say but I'll let a far better man than I say it for me:

"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent. - Thomas Jefferson"

"All, too, will bear in mind this sacred principle, that though the will of the majority is in all cases to prevail, that will to be rightful must be reasonable; that the minority possess their equal rights, which equal law must protect, and to violate would be oppression. - Thomas Jefferson"

"Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny. - Thomas Jefferson"

"I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them. - Thomas Jefferson"

"Our country is now taking so steady a course as to show by what road it will pass to destruction, to wit: by consolidation of power first, and then corruption, its necessary consequence. - Thomas Jefferson"

"When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty. - Thomas Jefferson"

There are more but I think the point has been painfully made.

I've said everything I've wanted to say on this story in the previous articles from last week, but I found one quote a little... pathetic. When Branda Miller says:

"this must be what it feels like to be in Iraq"

I cannot help but balk at her audacity. Seriously? A private institution chose not to show something, and that makes her feel like she's in a war-torn country where people are dying daily and speaking out paints a bullseye on your back? Personally, it is comments like this that show that she (and others like her) do NOT have any reak appreciation for what's going on over there, and her supposed empathy for the Iraqis is mostly just rhetoric.

Why do smart people say stupid things?

@ Are'el:
That quote is out of context. She was speaking about the officials who walked into her classroom where Bilal was a guest and took him away without any explanation to her or her class. She speaks of the college officials intervening in the teaching of her students.

"and that makes her feel like she’s in a war-torn country where people are dying daily and speaking out paints a bullseye on your back?"

Bilal spoke out in his way and now there's a bullseye on his back, in a manner of speaking. I'd say it's a fair analogy.
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Which Feminist Frequency video are you looking forward to most?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
prh99http://io9.com/one-of-our-most-popular-special-effects-originally-came-1682151657 Looks like the 1988 anime, Akira and anime in general has effecting popular culture, at least when it comes to special effects.01/28/2015 - 12:26pm
Wonderkarpyeah. some people are salty over it. but that wiki article was filled with vitriol01/28/2015 - 12:06pm
prh99Yeah, I saw people complaining about that, claiming Wales was a hypocrite cause he supposedly removed some feminist editors.01/28/2015 - 11:57am
WonderkarpCivility, Wikipedia, and the Conversation on Gamergate https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/01/27/civility-wikipedia-gamergate/01/28/2015 - 11:45am
Wonderkarpone thing that surprised me...theres a lot of expanded universe books for star wars, star trek, alien, even videogames like resident evil....why not ghostbusters? There's a comic series and cartoon but thats it01/28/2015 - 11:37am
prh99Well it is Hollywood, remakes are the one thing they can be relied on for.01/28/2015 - 11:34am
E. Zachary KnightSo you want a sequel and not a reboot. Fair enough. I think either could work as you have said yourself.01/28/2015 - 11:32am
Wonderkarpotherwise, let it lie. Next thing you know they'll remake/reboot Alien or Godfather01/28/2015 - 11:28am
Wonderkarpand Ghostbusters is my favorite movie and its aged well. it doesnt need a remake. Just like Psycho didnt need one. If they threw in Dan Aykroyd, kept the original tech, and acknowledged the old films without crappy easter eggs, I'd be on board.01/28/2015 - 11:27am
WonderkarpI dont like Reboots/Remakes. For every Batman begins or Invasion of the Body Snatchers, there's a million Robocops, King Kongs, Star Treks, Amazing Spidermans, Taxis, Clash of teh titans, planet of the apes, footloose.01/28/2015 - 11:26am
prh99Wonderkarp, what more do you need? It's been ~26 years, and Harold Ramis died last year. If they can make something decent, who cares?01/28/2015 - 11:19am
prh99I wonder if they will fall into the trap of making those items more scarce in game in order to get people to pay.01/28/2015 - 11:14am
Wonderkarpso its not even ghostbusters then. just in name and concept only. you could call it ghost chasers or spook snatchers01/28/2015 - 11:09am
Andrew EisenKarp - According to the creative team, the new Ghostbusters is a new story, not a gender swapped rehash.01/28/2015 - 10:36am
WonderkarpMan. Resident Evil has fallen hard. I was a Huge fan in the late 90s. I think its time for a reboot. I was playing the hd remaster of the gamecube remake and the dialogue still sucks. Chris asking Rachel if she knows how to use a gun. SHE'S A COP!!01/28/2015 - 10:33am
E. Zachary KnightThe whole point of early Resident Evil games was to beat the game using only those weapons and ammo you could scavenge and use save files sparingly.01/28/2015 - 10:08am
E. Zachary KnightDoesn't the ability to buy health and weapons defeat the whole point of survival horror games?01/28/2015 - 10:07am
PHX Corphttp://www.gamerheadlines.com/2015/01/report-resident-evil-revelations-2-checkpoint-microtransactions/ Report: Resident Evil: Revelations 2 to Have Checkpoint Microtransactions01/28/2015 - 9:57am
Wonderkarpgoogle fiber coming to atlanta georgia. I'm gonna try to get a transfer to atlanta just to get google fiber. lol01/28/2015 - 9:13am
Wonderkarpotherwise Its just going to feel like another unnecessary reboot to me01/28/2015 - 9:09am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician