May 4, 2008 -
The attorney general of Rhode Island has warned parents about the mature content in Grand Theft Auto IV, according to Legal Newswire.Of the best-selling, highly controversial game, A.G. Patrick Lynch (left), a Democrat, said:
As video games become more realistic and in many cases, more violent, parents must become more vigilant before buying them or letting their children use them.
Also, retailers and salespeople have a responsibility to better inform parents how violent these games actually are. Grand Theft Auto IV is obviously rated 'M' for a reason, and parents need to keep a game like this away from their kids.
In August, 2007, GamePolitics reported that Lynch had joined with the ESRB in an effort to educate parents about the video game industry's content rating system.



Comments
*bets against Zelnick getting arrested*
I'm glad it's officials asking parents to be more vigilant rather than decrying the outrageous "filth" on our screens, but any salesperson with a shred of common sense should be checking that parents are ok with the game anyway. We had some left in store this weekend, and I made an effort that every person who seemed to be buying it for their kids was aware of the content of the game. Some were a bit surprised, but still let them have it. That's fine by me, as long as they don't come back instore and start screaming about it to me.
how old is he?
rare to see!
*grabs Jack Thompson and shoves his noise in the common sense*
It's the parents, stupid!
It's good to see a lawyer with a brain.
"you do realize the second mission consists of you mass murdering a group of prostitues and slaugtering police in your escape attempt."
not very accurate but effective nonetheless
As the people above have already said, we shouldn't need politicians to tell us the obvious. I guess most people are just too content with letting others decide for them. Sad, true, but hopefully it can be changed.
I support it 100%.
Whatever next?
@jack thompson
I really wish you were Thompson, we could have a fun conversation. Unfortunately from what I hear he's blocked from posting on this site.
Back the the news, this is the kind of news I love to see: important persons who uses common sense.
It reinforces the happiness I experience when I think about how all the misinformed/uninformed, that are in power, are on their way out.
Witnessing positive change is so cool!
I agree with you in context, but in context only. You wouldn't let a six-year-old watch something like, say, any horror films, correct? The same would be said for something like Resident Evil.
Now, say, along the lines of a 14-16 year-olds, that's where parents can step in and choose depending upon the development of their individual child which, for some reason, politicians of most shapes and sizes don't seem to get. If specific parents sheltered their child and they're traumatized at the sight of blood, they wouldn't want said child to get something like Mortal Kombat. If, however, the actually succeeded in starting to prepare their child for the real world, (you know, like parents are supposed to do, just give bits in gradual doses. Baby steps.) they might buy it for them despite the M rating, because, contrary to the belief of the inept, the human mind does not sit in an eggshell until the magic age of 18.
What most people seem to do is that they fail to scrutinize what they mean by 'kids' and 'children.' However, i think i can speak for everyone here when i say that the mind of a 3-year-old is leaps and bounds different than that of 16, so bounding them together within the same context is... well... you get the idea.
Later in the day, I'll play the game. I'll doubtless kill numerous simulated cops, simulated innocent people and simulated prostitutes, I'll steal, I'll commit mass murder, I may even have simulated sex in the game with the simulated prostitutes, then in the real world I'll behave quite normally without harming or stealing from anyone and without cheating on my wife with a prostitute (or anyone else) because I, like almost everyone else in the world, can tell the difference between a game and reality, and because no game can ever influence me to place my morals and judgment on hold in the real world.
You know what else - even my daughter can tell a video game from the real world, and she's only FIVE!
"You wouldn’t let a six-year-old watch something like, say, any horror films, correct?"
Sure I would. If my daughter was six and she asked me if she could watch Halloween for example (or any horror film) I'd ask her if she was sure she wanted to watch it, and if she said yes I'd put it on and we'd watch it together. I'm pretty sure she'd balk at it part way through, but I'm not going to censor her. Heck, she may enjoy it.
Indeed a fake. The real deal always capitalizes,adds slashes when not needed, and labels himself an attorney(And will likely continue to after disbarment)
Watch the real one fire off twelve emails for not controling the posters.
@the article.
Where were all these intelligent politicians when this started?
My ma says the first movie I ever watched was Nightmare on Elm Street when I was 'bout a year old. I've been a horror fan all my life thanks to that film, and despite the fact that I have super deadly nightmare powers, I have never actually used them on anyone. I also watched Fist of the North Star (the anime one, not the lame live action one) when I was about six or so. That film is about as gory as it gets. Google it. You'll see.
The fact is that the issue was brought up when GTA IV was first announced and it hasn't stopped yet. It expanded with the release, but that is to be expected. The issue was here, so he just added his input. But those are just semantics.
I would rather have a politician attempting to educate parents about the ESRB system than having them call for an outright ban. The fact is that this kind of thinking is a good step forwards. He places his belief that M rated games should be kept from children in his statements, but that is to be expected. Politicians act within their beliefs. Personally, I believe that it is up to the parents to decide what is right for their children. But those who realise that a video game won't hurt a child usually don't need a politician to explain the ESRB to them.
Michael Jackson. That's a person who did not come to terms with the world soon enough.
am i right folks?