April 29, 2008 -
Despite claims by game violence critics and some law enforcement personnel, video games like Grand Theft Auto IV are not motivating youthful players to join gangs.According to the Edmonton Metro, gang expert Michael Chettleburgh says the video game controversy is over-hyped:
If you actually go out and talk to young gang members about the top 10 reasons why they joined a gang, you will never hear them talk about the influences of hip hop, video games or media.
It’s just not a primary driver of why kids join gangs.
Chettleburgh is the author of Young Thugs: Inside the Dangerous World of Canadian Street Gangs.
Via: Next Generation



Comments
Street Gangs = poor economic status = poor family structure
The very factors that bring youths to gangs are the very factors preventing said youths from affording games.
So tempted to make a joke right now, must resist...
I can't do it. I just can't do it.
Be on the lookout for Canadian street gangs who beat people with hockey sticks drench them in syrup and do drive-by snowball peltings. We understand a maple leaf is their calling card.
@Zerodash
I wouldn't go as far as to say that poor families. Many poor kids still have video games and cable TV. The assets of inner city poor are not the same as say...third world country poor.
I can name a few
Poverty,education,jobs,peer pressure, stupidity
Why is a kid going to knock over a liquor store and get busted, when he can do it in GTA with no consequences. In reality, it's really keeping kids off the streets.
"Here in Ottawa where I live, a massive graffiti epidemic has taken hold in the last couple of years, perpetrated largely by gangs of bored teenagers from the suburbs where there’s nothing to do."
And therein lies the difference. Here in S'toon we have two types of gangs. Gangs of low-income people, who are usually after drug money, and gangs of bored teenagers.
The bored teenagers do the most damage. The drug gangs do break-ins (mostly of people who owe them drug money), drug dealing, organized theft (cars, snowmobiles, etc) and prostitution. The bored teenagers do graffiti, steal anything that isn't nailed down, joyride, light fires, and commit tons of petty vandalism. Because if they get caught, they get a slap on the wrist.
Because those in power don't want it known that their inability to solve problems and set moral standards are the real issue. It's better to blame games, music, and culture in general for the issues at hand rather than themselves, their failures, and the special interests they cater to in order to increase their own wealth at the expense of increasing those who are impoverished and/or out of work.
Roving "gangs" of teenagers appear when you don't include them in society. Teens rebel against their parents and then go... Where? The mall. Which we, as the adult community, then run them out of because they cause trouble.
The city I live in has decided that night clubs cause "degenerate behavior in youth". So the city is clamping down on the music scene and has successfully closed most of the underage dance clubs (definitely all the popular ones). Now the police are complaining they need more people because the crime rate with the same age demographic has increased exponentially. Hardly a coincidence.
*sigh* You can't expect to ostracize a group from society and then play by the rules that same society has put in place.
So actually, the politicians would be the voters' puppets and not vice versa. But since hardly anyone wants to assume the role of a puppet, real-life politics is turned around and the politicians have the control and push the issues.
I don't know that anyone has seriously made such a claim that wasn't just seeking some undeserved attention.
The problem is capitalisms unfettered by passes the voters and the those with power subvert the needs of the people for their own.
Steve
Going full tilt to balance out the coming zombie news(causal news) spewing never hurts....
Well said. In a similiar vein to what you said, when we focus on violent media products "causing" crime it gives us a simple target to demonize and attack. What this allows us to do is to ignore the broader structural factors that contribute to stable and predictable patterns of criminality. We are able to blame a folk devil instead of asking difficult questions about the structural inequities of our society or the fact that our economic system isn't working the way we would like to believe that it does.
Not because GTA told them too. :s
This guy is right on.
I like to make with the 'capping of bishes' on GTA. Would I ever do this in the meat? No. Nor would I frolic around punching every car I step past in the street.