Blogger Concerned About Violence Against Women in GTA IV

May 1, 2008 -
One of the bloggers at Ladies Lotto has raised the issue of GTA IV's potential for violence against the game's female characters.

clothesminded writes:
In GTA 4... not only can you pick up and have sex with prostitutes, but then you can kill them: with you[r] car, a gun, or whatever you have lying around. The sex is graphic... and the killings have great tag phrases.

In general I don't have a problem with violence in the media, in movies, etc. In this game however... you can make what you want to happen. Meaning you are choosing to pick up the prostitute and kill her, as opposed to driving your car...

After watching... on youtube, i felt sick, sad and angry.



 


Comments

Re: Blogger Concerned About Violence Against Women in GTA IV

having read through more of the responses to this article, i can quite clearly see the mentality that dominates a few of GTA's more rabid proponents.

i know a few people who play and enjoy GTA 4 and none of them ever express some of the hideous sentiments expressed here, such as referring to the blogger as a 'bitch' for her views and suggesting practical experience with events in this game.

however, it's people like you who provide the public face of fandom, and easy fodder for people like Jack Thompson.

maybe you ought to think about what kind of influence media like this has upon yourselves.

Re: Blogger Concerned About Violence Against Women in GTA IV

@

cute reasoning, albeit facile and sub-sophomoric.

this blogger has some legitimate complaints to make, whatever some of you porn & pool self helpers might believe.

let's not kid ourselves: as people grow up, they take their cultural cues from the society that shapes them. when an individual - say a young male - grows up and enters puberty while being bombarded with certain images such as violence as an acceptable way to solve problems and masculinity manifested through dominance over women, they can and will adopt -some- of these tendencies, consciously or not.

the very fact some of you believe that being "American" entitles you to do whatever you want illustrates this perfectly.

the above blogger doesn't suggest banning any such material and, in fact, neither do i. i doubt either of us are bible bashers of any kind. i'll admit i'm a Unitarian, but i came to that faith long after holding the kinds of views i hold. previously, i was agnostic. why some choose to use the bible as a counterpoint to arguments like mine baffles me - i'm all for slapping a rating on the bible, also.

simply put, it would be nice if developers could show some restraint, rather than exploit certain negative base desires and tendencies of the male population to fatten their wallets.

i enjoy games. i'm currently playing AoC, which is quite violent and contains some quite explicit sexual themes. however, it does have some inherent controls and can be played from both gender PoV. some of you may remember the "controversy" surrounding Mass Effect - also laughable, honestly. i would not place either of those games in the same sentence as GTA, though.

this is an earnest bit of advice to the games industry: regulate yourselves before you get regulated more than you or any of us want.

 

 

@Stu;

From her blog entry...

After watching the video of "possibility" on youtube, i felt sick, sad and angry. Does anyone know a good way to protest this game and its rating?

She wants it, at least, rated more strictly, if not gone and is willing to protest to do so.

I wish the people that bitch and moan about this stuff would sit and think that the same right that gives them the opportunity to bitch and moan in the first place is also the same right that gives game developers the opportunity to develop these games and the consumer the right to purchase and play them.

Easy solution, you don't like it, get rid of the right that allows it.

If you want to keep the right to bitch about something then I want to keep the right to play games like GTAIV.

If I lose that right, then you should lose the right to bitch.

If you don't like that right, then STFU and move to a country more suited for a-holes like yourself.

I can't believe people are so stupid to not take account for the human factor.

I have played the hell out of GTAIV the past few days and I have not slept with a hooker nor have I driven my car over one. The human factor is that the person at the controller can go and kill anyone and anything they please, be it man, woman, child, animal, but also have the option not to kill non-key NPCs within the game.

It's just like the last line of her comment. You read the warning. You knew it was mature content. The human factor was that you were too stupid to heed the warning. Now you feel sick, sad, and angry.

Guess what, I know you have a period. I have the same feelings when I have to deal with your crap like this every 3 to 4 weeks but you don't see me going online and bitching about it to the world. I had my warning about it already yet I choose to deal with it. Maybe you should do the same, stupid.

To have the want to bar everyone else's rights is completely un-American and should be punishable by public stoning at the hands of the true American people who love their rights to do whatever the hell they want to do within reason.

Guess where I learned about stoning people. The bible.

You think GTAIV has some crazy s in it? Go read the bible.

Well, you better not let your kids read it. All I need is to have to go pick up my kid from school because he crucified some jack ass on the playground.

Here is a small cheat sheet when it comes to anything offense in the world:
1. Does it have warnings that suggest I may not like it?
2. Should I have heeded the warning that it first displayed?
3. Do I find this offensive?
4. Will I bitch and moan about it to someone because my opinion should be static across all walks of life on this planet?

If you answered yes to any of the questions above, then DON'T !@#$ING WATCH, PLAY, INTERACT, BE WITHIN 500 FEET OF IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Another thing, if you answered yes to any of the questions above, stay the hell off the internet because the majority of people who use the internet are tech savvy individuals who have IQs over 100 who understand the concept of "if I don't like it, I don't have to watch it" and are mature enough to know the difference between reality and virtual reality.

Now, if you think that is bad, go watch two girls one cup and Pain Olympics. Bad? You haven't seen bad until you watch both of those all the way through.

@Guiguibob80

Ah, but the city is American. I just don't think that that level of moral choice would work given GTA IV's story. I can't really explain more without spoiling the plot, though. Maybe for another game, but not this one.

But she apparently has no problem with the violence committed against men, I'm guessing.

"In general I don’t have a problem with violence in the media, in movies, etc. In this game however… you can make what you want to happen. Meaning you are choosing to pick up the prostitute and kill her, as opposed to driving your car…"

...So is this statement essentially a "Violent movies are fine, but playing violent games are bad" write-off?

if you want to make a difference focus your attention on real world violence against women. virtual violence is hardly comparable real world violence when talking about the influence it can impose on others.

I think her username says it all: close-minded.

I haven;t played GTA4 yet, but does the camera still just pan down and show a rocking car? If so then the sex is hardly graphic.

[...] wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptOne of the bloggers at Ladies Lotto has raised the issue of GTA IV’s potential for violence against the game’s female characters. clothesminded writes: In GTA 4… not only can you pick up and have sex with prostitutes, but then you can kill them: with you[r] car, a gun, or whatever you have lying around. The sex is graphic… and the killings have great tag phrases. [...]

@Kurisu,

No, it's much more graphic this time around, but still nothing that can legally constitute as pornography.

"and the killings have great tag phrases."

I loled at the "2nd amendmented" one, or are we not talking about multiplayer?

I don't want to add any credence to MADD's whining... but you may want to consider a "NSFW" tag above the video.

*headdesk*

Shouldn't the "MATURE CONTENT" have been warning that it wasn't work safe?

*Facepalm*

lmao, and the circle goes round again...

The media is a reflective entity, as jonc2006 said, if you want to make a difference instead of bleating like a mule DO SOMETHING ABOUT VIOLENCE IN REAL LIFE!

Secondly, just because someone drives around shooting prostitutes doesn't mean that's the point of the game, that's something someone chose to do. Perhaps instead of deciding what's appropriate for ME, you should focus on people you have the right to try to influence, like your children. Believe it or not, but you have no right to tell other people what to do when they are not infringing in YOUR rights, or the rights of OTHERS. And in care you were wondering, taking offense to something I do that really effects no one else, isn't a "right".

Well, her little article gets off to a fantastic start...

"So, I had heard a bit about generalized violence towards women in Grand Theft Auto's past incarnations."

You heard a "little bit"? I'll take it for granted then that she hasn't played the game and all her opinions are based on hearsay and rumour.

"In GTA 4, however, not only can you pick up and have sex with prostitutes, but then you can kill them: with you car, a gun, or whatever you have lying around."

You can do the same thing to men (not the picking up now), but this doesn't seem to bother her. On the other hand, you can just not bother to do that to the women. The only pedestrians, male or female, that I've killed in the game have just been unfortunate victims of my attempts to get the hang of the more realistic driving.

"The sex is graphic"

Untrue. Or, it depends on your definition of graphic. I saw an episode of the Soprano's where Tony and his mistress have sex in a darkened room in a zoo in public. The way it was acted, to me it seemed far more sexually graphic than a a few pixellated boobs or animation of a car bouncing...

"In general I don't have a problem with violence in the media, in movies, etc."

Then why go after this? It's no different to any other media, less graphic or violent than some! Oh wait, let's hear your answer to that:

"In this game however, you work in the space of "possibility" meaning within a framework you can make what you want to happen. Meaning you are choosing to pick up the prostitute and kill her, as opposed to driving your car."

And? Your point being? What if there was a film that contained a rape scene, and I chose to watch that single scene over and over and over again? Or if I fast forward through a film to see the nude scene only? Are those not contained in the "space of possibility" for media?

"The other amazing thing about this game is that its rated M for Mature. In the 2005 National Institute’s study, 50 percent of boys between the ages of 7 and 14 successfully purchased M-rated video games."

I wonder if they asked how many of those bobys got the game because their parents bought it for them?

"After watching the video of "possibility" on youtube, i felt sick, sad and angry."

You have an opinion! Good for you! Now act upon that opinion and choose not to buy or play the game!

"Does anyone know a good way to protest this game and its rating?"

Wait dumbass! Just because it's good that you have an opinion does not mean you should go out and push it on others! I hate reality TV and soap operas. I feel they promote ignorance. My girlfriend watches both, but the worst I do is roll my eyes when she says they are coming on. I don't try and get them banned, taken off the air or try and stop her from watching them. I go and play a video game instead. Or I look after our son. Or I go read a book. Take a leaf from mine and do the same.

"Oh, and by the way, the creator of the game is Rockstar games, owned by Take 2 Games, which is slated to have their stock price skyrocket after GTA4 tallies profits."

As they deserve for making an incredible game. A groundbreaking piece of interactive entertainment that deserves all the of applause and kudos it is receiving.

"if you want to the video is here:"

If you want the actual context that would make the video make sense, you will have to look elsewhere unfortunately.

I swear, every time I've heard someone going off like this I imagine that Red Zealot from Red vs. Blue (modified slightly for purposes here) "GTA IV is here! We are lost! And the world as we knew it is gone forever from our eyes! Only to live in our memories as the days of salad and glory! Truly these are the end of times! REPENT!! REPENT!!!"

Another day, another GTA IV complaint. At this point, all the complaints from every person and special interest group is just coalescing for me into one big drone that I'm beginning to simply tune-out.

To paraphrase the line from Mystery Science Theater 3000: "Repeat to yourself, 'It's just a game! I should really just relax.'"

Women.. always busting your chops.

Here's the way I read her comments: "I am really bothered by choice. People make bad choices sometimes. I don't think people should have a right to choose things for themselves."

Wanna bet she labels herself "pro-choice" on abortion issues and would have a serious problem with the government telling her what clothes she should wear as a manner of expressing herself?

She probably read the original post over at Feministing. But the good thing about the one at Feministing though, was that a whooooole lot of women gamers, who identify as feminists, were correcting the errors and informing the poster, who admitted to never playing the game, to what it was all about.

Ok yes the violence is distasteful as is the "sex" but the latter is far from graphic, and this isn't a game for children.

Gift.

@Brokenscope
Yea, the moment I saw that mature content warning I clicked the vid off when I was going to look at it yesterday however an NSFW tag probably wouldn't be without merit from what I've played and seen in the game.

and this isn’t a game for children

Any number of groups have been saying that in various news mediums for several weeks now. Yet, the other day the CNN anchors were remarking how they had no idea +20 year-olds played games when informed of the fact by the tech correspondent.

P.S. That tech correspondent lady is awfully cute. I wonder if she's a gamer.

Hey, why is everything italicized?

Hmmmm,I wondered when the feminazis would start somplaing about GTAIV's release.It's just like the PTC,AFA,and all these other groups that claim to promote "family"values.If they like what they see,then no one should.

Hey Dennis,aren't you getting tired of all the GTA stories?

My wife watched me play last night and thought it was hillarious. Guess that's the difference between people that can tell reality from fantasy. Sad but true.

I think black manta forgot to close his italics tags

Yeah I think I did, but I didn't think it would bleed over to other posts. Anyway, I figured I might as well leave it like that because it bears emphasis.

I wonder if this will fix it?

Anyway, as others have said, another day, another bandwagon hopper.

Good lord. Honestly...is any of that content actually necessary?

I'm a huge fan of freedom of speech, and I used to work in the games industry...but seriously, why do we need crap like this? GTA4 is completely overrated.

Something is wrong with the state of the gaming community if a game full of filth for the sake of filth is getting perfect reviews all over the place. We should be better than that.

I'm not saying all games need to have socially redeeming qualities...but really? We need to be able to pick up a hooker/stripper and watch her bounce up and down in our car? Really?

The game IS rated mature, and mature games should exist, but they shouldn't get this much attention when the actual gameplay isn't all that great.

feminists have been downgraded from useful to just plain activists these days.
just like most racial groups.

i mean seriously, some courts won't even hear out a guys side of the story just cause hes a guy and theres a female against him, or a white guy gets ignored for some "minorities" story alot lately.

i'm neither sexist nore racist, or at least i try to avoid being so.
but i sit here and watch "minority" groups or "feminist" groups whine all the time about jobs, and the government helps them, while me, being a white guy, gets no help whatsoever, and can narry find a job.
meanwhile the gov HELPS others while i sit and rot?
i actually know one job i lost to a woman, just because it was a woman, and "law" requires they hire at least 1 female should it arise.
i was 10 times more qualified for the position, and she got the job just cause she had tits and a vag?
wth?

nowadays these activist groups are about as meaningful though as a blister on my arse.
they don't help, they just make things worse.
no, not just for me, but for everyone, including themselves.
stop whining so bloody much..

and why's she so concerned over digital prostitutes anyways?
i find it funny prostitution is illegal in most places as it is, but you'll hear feminists complain about safety for the whores among them (then complain about them being whores...)
wtfh?

@Andy
I only have one issue with your post.

"The game IS rated mature, and mature games should exist, but they shouldn’t get this much attention when the actual gameplay isn’t all that great. "

If you'd played this game, you would realize that the actual gameplay IS great.

Bla bla bla voilence bla bla bla sex bla bla bla ratings enforcement.

This is OT, but what the hell is up with that 1gamerzone.net constantly commenting on GP's entries and basically stealing his content on the 1gamer website? Have I missed something, or is it some kind of spambot, or what?

equal rights equals equal murder in games. i can just as easily beat a hooker to death with the dildo in SA as i can a man. deal with it

Why do "feminists" never care about men? Like...ever? Why is wanting fair and equal treatment for all usually code for "I want my group to be treated special and the rest of you can piss up a rope for all I care?"

Fair and equal for all means EVERYONE gets a fair shot and EVERYONE has the potential to be offended, made fun of, passed over or ignored. EVERYONE. No one should get special treatment because of their sex, race, creed, etc. But lately that is all anyone wants. They don't want equality, they want enforced superiority.

Hypocrites. The lot of them.

Don't worry, lady. Men get as much as the recieving end as women. Try to prove me wrong by playing the game, oy.


So... killing men in the game in the same fashion is so much better?

Admittedly, I flinched at a few places in that video, but my solution to the stuff in it that bothers me? I don't play the friggin game. That simple. There are plenty of video games out there for me to play. I don't think anybody's twisting her arm to play GTA :P

I don't like picking up hookers in this game or previous GTA game and don't. I get health through other means. Just because it's in there, don't mean you have to do it. The drunk mini game on the other hand was funny. But then again, I have a 'drink' about once every one or two months and I never drink enough to get drunk, and on top of that, do not own a car, nor drive one

- Warren Lewis

I'll give women equal rights when they're not first in the lifeboat any more.

Oh, and If true equal rights were ever to happen women would complain about chivalry being dead. Can't have it both ways now can we?

Couple points of notes.

1) The killing phrases were generic comments that is made after most kills, nothing specific to killing the hooker. I got the "and stay down" after shooting a bad guy in a mission once.

2)I have GTA4 and I did a test with a hooker. I brought her in the middle of nowhere, there was not a single person in site. After the "deed" I got out and shot her and took the money. Ten seconds later, I got a wanted star and police started to come after me. This wasn't a fluke, I tried it a few times(different completely secluded areas) and each time I got a wanted star and the cops came. So this isn't consequence free killing like past games, you do this to a hooker, the cops will come.

*headddesk*

Fucking IGN, you gave everyone in the world just enough to justify why GTA should be put behind locked glass cases in retail stores.

GJ, assholes.

The funny thing is you have to actively go looking for hookers this time around, they're not on practically every street corner like some districts in past games. So far I've sunk roughly 8-10 hours into the game since Monday night. Just last night I decided to poke around and see what changes were made to that aspect of the world. Two in-game days passed before I found a single street corner that had two prostitutes on it, and I was actively seeking them out.

It's not like you're going to accidentally end up with a hooker in car after ten minutes like III.

And what the hell is up with the italics?

This isn't suprising: society generally places more value on women than men these days. Assault on a woman feels much worse than assault on a man. We send men off to die in wars while debating the validity of doing the same with women. An abusive husband is treated differently than an abusive wife. You could call it human nature.
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Michael ChandraSo really the guy's own words strike me as "wah! How dare you disagree with me!" behaviour, which is the sort of childish attitude I am unfortunately not surprised by.10/20/2014 - 2:17pm
Michael ChandraCorrect AE, but then again the owner's own words are about "wishes", not about an order. No "we told him not to", but going against his wishes.10/20/2014 - 2:16pm
Matthew Wilsonyup. sadly that has been true for awhile.10/20/2014 - 2:10pm
james_fudgewelcome to 2014 politics. Increasingly fought online10/20/2014 - 1:54pm
E. Zachary KnightIt is honestly a shame that anyone has to publicly state they are against such vile behavior, but that is the sad life we live.10/20/2014 - 1:46pm
E. Zachary KnightDecided to publicly reiterate my opposition to harassment campaigns. http://randomtower.com/2014/10/just-stop-with-the-harassment-and-bullying-campaigns-already/10/20/2014 - 1:45pm
Andrew EisenMichael Chandra - Unless I overlooked it, we haven't seen how the directive to not talk about whatever he wasn't supposed to talk about was phrased so it’s hard to say if it could have been misconstrued as a suggestion or not.10/20/2014 - 12:35pm
Andrew EisenHey, the second to last link is the relevant one! He actually did say "let them suffer." Although, he didn't say it to the other person he was bickering with.10/20/2014 - 12:29pm
Neo_DrKefkahttps://archive.today/F14zZ https://archive.today/SxFas https://archive.today/1upoI https://archive.today/0hu7i https://archive.today/NsPUC https://archive.today/fLTQv https://archive.today/Wpz8S10/20/2014 - 11:21am
Andrew EisenNeo_DrKefka - "Attacking"? Interesting choice of words. Also interesting that you quoted something that wasn't actually said. Leaving out a relevant link, are you?10/20/2014 - 11:04am
quiknkoldugh. I want to know why the hell Mozerella Sticks are 4 dollars at my works cafeteria...are they cooked in Truffle Oil?10/20/2014 - 10:41am
Neo_DrKefkaAnti-Gamergate supporter Robert Caruso attacks female GamerGate supporter by also attacking another cause she support which is the situation happening in Syia “LET SYRIANS SUFFER” https://archive.today/F14zZ https://archive.today/Wpz8S10/20/2014 - 10:18am
Neo_DrKefkaThat is correct in an At-Will state you or the employer can part ways at any time. However Florida also has laws on the books about "Wrongful combinations against workers" http://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2012/448.04510/20/2014 - 10:07am
james_fudgehe'd die if he couldn't talk about Wii U :)10/20/2014 - 9:16am
Michael ChandraBy the way, I am not saying Andrew should stop talking about Wii-U. I find it quite nice. :)10/20/2014 - 8:53am
Michael Chandra'How dare he ignore my wishes and my advice! I am his boss! I could have ordered him but I should be able to say it's advice rather than ordering him directly!'10/20/2014 - 8:52am
Michael ChandraIf GP goes "EZK, do not talk about X publicly for a week, we're preparing a big article on it" and he still tweets about X, they'd have a legitimate reason to be pissed.10/20/2014 - 8:52am
Michael ChandraIf GP tells Andrew "we'd kinda prefer it if you stopped talking about Wii-U for 1 week" and he'd tweet about it anyway, firing him for it would be idiotic.10/20/2014 - 8:51am
Michael ChandraLegal right, sure. But that doesn't make it any less pathetic of an excuse.10/20/2014 - 8:50am
ZippyDSMleeYou mean right to fire states.10/20/2014 - 8:50am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician