
The Florida Supreme Court will no longer accept anything directly from controversial Miami attorney Jack Thompson. If Thompson wants to file with the Court, he's going to need to hire another lawyer to do it on his behalf.
That's the ruling handed down by the Court late this morning.
As
GamePolitics reported last month, the Florida Supreme Court issued a
show cause order demanding that Thompson explain why the sanction shouldn't be issued. Clearly, Thompson's multiple responses did nothing to change the collective mind of the Justices.
The order issued by the Court may be found
here, and the following passages are quoted from it:
After submitting inappropriate and pornographic materials to this Court, Thompson was specifically warned that should he continue to submit inappropriate filings, this Court would consider imposing a sanction limiting Thompson’s ability to submit further filings...
Since that order, Thompson has filed numerous additional filings which led this Court to issue an order directing Thompson to show cause why we should not limit his filings... We now sanction Thompson...
Thompson engaged, to the point of abuse... in a relentless and frivolous pursuit for vindication of his claim that he is being victimized by The Florida Bar...
Thompson’s multiple responses are rambling, argumentative, and contemptuous... What we cannot tolerate, however, is Thompson’s continued inability to maintain a minimum standard of decorum and respect for the judicial system to which all litigants, and especially attorneys, must adhere...
A thorough review of Thompson's filings lead to one conclusion. He has abused the processes of the Court... Accordingly... the Clerk of this Court is hereby instructed to reject for filing any future pleadings, petitions, motions, documents, or other filings submitted by John Bruce Thompson, unless signed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar other than himself.
...Further, if Thompson submits a filing in violation of this order, he may be subjected to contempt proceedings or other appropriate sanctions.
For his part, Thompson has sent out an e-mail describing the Supreme Court's order as both "good news" and "idiotic."
GP: Just to be clear, this sanction imposed by the Florida Supreme Court is a separate issue from Thompson's Bar Trial which we have been reporting on in a
series of articles this week. No decision has been rendered by the referee in the Bar Trial as of yet.
UPDATE: Thompson writes in to say that he mailed today's motion prior to the Florida Supreme Court's order and that, in any event, he is entitled to make an oral argument on the matter.
Comments
Music to my ears.
Note: Caps Lock was intentionally left on.
But once we get there, what will we do then?
Depending on who his cellmates are, he may end up going down on something more than a martyr.
Too bad it only applies to the Florida Supreme Court, and not any sub-courts... Oh well. It's a start. ;)
@mogbert
"This pretty much shows the court doesn’t feel he is a qualified counsel. If he is not qulaified, how can they keep him on the bar?"
Because it's not up to the Florida Supreme Court. Disbarment is handled by the Bar, not the court. They are, however, allowed to be quoted as an "authority" when it comes to determining if he is qualified to be a lawyer.
"That means, about 2:30 PM, you can expect him to file a Rehearing Motion, stating that he can file it because this sanction wasn’t finalized yet."
He can file it. It's a "final chance" to state his case. However, they are free to reject the motion (see the determined catch), which would finalize the order...
Actually, in Jack's (and all other) disciplinary proceedings, the Florida Bar prosecutes. Judge Tunis makes a recommendation in her Report. The Florida Supremes either accept or reject her recommendation and stamps their approval or disapproval. So, the binding sanction actually eminates from the Supremes.
I suppose. The disbarment is essentially the Bar suing JT for "breach of contract" (breach of the rules he agreed to abide to when he got his license).
So the judges do have authority to "rule in favour of" the plaintiff (the Bar)...
I'm not certain even a law school student would want to go down this road, think about it. How'd you like your first impression on the local circuit judges AND the florida bar to be "figurative" threats on the same florida bar? (sprinkled liberally of course, with gay porn and references to JT as jesus)
Overruled!! Sit down, Mr Thompson! And please stop sending me naked pictures of your boyfriend.
http://jaablog.jaablaw.com/2008/03/20/supreme-court-sick-of-jack-thompso...
I'd like John Bruce to get comment privileges for this one topic as I'd like to know how the hell this is possibly "good news".
""And by the way, Jackdon'tknowjack, you stated in a post at Gamepolitics.com that I contact victims after school shootings. I never do that. I am going to find out who you are and sue you for that."
Oh ho ho, better watch out Jackdon'tknowjack! A guy who can't file anything to the court is going to sue you! What's next? He's going to shoot you with an unloaded gun?
Ah, Jack, you're too good. In a community so fractured and divided, only you could bring us all together, side by side.
And Thompson, if you’re reading this, here’s a song recommendation for you that I think will fit nicely to what you’re experiencing these days:
Celldweller - Welcome to the End "
- Here's another song that would be fit for that
"Beginning of The End" by Spineshank. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C39MzhiRhhM
Lyrics (Which describe the situation EXACTLY from Thompson's view): http://www.darklyrics.com/lyrics/spineshank/selfdestructivepattern.html#...
Jt has got an offical 'STFU' from florida, theyre as annoyed as we are, this can only mean good things for us and bad things for ole JT
How can he represent people in Florida when any case could potentially go before the Supreme Court of the state, and he'd have to bow out and get another lawyer?
Right?
I can hardly wait.
"I’m assuming he sent out a press release to all known media to make sure everyone knows about this.
Right?"
And likely claim that this is what he wanted and the Florida Bar has shot themselves in the foot.
When you're delusional, you'll never bored.
So, yeah, no surprise here really.
This story has made my day just a little bit brighter. We all know Jack will not go down quietly, even with the sanctions against him. He will continue to submit filing after filing until he is held in contempt. He will then scream his First Amendment Rights are being violated.
And when that happens all of us will throw our heads back and have a good hearty laugh.
Possibly the best play on that quote I've heard yet. Beautiful, just beautiful.
ohh...
I can see Thompson at the Clerk of the Courts office:
*waving fingers back and forth* I'm not the lawyer you think I am, I'm not the lawyer you think I am
Clerk: Sorry Mr. Thompson, I'm not accepting that
JT: !#$%!%!#
na na na na
heey hey hey
goodbye!
No?
Didn't think so...
It's as if he wants to get disbarred.
That's exactly what I was singing when I saw that.
Jack Thompson wins this case...wait what? He lost?
YES! Thank you, ohh thank you American Court system! Thank you guy who prosecuted against JT...And thank you gay porno for giving JT his "dirty" thoughts...
This could be VERY interesting.
P"ick.
@Rey
I find that to be an exceedingly appropriate song to sing right now
Classic. Beautiful. I can't wait to see him flail impotently at this one.
'Nuff said. :P
Nightwng2000
NW2K Software
The system works. I'm so pleased. Setting aside his agenda, the one thing I've never liked about the guy is he's a bully. Seemed to feel like the legal system was his own personal implement to bludgeon people with who don't share his belief. Maybe I'm not a lawyer, but I read that to basically say the legal version of "We warned you. SHUT UP."
The system works!
Didn't see that coming! Ha!!! ;) :D
You know the more that Jack is losing the better he thinks he is doing. Just for once I'd like Jack to realize, "Oh hell, I'm boned."
I think most, if not all people learn at some point in their lives that sometimes there are things that should not be said. Conversations where things said too hastily in anger or frustration cause the loss of friendship, respect, or even have repercussions on one's professional life. Things we say that we wish we could take back and this time, think before saying. That's in the spur of the moment however. This man rattled off his letters, "media alerts", "responses", motions, etc. without a single thought as to whether what he was saying was a good idea or not, and it has cost him dearly.
Abraham Lincoln was said to have wrote letters in anger. Mean, spiteful an insulting letters, but he never sent them. As he wrote, he mulled over his words and ultimately decided against sending them, perhaps instead, having "exorcised" the angry words and getting them out, he was able to reflect without the initial anger and compose more suitable messages. If only Jack had picked this historical figure to compare himself to (as opposed to Paul Revere, Jesus, Batman, Martin Luther King, etc.), he may not have ended up in his current pitiful state.
I would LOVE to hear how the idiot in Miami thinks this is a good thing. He probably thinks it's "proof" of a "widespread conspiracy against him". Shiny side out, JT.
I tip my hat to the Florida Bar Association, and here's hoping they will go all the way and disbar this embarrassment of a human being.
And there was MUCH rejoicing! Best news ever! :)
My kingdom for an edit function GP!
Can we see the email JT sent out in response please ??
We should keep base camp anyways, because JT could use other venues to be heard.
And JT says the ruling is both 'Good news' and 'idiotic'? Buwha? I wonder if he means he's been an idiot and the ruling was good news for folks who want a bit of decorum from the legal institutions of our great state and nation. Or maybe JT just had a few too many Rum & Cokes after the ruling. Thats completely possible too.
I doubt it because she's got a long list of honors and is part of a good firm, but you never know.
I sure hope so.
Court orders and filings are part of public record, but public record cannot be used as a cause for slander/libel. So, uncouth individuals that happen to have a J.D. and practice in a particular state can file defamatory and potentially libel/ slanderous statements all day long and not get busted for it. I would argue that use of the courts in this manner is another violation of the Bar's code of ethics, and also grounds for a contempt of court charge. Just a thought.
What happens then depends on his reality distortion field. He will either feel as if everyone in the world is holding him dear in their heart, or he will possibly lash out at a world that has rejected him, likely in a long and rambling press release.
Note: I purposefully didn't name any relations in this post.
And Thompson, if you're reading this, here's a song recommendation for you that I think will fit nicely to what you're experiencing these days:
Celldweller - Welcome to the End
This is EXACTLY what Jack Thompson wanted!! Now the florida bar is his to destroy!!!
This is exactly the good news jack was looking for.
Meanwhile, on planet Earth, the rest us raise our glasses to the Florida Bar.
Handcuff time.
This is a beautiful day....*cry*....
I think that's what he's aiming for, if he can't win, then he'll go down a 'martyr' to the evils of the gaming industry in his own eyes.
But yes it won't be so hard. Some lawyers don't care much about the case, just getting paid for it.
The hope here by the Court is that by getting a real lawyer to sign off on filings, it will dramatically reduce the volume and clean up the language of the filings.
This can only be a good thing.
I feel sorry for the poor court clerks who had to wade through his bile.
Nicely put :D
This might be one small step to devastate JT, yet it's a step never the less.
Sooner or later, he will lose more, and the day will come when we all can celebrate his disbarment.
I'm wondering if his wife will "risk" her career for her beloved looney husband.
Honestly I'm quite surprised that she hasn't ditched him already...
HALLELUJAH!
"In sanctioning Thompson, we are requiring him to retain qualified counsel so that his arguments might be properly presented through the appropriate procedures in the appropriate forum."
This pretty much shows the court doesn't feel he is a qualified counsel. If he is not qulaified, how can they keep him on the bar?
Now for the scary part:
"NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION, AND IF FILED, DETERMINED."
That means, about 2:30 PM, you can expect him to file a Rehearing Motion, stating that he can file it because this sanction wasn't finalized yet.
I do like how when he claimed they couldn't forbid him access to the court system, they showed in almost a pages worth of cases where they, and the Supreme Court, have ahd to do this, showing that yes, they can restrict it, it isn't preventing him from seeking justice, just requiring him to stop wasting their time.
Jack'll have to search the pyschiatric wards of Jackson Memorial to find an attorney who'll sign one of those "picture books" at any price.
I LOLed @ your comment :D
Sure it feels like mind of JT is so far out there, so we just can't grasp it ;)
Anyways, cheers mate!
2:30? Could be in the Clerk's office already.
you forgot "Entire population of world wide web" because they are out to get JT!!!!!!
That gives him enough time to file at least 5 motions
With that in mind Jack will UNDOUBTEDLY file regardless of this motion. Simply because of the above. He will be hit with contempt and Jack will see this as another victory within his own little conspiracy argument.
Jack, I'm going to just break this to you... There is no conspiracy. You're simply wrong. The super majority of the legal system has ruled everything you've come up with as wrong. All of the bills you tried to get into law and when they were made law were struck down by judges quoting the first ammendment of the United States Constitution.
It's a free country friend. You're welcome to continue your efforts within your hate filled JT land, but the rest of the world's patience has run out, the kid gloves are off, and your ranting and making other's lives miserable when they are those you're supposed to respect will no longer be tolerated.
Happy first day of SPRING! ^_^
Even if they care more about money, the order still says that it's a FLORIDA BAR MEMBER who has to sign. After insulting every member and the bar itself for years, I doubt he'd be able to find anyone who will accept to sign everything from him.
To advert Monty Python, "...'tis but a scratch..."
Watch out! He will try to bleed on you!
Mr. Kent should be able to clear up the chances of JT having someone else file for him. Maybe he'll post to clear up the confusion.
Please jackie do us one little favor and file a refutal of your sanction. Go on you know you want to, they are laughing at and conspiring against you. Hell they must be in league with game companies and were paid to Rockstar and T2 to unmine you and your crusade. Going to call holy fire down on them too?
Odds are there are probably more Jack Thompsons of the world that will gladly take up a case for him if its to help defend the children from video games not intended for their age.
Until that happens I'm going to listen to "We Are the Champions" all day long. :D
I'm going with zero.
If he gets another lawyer to file for him it will destroy his conspiracy agenda.
I'm going with zero too. JT's pretty well known, I can't see anyone wanting to risk their careers (or sanity) dealing with him.
Plus he'd probably insist on Pro-Bono, seeing as how he hates handing out money (see the Junkin article about how JT thought a 10% cut for co-counsel was "outrageous").
Best he might get is a law-student, working the Pro Bono track, at most they'd give him one chance before getting tired of his constant nagging and harassment...
How about his wife?
Just the Florida Supreme Court. But give him time. He'll work his way around to the others.
Ah, thanks. And you're probably right about the other courts!
Someone should probably explain to him that the difference is, when Paul Revere was screaming drunkenly about an invading threat, that threat actually existed.
Sounds like just the Florida Supreme Court, where his disbarment cases are currently in "review".
So he could presumably still flood the lower courts, and he could still file federally (although he has insisted he will, the last time he did the court denied him and said to let the Florida court finish first...)
And he can't file outside his jurisdiction without some other lawyer, or getting Pro Hac Vice (and I'm sure they wouldn't grant it if he was in the middle of a disbarment hearing...)
Either it'll be his wife signing off on his crap, or no one else unless he's paying. Even then, it's unlikely.
The man is a legal joke in his home state. No one would hitch their wagon to his. Even if they had an ulterior motive, his ego would be too much to deal with.
I have the good fortune to be married to a wonderful woman who is willing to support me, but who isn't afraid to call me out when I'm wrong. I was thinking about her this morning, and about what kind of woman is married to Jack Thompson, and how this affects her life.
Maybe she doesn't pay as much attention. Maybe she really believes in him and is pushing him on. Maybe she is telling him to stop, to try to save a sinking ship. Maybe he's been trying to hide all this from her, which, while unlikely, screams sitcom to me. Like I said, I know she's an attorney, and that's about it. It was just a thought I had this morning.
JT: OBJECTION!
Judge: Overruled
JT: OBJECTION!
Judge: Overruled
JT: OBJECTION!
Judge: Overruled
JT: WELL YOU WANNA KNOW WHAT I SAY TO THAT!? *turns around and drops drawers and starts smacking bottom at the judge* KISS IT!
Just like:
pie > cake, but were getting off topic now.
Pie only > then cake when cake = lie.
@ JDKJ
Love is love. For real love you wouldn't give your wife up for $1,000,000,000. The problem with buying another wife is the good ones aren't for sale.
Cheers mates!
Mind you, I'm saving my bottle of fine Irish Whiskey for his disbarment announcement.
-----------------------------------------------
Knowing him he already has attorneys lined up. Can't stop looking like a fool just because some "court" says he can't file any longer... Knowwhaddamean?
Jack = Epic Phail
I'm going to stick with the averages and keep to my zero with his wife in mind when it comes to filing.
She's kept out of JT's business throughout all of his shinanagans and I don't see why that would change now. I'd be more inclined to believe that he'd get a buddy from church to help him out more than his wife. Not to mention she has a lucrative law career. How can she be the bread winner if she takes time away to file stuff for JT pro bono?
I'm just messing. I ain't giving ol' girl for nothing. Besides, in our house, she's the one with the $1,000,00 a year income.
Just messing.
I 100% agree.
Leave JT's fam out of his mess he's created. His wife is a lawyer so asking, "Would she file for him?" is obiviously a legitimate professional question, but let's keep it at that folks. I know I'd hate to be pulled into this just because I was related to the guy.
Quite true. You have a point there.
Well let's hope we can watch him crash and burn soon enough.
Oh wait, he is already crashed and burning as we speak.
Someone bring some petrols quick!!!
I don't really know anything about her either, but I imagine her a saint.
But seriously, speculation about Jack's family is nothing wrong, so long as we do not diss on her. I am frequently quite curious as to what her opinions are and how what her husband does by making himself such a public figure impacts her life.
It's not like the public scrutiny has yielded any results. Jack is akin to a politician, albeit a rather poor or unrealistic one. And a politician's family is under scrutiny almost as much.
Only thing I can really speculate is that it has not (yet) affected her career as a lawyer by association. Though I'm sure there are small sniggering groups at gatherings when she walks by, as they joke about JT. ;)
That $1,000,000,000 would sure help me cope with the loss though, heh.
I'm telling you guys, Jack has them right exactly where he wants them! Victory is at hand, HOOAH!
JT was a worthy advesary up to the point he just started insulting every gamer in the world. Having a difference of opinion and voicing it is admirable. I, myself, have best friends who sometimes I'd love to just CLOCK for what I feel is stupidity they spew, but at the end of the discussion we shake hands and know that we are colleagues and no one is right or wrong we simply have different views and things we hold dear.
Jack Thompson has brought this on himself. I, for one, have never wished ill will against him. Oh yeah he's got my ire up, but he has a position and he's sticking to it. Unfortunately that turned into a vendetta and now it's become nothing more than a festering wound of hate for our favorite, game hating lawyer.
I hope he comes to his senses if not for his own sake, his family's.
JT: Take doe that article of I will sue you!!!
Gamer: Really? How?
JT: ........
I think he's just too proud to admit that he was wrong nor "come to his senses" at all.
I mean look at him, he acts like he is the best thing since the sliced milk, and all righteous like (in his mind anyway).
"I would not be surprised to see is an increase in the ‘Media-grabbing’ content of his Bar-hearing filings, since he’s only got one place from which to perform his own somewhat unique type of attention grabbing."
You raise an interesting point (although your prediction may not come true for the following reasons):
I suspect there's a simple explanation (in part) for why Jack kept ignoring the Supremes' instructions to stop filing papers with them and, instead, file his papers with Judge Tunis: the Supreme Court allows for electronic filing, while I'm not so sure the 11th Circuit does. If they don't, then there's your partial explanation: Jack didn't want to either (a) drive down to the courthouse every time he wanted to file a paper (i.e., two, three times a day) or (b) pay a courier to do it for him. So he kept on clicking the "Send" button.
And if the 11th Circuit doesn't have e-filing, then I wouldn't look for an uptick in crazy filings with Judge Tunis because he still won't want to do either (a) or (b).
This stopped being about children and videogames LONG ago. Jack has made sure, every single time, that its all about HIM.
You have an excellent point.
His denial of the reality of the situation is in the way to be rational. It does make one wonder what the breaking point on his reality will be.
That, or karma is a real bitch.
Yup.
JT has made it clear his crusade is only about getting himself in the limelight. The wreakage he leaves in his wake in the form of family members who really want closure and law makers who truly do want to do right by the people (that last statement is made with a grain of salt). If he TRULY wanted to address this issue he would have funded his own study with REAL psychology professionals.
Karma ran over JT's Dogma :D
I am intrigued by your idea and would like to subscribe to your newsletter.
Mad props.
Sig worthy.
After reading that, I can only say: I'm naming my secondborn after you.
etc, etc.
Like Good News for us and the state of Florida and Idiotic for him?
Seriously? Wow.
"He tried to argue that point on behalf of his co-counsel at his hearing and Judge Tunis had to remind that he was his co-counsel’s client, not his attorney."
Ha!
I'm being mean, I know. Everyone here probably is in some way. But Jack was meaner, and he's /finally/ getting what he deserves, so this is good reason to make a joyful noise. Soon our glorious suffering at the hands of this relentless bully will be over!
I'm pretty sure he will still get on Fox News- especially next month as GTA4 draws near. If anything, he will point to his current legal career as proof that the games industry is trying to scilence a whistleblower. Fox will eat that all up...
It's kinda like that with Jack Thompson.
Does it smell like law license burning? 'Cause that's all I smell.
"Reality continues to ruin my life."
After all, only someone not living in reality could take something like this and say it is "good news" and "idiotic".
DENIED!
Yep. And, perhaps, another show cause order. For contempt.
I love how he brings up Faretta in that blog you posted. He tried the same thing on the Slate article about him. The posters there explained precisely on why he was utterly wrong. He's totally misunderstanding the ruling.
JT has called nearly defeat/setback "the single greatest gift" he has ever seen in his legal career. He called the TT settlement the final ammunition he needed to destroy the company.
"a defendant in a state criminal trial has the constitutional right to refuse appointed counsel and conduct the trial when he or she voluntarily and intelligently elects to do so."
Two key world JB glossed over I imagine. :)
@Papa Midnight: Not sure how it's good news for Jack, but it's definitely good news to the rest of us. ;)
Jack has that uncanny ability to read something and, regardless of what reasonable people would understand it to mean, come away with his own very peculiar understanding.
"In that regard, since the Court is alleging that I have somehow encumbered access to the court for litigants by burdening these Justices, etc., I hereby make this formal Public Records Request pursuant to Chapter 119, Florida Statutes:
I should like copies of all documents that indicate the Justices’ public appearances and also their daily schedules doing the Court’s in-house business, from January 1, 2005, to present. In other words, I want to see how they have been spending their valuable time, in and out of the Court, over the past three years or more."
Wow. Just freaking WOW. I have nothing to say to this. What, is he trying to prove he's been on TV more than the judges have? Like that's going to prove anything other than the fact that... he's been on TV. Wow. Nobody gives a damn, Jacko. How is that supposed to be relevant to the case? That he's some sort of celebrity, and since EVERYTHING on TV is true to him, (since he seemed to be acting like somebody out of Law and Order during this trial of his) all celebrities walk, no matter what the charges are?
And even so, again, he's still mistaking his lisence as a secret service badge at this blatent request to peek into the private lives of the judges. Yeah. Real professional.
And i forgot to mention this, but maybe Jack actually DOES play Phoenix Wright in his closet. The amount of times he's objected is staggeringly similar. ;p
Jack:They've given me just what I need to destroy the game industry.HOOAH!
Doctor:Mr.Thompson, you have cancer.
Jack:HOOAH!
Doc:It's malignant.
Jack:HOOAH!
Doc:Sir, you're going to die.
Jack:They've given me just what I need to destroy the game industry.HOOAH!
Doc:DO YOU HEAR ME? YOU'RE GOING TO DIE!
Jack:Can I blame video games for my cancer? I played Tetris once.
Doc:Video games don't give you cancer, Mr.Thompson.You probably got it from cronically masturbating to pictures of yourself.
Jack:Nobody asked you, you schill for the game industry!
Doc:What the fuck are you talking about?
Jack:HOOAH!(Stabs doctor)
Doc:UNGH!(Drops to floor)
Jack:I have to take it to the next level;their level!!!!!
THIS SUMMER: JACK THOMPSON:THE RECONING!
RATED G
AVAILABLE ON DVD
It sounds like his argument is "I can't be burdening the court if the justices have any free time".
With arguments like that, no wonder Jackie can't win any court cases.
Brilliant.
Can we do a flowers for Florida Court? and well ask what took so long? But thank you.
Now only if we can get them to have Jack Thompson appear on Television and say he is a liar, and was wrong to be portrayed as a school shooting expert. Stating that he has no qualification to be consider an expert on anything besides being a dumbass.
they say dreams can come true, well please let this dream come true.
JT: None of you gamer idiots don't understand. This has been a victory for me! I have you all right where I want you! You will see me triumph! Hooah!
GP: Overruled
JT: What are you talking, you id-
GP: Overruled
JT: I see the games have corrupted your mind, Den-
GP: Overruled
JT: List-
GP: Overruled
JT: IF YOU DO NOT STOP THE HARASSMENT I WILL SU-
GP: Overruled...
JT: ...I am a moron
GP: Sustained
...Sorry I couldn't help it.
I'm holding off on the celebrations till the 'THOMPSON DISBARRED' headline shows up on GP... then the party's at my place!
@myrpok:
I doubt they'd 'get sick of him' ... well at least not FAUX NOISE: 'We Report and decide.'
@Shoehorn:
"Now that they have told him in plain language why his filings were intolerable, maybe he will have the time to reflect on them and realise what an idiot he has been."
Or, he'll continue like he's been doing only digging himself in deeper... This is JT we're talking about... who hasn't figured out the whole 'knowing when to say when' concept.
@EZK:
That would probably make you rich, as his legal filings would crash even the most sophisticated spellcheck. :P
@jkdr25:
Well the 'gatling gun filing system' hasn't worked in the past, but it's worth teh lulz.
@Anon:
Yeah she must have a gigantic heart to want to stay attached to that vortex of sanity.
@Lost Prophet:
Again, see my earlier comment.
@GoodRobotUs:
Well I wish they'd hurry up and make with the funeral for his failed career, the wait is excruciating...
@Trails:
Or have the Top Men lock him in a crate next to James Woods.... XD
@jesse:
See that'd make sense, so no... not like that at all. :P
@F***ed up:
I thought we were doing 'Muffin Basket for Judge Tunis? Either/or... I'm all for it.
@Zerodash:
And yet, they're still in buisness... imagine that.
"Can we do a flowers for Florida Court? and well ask what took so long?"
Sorry, no.
http://www.floridasupremecourt.org/clerk/index.shtml
it can be a fine or jail time judges choice
I was wondering where you've been. Good to see ya.
only if she wants to get disbarred lol
dumbass doesnt get it, does he?
(or whatever it is he says!)
lol so they ban him from filing motions... and threaten holding him in contempt if he does.. so he files 2 more motions..
HAHAHAHA great, we arent gonna have to get rid of him, hes gonan do it himself!
http://www.abajournal.com/news/facing_state_bar_ethics_charges_in_alabam...
Well all of us who said zero called it for motions filed by other lawyers on JT's behalf.
Jack Thompson gets in trouble
gets in trouble
gets in trouble
Jack Thompson gets in trouble
All through the courts.
Jack Thompson makes de-mands
makes de-mands
makes de-mands
Jack Thompson makes de-mands
All through the courts.
Jack Thompson's demands are ig-nored
are ig-nored
are ig-nored
Jack Thompson's demands are ig-nored
All through the courts.
Jack Thompson's career is going down
going down
going down
Jack Thompson's career is going down
right down the tubes.
Nightwng2000
NW2K Software
.......No ingenious plan? Just empty threats? Nothing but the rambling nonsense of a strange man? Really? NVM then...
This news is too good for words... Plus he decided to make more filings??? What is he thinking?
...Then I suppose he'll become a "martyr" *rolls eyes*
Craig R,
He actually did face a psychiatric evaluation previously several years ago. If I understand correctly, it was the same psychologist that he hired recently to perform another evaluation, Dr. Wunderman.
Of course, had I the legal Right to do so, I'd jump at the opportunity to move that there is a conflict of interest in the evaluation by Dr. Wunderman.
As I have ntoed before, while religion may be acceptable as a foundation for counseling in general (it should be a patient's choice whether to be counseled by someone who mixes religion in with their counseling), an evaluator who shares similar or equal religious beliefs cannot be viewed as being unbiased when evaluating a patient for another organization or legal body.
It would be like having a psychologist who believes repeated shock therapy will "cure" homosexuality evaluate Fred Phelps or having a psychologist who is a member of the Black Panthers evaluate Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson.
Dr. Wunderman and his wife (who is actually a religious leader in a church) actually share very similar fundamentalist religious beliefs with John Bruce. So, quite frankly, his evaluation cannot be viewed as unbiased.
Nightwng2000
NW2K Software
If memory serves, Dr Wunderman is also a member of the same church as JT is and they are friends. I could be wrong, but I do remember there being evidience of such a dynamic.
That may be, but it is also irrelevant because we already know what the answer will be. Until Jack can speak with something other than hate, insults, put-downs, and contempt, until he can STOP being so verbally abusive, he will never have a chance.
The problem there is that people can be sane and biggoted.
If I may digest for a moment:
I know there are law students who post here. Have any of you submitted one of Jack's filings to a professor for grading/feedback? I'd really be interested to hear how a legal professor at an accredited university feels about his filings. Is it shock and horror? Do they regard them as a joke? Are there actual points being made in there they they can agree with and positively comment on?
Yeah, I've been busy with real-life stuff...
That, and my friends back in the US (those bastards) got me back into Eve Online. Bastards.
Hey, another Eve player. Care to tell who you are?
I'll show you mine, if you show me yours.
Regarding the update. The SCOFLA already denied his motion with nothing more than a "SEE ORIGINAL ORDER" next to it. Thompson offered nothing new in his motion and instead went back to "I'm entitled because of Faretta and you all suck and the world is against me" arguments. It didn't work the first 15 times, so I'm not surprised it didn't work this time.
Jack keeps using that word "entitled." I don't think it means what he thinks it means.
"If I may digest for a moment:"
Um.... EWWWWW!
Please! Digest in private, would ya?! That's so disgusting!
;D
Ok, I'll behave now. :)
Nightwng2000
NW2K Software
I did respond to you last night, but it looks like it's jammed in the filters due to a couple of short copy/pates in the comment. Give a little time.
All/GP,
I looked at the FL SC Docket just a moment ago. The very last note is a Motion to Dismiss which is noted as Denied and a reference to the prior Opinion. I wonder if the Motion to Dismiss counts as a violation of the order or if it sort of counts as a "freebie".
Nightwng2000
NW2K Software
I'm wondering which he wrote first, though, the big press release declaring how great he is and how stupid the SCOFLA is, or his actual response to the court.
I'm a little late here but this story occured on my B-Day.
YAY.
Mnementh2231 in game. :)
I'm ALWAYS Mnementh2230 or some derivative thereof.
Can't wait till he gets disbarred! This should have happened years ago.
I go by F'nog on the boards.
Thank you for this delivery of hilarity and swift decision making.
In your name,
Amen.
Or better yet , to play GTA 24 hours a day for life ?
I'm all for him not being able to take things to court though =D
this guy deserves all the bad press and PR ruination that comes his way
And an excellent one at that.
that was supposed to be a response to Ghost Coins' statement. That's what I get for being a first time poster.
Nintendo is indeed selling SOME of these on the Virtual Console but not even close to all of them. While i agree in part to his piracy he was filling a market that Nintendo failed to recognize. Maybe someone doesnt want to buy a Wii. maybe they just want a console with 50 - 100 NES games on them?? maybe just maybe?
but no Nintendo wants everyone araba kiralama to buy the Wii. thats their excuse but thats not what copyright is supposed to protect. i am real sure that the makers of 10 yard fight were losing sleep because they were missing out on their $0.00025 worth because they didnt get royalties from this player. *smirk*
my question is, should Super Mario Bros. be banned from public domain forever? isnt 23 years enough time for Nintendo to have made their profits?
If you have followed the Steamboat Willie case regarding Mickey Mouse you can rest in your bed well at night knowing that the MOUSE will still be under copyright law, away from public domain after your great grandchildren are in nursing homes. That is beyond ridiculous dont you think??
Gallagher can araç kiralama say all he wants, but I strongly rent a car believe it's due to his crappy leadership and E3 being a joke. ESA's Board of Directors need to find a way to get out rent a car of this horrid contract with this Bush cronie before there's no one left on the Board.
Btw, I think Atari and Midway will drop out too, but mostly travesti because these guys have done nothing ttnet vitamin or little and need to start saving costs.
YES.
Now I don't have to get off my ass for the important shit anymore!
Whats next, ordering pizza from Xbox live?
Wait... I think that sounds like a good idea.
But I think voting should MAKE you get off your ass, and see outside or a second while you go vote. I mean, your picking the president of the United States of America for God's Sake... least you can do is drive down there and punch out a card.