Artist Continues "Dead in Iraq" Video Game Protest

March 20, 2008 -
Nearly two years ago Joseph DeLappe, an artist and academic, created a virtual protest of the Iraq war - with a video game twist.

DeLappe used the Defense Department's own, freely-distributed recruiting game, America's Army, as his vehicle to protest the conflict. As we reported on GamePolitcs in 2006:
DeLappe began joining online matches. He doesn't play the game, however. He simply uses the game's chat interface to type in the name, rank and date of death of U.S. military personnel killed in the Iraq conflict. When his avatar is killed, he simply waits for the next round to begin and continues to enter the names of the dead.

DeLappe's goal is to eventually enter the name of every service member lost in the war.

The New Media Research Studio blog reports that DeLappe is still at it and will present a live performance of his protest in New York City tomorrow with a discussion to follow. Last week GamePolitics detailed another DeLappe project, a Second Life re-enactment of Gandhi's 1930 Salt March protest.

DeLappe is also working on a project to create memorials to civilians killed in the Iraq war.

Comments

I wonder if this is why every artistic piece of video/computer media I see that deals with anti-war rhetoric is either too vague, too non-sequitur or too cliche. Because as we've seen with the shutdown of Bilal's exhibit, you can't hope to hammer close to people's hearts without causing a big stir from authorities.

America's Army is absolutely the place to do it and I would like to ask those of you who said otherwise why. He's using a recruiting tool of the United States Army to voice dissent to the war, what's wrong with that? It does get to people who count, people who are thinking about joining the army, he's giving another side to doing that.

For an artist, he's fairly random. Is this even art he's doing? Well at least his anti-war protests are peaceful than most "peaceful" anti-war rallies (only noting the irnoy nothing more)

And as soon as Robert Mirch gets wind of this, he'll slap a building code violation on the place of protest.

Wait. If he is walking 240 miles, how does he have the time to play American Army?

@ Ebon Heart

This is "art" in the loosest terms. It is the equivilant of tying a thousand balloons to a bridge.

E. Zachary Knight:
Simple... 2 computers! One to run Second Life, the other to run America's army....

Well the other article says he's walking on a treadmill, presumably he's got a laptop

Well, at least this is fairly peaceful and ironic, if not quite "art". Videogames being used in a peaceful way has to say something

@MaskedPixelante

Kinda hard to do since it's in a video game.

Oh he can do it. If he can legally circumvent free speech, he can do ANYTHING.

Anyway, gotta admire the guy for being so determined.

He'll type in every name soon enough I suppose.

The war in Iraq has cost the U.S. 3 Trillion dollars, yes 3 Trillion dollars I kid you not.

He is doing no harm, except to some players who are getting pissed off because of the flow of text in the chatbox.

I'm sure it's all very touching but...
all I can think is "Spam!"
sounds like it'd get really irritating in-game.

If he wants to protest against the war, that's fair enough. I don't think America's Army is the place for that, because his message isn't getting to the people who count.

But it's hard to tell what he is actually protesting about, because he didn't give a straight answer when asked in that GP interview. Why didn't he give a straight answer? Either he doesn't know the answer, or the answer is something he doesn't want us to know.

With something like this, I think he should have figured out why he was doing it and what he was trying to say, and if these reasons stood up to the example set by the people on his list. Doesn't he owe them that, at least?

There are still servers out there that this griefing jackass hasn't been banned from?

@ Gmeclucks

He has a good point in the protest but agreed AA isn't the place to do it.

@ Marlowe

Except 90% of the people who play AA don't give a crap about what the guy is doing there fore it's the wrong place. Now if he did it in front of a recruiting station, hey the guy has something.

@Marlowe
I'm sure I could think of more reasons if I had the EULA or TOU for America's Army on hand, but here's three reasons that come to the top of my mind almost immediately:

1. Chat Spamming
2. Griefing and Interupting the game for other players
3. Team Stacking (Creating an unfair team balance by not playing the game)

A game (yes, it is a Game at the end of the day, regardless of how many people want to call it a 'recruitment tool') is NOT the place for this kind of behavior, let alone "voice" this kind of anti-war dissent. His supposed "message" doesn't make him any less of a jackass. This is a guy who makes a living on controversy and calls it "art", I sincerely doubt that he gives a damn about his "message" other than the amount of attention that it gets him.

I wonder if he'd be willing to list the names of ever service member lost in the first five years of Bill Clinton's presidency.

Because there were more. A lot more, actually. Not saying Clinton had any responsibility beyond that of any normal CiC. It's just the way the numbers worked out.

I *am* saying that this guy doesn't give a fig for the ACTUAL dead soldiers. He only cares about his "protest" and his "art."

@ Marlowe,

Any arguments about the war in Iraq should be made to the people who can influence America's withdrawal: the policy makers. If someone plays America's army and decides to join the army, then that has nothing to do with the war in Iraq. Stopping a handful of people from joining the army will not end the war.

it's a protest. protests rarely stop people from doing something, they influence other people to join the cause.

for the first time, trolling is an art

@ JimK

Yeah I wouldn't blame Clinton for those deaths or the military for that matter. Let's blame whos fault it really is, Congress. They Can choose to go to war, and wether or not to fund it. Personally I'm agreeing with the

"I *am* saying that this guy doesn’t give a fig for the ACTUAL dead soldiers. He only cares about his “protest” and his “art.” He comes off like Cindy Shehan minus the foaming at the mouth.

So what if AA is a game? Can anyone here seriously argue that a game cannot be a recruitment tool, send a message, or act as propaganda? AA was originally pitched as, approved as, funded as, and continues to be thought of as a recruitment tool for the pentagon. How does its status as a game make it the “wrong” place to spread a political message opposing the game’s purpose?

I understand and agree that protests within games are disruptive and annoying, but so are protests in real life. I hate getting held up in traffic by war protesters, but I don’t tell them they shouldn’t be on the sidewalks distracting drivers and causing a slow-down. Annoying yes, but my annoyance can’t trump the protesters right to be there and speak their mind.

Like it or not, AA is the ideal place for a protest of this sort to take place not only because AA is a government project and tool, but because the protest itself opposes the goal of that tool.

Right-o, DurWrathi. As annoying as being stuck on the same team with this protester would be, doing this in any other game would be totally irrelevant.

But if he really cared about making waves, he would have to invite some of his friends to join the "protest". Such a move might pull a load on AA's servers and get some kind of reaction from the US Army.

Not just his friends, actually. Just succeed in virally spreading the campaign to a lot of online players.

What pisses me off is the way this schmuck uses the names of soldiers in his "protest" - and I'm sorry, but I have a hard time being sympathetic to a person's cause if they don't care enough to leave their house - without consideration to the soldiers who would disagree with him.

As to whether or not AA is a recruiting tool, it may have been initially designed to help recruiting efforts, but we have to consider the practical effect it has. How many people play AA and then say, "well, that sold me. Sign me up!" It's not a recruiting tool, it's a game. Granted it is a propaganda game, but it's still a game.

As annoying as this guy may be, and as much as I want to stop him from spamming, this game, even if it isn't so in practice, is meant to be a recruitment tool. It's meant for those who want to join the army. As such, it is an appropriate medium for this spamming that can loosely be called a peaceful protest.

And besides which, games are past the stage of being just games. You can find books less intricate or complicated(and no, I dont mean kiddie books) than some of the high end games.

What this guy is doing may not be art, or even a good idea, it's something he's allowed to do. Of course, the right to free speech doesn't necessarily mean we have to listen...

That's a pretty lame protest if you ask me. And he calls it art? That could cast me gaming into a hole new light if I wanted it to then ;)

@Elalonna
Well spoken. You read thoughts.
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MaskedPixelanteNah, I'm fine purple monkey dishwasher.07/28/2014 - 4:05pm
Sleaker@MP - I hope you didn't suffer a loss of your mental faculties attempting that.07/28/2014 - 3:48pm
MaskedPixelanteOK, so my brief research looking at GameFAQs forums (protip, don't do that if you wish to keep your sanity intact.), the 3DS doesn't have the power to run anything more powerful than the NES/GBC/GG AND run the 3DS system in the background.07/28/2014 - 11:01am
ZenMatthew, the 3DS already has GBA games in the form of the ambassador tittles. And I an just as curious about them not releasing them on there like they did the NES ones. I do like them on the Wii U as well, but seems weird. And where are the N64 games?07/28/2014 - 10:40am
james_fudgeNo. They already cut the price. Unless they release a new version that has a higher price point.07/28/2014 - 10:19am
E. Zachary KnightMatthew, It most likely is. The question is whether Nintendo wants to do it.07/28/2014 - 10:12am
Matthew WilsonI am sure the 3ds im more then powerful enough to emulate a GBA game.07/28/2014 - 9:54am
Sleaker@IanC - while the processor is effectively the same or very similar, the issue is how they setup the peripheral hardware. It would probably require creating some kind of emulation for the 3DS to handle interfacing with the audio and input methods for GBA07/28/2014 - 9:30am
Sleaker@EZK - hmmm, that makes sense. I could have sworn I had played GB/GBC games on it too though (emud of course)07/28/2014 - 9:23am
E. Zachary KnightSleaker, the DS has a built in GBA chipset in the system. That is why it played GBA games. The GBA had a seperate chipset for GB and GBColor games. The DS did not have that GB/GBC chipset and that is why the DS could not play GB and GBC games.07/28/2014 - 7:25am
IanCI dont think Nintendo ever gave reason why GBA games a reason why GBA games aren't on the 3DS eshop. The 3DS uses chips that are backwards compatable with the GBA ob GBA processor, after all.07/28/2014 - 6:46am
Sleakerhmmm that's odd I could play GBA games natively in my original DS.07/28/2014 - 1:39am
Matthew Wilsonbasically "we do not want to put these games on a system more then 10 people own" just joking07/27/2014 - 8:13pm
MaskedPixelanteSomething, something, the 3DS can't properly emulate GBA games and it was a massive struggle to get the ambassador games running properly.07/27/2014 - 8:06pm
Andrew EisenIdeally, you'd be able to play such games on either platform but until that time, I think Nintendo's using the exclusivity in an attempt to further drive Wii U sales.07/27/2014 - 7:21pm
Matthew WilsonI am kind of surprised games like battle network are not out on the 3ds.07/27/2014 - 7:01pm
Andrew EisenWell, Mega Man 1 - 4, X and X2 are already on there and the first Battle Network is due out July 31st.07/27/2014 - 6:16pm
MaskedPixelanteDid Capcom ever give us a timeline for when they planned on putting the Megaman stuff on Wii U?07/27/2014 - 2:23pm
MaskedPixelanteIf by "distance themselves from Google Plus" you mean "forcing Google Plus integration in everything", then yes, they are distancing themselves from Google Plus.07/26/2014 - 12:20pm
MechaTama31I wish they would distance G+ from the Play Store, so I could leave reviews and comments again.07/26/2014 - 11:03am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician