Tivo Alert: Hal Halpin Talks GTA IV on CBS Evening News

April 29, 2008 -
Entertainment Consumers Association (ECA) president Hal Halpin will appear on the CBS Evening News to discuss the Grand Theft Auto IV launch.The program airs at 6:30 PM Eastern. More details to follow...

Full Disclosure Dept: The ECA is the parent company of GamePolitics...

Comments

Wow, we're actually gonna have someone with half a brain on the news. Instead of the "oh it's cool, you get to run over cops" and "you get points for shooting people" crap they've been force feeding us all day. Too bad I'll be out tonight since I feel truly dumber for having to listened to these morons.

It's appalling that the media just grabs the first moron they can find to say something stupid and use it to fuel their fear mongering. I've heard GTA 4 mentioned 200 times in the last 2 hours, it must be a REAL slow news day that they spend so much time on this evil game that's gonna kill us all.

http://www.nbc10.com/news/16051084/detail.html?dl=headlineclick

Well, that wasn't bad.

they cut that little no thanks... it was right at the end. I still can't get over how they don't show any story. You remember GTA for story, not for beating up hookers and running people over.

That's who I should interview for my paper. GP, do you have Halpin's email address?

So I assume he has the patience for the cut-offs and assholes calling him a baby killer on TV?

[...] wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptEntertainment Consumers Association (ECA) president Hal Halpin will appear on the CBS Evening News to discuss the Grand Theft Auto IV launch. The program airs at 6:30 PM Eastern. More details to follow… Full Disclosure Dept: The ECA is the parent company of GamePolitics… [...]

Well, now the Jackhole has something else to whine about. Hal got on the CBS Evening News. (and he didn't) Is that a step UP or BELOW 60 minutes? Not sure, but it must mean SOMETHING, seeing as the hack mentions he was on it about every five minutes.

@DavCube

I don't know how it'll turn out, but I would consider it a step up from Faux News.

I've got class tonight. I'll have to wait for the reruns on Youtube.

If it's 7:00 eastern, is it 8:00 western?
Sorry, it's just that it's relieving to find that we can get some mainstream coverage that supports gaming. Beware, Jack, your reign of retardation will end soon enough. BWA, HA, HA! (cough)

@GRIZZAM 512

He's going on CBS, not FOX.

@DarkHelm

Yeah I think one would rather take the low ratings of the CBS Evening News with Katie Couric over the biasness that is Fox News.

Damn! And I'm at work. :( Oh well, there's always YouTube.

Dennis can you post the news story?

The show is on now, unless it was on in the first 10 minutes it still hasn't aired.

Have they shown it yet or is this one of those things they advertise through the whole program and don't show until the last five minutes? They have ten minutes left...

Yup, just as I thought, it'll be on in a minute or two. At 6:56.....

Okay until Couric had to add a little "No Thanks" at the end of the segment.

You know who I say "No thanks." to? YOU KATIE SOON TO BE FIRED COURIC!!!!!!!!!!!!

Unbiased Brian Williams for the win. :)

So a bland piece about the economics of games and then Katie Couric's stupid quip. Ace reporting as always from the media.

Just saw it. CBS tried to keep it neutral, they really didn't focus on the violence as much as the economic value of video games verses hollywood.

I thought it was about as balanced as it'll get when it comes to the MSM.

@Prescott

Aren't news anchor people supposed to stay neutral when reporting the news?
That little No Thanks just irks me!!

The No Thanks was just her opinion.
Pretty short, though Hal did make some good points.
Much better than "faux news" Tee hee hee. Still makes me chuckle.

"No thanks" is such a terrible thing to say. That will be the thing that so many middle aged and senior citizens who just watched that will be thinking now.

I was pleased they didn't try and say that kids shoot people because of GTA though.

Could somebody put the "No thanks," comment into context? It'll probably be a little while before this is up on Youtube.

@ Luke

They were talking about the comparison between games and movies that has become increasingly apparent over the past few years. They quickly went into the use of character ideas to be exchanged both ways between the mediums. At the end they went something along the lines of "...IF you feel like stepping into this guy's shoes." To which Couric went "No thanks." That's all, really. It was an opinion.

@ Luke

They were just talking about the growing parallel between games and movies, the possible exchange of ideas for years to come. To that end, they wondered if GTA would be something of interest. That's where Couric said 'No thanks.' That's all. It was just an opinion.

They posed the question of whether games could overtake movies, and whether people would want to spend time with "cahracters like these" (no cutscene footage, just Niko killing and running over people... because there is NO STORY in the game... right?) and in response to that thought, Couric said "No thanks"... but she said it in a smug little way.

*sigh* I really don't like that she said it in a smug little way. That tells you she's in the bracket of middle aged/senior citizens/ignorant/innovation killer/image group. If the game wasn't GTA or "violent," odds are she'll be all over it, IMO.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcovxDv8ayQ

There it is, I guess. Looks like it cut off before that "No thanks" part you guys are talking about, though.

That report wasn't that bad, actually. I was satisfied until Katie Couric added the "No Thanks".

Oh well, she'll be fired soon anyway.

While her tone wasn't exactly the nicest, Couric however, didn't do anything wrong in saying No thanks. Just as we fight for our right to chose what games we can play, other people have a right to chose not to play them. The important thing is that she chose not to, instead of telling others they can't play if they want to.

The overall tone of the story was good and balanced, a far cry for Fox news supposed Mass effect story, for which the game community was rightly upset about.

@Yuki

I have not heard the comment in question, her choice is irrelevant and unimportant.

Journalists, especially in general areas such as news hosting, should endevour to remove their personal opinion and feelings from things. They should not be making their personal feelings known on issues, be it video games, famine, homicide or cute puppies.

They should be required to only report facts and never let emotion nor opinion influence their report.

That they do not, is one of the reasons journalism is almost in a worthless state these days for people looking for real facts and news instead of sensationalist garbage.
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Michael ChandraSo really the guy's own words strike me as "wah! How dare you disagree with me!" behaviour, which is the sort of childish attitude I am unfortunately not surprised by.10/20/2014 - 2:17pm
Michael ChandraCorrect AE, but then again the owner's own words are about "wishes", not about an order. No "we told him not to", but going against his wishes.10/20/2014 - 2:16pm
Matthew Wilsonyup. sadly that has been true for awhile.10/20/2014 - 2:10pm
james_fudgewelcome to 2014 politics. Increasingly fought online10/20/2014 - 1:54pm
E. Zachary KnightIt is honestly a shame that anyone has to publicly state they are against such vile behavior, but that is the sad life we live.10/20/2014 - 1:46pm
E. Zachary KnightDecided to publicly reiterate my opposition to harassment campaigns. http://randomtower.com/2014/10/just-stop-with-the-harassment-and-bullying-campaigns-already/10/20/2014 - 1:45pm
Andrew EisenMichael Chandra - Unless I overlooked it, we haven't seen how the directive to not talk about whatever he wasn't supposed to talk about was phrased so it’s hard to say if it could have been misconstrued as a suggestion or not.10/20/2014 - 12:35pm
Andrew EisenHey, the second to last link is the relevant one! He actually did say "let them suffer." Although, he didn't say it to the other person he was bickering with.10/20/2014 - 12:29pm
Neo_DrKefkahttps://archive.today/F14zZ https://archive.today/SxFas https://archive.today/1upoI https://archive.today/0hu7i https://archive.today/NsPUC https://archive.today/fLTQv https://archive.today/Wpz8S10/20/2014 - 11:21am
Andrew EisenNeo_DrKefka - "Attacking"? Interesting choice of words. Also interesting that you quoted something that wasn't actually said. Leaving out a relevant link, are you?10/20/2014 - 11:04am
quiknkoldugh. I want to know why the hell Mozerella Sticks are 4 dollars at my works cafeteria...are they cooked in Truffle Oil?10/20/2014 - 10:41am
Neo_DrKefkaAnti-Gamergate supporter Robert Caruso attacks female GamerGate supporter by also attacking another cause she support which is the situation happening in Syia “LET SYRIANS SUFFER” https://archive.today/F14zZ https://archive.today/Wpz8S10/20/2014 - 10:18am
Neo_DrKefkaThat is correct in an At-Will state you or the employer can part ways at any time. However Florida also has laws on the books about "Wrongful combinations against workers" http://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2012/448.04510/20/2014 - 10:07am
james_fudgehe'd die if he couldn't talk about Wii U :)10/20/2014 - 9:16am
Michael ChandraBy the way, I am not saying Andrew should stop talking about Wii-U. I find it quite nice. :)10/20/2014 - 8:53am
Michael Chandra'How dare he ignore my wishes and my advice! I am his boss! I could have ordered him but I should be able to say it's advice rather than ordering him directly!'10/20/2014 - 8:52am
Michael ChandraIf GP goes "EZK, do not talk about X publicly for a week, we're preparing a big article on it" and he still tweets about X, they'd have a legitimate reason to be pissed.10/20/2014 - 8:52am
Michael ChandraIf GP tells Andrew "we'd kinda prefer it if you stopped talking about Wii-U for 1 week" and he'd tweet about it anyway, firing him for it would be idiotic.10/20/2014 - 8:51am
Michael ChandraLegal right, sure. But that doesn't make it any less pathetic of an excuse.10/20/2014 - 8:50am
ZippyDSMleeYou mean right to fire states.10/20/2014 - 8:50am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician