T2 Shareholders Meeting Reveals PERFECT Review Scores for GTA IV

T2 Shareholders Meeting Reveals PERFECT Review Scores for GTA IV

April 17, 2008
Some interesting results from the T2 shareholder meeting:

First, from a T2 source, GamePolitics has learned that the controversial compensation package sought by chairman Strauss Zelnick (left) and his management team was approved by a 73% shareholder margin. What effect this will have on the EA bid remains to be seen. We should know more on Friday.

From a game standpoint, Zelnick let slip that T2 has already seen some of the reviews for GTA IV. Although he didn't specify the publications involved, he did say that all of the reviews were perfect scores:
We've already received numerous [GTA IV] reviews, and to a one, they are perfect scores. My mom couldn't write better reviews...

It's no surprise that GTA IV is garnering great reviews, as all previous major GTA releases have as well. It is interesting that the reviews are apparently flawless - not to mention that Zelnick has revealed this information ahead of time.

Of the shareholder affirmation of his compensation package, Zelnick said later, via press release:
Today’s vote demonstrates stockholders’ confidence in management and the Board of Directors of Take-Two. The Board and management remain committed to acting in the best interests of stockholders. We are confident in the significant growth potential of Take-Two and in the unique value of our business given our strong position in this dynamic industry.

In other meeting business, Zelnick declined to say whether he had signed a confidentiality agreement (presumably with EA) and also wouldn't comment on today's report that the Federal Trade Commission is requesting additional data on any potential EA-T2 merger.

Comments

Dammit, I wanted to know about the EA proposal the most. I think that's what most gamers are looking for. Nice to hear GTAIV got those scores though.
Wait, wait, wait... Jack Thompson backed out of doing something he vowed to do? Stop the presses.
What about Jack "the jackass" Thompson? Did he even go the the meeting? And when will we know if EA acquires T2?
I'm concerned about two things. Games getting perfect scores before they're released is rarely a good sign. And why isn't there any mention of Jack? He promised to be there. Did he let me down? That would destroy me.
No surprise.
What of Dick Thompson wanting to gain an audience at the meeting?

Otherwise, Go T2! Rock* On!
[...] wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptSome interesting results from the T2 shareholder meeting: First, from a T2 source, GamePolitics has learned that the controversial compensation package sought by chairman Strauss Zelnick (left) and his management team was approved by a 73% shareholder margin. What effect this will have on the EA bid remains to be seen. We should know more on Friday. From a game standpoint, Zelnick let slip that T2 has already seen some of the reviews for GTA IV. Although he didn’t specify the publications involved, he did say that all of the reviews were perfect scores: We’ve already received numerous [GTA IV] reviews, and to a one, they are perfect scores. My mom couldn’t write better reviews… [...]
Yeah, what about JT?
Chances are he didn't show up.
Entirely Irrelevant: That picture (I presume of Zelnick) looks ALOT like McNulty from The Wire...
Alas, if only I had the proper console for it..
I listened to the webcast as it happened and to my recollection, only two questions were fielded at the tail end of the meeting. Both dealt with the EA hostile takeover bid. The only major point I paid attention to was that GTA IV is being punched out at the manufacturer and will be shipped on time. I would expect the Western seaboard fall off the map before any one batshiat crazy "lawyer" keeps it off retail shelves.
This is a good thing for Take-Two to say. It shows that they are fine with out anybody getting in there way. If EA gets a hold of it they would force them into releasing GTA and Bioshock every year and loose what made the games so fun in the first place. I only know one company that can do that and get away with it and it's Insomiac Games.
What reviews?
@ Michael:

Xbox Magazine UK reviewed the game and gave it a 10.

"Official Xbox Magazine UK
Utterly stunning in every resepct. [May 2008, p.79]"
OPSM UK also gave it a 10 also.
I'm more worried about these reviews. The way it sounds, it looks like T2 is patting themselves on the back for money well spent.
[...] I was just reading a report on Game Politics about the Take Two shareholder meeting. Yep, I know. Boring stuff for most of you. You want commentary about games don’t you. Read on, there’s not much about the meeting there anyway. [...]
@Mike T
They don't really have money to buy reviews, just some ad space. Most of their advertising is done virally and by word of mouth of many fans.
They were paid $50m to hold content just for 360 DLC.

Besides, a lot of good games get great reviews before release, that's how they are able to make the reviews on time for print media... >_>

Good reviews don't always mean good sales though.
They invited selected reviewers to their offices in order for them to be able to complete their reviews prior to release, playing on virtually final code. Nothing untoward going on.
@Ryno

Maybe JT knew it would destroy you and decided to let you down so you would be destroyed.

That S.O.B. is f***ing evil. I can imagine him sensing Ryno's destruction and saying "one less gamer to shoot up a school" and then evil-laughing.

*his shadow whispers something in his ear*

What? That was you? You ass! You're getting a month in the seal for that!
Oh, see, now right off the bat, I'm suspicious. Perfect reviews always sets off the BS alarms. It's precisely because of junk like that, that nobody trusts reviews.
So Thompson was a no-show? Probably saw an ambulance on the way there and chased it for a few blocks.
@Papa Midnight -- I'd never seen the resemblance before, but you're right. Jimmy McNulty is a great character.
The great reviews and praise the GTA games get tend to bewilder older people. My father, to this day, cannot fathom how such "filth" can be considered good. Having never played games, he never will...


JT + NO SHOW = He lied about owning TT stock. Just like his fictional "client" going against TT. Add this one to the HUGE pile of lies.
And back on track...only seen one review so far, and it was a perfect 10 out of 10. Can't remember which site it was, though.
To all those who are suspicious of GTAIV's 'perfect' scores:

T2 is still a struggling company. For all the bravado and bluster they haven't fully turned the company around yet (though 2007 was a good start).

Perfect reviews notwithstanding, if they weren't 100% sure that GTA IV would make them scads of money they -as a struggling company- wouldn't turn down EA's $2bil offer, not only once, but twice - and urged their stockholders to do the same. If they actually had any doubt at all that GTA IV *might* have a mediocre showing they would have jumped at the offer.

Besides, there's always the possibility that the simplest answer is the truth - that GTA IV is an awesome game and deserves the reviews so far.
@ Dog

Gta 3 got a 9.5 and VC got a perfect 10 and SA got 9.75. GTA and SA where ntoed to be full of glitches, while VC had reletively few. This was Game Informer. I'm not 100% on the SA, and 3 but positive on VC.
Zelnick espousing the perfect scores at a shareholder meeting was likely to bolster morale and shareholder confidence for anyone listening. I'm sure it was also a clear message to EA that their offer was low and the perfect scores are some sort of proof that the T2 library is worth more than EA's offer.

Thing is, if EA got hold of the GTA series, we'd see GTA jump the same shark that EA jumped with the Medal of Honor and MAdden series'.

That would just suck.
@ JDS

You mean the exact same game with a diffrent tittle/number?
Ebonheart Says:

April 18th, 2008 at 3:27 pm
@ JDS

You mean the exact same game with a diffrent tittle/number?
==============================================

Exactly. That, and stifling enhancements to 3D engines by cranking out game after game so fast that the engine isn't strengthened; all to make a quicker buck.
[...] Filed under: NewsIs there really such a thing as a perfect game? Of course not, but they can be good enough to be considered the best there is, and Take Two seems to already know that about GTA IV. According to a post on GamePolitics, the upper levels of Take Two have already laid eyes on reviews of their game and: "to a one, they are perfect scores. My mom couldn't write better reviews." Disregarding the obvious your-mom joke, this means that we definitely have a quality game coming later this month (as if that was in doubt). And it should be interesting to witness the internet fanboy meltdown if any publication dares to give it anything less than a perfect score. Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments Permalink Comments [0] [...]
I'm pretty sure GTA IV got all of it's reviews because they let reviewers play it early. I mean, with all the new features and raising the bar quite a bit , it most likely deserves the 10's.

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 11/08/09 at 09:02am
DarkSaber: http://tinyurl.com/yez7jyo
Posted 11/08/09 at 09:01am
DarkSaber: Oh for gods sake, the Gearbox pres is gobbing off about Valve again
Posted 11/08/09 at 08:53am
JDKJ: But cheer up, Austin. If the unemployment rate continues to double-digit as predicted for the next few years, your half-dozen stands a better than likely chance of returning to power.
Posted 11/08/09 at 08:46am
JDKJ: @DS: If he had added the line about "or hiring illegals aliens under the table to work as nannies," it would have been a completely perfect descripition. And, yes, it's about the same difference between a six and a half-dozen.
Posted 11/08/09 at 08:31am
DarkSaber: My god, that description makes them sound almost Republican. Still what did you expect, Obama is only marginally more left than republicans.
Posted 11/08/09 at 01:07am
Austin_Lewis: Health insurance, brought to you by the same kind of bureacrats who couldn't, in timely fashion, investigate the comments of any of the men Obama appointed Czars. Or their past. Or their history of not paying taxes.
Posted 11/08/09 at 01:06am
Austin_Lewis: Yes, and what a piece of crap it was. Arresting and fining people just because they don't make a personal choice to buy healh insurance, creating over a hundred new bureacracies, and worse.
Posted 11/08/09 at 12:24am
ZippyDSMlee: JDKJ:the only trouble is a bunch of witless hacks wrote it....its going to be a train wreck....
Posted 11/07/09 at 11:33pm
JDKJ: BREAKING: In a photo-finish at the wire, House passes health care reform bill. Relatedly, in a fit of pique, Austin Lewis kicks innocent dog.
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:27pm
ZippyDSMlee: man I got alot of junk and dup files too >< god I need orginization...and no not the knee capping media mafia kind :P
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:26pm
ZippyDSMlee: replaced :P
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:23pm
ZippyDSMlee: beemoh:hey its like 60GB porn,400GB anime 100GB games and crap I have took from all my DVDs, I hate waiting on dvds to install stuff..... oh and 40GB of my porn was in the found.000 folder...mostly corrupted.... least I got names of wut needs to be repa
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:18pm
beemoh: @Zip: ...and you'd have to spend all that time re-downloading that porn?
Posted 11/07/09 at 03:34pm
ZippyDSMlee: ggrrrrr......vista lost one of my hard drives and I had a heart attack thinking I lost 1TB of data....
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:58am
JDKJ: Which could be explained by both (a) and (b).
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:56am
Austin_Lewis: JDKJ: You forgot C) the fact that, for some reason, every time he did something that would suggest he shouldn't be in the military, let alone an officer, higher ups ignored it or let it slide.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:51am
JDKJ: Part of the problem is, I believe, that (a) the Army had a lot of time and money already invested in him and which they were unwilling to simply write-off and (b) an increasing need for the type of skills and services he provided.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:48am
JDKJ: And that even if he was begging not to get cut loose, he was apparently a real good candidate for being cut loose, anyway.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:11am
JDKJ: @chada: And while Kennedy once noted that there's usually more than enough blame for everyone to get a slice, the possibility that the Army was unwilling to cut loose someone who was asking to get cut loose could be a factor.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:07am
ZippyDSMlee: *noms on his feet*..nomnomnomnom*droooll* ...wuuutttttt uuu looking at?
Login or register to post shouts