Jack Thompson on NPR: If You Blinked, You Missed It

May 1, 2008 -
Neil Conan, host of NPR's Talk of the Nation gave Jack Thompson the bum's rush during a three-minute appearance that also featured G4TV's Adam Sessler and a guy named Jim from BushLeague.TV.

Highlights of Thompson's brief appearance include:

Conan: I understand that you think one of the characters in Grand Theft Auto IV is based on you

Thompson: Well, they go into a lawyer's office and they kill him. I had my house vandalized, by the way, today by gamers. I get calls, death threats all the time by gamers... The real issue here is, though, that there is so much sex and so much graphic sex... I'm working with various law enforcement agencies,hopefully with the result that Take Two corporately and the chairman Strauss Zelnick will be indicted for that because this is way, way over the line...

Sessler: I hope you don't mind if I step in there, Neil. Having played the game I have yet to discover the graphic sex Mr. Thompson is identifying...

Conan: John Thompson... Have you played the game?

Thompson: It just came out and I have a life... 

Conan: And which law enforcement agencies are you working with?

Thompson: I'm not gonna tell you.

(GP: this answer seemed to convince Conan to terminate the interview... it's also a question that I have asked Thompson without receiving a satisfactory answer...)

Conan: Alright, well, thanks very much for speaking with us.

Thompson: (chuckle) I'm done?

Conan: You're done.

Thompson: Oh, great. I'll go play the game now.

Conan: Good luck... (click)

UPDATE: To listen to an mp3 of Thompson's 3-minute segment, click here... Or, get the full 16 minutes from NPR's website.

UPDATE 2: Thompson found a more sympathetic ear on Glenn Beck's CNNHL program, which I just caught. Can someone YouTube that? Of course, that nonsense about the military desentizing recruits with video games has been debunked before, but now Beck is parroting it.

Thompson also (again) linked the Red Lake school shooting to GTA and Virginia Tech to Counter-strike.

Comments

"...so much graphic sex"

ORLY? For a guy who has not played much of the game (he has a life- sending endless emails and faxes is serious business), he has found a lot more than most people.

His claim of working with law enforcement is especially bullshit- just like how his wife is supposedly sick...only when convienient for him.

Wow, I could actually feel my brain cells crying out in misery and agony as they died while watching that *ahem* "news report". No, not news report. Lynch mob is far more accurate.

@ Jonnyboy

I said it before, the hookers say stuff like 'I'll suck yer #*&$' and stuff, but... innuendo =/= the actual act.

If innuendo = porn, than anything that airs on TV 7:00 and later is grounds to be banned in JT's eyes.

I'm wondering what "criminal activities" Jacko's talking about that he claims Zelnick is committing. Hopefully on another unbiased interview, somebody will actually mention Jacko's disbarment trial in Florida and that his fate will be decided in August unless the judge delays her decision again and again.

@ Dav.

lol yeah. Thats why its rated M. There are obveously gonna be swears and violence in an M rated game...

but never do you see a girl completely undressed or doing any sexual acts.... this is just stupid how people scapegoat great games like this..

That Glenn Beck "story" was certainly fair, don't you think?

Also, what version of GTA IV is JT playing that allows for "graphic oral and anal sex"? Sorry, I don't recall how the quote goes exactly and I am not going to subject myself to that kind of biased ignorance again. All I have seen as far as sexual content goes is a stripper who never takes her clothes off gyrating awkwardly, a hooker who (fully clothed no less) climbs on Niko's lap in a car and kisses him, and taking Michelle back to her apartment where she screams such things as "Oh, Niko you're so interesting. Tell me more interesting things!" while the camera had an outside shot of her apartment and the city skyline.

I've said it before and I'll say it again. If people can train to kill and operate expertly, the first time with no prior experience, a gun on GTA then why don't NFL teams save probably thousands of dollars on training camps/equipment and such and just have their players go at it in the latest version of Madden? After all, Madden is far more lifelike than GTA ever could be and if you can train off a game like GTA logically the more real it is the better the training.

lol god, it's fully clothed humping. Get a life Jack. You think 17 year olds will be disturbed or somehow damaged by dry humping? LOL. You think they haven't actually HAD sex by that age? In most countries the age of consent is well under 18.

So.. 3 minutes huh? Don't worry, It happens to everyone, I think they make pills for that sort of thing... (hehehe)

It'd be nice if the "Have you played the game?" line of questioning was continued and asked every time J.T. crops up on a broadcast decrying GTA IV. An interesting bit of stonewalling it'd be, I think. Maybe even for any game he uses as a scapegoat. It would be damaging to whatever credibility he has, anyway.

@ Pierre-Olivier
It might be a gamer(assuming what he says is the truth, and isn't something overly exaggerated....), but he has lots of people other then gamers that he has ticked off over all these years who could have done it.

For all we know, "vandalized" might have just been some dog or the wind knocking over a trashcan...

@ GP
I find he won’t answer the tough questions - like Conan’s about which law enforcement agencies. I believe that if there was a PD buying his theories he’d be only to glad to announce it.
Obviously, anything that would discredit him he avoids. There have been quite a few times where he avoided some poster's main point, but felt the need to reply and go after them.

Also explains the other "interview" he had, haven't seen it yet, but based on the comments I guess there are a lot of holes and lies Rockstar can hit them back for.

Anon... is that you from MSVGF?

I caught this interview today, but sadly missed Thompson's segment. Stepped out of the car five minutes, came back, caught the references to his call, and was a little bummed.

That said, it was a solid interview overall, though its shortness (twenty minutes or so in total) didn't allow everything to be explored or discussed. In particular, I was disappointed that Conan seemed to find some merit (however little) in MADD's condemnation of drunken driving in the game. He didn't seem to thoroughly understand the view that the difficulty served as a kind of penalty. I was relieved, though, to hear him admit upfront to not having played the game while still having an open mind to discuss its merits, story, characters, etc.

I love the bit about him "having a life". Yes, sending an endless stream of nonsensical e-mails to those who you are at odds with and posting idiot comments on videogame related websites certainly qualifies as a life.(sarcasm) I have more of a life than Jacko ever will. There's no actual logic behind his argument of "you play video games=no life". The man is just like some sort of obnoxious, self-obsessed highschooler. It's actually pathetic. (and a little funny)

You see Jack thinks there is graphic sex in the game due to his elementary school level knowledge of sex itself. Sexual content doesn't necessarily mean sex. Use of the words such as tits and dancers in bikinis make up the sexual content of GTA4. But Jack just looks at the descriptors on the back and thinks that there HAS to be a porno somewhere inside. So in other words he doesn't know what the fuck he's talking about. Zero evidence.

I've said it before Jack and I'll say it again: Back up your shit or go home.

Delin Says: "I believe the death threats. There are members of our community that are too young and immature to realize that their big talk actually hurts our cause.

The vandalism, well, I have the strangest feeling that it was something along the lines of his house being TP’d or putting up signs or lawn flamingos on his lawn..."

That's my thought as well. After Thompson claimed that kissing constituted "gay sex" in Bully, it became all too clear that he's willing to exaggerate, to absurd levels, the degree of any given subject.

Sadly, I have to agree with the issue of death threats as well. I'm sure that he's received very few, but it's asinine, dangerous, and damaging to the view of gamers all the same. Fortunately, the only prosecuted case of such an act toward Thompson involved (if I recall) an underage boy who probably didn't have the nerve to harm a fly.

"I have a life"

Could've fooled me!

@jadedcritic:

A basket of muffins to anyone who suggests that to the honorable Judge Tunis for use in JT's lawyerectomy... :P

Jack saying that he didn't play the game because he has a life was a direct shot at Adam who was also in the interview, and already said he played the game.

Jack rolls in the mud and slings it at anyone who happens to come by, hoping that they too, will come and roll in the mud in which he dwells.

That said, the 'discussion' was worth listening to simply to hear joke say 'cunnilingus' and 'fellatio'.

I would like to see joke thompson try and play GTA. Put him in front of the game and say 'ok johnny boy, show me the graphic sex'. He would have no fucking idea what to do. It doesn't matter that the game teaches you how to play. jack has no concept of what playing a video game involves. He thinks it is a simulator. The guy is borderline retarded.

I love when Conan asks Jack if he's played the game and he goes:
"Ugh, I.. have a life".

Poor excuse since we all know he sits at home visiting all our favorite websites, firing one line email responses to gamers, and googling his own name all day.

@HurricaneJesus:

Don't you mean just *over* the line? (sorry, couldn't resist. :P)

I should have added before that the next time he says it contais graphic sex, the person on the side of games should ask if it is more or less offensive than the porn he submitted to the public docket.

Ok I am done. ;)

You're done.

Okay I think the most major thing that jumped out at me was when thompson said "as a lawyer I know where the line is" (paraphrasing). Is he high? Sending legal documents filled with gay porn was in the lines? Lieing about his connection to law enforcement is in the line? Reporting people who irritate him to the freaking F.B.I is in the line?

So GTA is over the line, but the constant stream of lies and intimidation by thompson isn't? Does he get a special line or something? My god how much more moronic can he get?

It’d be nice if the “Have you played the game?” line of questioning was continued and asked every time J.T. crops up on a broadcast decrying GTA IV.

Jack actually has an answer to that question. It was posed to him when he said he was disappointed about the Left Behind game, "Have you ever played it?" His answer was something along the lines of, "No, but I don't have to meet Abraham Lincoln to know that he was the sixteenth President of the United States."

Kicked off NPR for being too crazy, given facetime on Glenn Beck's show? Sounds about right...

Damn, the bastard only let Sessler talk once.
GTA IV IS NOT MARKETED TO KIDS !

Glenn Beck is one big idiot.

That is all I have to say on that.

I was glad to hear NPR kick John Bruce off the show early. I love NPR.

@kaemmerite

"I don't have to meet Abraham Lincoln to know that he was the sixteenth president." You do however have to read a US history book. :)

@Ronnie

Thanks.

I've seen that footage on IGN that Jack kept talking about. I don't know where he saw cunnilingus in that. Also if he considers S&M to be two bikini-clad women simply slapping each other on the ass, then he's really, really repressed! I think if he were to see real S&M, he'd drop dead on the spot.

"I'm done? Oh I can go play the game now!" *click*


Fuckin' douchebag! :P

Seems that the NPR interview was much more balanced. Kudos to Adam Sessler for speaking up against JT. The Glenn Beck interview, on the other hand, was a one-sided bash fest. There was Beck, JT, and some guy from the PTC. There wasn't even someone there to defend the game. Not like that person would have had a fair chance to defend the game anyway.

Heres a question, WHY in the HOLY HELL isn't Jack, Gavin, and BECK being FUCKING SUED right now for lying!!!!

HUh? Well? Wheres the lawsuits, wheres the Slander suits, the threats, the demands for retraction!!?

Lets see someone stand the fuck up for this industry. I'm getting sick of this crap!

I know we all have the right to say what we want, but is there no law(s) against the types of things he is doing?

He is knowingly creating hysteria over virtually nothing, harassing people in writing, disrupting the work environment for quite a few people, openly lying on nationally televised media . . . thats all I can think of at the moment, but I know the list is much larger than that.

Can't someone, who has had to suffer his crap, press charges for at least one of the things he has done?

I know he . . . ummmm . . . went to law school (I am not going to say he is an attorney, since he made a mockery of the courts and is soon to be disbarred) and knows the loopholes, but he must have crossed the line at least once, somewhere.

@Yuki

I'm about sick of it too. The industry really needs to drop it's balls with the defense thing.

@BB

It all falls on the industry to take action. In all of JT's attacks on games he has to have crossed the line at least like, three times the way he carries on, you're dead center on that observation, so all that remains is for the industry to pony up with the legal papers.

@ Grizzam & BB

I think they're waiting to see if he gets disbarred. I'm guessing they figure if/when that happens, he'll be easier to sue successfully.

Just watch. I'll bet anything if that happens, they'll descend on him like a pack of ravenous wolves! :D

Oh, I just listened to a podcast of him over on Destructoid. Seems Jack's been a busy little beaver today. The host tried to get him to stay on topic, but Jack kept accusing him of cutting him off until he finally got tired of it and left. As always, trying to dominate the discourse and forcing his own brand of morality and warped truth on everyone. I love how he thinks that if the industry and its "apologists" don't listen to him, then the government will step in and that video games really will be banned, which is complete and utter hogwash. While the government has been known to take a "one size fits all" mentality, I seriously doubt they would take that approach to games. There's that pesky little First Amendment he keeps conveniently ignoring as he continues to equate games with tobacco, alcohol and regular porn (which he also has skewed view of).

He says he won't be happy when they come to him and cry "Why didn't we listen to you?" But past words and deeds say otherwise. I just know there's a part of him that would just love to be the one to save us from ourselves.

He also briefly mentioned how he considers games to be a "waste of time." To which I say, "So says you." They said the same thing about comic books too, yet he doesn't bash them, and many people consider reading comic books today to be one of many good reading choices. Proof positive that Jack's a useless old fart.

To take a completely different route:

I just sent an email to Take-Two about my genuine concerns about his mental health. I really am very worried that he may hurt himself and/or others in the near future, and I would not like to wait for that to happen.

I am not saying that I want him arrested, but I would like something to be done before he decides to do something that would cause bodily harm and/or death.

I have taken a fair amount of college psychology courses, and his behavior is making me very uneasy. I really don't like to see people get hurt, even if they bring it upon themselves.

Has anyone else tried voicing this concern to someone of high authority?

Oh ya, on another side of that issue:

Many times he has openly insulted the intelligence and demeanor of our (gaming) community. It may do wonders to have us show genuine compassion, even for those that hate us.

It would be great to demonstrate to the rest of the world the amount of kindness we are capable of showing, especially since jack is constantly trying to tell everyone that we are all "training" (and supposedly have been training for some time now) to be a bunch of blood-mongerers.

Just a thought, and it definately wouldn't hurt.

So Jack says that he has a life and prefers not to play the game, instead making up horrible misconceptions of what the game is about.

Shows you that we need more news stations that have gamers ready to rebut JT's comments allot more these days.

For those of you who read Something Awful, there's a surprise (fake) review there...

Just watched that Beck videos and man what a biased reporting. More likely the reason soldiers shooting at the range got better is increased time on the range and not because of a human shaped target (and maybe better rifles). Be interesting if everyone here emails CNN and the Beck show and complain about how inaccurate and biased that was report was. I had to check to make sure I wasn't watching fox news. Beck mentioned that TV, going back to the 1950s(when it came out) was the blame for an increase in violence. One has to wonder how true that is, after all its likely back in those days most people didn't own a TV (most had radios), since they were fairly expensive and new.

Jt brings up 'that there are dozens of cases where GTA and other shooting games have trained kids to kill", and yet how many more hundred and thousands of killers are there who have never seen or touched a video game? I grew up playing Wolfenstein and Oregon Trail (I kicked butt hunting) and I haven't killed anyone. His logic also fails, in that if 9 million GTA4 are sold, he is saying that all 9 million will be killers and yet we all know that is false. If JT wants to be the next Hitler and go and have mass game burnings, where will it stop? Will once all the "violent games" are destroyed, will they move to movies next? How about books? Is the reason there is more crime really because there is more "Violent media" or is it more likely reason, there is just more people on this ever crowding planet and more people that are just "evil" or mentally disturbed.

Overall, that was some very sloppy reporting with logic holes big enough for the Death Star to go in and out of.

On a side note, not sure if its a different piece, but on Glenn Beck's web page, in the subscriber area, there is Listed Hour 2 - Grant Theft Auto: The takedown of our society?...

Though isn't GTA4 more a reflection of houw society is, specifically organized crime. I'm only at the beginning so far, but I feel like I am watching the Soprannos.

You know, I'm trying to sleep here, but I can't seem to stop watching these videos. So angry. So so angry.

@BB

It's remarkably hard to have someone commited involuntarily for any length of time. If your under 18 your parents can force you but Jack has obviously passed that stage. I also imagine that jack doesn't have a current therapist or psychiatrist so the courts would have to get involved. Then there is the fact that the doc a while back gave him a clean bill of mental health, so I really doubt there's anything anyone can do.

Ok boys and girls, lets be totally truthful. Why are all these idiots crying about GTA4?

Its not due to morals.
Nor to voilence.
Not Sex.
Not even how to treat women.

Its all about money. They are complaining they are not getting their take of the profits. It seems so easy. If any of these idiots REALLY wanted to curb violence, they report on the White House's failure to curb violence in America. Or Congress.

Frankly, there's 100 fold, more sex in most evening programs on ABC, CBS, and NBC....and most ironically, Fox, then all the GTA's combined.

@Grendal

Yep. I'm tempted to wonder if he gave the doctor a BJ.

Did his house really get broken into???

If it did thats harsh....

@yuki

actually a slander suit would be near impossible to win right now, for the taketwo to win a slander suit they have to prove that these lies have hurt their profits, and with the amount that GTA4 is selling, that would be near impossible to do, and in the long run probably cost them more money than the small amounts that jack is costing them with his lies, making it poor bussiness sense to take him to court

in the end the suit would actually do more to bolster Jack as when it's thrown out he would make claims that he was "obviously" telling the truth and the judge saw right through take twos slap lawsuit
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Michael ChandraSo really the guy's own words strike me as "wah! How dare you disagree with me!" behaviour, which is the sort of childish attitude I am unfortunately not surprised by.10/20/2014 - 2:17pm
Michael ChandraCorrect AE, but then again the owner's own words are about "wishes", not about an order. No "we told him not to", but going against his wishes.10/20/2014 - 2:16pm
Matthew Wilsonyup. sadly that has been true for awhile.10/20/2014 - 2:10pm
james_fudgewelcome to 2014 politics. Increasingly fought online10/20/2014 - 1:54pm
E. Zachary KnightIt is honestly a shame that anyone has to publicly state they are against such vile behavior, but that is the sad life we live.10/20/2014 - 1:46pm
E. Zachary KnightDecided to publicly reiterate my opposition to harassment campaigns. http://randomtower.com/2014/10/just-stop-with-the-harassment-and-bullying-campaigns-already/10/20/2014 - 1:45pm
Andrew EisenMichael Chandra - Unless I overlooked it, we haven't seen how the directive to not talk about whatever he wasn't supposed to talk about was phrased so it’s hard to say if it could have been misconstrued as a suggestion or not.10/20/2014 - 12:35pm
Andrew EisenHey, the second to last link is the relevant one! He actually did say "let them suffer." Although, he didn't say it to the other person he was bickering with.10/20/2014 - 12:29pm
Neo_DrKefkahttps://archive.today/F14zZ https://archive.today/SxFas https://archive.today/1upoI https://archive.today/0hu7i https://archive.today/NsPUC https://archive.today/fLTQv https://archive.today/Wpz8S10/20/2014 - 11:21am
Andrew EisenNeo_DrKefka - "Attacking"? Interesting choice of words. Also interesting that you quoted something that wasn't actually said. Leaving out a relevant link, are you?10/20/2014 - 11:04am
quiknkoldugh. I want to know why the hell Mozerella Sticks are 4 dollars at my works cafeteria...are they cooked in Truffle Oil?10/20/2014 - 10:41am
Neo_DrKefkaAnti-Gamergate supporter Robert Caruso attacks female GamerGate supporter by also attacking another cause she support which is the situation happening in Syia “LET SYRIANS SUFFER” https://archive.today/F14zZ https://archive.today/Wpz8S10/20/2014 - 10:18am
Neo_DrKefkaThat is correct in an At-Will state you or the employer can part ways at any time. However Florida also has laws on the books about "Wrongful combinations against workers" http://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2012/448.04510/20/2014 - 10:07am
james_fudgehe'd die if he couldn't talk about Wii U :)10/20/2014 - 9:16am
Michael ChandraBy the way, I am not saying Andrew should stop talking about Wii-U. I find it quite nice. :)10/20/2014 - 8:53am
Michael Chandra'How dare he ignore my wishes and my advice! I am his boss! I could have ordered him but I should be able to say it's advice rather than ordering him directly!'10/20/2014 - 8:52am
Michael ChandraIf GP goes "EZK, do not talk about X publicly for a week, we're preparing a big article on it" and he still tweets about X, they'd have a legitimate reason to be pissed.10/20/2014 - 8:52am
Michael ChandraIf GP tells Andrew "we'd kinda prefer it if you stopped talking about Wii-U for 1 week" and he'd tweet about it anyway, firing him for it would be idiotic.10/20/2014 - 8:51am
Michael ChandraLegal right, sure. But that doesn't make it any less pathetic of an excuse.10/20/2014 - 8:50am
ZippyDSMleeYou mean right to fire states.10/20/2014 - 8:50am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician