House Subcommittee Explores Virtual Worlds, Simulcasts on Second Life

House Subcommittee Explores Virtual Worlds, Simulcasts on Second Life

April 2, 2008
markey-avatar.jpgYesterday's congressional visit to Second Life is chronicled by the Washington Post.

The Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet, chaired by Rep. Edward Markey (D-MA), heard from executives of Linden Lab (publisher of Second Life), IBM and other firms. The meeting was simulcast within Second Life, a Congressional first, according to Markey (seen in SL avatar form at left). WaPo reporter Mike Musgrove writes:
A virtual depiction of the Rayburn House Office Building meeting room was projected on television screens on the wall, so that real-world attendees could take a look at the small virtual crowd that logged on for the event. Attendees logging in from Second Life, meanwhile, could watch the proceedings in a video screen projected on the wall of the virtual room.

The subcommittee had questions about the potential for money laundering and whether children were safe in online worlds. This being Second Life, of course, there was some silliness:
As the politicians and the witnesses discussed the potentials of the online virtual world, the online visitors logged on in Second Life chatted away on the screen in conversations that ranged from the topic at hand and beyond:

"I think senators are superdelegates but not all reps."
"I love flip4mac."
"They should really move the x and the c away from each other on the keyboard." (this following a warning that the video might freeze for "just a sex.")

Rep. Jane Harman (D-CA) joked that Markey arranged the hearing only to find out how to level up in World of Warcraft. Markey had previously participated in a climate change conference via Second Life.

Rep. Cliff Stearns (R-FL) fretted about the potential for child pornography and fraud in online games.

A video webcast of the hearing is available at the subcommittee site.

UPDATE: Liz Losh at Virtualpolitik offers her take on the subcommittee hearing and is troubled by some of the comments made by the congressional reps serving on the committee.

Comments

[...] another good waste of Congressional time and money they held a hearings about virtual worlds. Just to try to demonstrate how “with it” they simulcast in Second Life. As you would expectmembers showed their ignorance about online worlds. Not as bad as the whole “steroids” thing but almost as bad. read more | diggstory [...]
as if second life wasn't boring enough
I'm sure all three people that are still on second life had a wonderful time
"Lets show how out of touch with this generation we are by going on an MMO barely anyone plays"

Seriously... Is this game even valid anymore?
Hey, it might not be all bad.

Like they might find out that the online world is acutely fun and meaningful even though they are not learning anything....

But yeah, talking to people online is fun, but not as fun as blowing someone up in a Videogame.
I read in a Reuters article that they want to make sure terrorism doesn't happen in 2nd Life.

Lmao
Well, when a group of them meet up Second Life, I don't really know who their intended audience is. Are they just using it as a medium for teleconferencing?
Man... second life. Why don't they just hold conferences on 4chan? At least there, they'd have an audience.
It'd be nice if they picked a game that... I dunno had people on it. But I suppose listening to a politician standing in Orgrimmar as an Orc Hunter would be a little... odd.
And nobody pelted them with dicks?
Am I the only one who's excited about the prospect of virtual reality becoming a common element of our lives? When I was a kid, this was the future, right up there with flying cars and robot butlers. The government might be unpopular, but getting them on board at this early stage seems like the surest way to keep the developments coming.
Thank you Congress for wasting my tax money responcibily!
Addendum

I use to want to play Second Life, then I thought "Why the hell would I want to play a boring 3d representation of reality when I could just go outside and live my First Boring Life for free?"
[...] GamePolitics wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptYesterday’s congressional visit to Second Life is chronicled by the Washington Post. The Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet, chaired by Rep. Edward Markey (D-MA), heard from executives of Linden Lab (publisher of Second Life), IBM and other firms. The meeting was simulcast within Second Life, a Congressional first, according to Markey (seen in SL avatar form at left). WaPo reporter Mike Musgrove writes: A virtual depiction of the Rayburn House Office Building meeting room was projected on television screens on the wall, so that real-world attendees could take a look at the small virtual crowd that logged on for the event. Attendees logging in from Second Life, meanwhile, could watch the proceedings in a video screen projected on the wall of the virtual room. [...]
“Uh…the only reason I believe your…uh… avatar, is holding this hearing is to learn how to get past the…uh…7th level of the…uh…the world of warcraft. Unfortnuately this hearing is only worth 2 xp points.”

*facepalm*
Why are our politicians so desperate to capture the Furry vote?
@ Viral

I...er uh... like to say....er uh... that Second Life...... suck compared to my err uh... reeal life... er uh... person.

ANd Kennedy is still fun to make fun of all these years later!

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 07/04/09 at 03:48am
Michael Chandra: I missed out on Jack? =(
Posted 07/04/09 at 01:52am
Escanor94: hmm, looks like when someone gets banned all their comments are automaticly deleted
Posted 07/03/09 at 11:46pm
Arcanagos: aww, did i miss the JT party? :(
Posted 07/03/09 at 11:00pm
Leet Gamer Jargon: Where's the recent JT bullcrap? Which comments section has he vomited on? EDIT: Nevermind; it's in the "Radio" thread.
Posted 07/03/09 at 09:17pm
BearDogg-X: I wonder what the Metropolitian Moron of Miami said in response to my comment saying that he got a dose of his medicine on the SGC09 Debate thread?
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:51pm
Rodrigo Ybáñez García: He gets offended with a bunch of flowers.
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:49pm
GoodRobotUs: LOL He takes offence at the fact he might have *chosen* to be crazy?
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:47pm
Rodrigo Ybáñez García: He warned me to get a lawyer after I called him "crazy by his own choice"... that´s libel for him
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:45pm
HilaryDuffGta: "libel" what did he threaten now?
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:44pm
Rodrigo Ybáñez García: Was fun to be threatened for "libel" again.
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:26pm
HilaryDuffGta: hey so what did i miss??? the usual spam of "crap"
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:15pm
FlakAttack: Jack ruined his chance to have civil debates with us here. Glad you banned him (again).
Posted 07/03/09 at 04:04pm
Krono: Unexpected is probably the best word to describe it. Particularly as no decent reason is given.
Posted 07/03/09 at 03:59pm
GoodRobotUs: Just heard about that myself... kinda unexpected
Posted 07/03/09 at 03:58pm
Krono: Huh, apparently Sarah Palin is resigning.
Posted 07/03/09 at 03:34pm
GoodRobotUs: Sounds like he's been mainlining the Angel Dust again
Posted 07/03/09 at 01:50pm
ezbiker555: I'm back. Just in time too, my Jack Thompson sense were going wild
Posted 07/03/09 at 01:47pm
DarkSaber: You mean "playing with himself"? :-P
Posted 07/03/09 at 01:16pm
Matthew: Oh, Jack's back? I guess he got bored of playing single-player.
Posted 07/03/09 at 01:05pm
Andrew Eisen: I'm leaving most of his comments up but he'll be banned again shortly.
Login or register to post shouts