Police Fret Over GTA IV's Drunk Driving

May 2, 2008 -
If you've experienced the "drunk driving" aspect of Grand Theft Auto IV, you know that it is pretty annoying. It makes it very difficult to control your ride.

Beyond that, it's not a requirement. Nor is it a something that furthers your progress in any way.

But, as GamePolitics reported earlier this week, Mothers Against Drunk Driving have called for the ESRB to re-classify GTA IV as "Adults Only" based on the DUI feature.

Savannah, Georgia TV station WSAV-3 reports that the Traffic Commander of the Savannah-Chatham Police Department is also concerned. Lt. Scott Simpkins told WSAV:
How many people are going to go 'hey if I can master this, I can go out and instead of having a glass of wine or a beer with dinner, I can have 2 or 3 because I've been training how to drive intoxicated'? So these are the things that I have to worry about when stuff like this hits the market.

Comments

I've pre-ordered Conan, just so i can 'train up' in the wearing of furry pants without looking like a complete tosser.
See gaming 'simulators' do have a positive use, though the woman at my local Tesco may not think so when I turn up all CONANified and start delving for change.....

How many people?

None, sir.

I'm going to be quite honest. I like to play Gran Turismo drunk.

I do quite well. And I would say that Gran Turismo is arguably a very good driving simulator and has actually helped me become a pretty good real life driver.

HOWEVER, I NEVER drive drunk in real life. It's just stupid and a matter of personal responsibility. I have TECHNICALLY trained myself to drive drunk, but I don' because I am a responsible person. If I decided to do something irresponsible, I expect that *I* will be punished for it.

Something the officer and MADD missed was the fact that no matter how well you drive drunk in the game, the police in the game will automatically try to pull you over if they see you.

The game tries to discourage driving drunk a lot.

Besides that cars in real life don't control using a joystick.

How many people are going to go ‘hey if I can master this, I can go out and instead of having a glass of wine or a beer with dinner, I can have 2 or 3 because I’ve been training how to drive intoxicated’? So these are the things that I have to worry about when stuff like this hits the market.

ROFL.
No way - is he serious?

This guy can't really be serious - but yet, I think that he thinks he is.

And I don't trust MADD one bit - I believe they get a cut from DUI's don't they? I don't drink and drive - I have in the past however, but only once or twice.

Every freakin' habitual drunk driver I've ever known doesn't even play video games - they are too busy at the bar and on top of that most are die hard sports fans or country club members. Funny how much little 'hidden knowledge' one gets from working at a country club. It's actually rare to see many of them drive sober. In all seriousness, the public officials are the worst with it too.

So if anything contributes to drunk driving - it's going out to the bar and/or country club. Most people playing video games and drinking are going to stay quite comfortable at home.

"How many people are going to go ‘hey if I can master this, I can go out and instead of having a glass of wine or a beer with dinner, I can have 2 or 3 because I’ve been training how to drive intoxicated’? So these are the things that I have to worry about when stuff like this hits the market."

What? really?
oh man, that IS something to worry about... good thing that mastering drunk driving in GTAIV is impossible to master...

Ok ya really, i'd compare GTAIV to those goggles they use to teach kids about the dangers of being drunk

On the other hand, how many people are going to say, "Now I don't have to drink anymore; I can do it in GTA without killing myself!"

Has anyone ever figured out why people who don't play video games can't seem to understand that people who do play video games are quite able to tell the difference between make-believe and reality?

How many people are going to say, "Hey, if I can master Mario Kart, I can go out and throw banana peels at other cars and make them spin out!"

If you're really so worried about that happening, just keep a couple of turtle shells in your police cruiser.

Wait! I got an even better idea. Instead of outlawing games, it's The Prohibition pt. II ! Just think, by outlawing liquor again, we not only eliminate Drunk Driving, but also Domestic Violence, Alcohol Poisonings, and a load of other problems!

It really astounds me that groups who are not traditionally opposed to video games would compromise their credibility chasing after sensationalist bullshit like this. IMO.. MADD is already clownshoes, and a menace to their own cause, but now.. people far less cynical than me are going to think so too. Just amazing.

And...

"‘hey if I can master this, I can go out and instead of having a glass of wine or a beer with dinner, I can have 2 or 3 because I’ve been training how to drive intoxicated’"

First of all, if you're ripped after 3 of basically anything, you're likely a noob drinker. Then we have the improbable situation of individuals feeling some how qualified to drive drunk purely based on their performance in a game.

Call me evil, but.. I think it's time to start euthanizing people that are so %&*#ing retarded, yet some how smart enough to have the means, to commit these [mythical] game based crimes.

"So these are the things that I have to worry about when stuff like this hits the market."

You should worry about keeping your job, you pitiful $%&*ing tool. If that's what you're worried about then you have very little legitimacy in your position. Go taser some skateboarders, like real cops.

**Deep breath**

Serenity now!

@ aphexbr

"So… there’s a feature in the game that makes it clear how much driving ability is affected by drinking… and the suggested response to this educational tidbit is to ban/restrict the game? Idiots. "


Exactly.

The guy MIGHT have a point if real cars used analog sticks

Speaking for myself, here, as a person that is obviously not completely retarded and lacking common sense, but definitely not lacking in fear of death, I would have to say that the drunk driving portrayed in the game is not leaving me wanting to mimic it in real life.

In fact, if any of these yokels would actually play the game, they could clearly see that driving drunk in-game is nearly impossible. You end up hitting everything under the sun, and it is quite a feat to escape the police. It makes you *not* want to try it, in my opinion; although I suppose that it makes a fun little mini-game to see if you can make it home without killing yourself.

But that's just it: it's a GAME. I would never willingly try this in real life under any circumstance, and certainly not because it is (in large quotes) "glorified" in the game. Even with everyday driving, I always have this little fear, because being in a multi-ton machine means that I am putting other people's lives on the line if something goes wrong. That, and my own life, which is both in my own hands and in others.

It's called being a human. It's called having a care for human life. It's something you can loosen up a little within the confines of a game, because you know "these are not real people, and I'm doing things I wouldn't normally be able to do in real life because they have consequences".

And if *I* feel this way, I'm sure there are many other fellow human beings who feel the same.

"How many people are going to go ‘hey if I can master this, I can go out and instead of having a glass of wine or a beer with dinner, I can have 2 or 3 because I’ve been training how to drive intoxicated’? So these are the things that I have to worry about when stuff like this hits the market."

Was the a serious statement or is he being sarcastic?

Any idiot who thinks proficiency in virtual drunk driving can do it well IRL shouldn't be allowed on the road under any circumstances anyway.

Seriously, again? Besides, isn't driving drunk in GTA IV damn near impossible from what I hear? Wouldn't that deter from people wanting to drive drunk?

And in other news, in The Witcher (a game) you can fight drunk. The game the must teach you how to fight drunk. Oh wait...

Both in The Witcher and in GTA figting and driving a car (in GTA) is very difficult if you have been drinking a lot. In GTA, the police will come after you. If you try to resist arrest, more police will show up...

In The Witcher not so much...

I think the cop should be more worried about the vigilante missions. If what he's saying is true, there's going to be a whole generation of gamers ready to replace him.

You know, maybe they're right. Maybe we should classify it Adults Only. I mean, not only will it teach people how to drive drunk, but it will teach them how to drive. We'll have 8 year olds playing this game and thinking they can drive their parents car just because they managed to do it in the game. For that matter, let's reclassify any game where you drive as Adults Only, because you could drink yourself and then play the game.

Yeah Right. A controller can't teach you how to drive.

Is it only me or is every single criticism against GTA 4 about how it "trains" you to do such things? Since when did GTA 4 and games in general become real life simulators.

People really should understand what they are bashing before opening their mouth. There is nothing like seeing a guy who got all the facts wrong still get some air-time while the people who actually knows their stuff is ignored.

Suppose that's how the American press works, whatever gives the biggest articles.

Wouldn't the drinking and driving be more of a deterrent in GTA than, well, encouraging people to try it?

That drunk driving thing should be seen as a tool to deter DUI, not glorify it

love how real news
http://forums.theeca.com/showthread.php?t=4588

is over looked for GTA 4 spewings.....

If people try to drunk drive because they did it in a game and did it well, and get in some kind of accident, they deserve it. They're are responsible for their own actions and no amount of stupidity should make you less liable (unless it's an actual mental illness). If you drive drunk that's nobody's responsibility but yours.

This law enforcement official is just worried that he might have a harder time with busting more people for DUI. Is he afraid he's not able to handle it anymore?

Ok, he obviously realises that it can't actually train anyone to drive drunk. He just suggests that some people in the gaming world would think it does. Except for the fact that the gaming world is constantly fighting the idea that you can train on video games. The only people I could see thinking that it is possible would be children under the age of 10. They are unable to drink or drive. They typically shouldn't be playing this game anyways.

(Though, I was rather mature 11 years ago and I played games that were geared towards an adult crowd with no ill effects.)

The biggest problem I see coming for this is people on trial for DUI will suddenly claim inspiration from GTA. Though I find it funny how much they talk about this while in Saints Row you could drink & smoke pot without it affecting your driving at all. People need to stop using GTA as a punching bag.

GTA IV trained me in the art of drunk driving.

Just like:

DOOM taught me how to shoot.

Mortal Kombat made me a kung fu master.

Lunar Lander taught me how to pilot spacecraft.

Battle Zone trained me to drive a tank.

And I got through about a third of the Harvey Birdman game before I lost interest. That should be good enough to qualify as a paralegal, right?

Cool, but my car doesn't have a d-pad :(

As someone who doesn't drink I found it quite interesting. I have no idea how close it is to the real thing but it was dizzying and hard to drive. I don't have a problem with it in the game, I thought it showed how bad of an idea it would be to drive intoxicated.

Lt. Scott Simpkins, You Are A Fucking Moron...

*Audience cheers*

Thank you.. Thank you..
Thank you..

"GTA IV trained me in the art of drunk driving.

Just like:

DOOM taught me how to shoot.

Mortal Kombat made me a kung fu master.

Lunar Lander taught me how to pilot spacecraft.

Battle Zone trained me to drive a tank.

And I got through about a third of the Harvey Birdman game before I lost interest. That should be good enough to qualify as a paralegal, right? "

And Leisure Suit Larry trained me to be a player.

I live in Wisconsin which has one of the highest drunk driving rates in the country so this issue hits close to home with me. People think they can drunk drive without any repercussions just after a few drinks. It's really not too far a stretch too think a drunk person would convince themselves into drunk driving after playing the game.

The thing that I am worried about is the game giving players a more casual attitude towards drunk driving. To be fair I haven't played the game yet. I love the GTA series and if the game makes drunk driving seem impossibly hard or horrible than I don't really object to it. I just hope that it doesn't glorify drunk driving in any way.

@WBrian

According to all I hear it makes even walking impossibly hard. And hailing a cab is an option in the game at all times

@WBrian: It doesn't glorify it. I haven't played the game yet, but I heard drunk driving in this is redicously hard to do, and the cops jump all over you the moment it starts and such, so no, this does not glorify it, and besides, even the main character says that he's in no shape to drive when he drinks.

Can a game accurately simulate what it's really like to drive drunk?

I haven't tried that in GTAIV (yet) but based on previous games in the series I assume it makes the screen warp and distort as you drive. Because that's what being drunk is like, right? Your vision starts to swim and you suffer no other ill effects, right?

I guess that means what GTAIV really trains you to do is drive with your eyes shut. God knows the simulated HDR effects make it look like that.

Here's a vid of the mini-game-mission that illustrates taxi cabs and drunk driving

http://youtube.com/watch?v=Z1g6M5-krHc

The screen goes blurry and wobbles, the controls suck, and the car swerves everywhere.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=dDeSUdQpms0

In this one, Nikko can't even walk 20 ft without falling down. He can't steer either, and the screen gets progressively blurrier (almost like that TV commercial where they keep putting beer glasses in front of the camera)

Matthews, there's several things they can do. Blurry vision, mess with focal effects, wobble the screen. They can delay reaction time from the controls, and even mess with them, to simulate the confusion and dizzyness. Varying all of this means you can't get used to it.

@Jabrwock: Ugh, I watched the second one, and ugh, it kinda gave me a little motion sickness, and it does look very difficult, if thats a required mission, it looks hard to do.

Idiot police officer and idiot mothers association think everybody is as idiot as they are. Great.

Once again, it is assumed that gamers are brain-dead morons who think that because it's fun doing something in a game, that we are going to attempt it in real life. There are only two groups of people who would immitate something from a videogame like GTAIV. 1. The mentally disturbed. 2. Little kids. Neither of those two groups should be playing this type of game.

Aaand the results are in. After a heavy drinking sesh with Roman I decided to drive home. It is worth noting at this point that the in-game narration told me not to, and after a little while suggested I get a taxi instead. Niko also insisted that I put the controller down and give it up. The screen is swaying in a curiously beautiful way, and the vehicle lurches to the side even if I don't touch the controls. Thirty seconds later I hear sirens and the vomit-o-vision means I can't even make out the cop car I'm looking right at.

The game clearly does not like me driving drunk.

Also worth noting is that I myself am no more tired or lethargic than I was five minutes ago. I'm capable of reading and understanding the map showing me my waypoints, and I know what everything on the sceen means when I can make it out behind the motion blur.

The game clearly does not recreate the feeling of being drunk.

So really they only thing that makes GTAIV "promote" or even *feature* drink driving is that it says 'hey, you're now drunk.' It could apply the same screen filter as a result of eating too many burgers if it wanted to; would that make it a simulation of fat-driving?

I am sorry for her loss, of course, but she must realize that videogames did not cause her son's death. Videogames don't have this hypnotic power that just commands people to go out and kill other people. If she wants to honor her son, she should try to focus on the real factors that cause criminal behavior. There are a number of factors that turn people into criminals, such as an abusive childhood and poverty.

You know, I kind of wish they were right, and games really did train us to do stuff. I mean, I'd be a jedi, dammit. I would also be a master of every martial art and combat style ever, and a sorcerer. And I would have all kinds of world domination skills, on earth, in alternate timelines, in alternate dimensions, in a galaxy far far away, and on alpha centauri, for starters. And when someone pissed me off, I could just load up a lance of Daishis to get my vengeance...ahh, sweet dreams indeed. Oh, and I would enjoy saving the world with a crowbar. Now THAT, my friends, is something you can brag about.

On a serious note, I have to say that it seems to me a more realistic presentation of drunk driving, one which makes it dangerous, is ideally placed in a game like GTA that people are playing for fun. It's certainly better than creating a separate "The Dangers of Drunk Driving" game that no one would ever play unless forced to in Driver's Ed or something.

I criticize MADD for targeting GTA IV because of it's "drunk driving" feature. I attend university, and often I've found a van set up by responsible drinking advocates trying to communicate the perils of drunk driving by featuring a driving simulator. On this simulator, a computer operator can impose poor reaction times, as well as other features that would simulate intoxication, onto the simulator driver. I am pretty sure MADD is grateful to the simulator operators for trying to advocate the responsible use of alcohol. GTA IV's drunkenness is no different. The only difference is that it's a part of a product designed for pure entertainment.

Pure entertainment. The game tries to teach nothing. The game only serves to be entertaining.

It in no way tries to encourage players to perform ANY of the acts featured in the game.

Though I'll admit... I would like to call up a friend and play some darts. Is GTA to blame for that?

Query: What happens if you get drunk one night and decide to play Forza for a bit? Is that more or less training and/or encouragement than getting fake-drunk in GTAIV?

Don't worry, I played F-Zero X. I can totally pilot a rocket car at 1000+mph

I enjoy walking drunk because is funny as hell, and it also reminds me of my roommate some nights. However, driving drunk is annoying if I'm really trying to go somewhere. I do it if I just feel like a crazy drive that will most likely end with me being killed by the cops. It can cause motion sickness though. I do not think anyone will ever, ever think that if they can master driving drunk on GTA they will be able to do it in real life. I don't think anyone could believe they could master driving a car without being drunk and do the same in real life. People like this cop are really stupid.

@ KillianD

You had me at 'Jedi'

Training to drive drunk? If you're using this game so that you can master drunk driving, you're an asshole and a dumbass. If videogames could "train" people to do that sorta stuff, why am I not a baddass stealthy killing machine?

These cops are more stupid than they accuse of us gamers of being.Mainly gamers under the age of 40 they think can't tell the difference between reality and Final Fantasy.

'If you’ve experienced the “drunk driving” aspect of Grand Theft Auto IV, you know that it is pretty annoying. It makes it very difficult to control your ride.'

It actually makes me drive better.. But then, I always drive like all the dogs of hell are coming for me, so..
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Michael ChandraSo really the guy's own words strike me as "wah! How dare you disagree with me!" behaviour, which is the sort of childish attitude I am unfortunately not surprised by.10/20/2014 - 2:17pm
Michael ChandraCorrect AE, but then again the owner's own words are about "wishes", not about an order. No "we told him not to", but going against his wishes.10/20/2014 - 2:16pm
Matthew Wilsonyup. sadly that has been true for awhile.10/20/2014 - 2:10pm
james_fudgewelcome to 2014 politics. Increasingly fought online10/20/2014 - 1:54pm
E. Zachary KnightIt is honestly a shame that anyone has to publicly state they are against such vile behavior, but that is the sad life we live.10/20/2014 - 1:46pm
E. Zachary KnightDecided to publicly reiterate my opposition to harassment campaigns. http://randomtower.com/2014/10/just-stop-with-the-harassment-and-bullying-campaigns-already/10/20/2014 - 1:45pm
Andrew EisenMichael Chandra - Unless I overlooked it, we haven't seen how the directive to not talk about whatever he wasn't supposed to talk about was phrased so it’s hard to say if it could have been misconstrued as a suggestion or not.10/20/2014 - 12:35pm
Andrew EisenHey, the second to last link is the relevant one! He actually did say "let them suffer." Although, he didn't say it to the other person he was bickering with.10/20/2014 - 12:29pm
Neo_DrKefkahttps://archive.today/F14zZ https://archive.today/SxFas https://archive.today/1upoI https://archive.today/0hu7i https://archive.today/NsPUC https://archive.today/fLTQv https://archive.today/Wpz8S10/20/2014 - 11:21am
Andrew EisenNeo_DrKefka - "Attacking"? Interesting choice of words. Also interesting that you quoted something that wasn't actually said. Leaving out a relevant link, are you?10/20/2014 - 11:04am
quiknkoldugh. I want to know why the hell Mozerella Sticks are 4 dollars at my works cafeteria...are they cooked in Truffle Oil?10/20/2014 - 10:41am
Neo_DrKefkaAnti-Gamergate supporter Robert Caruso attacks female GamerGate supporter by also attacking another cause she support which is the situation happening in Syia “LET SYRIANS SUFFER” https://archive.today/F14zZ https://archive.today/Wpz8S10/20/2014 - 10:18am
Neo_DrKefkaThat is correct in an At-Will state you or the employer can part ways at any time. However Florida also has laws on the books about "Wrongful combinations against workers" http://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2012/448.04510/20/2014 - 10:07am
james_fudgehe'd die if he couldn't talk about Wii U :)10/20/2014 - 9:16am
Michael ChandraBy the way, I am not saying Andrew should stop talking about Wii-U. I find it quite nice. :)10/20/2014 - 8:53am
Michael Chandra'How dare he ignore my wishes and my advice! I am his boss! I could have ordered him but I should be able to say it's advice rather than ordering him directly!'10/20/2014 - 8:52am
Michael ChandraIf GP goes "EZK, do not talk about X publicly for a week, we're preparing a big article on it" and he still tweets about X, they'd have a legitimate reason to be pissed.10/20/2014 - 8:52am
Michael ChandraIf GP tells Andrew "we'd kinda prefer it if you stopped talking about Wii-U for 1 week" and he'd tweet about it anyway, firing him for it would be idiotic.10/20/2014 - 8:51am
Michael ChandraLegal right, sure. But that doesn't make it any less pathetic of an excuse.10/20/2014 - 8:50am
ZippyDSMleeYou mean right to fire states.10/20/2014 - 8:50am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician