In New Zealand, Politician Calls for GTA IV Ban

April 30, 2008 -
A member of New Zealand's Parliament has called for a ban on Grand Theft Auto IV.

As reported by Scoop, Independent MP Gordon Copeland wants GTA IV to be unavailable to New Zealanders. Copeland told Scoop:
Sadly New Zealand has become a violent society. Our criminal courts are almost log jammed with cases involving murder, manslaughter, rape, and other heinous crimes. Our jails are overflowing.

A recent study has indicated that, on a per capita basis, New Zealand is now twice as violent as the USA...

Simply stated, it is time to reverse the tide of violence in New Zealand. We have to have the courage somewhere, sometime, to say "no" and I agree with kiwi parents and the police, that this is not a bad place to start.

Comments

"A recent study has indicated that, on a per capita basis, New Zealand is now twice as violent as the USA"

So, per capita, what's the video game use in each society? If it's higher in the US, maybe you need to *push* video games.

(yeah, yeah, I know correlation and causation and all that bit)

Clearly GTA IV isn't causing your violent crime spree, being as it only came out yesterday in the US while your crime spree came out some time ago, presumably. Seriously, I think you can do a better job than this in terms of stemming your violent crime rates.

Actually it is probably the worst place you could start. But hey whatever gets you to sleep at night sir.

One more WHITE HAIRED OLD MAN jumping on the bandwagon. These people need to hurry up and croak so the world can move on.

No, banning GTA IV IS a bad place to start.

Double the violence as the USA is murders and such in the thousands. THOUSANDS.

It's about time they do something about it.

And they decide to put that initiative towards.. banning a video game.

Fucking brilliant. Just fucking brilliant.

Two guesses why New Zealand has gone to shit with politicians like this.

*facepalm*

I'm discussing this with a kiwi I know. Hey, did you know how limited your rights are?

[...] wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptA member of New Zealand’s Parliament has called for a ban on Grand Theft Auto IV. As reported by Scoop, Independent MP Gordon Copeland wants GTA IV to be unavailable to New Zealanders. Copeland told Scoop: Sadly New Zealand has become a violent society. Our criminal courts are almost log jammed with cases involving murder, manslaughter, rape, and other heinous crimes. Our jails are overflowing. A recent study has indicated that, on a per capita basis, New Zealand is now twice as violent as the USA… [...]

What didn't you guys know? GTA IV caused everything from the Holocaust to the Spanish Inquisition. This guy is an excellent example of how to do as little as possible while still looking like your actually doing good. I think they need to take the ban hammer from these kinds of people.

I put the question this way:

Does anyone honestly believe that if every single game was banned, collected and burned, violence would cease to exist?

Chris Wallace:

Here's a better way to put that.

Does anyone honestly believe that if every single game was banned, collected and burned, even .5% of violence would stop?

Not necessarily a bad idea, but not one that makes sense.

Sure, games are a great place to start.

But don't stop there!

Ban violent media like Television! And cartoons! And of course ban all movies with even a hint of sex or violence, those are never good forms of entertainment.

And don't forget music! A lot of music has violent lyrics, or at least conjures up suggestive imagery.... gotta ban the music too!

BOOKS! You have to ban books too! There's all kinds of violence and evil and people doing stuff to each other, you just have to ban books! Think of how much it will help society if you just burn all those nasty books...

Then there's paintings. Full of sex, wars, people's faces... gonna have to shred and destroy and burn all the paintings too.

Oh, and speech. Can't have people talking, they might talk about violence or something.

Hmm... then what can we ban? Oh, nevermind, I'm sure once all that stuff is forbidden there just won't be any violence in New Zealand anymore.

@ Justin:

You don't think censorship and limited rights are bad ideas?

Because right now, New Zealand is heavily censored and their citizens rights are very limited.

How's that been working out for them?

Oh, right. It hasn't.

Let him bitch and moan - keeps him off the streets.

I think the fact that gamers in New Zealand have to deal with censored games like GTA4, and the fact that they come out months after the US is what's spurring violent crime rates.

"Simply stated, it is time to reverse the tide of violence in New Zealand."

Nice sentiment. Too bad your "solution" will have no effect on the problem.

~~All Knowledge is Worth Having~~

After we succeed at banning the relatively tamer (in comparison) GTA IV, are we going to start hitting other media; like books, movies, art, comics, music, religious texts, theatre, poems, history texts, human thought?

I'm really eager to start the cleaning of all this filth from our world so that we may finally create a politician's utopia.

Sincerely LujanD, the futuristic and politically correct version.

The report that I saw, showed the largest contributing factor for increased crime rates in general, is actually an increase in laws, and an increase in their modification/application.

The largest portion of crimes were classified as "Dishonesty". Aside from sounding Orwellian, it's very closely tied to the state of the economy, as was admitted.

For violent crimes, the 3rd largest portion, the bulk of reports were from "Threats/Intimidation". Any crime recorded in this way had no official physical component.

Of course this study was only for New Zealand between 1996-2006.

Even in my embarrassingly limited research, I'm pretty convinced that he's either wrong, lying, or using 'violent' in the same frame of reference that the law enforcement use. Which is to include non-physical encounters, Threats/intimidation.

It's like the march of a herd of dinosaurs, all of them are bellowing in impotent despair as they plod slowly along toward extinction, while younger and more evolved life waits patiently until the noise stops and they can get on with what they were doing.

"As David Rossman, one of the world's foremost experts in the field of violent crime, has said "These (video games) are actually killing simulators and they teach... to kill in much the same way the astronauts on Apollo 11 learned how to fly to the moon.""

I'm sure someone quoted this guys before. Never mind the fact that the astronaut metaphor is completely and hoplessly inaccurate, who is this David Rossman? He doesn't seem like much of an expert if this bull is what he comes up with.

"Simply stated, it is time to reverse the tide of violence in New Zealand."

The tide that started on April 29th 2008? lol

"We have to have the courage somewhere, sometime, to say "no" and I agree with kiwi parents and the police, that this is not a bad place to start.""

If only they had the courage somewhere, sometime to go after the real causes of crime, instead of calling for a ban on a video game that has been available for less than a week and blaming it for all of their societies problems.

I would love, just once, for these people to prove exactly how banning a videogame would make any difference to the crime rate in their respective countries. I mean, presumably, they have some facts, studies, and other assorted media to back up their argument, yes?

Maybe we should just send that Richard Bartle blog post to each and every politician that tries to get a quick 15 minutes of fame with this poorly considered bollocks.

"A recent study has indicated that, on a per capita basis, New Zealand is now twice as violent as the USA…"

Sir that sounds like a challenge to me. :D

This is coming from a country so anal that they eliminated the words "ho ho ho" among Santa Clauses because they thought it would offend prostitutes.

So, no- one should NOT be expecting a grain of wisdom from these people.

Is it possible that a video game, even if violent, may keep kids attention longer and indoors, off the streets?

It would be nice to hear how videogames differ from other medias in causing violence. Well I think none does. And anyone ever thought of the fact that while people are indoors playing video games, it's really hard to be out on the streets commiting acts of violence.

I think the very first step to making New Zealand a nicer place is to get rid of a politician like this that aims at getting rid of a video game rather then deal with all these more serious situations.

With a politician like this no wonder why New Zealand has an uprise in violence.

How more honest can I be?

@Eric
People tend to argue the interactivity element. However that argument holds no water as there have been no studies done with conclusive results proving any causation.

Banning GTA4 won't lower there violence and crime rates.

Banning GTAIV would more likely increase their violence and crime rates...... Idiots...

@Talouin:

IIRC, BBFC said that the lack of interactivity in movies made them *WORSE* than video games.

In Soviet Russia, GTAIV bans you!

I had finally found the word I was looking for in a related article about GTAIV.

catharsis

Look it up. Maybe NZ has a bigger problem. Maybe it should import more games like this. What you have is a bunch of ticked off bored people. If GTAIV isn't there yet and you have this crime wave, maybe it isn't the problem?

*plays imperial march*

Am I the only one to have noticed the mispelling of David Grossman (called "David Rossman") ?

Not only do they recycle the same old sources article after article, but they can't even do it accurately.

Am I the only one to have noticed the mispelling of David Grossman's name (called "David Rossman") ?

Not only do they recycle the same old sources article after article, but they can't even do it accurately.

But they get the neutered Aussie version? Why ban the game after the bigger island gimped it?

Banning a video game seems pretty violent to me. To reduce violence, kiwi readers, I'm telling you: why not ban this guy from politics at the next elections?

"and I agree with kiwi parents and the police, that this is not a bad place to start."

too bad it's a meaningless place to start.

The part that kills me is that he wants to ban violent games because, per capita, New Zealand is twice as violent as the USA. Okay. Think about this.

In New Zealand, some (most?) games are censored the same as in Australia (heavily). Yet, despite LESS game influence, their violence is worse. It's pretty clear it's not the games. If it were, the violence would be worse here.

They've also got one of the world's highest domestic violence rates (35% of women interviewed said they'd been victims). Anyone got your copy of WifeBeater for Windows? No? Doesn't exist. New Zealand has a cultural issue with violence that far predates video games.

Don't they think these violent SOBs' could channel their violent impulses into GTAIV?I mean sh*t,I channel all of my violent impulses into every game I play,and it really helps blow off steam.Oh well.

If the crime is already bad, how the hell is banning a video game going to change anything. This guy has no common sense, or he does not use it.

I think you'll agree that we need to turn the tide of violence. And folks, are you in for a wild night. We have perhaps THE most amazing idea ever. This is a million times better than the atkins diet - you won't see this one coming. We will NOT tackle the causes of crime. We will NOT crack down on crime in the streets. We will NOT take down corruption in New Zealand.

Oh no.

We're going to ban a game!

So what does NZ have? Poverty, drugs, mega-culture clash, gangs, or all of the above? Has anybody pointed out that videogames are avaailable internationally and yet only certain areas are going to hell?

I'd just like to point out that virtually no one in New Zealand takes Gordon Copeland seriously, and there isn't a hope in hell of him still being an MP after the next election.

He was a member of the Christian oriented United Future party but left after a falling out over a particular bill going through Parliament, a bill he then failed to turn up to vote against, which should tell you how well he follows through on things.

@ Demontestament

As an American and representative of the United States I will point out to my gov't officials that, we the people, are slacking off when it comes to violent crime rates.

...Solution. Give everyone in the United States free copies of GTA IV!

It's a proven solution to the problem.

Then just reference every JT press release in existence...

...It's a perfect plan... MUHUAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

That guy looks like the emperor without his hood...

"We have been expecting you..."

"Well, damn - nothing we do seems to stop this endless tide of violence. We need ... a SCAPEGOAT!"

- Excerpt from the Book of Politico Wankery.

People in the middle ages were violent coz of videogames as well then?

Gordon Copland is pretty much a joke in the country and is known for making ill-informed comments. Like ExLibris says he's unlikely to be in parliament after the election later this year.

Okay, 1st off

@ Demontestament: Bring it on :D

@ Kajex: Actually, that was Aussie, Melbourne I think...

As for Gordon Copeland; he recently managed to sink his own new Christian Conservative party (or whatever the hell they called it) with Destiny Church (a pryamid scheme to pay for "Bishop" Tamaki's mansions).

Secondly his party should concentrate on the effect of paedophiles on the crime rates in New Zealand (take that!).

Thirdly, new statistics show that the criminal population in NZ is aging, with less teens and young adults commiting crime and the recent reports on crime levels overall show that violent crime has fallen in recent years.

But nevermind facts, GTAIV kills prostitutes. I mean just wait; clearly because there have been millions of copies sold we should now be beginning to see a flood of dead prostitutes and cops.

Or not...
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Michael ChandraSo really the guy's own words strike me as "wah! How dare you disagree with me!" behaviour, which is the sort of childish attitude I am unfortunately not surprised by.10/20/2014 - 2:17pm
Michael ChandraCorrect AE, but then again the owner's own words are about "wishes", not about an order. No "we told him not to", but going against his wishes.10/20/2014 - 2:16pm
Matthew Wilsonyup. sadly that has been true for awhile.10/20/2014 - 2:10pm
james_fudgewelcome to 2014 politics. Increasingly fought online10/20/2014 - 1:54pm
E. Zachary KnightIt is honestly a shame that anyone has to publicly state they are against such vile behavior, but that is the sad life we live.10/20/2014 - 1:46pm
E. Zachary KnightDecided to publicly reiterate my opposition to harassment campaigns. http://randomtower.com/2014/10/just-stop-with-the-harassment-and-bullying-campaigns-already/10/20/2014 - 1:45pm
Andrew EisenMichael Chandra - Unless I overlooked it, we haven't seen how the directive to not talk about whatever he wasn't supposed to talk about was phrased so it’s hard to say if it could have been misconstrued as a suggestion or not.10/20/2014 - 12:35pm
Andrew EisenHey, the second to last link is the relevant one! He actually did say "let them suffer." Although, he didn't say it to the other person he was bickering with.10/20/2014 - 12:29pm
Neo_DrKefkahttps://archive.today/F14zZ https://archive.today/SxFas https://archive.today/1upoI https://archive.today/0hu7i https://archive.today/NsPUC https://archive.today/fLTQv https://archive.today/Wpz8S10/20/2014 - 11:21am
Andrew EisenNeo_DrKefka - "Attacking"? Interesting choice of words. Also interesting that you quoted something that wasn't actually said. Leaving out a relevant link, are you?10/20/2014 - 11:04am
quiknkoldugh. I want to know why the hell Mozerella Sticks are 4 dollars at my works cafeteria...are they cooked in Truffle Oil?10/20/2014 - 10:41am
Neo_DrKefkaAnti-Gamergate supporter Robert Caruso attacks female GamerGate supporter by also attacking another cause she support which is the situation happening in Syia “LET SYRIANS SUFFER” https://archive.today/F14zZ https://archive.today/Wpz8S10/20/2014 - 10:18am
Neo_DrKefkaThat is correct in an At-Will state you or the employer can part ways at any time. However Florida also has laws on the books about "Wrongful combinations against workers" http://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2012/448.04510/20/2014 - 10:07am
james_fudgehe'd die if he couldn't talk about Wii U :)10/20/2014 - 9:16am
Michael ChandraBy the way, I am not saying Andrew should stop talking about Wii-U. I find it quite nice. :)10/20/2014 - 8:53am
Michael Chandra'How dare he ignore my wishes and my advice! I am his boss! I could have ordered him but I should be able to say it's advice rather than ordering him directly!'10/20/2014 - 8:52am
Michael ChandraIf GP goes "EZK, do not talk about X publicly for a week, we're preparing a big article on it" and he still tweets about X, they'd have a legitimate reason to be pissed.10/20/2014 - 8:52am
Michael ChandraIf GP tells Andrew "we'd kinda prefer it if you stopped talking about Wii-U for 1 week" and he'd tweet about it anyway, firing him for it would be idiotic.10/20/2014 - 8:51am
Michael ChandraLegal right, sure. But that doesn't make it any less pathetic of an excuse.10/20/2014 - 8:50am
ZippyDSMleeYou mean right to fire states.10/20/2014 - 8:50am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician