Artist Continues "Dead in Iraq" Video Game Protest

March 20, 2008 -
Nearly two years ago Joseph DeLappe, an artist and academic, created a virtual protest of the Iraq war - with a video game twist.

DeLappe used the Defense Department's own, freely-distributed recruiting game, America's Army, as his vehicle to protest the conflict. As we reported on GamePolitcs in 2006:
DeLappe began joining online matches. He doesn't play the game, however. He simply uses the game's chat interface to type in the name, rank and date of death of U.S. military personnel killed in the Iraq conflict. When his avatar is killed, he simply waits for the next round to begin and continues to enter the names of the dead.

DeLappe's goal is to eventually enter the name of every service member lost in the war.

The New Media Research Studio blog reports that DeLappe is still at it and will present a live performance of his protest in New York City tomorrow with a discussion to follow. Last week GamePolitics detailed another DeLappe project, a Second Life re-enactment of Gandhi's 1930 Salt March protest.

DeLappe is also working on a project to create memorials to civilians killed in the Iraq war.

Comments

I wonder if this is why every artistic piece of video/computer media I see that deals with anti-war rhetoric is either too vague, too non-sequitur or too cliche. Because as we've seen with the shutdown of Bilal's exhibit, you can't hope to hammer close to people's hearts without causing a big stir from authorities.

America's Army is absolutely the place to do it and I would like to ask those of you who said otherwise why. He's using a recruiting tool of the United States Army to voice dissent to the war, what's wrong with that? It does get to people who count, people who are thinking about joining the army, he's giving another side to doing that.

For an artist, he's fairly random. Is this even art he's doing? Well at least his anti-war protests are peaceful than most "peaceful" anti-war rallies (only noting the irnoy nothing more)

And as soon as Robert Mirch gets wind of this, he'll slap a building code violation on the place of protest.

Wait. If he is walking 240 miles, how does he have the time to play American Army?

@ Ebon Heart

This is "art" in the loosest terms. It is the equivilant of tying a thousand balloons to a bridge.

E. Zachary Knight:
Simple... 2 computers! One to run Second Life, the other to run America's army....

Well the other article says he's walking on a treadmill, presumably he's got a laptop

Well, at least this is fairly peaceful and ironic, if not quite "art". Videogames being used in a peaceful way has to say something

@MaskedPixelante

Kinda hard to do since it's in a video game.

Oh he can do it. If he can legally circumvent free speech, he can do ANYTHING.

Anyway, gotta admire the guy for being so determined.

He'll type in every name soon enough I suppose.

The war in Iraq has cost the U.S. 3 Trillion dollars, yes 3 Trillion dollars I kid you not.

He is doing no harm, except to some players who are getting pissed off because of the flow of text in the chatbox.

I'm sure it's all very touching but...
all I can think is "Spam!"
sounds like it'd get really irritating in-game.

If he wants to protest against the war, that's fair enough. I don't think America's Army is the place for that, because his message isn't getting to the people who count.

But it's hard to tell what he is actually protesting about, because he didn't give a straight answer when asked in that GP interview. Why didn't he give a straight answer? Either he doesn't know the answer, or the answer is something he doesn't want us to know.

With something like this, I think he should have figured out why he was doing it and what he was trying to say, and if these reasons stood up to the example set by the people on his list. Doesn't he owe them that, at least?

There are still servers out there that this griefing jackass hasn't been banned from?

@ Gmeclucks

He has a good point in the protest but agreed AA isn't the place to do it.

@ Marlowe

Except 90% of the people who play AA don't give a crap about what the guy is doing there fore it's the wrong place. Now if he did it in front of a recruiting station, hey the guy has something.

@Marlowe
I'm sure I could think of more reasons if I had the EULA or TOU for America's Army on hand, but here's three reasons that come to the top of my mind almost immediately:

1. Chat Spamming
2. Griefing and Interupting the game for other players
3. Team Stacking (Creating an unfair team balance by not playing the game)

A game (yes, it is a Game at the end of the day, regardless of how many people want to call it a 'recruitment tool') is NOT the place for this kind of behavior, let alone "voice" this kind of anti-war dissent. His supposed "message" doesn't make him any less of a jackass. This is a guy who makes a living on controversy and calls it "art", I sincerely doubt that he gives a damn about his "message" other than the amount of attention that it gets him.

I wonder if he'd be willing to list the names of ever service member lost in the first five years of Bill Clinton's presidency.

Because there were more. A lot more, actually. Not saying Clinton had any responsibility beyond that of any normal CiC. It's just the way the numbers worked out.

I *am* saying that this guy doesn't give a fig for the ACTUAL dead soldiers. He only cares about his "protest" and his "art."

@ Marlowe,

Any arguments about the war in Iraq should be made to the people who can influence America's withdrawal: the policy makers. If someone plays America's army and decides to join the army, then that has nothing to do with the war in Iraq. Stopping a handful of people from joining the army will not end the war.

it's a protest. protests rarely stop people from doing something, they influence other people to join the cause.

for the first time, trolling is an art

@ JimK

Yeah I wouldn't blame Clinton for those deaths or the military for that matter. Let's blame whos fault it really is, Congress. They Can choose to go to war, and wether or not to fund it. Personally I'm agreeing with the

"I *am* saying that this guy doesn’t give a fig for the ACTUAL dead soldiers. He only cares about his “protest” and his “art.” He comes off like Cindy Shehan minus the foaming at the mouth.

So what if AA is a game? Can anyone here seriously argue that a game cannot be a recruitment tool, send a message, or act as propaganda? AA was originally pitched as, approved as, funded as, and continues to be thought of as a recruitment tool for the pentagon. How does its status as a game make it the “wrong” place to spread a political message opposing the game’s purpose?

I understand and agree that protests within games are disruptive and annoying, but so are protests in real life. I hate getting held up in traffic by war protesters, but I don’t tell them they shouldn’t be on the sidewalks distracting drivers and causing a slow-down. Annoying yes, but my annoyance can’t trump the protesters right to be there and speak their mind.

Like it or not, AA is the ideal place for a protest of this sort to take place not only because AA is a government project and tool, but because the protest itself opposes the goal of that tool.

Right-o, DurWrathi. As annoying as being stuck on the same team with this protester would be, doing this in any other game would be totally irrelevant.

But if he really cared about making waves, he would have to invite some of his friends to join the "protest". Such a move might pull a load on AA's servers and get some kind of reaction from the US Army.

Not just his friends, actually. Just succeed in virally spreading the campaign to a lot of online players.

What pisses me off is the way this schmuck uses the names of soldiers in his "protest" - and I'm sorry, but I have a hard time being sympathetic to a person's cause if they don't care enough to leave their house - without consideration to the soldiers who would disagree with him.

As to whether or not AA is a recruiting tool, it may have been initially designed to help recruiting efforts, but we have to consider the practical effect it has. How many people play AA and then say, "well, that sold me. Sign me up!" It's not a recruiting tool, it's a game. Granted it is a propaganda game, but it's still a game.

As annoying as this guy may be, and as much as I want to stop him from spamming, this game, even if it isn't so in practice, is meant to be a recruitment tool. It's meant for those who want to join the army. As such, it is an appropriate medium for this spamming that can loosely be called a peaceful protest.

And besides which, games are past the stage of being just games. You can find books less intricate or complicated(and no, I dont mean kiddie books) than some of the high end games.

What this guy is doing may not be art, or even a good idea, it's something he's allowed to do. Of course, the right to free speech doesn't necessarily mean we have to listen...

That's a pretty lame protest if you ask me. And he calls it art? That could cast me gaming into a hole new light if I wanted it to then ;)

@Elalonna
Well spoken. You read thoughts.
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Did Microsoft pay too much ($2.5 billion) for Minecraft developer Mojang?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Kronodebate. Becaus apparently people who only post on Reddit are supposed to police twitter before they're allowed to question anything about the people involved.09/18/2014 - 10:40pm
KronoI highly doubt many, if any are using journalistic integrity as a cover for harassment. The people harassing are essentially trolls. They aren't interested in subtle. More often it's othe other way around. People use "but X is being harassed" to shut down09/18/2014 - 10:38pm
Andrew EisenAnd exacerbating everything is the fact that all the cries of ethics violations have been obnoxious and easily proven false.09/18/2014 - 8:59pm
Andrew EisenProblem is, I would imagine, the sheer number of people who are using journalistic integrity as a cover for their harassing actions or only bringing it up on the false pretense of journalistic integrity.09/18/2014 - 8:47pm
Andrew EisenHaving said that, I can certainly see how one would be frustrated if they truly just wanted to talk about journalistic integrity and someone said they were one of the people harassing Sarkeesian, Quinn and others (though I've seen no examples of that).09/18/2014 - 8:44pm
KronoThat's been the common refrain, that talk of journalism ethics is just an excuse to harass people.09/18/2014 - 8:44pm
KronoLines like "like a partial compromise with the howling trolls who’ve latched onto ‘ethics’ as the latest flag in their onslaught against evolution and inclusion." are taring everyone questioning the ethics as a harasser.09/18/2014 - 8:43pm
Andrew EisenKrono - Except, none of the articles were talking about gamers complaining about journalist ethics, let alone called them white male misogynists. They were talking about the gamers who were harassing others.09/18/2014 - 8:36pm
Kronomakes plenty of sense. It's rather hard to dismiss someone as a white guy running a sock puppet when they've posted proof they're a woman, or black, or another minority.09/18/2014 - 8:32pm
Kronothat any critics of journalists were white guys that hated women, and could be dismissed as such. It seems to have helped some. It's kind of difficult to maintain the white guy narrative in the face of a bunch of women and non-white guys. So the tag09/18/2014 - 8:32pm
Kronothat, someone vented on a #gamergate 4chan thread about being dismissed like that. The suggestion they got in return was to organize their own hashtag in response, with #NotYourShield being suggested. Thus the tag came into use to combat the undercurrent09/18/2014 - 8:32pm
Kronomuch more general problem. And while several of the articles were fairly tame, they spured a bunch of people to dismiss any critics of the journalism involved as misogynistic men. Usually with insults aimed at the geek stereotype. After about a week of09/18/2014 - 8:32pm
Andrew EisenSleaker - Not sure what that has to do with anything but yeah, the gender percentages differ depending on how the study defines what a gamer is.09/18/2014 - 8:32pm
KronoThe rhetoric pushed by the spearheading articles that the "gamers" complaining about journalist ethics were just angry white male misogynists, insulted a lot of people that were previously fairly neutral. It made it go from a Kotaku problem, to a09/18/2014 - 8:31pm
Krono@Andrew I'm not surprised overlap exists. I expect much of it is a rush to jump on the bandwagon, either by reporting on the original articles, or rushing out their own. The point is that was a major flashpoint, much bigger than the reddit mass deletion.09/18/2014 - 8:31pm
Sleaker@AE - well the gamer trend was described with stats on Factual Femenist. Only 1 in 7 males plays games 20+ hrs going into college vs 1 in 40 females. So gaming is definitely still male dominated despite fake stats trying to say otherwise.09/18/2014 - 8:30pm
Craig R.Do conspiracies ever make sense? The fact that people are now having to defend themselves against nutjob websites like Breitbart.com shows how far down into the rabbit hole we've all been forcibly dragged.09/18/2014 - 7:05pm
Michael ChandraBut when the mountain obviously exists...09/18/2014 - 5:49pm
Michael ChandraMind you, if someone makes a mountain out of a molehill with a secret agenda as motive, it'd be fine.09/18/2014 - 5:48pm
Andrew EisenOkay, so I guess I'm not making sense of #notyourshield because it doesn't make any sense.09/18/2014 - 5:28pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician