April 10, 2008
When it comes to video games and politicians, disgraced former New York Governor Eliot Spitzer is, by a wide margin, the biggest hypocrite.
Spitzer was the runaway choice of GamePolitics readers in a poll we ran this week, gathering nearly 46% of the vote.
To be fair, his selection should come as no surprise. After all, Spitzer complained about GTA's cartoon hookers (right) in campaign speeches and then get caught paying big bucks for the real thing (left) as governor.
Here are the numbers:
Spitzer: 45.7%
California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger: 21.8%
Boston Mayor Thomas Menino: 18.7%
MP Keith Vaz: 9.3%
Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius: 4.6%



Comments
Go Spitzer, you just got labeled as the most hypocritical detractor of gaming today, just one level above JT's lunacy.
Arnold is in second for his roles in several violent movies and games based on the movies, but it seems that he honestly believes that that's what the people of California want, so he's not as hypocritical as it could be.
Menino and Vaz are morons.
Sebelius may be breaking a few laws/
Not 10,000 dollars a day hot though
I'd be inclined to agree with you IF he were still making such movies. As such, he is not... and I would be inclined to agree with you further if he were to resume making violent movies after leaving office.
This is unlike Spitzer who was clearly two faced within the same segment in time.
I do agree that Spitzer should get some kind of reward for this achievement but I hesitate about the trophy. Dare I ask what shape it would be in? Would it be something akin to the instrument of his downfall?
http://image.com.com/gamespot/images/2004/reviews/919220_20040114_screen...
Excellent work.
A prize? How about some vouchers for the Bunny ranch?
Okay, that was in bad taste, especially because that sounds like the next pornstar name.
岩「…」
If he did that would mean he proformed the acts and paid himself to proform those acts.... more I think about it, would he be ridiculed for
1. Being Homosexual
2. Hiring a prostitute
3. Being a prosititute
4. or proforming lewd acts while in office
those thoughts boggle my mind and want me to vomit.
but as most of you said.. he's no politician
"April 10th, 2008 at 11:13 am
I will say this, though, she was hot.
Not 10,000 dollars a day hot though "
I heard he paid $2400
and at least he picked a winner
Still crazy expensive but hey if its the tax payer's money...
In his level of pay for sex. It not just about the sex you also are pay for a nice conversation and the subject to be clean. He was in level 1 there are actually 3 level above him. Level 3 is were you pay 10k for one night and sex is not guaranteed. This is according my political science professor who was sighting from a social scientists findings on prostitution (sry i dont have a link). And it wasn't the tax payers money he was using his on finances. However they were look in to him for money laundering and corruption becuase he was hiding assets to do this. He was hiding them for his wife. Personal i think it was inappropriate for the government to use this law in this means but that is nether here nor there.
But i do think that he is a hypocrite. But i don't know about being number one.