Federal Trade Commission Digging Deeper into EA's T2 Takeover Bid

Federal Trade Commission Digging Deeper into EA's T2 Takeover Bid

April 17, 2008
A press release issued by Electronic Arts this morning says that the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has issued a second request for data concerning EA's proposed hostile acquisition of Grand Theft Auto publisher Take Two Interactive.

The type of information sought by the FTC is not specified.

The government inquiry reminds us that Newsweek's N'Gai Croal reported recently the FTC might have anti-trust (i.e., monopoly) concerns. Croal's report was generated in part by comments previously made to GamePolitics by Wedbush-Morgan analyst Michael Pachter, who said that T2's sports game properties are the key to the deal and GTA is just gravy. Here's what Pachter told GP in February:
For EA, sports is enough to pay for the whole [$2 billion] thing. If you get rid of sports competition, you suddenly add Take Two’s $200 million per year in sports revenue and EA doesn’t compete on price anymore. So, theoretically, they could grow that business by $100 million [per year].

Currently [EA and Take Two] compete in pro basketball, college basketball and hockey. So by taking out all of that, EA has a monopoly in sports. If these guys have a monopoly, they’re not going to cut pricing on sports games as quickly. We’ve been seeing sports games come down [in price] before Christmas the last couple of years. That’ll never happen again.

That’s worth a lot [to EA]. Everything else is gravy. GTA is just gravy…

AND, DON'T FORGET DEPT: Take Two's shareholder meeting will be webcast this evening at 6:30 Eastern Time...

Comments

If GTA is just gravy, then what is up with the timing of the takeover? If GTA didn't matter then why were all the deadlines to sell only a few weeks before GTA? Everyone knows that GTA is going to be a huge success.
Monopolies are bad for consumers, no two ways about it, and no matter how EA tries to paint it
GTA may only be gravy... but it's tasty gravy.
Gravy's the only reason I'll eat turkey.
just gravy.

not convinced myself....
GTA4 will be $400 million in gravy. And that should just be the first week. EA is a lot of things, but they ain't stupid. The dollar signs can be seen from space.
I never liked gravy. That stuff is gross. I never found GTA to be particularly interesting, either. Funny how the two should be linked in a metaphor.

On topic, I think I'd rather EA didn't buy Take Two. EA might not be as bad as the robber barons of old, but damned if it isn't trying.
Sean: you're crazy. Turkey is always good, be it gravied, sandwiched, or just plain torn from the bone. Dangit, now I'm hungry.

As I said the last time this came up, the sport correlation doesn't seem unlikely; GTA4 will be a big shot in the arm, but selling the big sports games year after year is an ongoing investment that'll pay off huge in the long run.
@ OrangeSoda:
Yeah, I never really liked gravy either, with the exception of the stuff that was served with my mashed potatoes at a local restauraunt. That actually had FLAVOUR.

All metaphors aside, I'mma listen to that webcast and try to figure out which voice belongs to JT again.
[...] The Federal Trade Commission is taking a good long look into the bid (hostile in most regards) from EA for Take2. [...]
I wonder if EA would be willing to abandon NFL exclusivicity to make this merger happen? Would the NFL be willing to do the same?
@Zerodash

Probably not.
Have you seen the story on GameSpot today?
http://www.gamespot.com/news/6189491.html?tag=latestnews;title;0

THE DEAL FELL THROUGH!! REJOICE! STRAUSS ZELNICK IS GOD!!
I'll wait until someone other than gamespot posts news...
EA needs to be broken up we don't need the Rockefeller of the Video Game Industry
I really hate platitudinous games
@Simon Roberts

I'm talking about dry Thanksgiving turkey, I'm fine with the kind you eat sandwiches with.

@Ben

Not quite, Take-Two only restated that they wouldn't cave in to EA.
Analysts talking out of their arses? SHOCK, HORROR!

Most of the regulars at NeoGAF would make better analysts than Michael Pachter. I wish I was joking...
Just more proof that EA is evil. Good thing I don't play sports games anymore. Once you have one, you have them all.

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 07/04/09 at 03:48am
Michael Chandra: I missed out on Jack? =(
Posted 07/04/09 at 01:52am
Escanor94: hmm, looks like when someone gets banned all their comments are automaticly deleted
Posted 07/03/09 at 11:46pm
Arcanagos: aww, did i miss the JT party? :(
Posted 07/03/09 at 11:00pm
Leet Gamer Jargon: Where's the recent JT bullcrap? Which comments section has he vomited on? EDIT: Nevermind; it's in the "Radio" thread.
Posted 07/03/09 at 09:17pm
BearDogg-X: I wonder what the Metropolitian Moron of Miami said in response to my comment saying that he got a dose of his medicine on the SGC09 Debate thread?
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:51pm
Rodrigo Ybáñez García: He gets offended with a bunch of flowers.
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:49pm
GoodRobotUs: LOL He takes offence at the fact he might have *chosen* to be crazy?
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:47pm
Rodrigo Ybáñez García: He warned me to get a lawyer after I called him "crazy by his own choice"... that´s libel for him
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:45pm
HilaryDuffGta: "libel" what did he threaten now?
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:44pm
Rodrigo Ybáñez García: Was fun to be threatened for "libel" again.
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:26pm
HilaryDuffGta: hey so what did i miss??? the usual spam of "crap"
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:15pm
FlakAttack: Jack ruined his chance to have civil debates with us here. Glad you banned him (again).
Posted 07/03/09 at 04:04pm
Krono: Unexpected is probably the best word to describe it. Particularly as no decent reason is given.
Posted 07/03/09 at 03:59pm
GoodRobotUs: Just heard about that myself... kinda unexpected
Posted 07/03/09 at 03:58pm
Krono: Huh, apparently Sarah Palin is resigning.
Posted 07/03/09 at 03:34pm
GoodRobotUs: Sounds like he's been mainlining the Angel Dust again
Posted 07/03/09 at 01:50pm
ezbiker555: I'm back. Just in time too, my Jack Thompson sense were going wild
Posted 07/03/09 at 01:47pm
DarkSaber: You mean "playing with himself"? :-P
Posted 07/03/09 at 01:16pm
Matthew: Oh, Jack's back? I guess he got bored of playing single-player.
Posted 07/03/09 at 01:05pm
Andrew Eisen: I'm leaving most of his comments up but he'll be banned again shortly.
Login or register to post shouts