Rhode Island Attorney General Issues GTA IV Warning

May 4, 2008 -
The attorney general of Rhode Island has warned parents about the mature content in Grand Theft Auto IV, according to Legal Newswire.

Of the best-selling, highly controversial game, A.G. Patrick Lynch (left), a Democrat, said:
As video games become more realistic and in many cases, more violent, parents must become more vigilant before buying them or letting their children use them.

Also, retailers and salespeople have a responsibility to better inform parents how violent these games actually are. Grand Theft Auto IV is obviously rated 'M' for a reason, and parents need to keep a game like this away from their kids.

In August, 2007, GamePolitics reported that Lynch had joined with the ESRB in an effort to educate parents about the video game industry's content rating system.

Comments

Heh. Hehhehhehhehhehheh. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Oh the wonders of rationality! How SPLENDID!

Well, duh, however it seems that common sense isn't all that common.




*bets against Zelnick getting arrested*

Hey, what is this guy doing in politics? Politicians are supposed to blow things out of perspective, make rash judgements, use ninth hand information to propose laws about video games, and assume it is up to the publishers to prevent kids from buying the games. This type of common sense and rational reasoning doesn't belong any place in government. And expecting the parents to be involved with their children past the age of four? Insanity.

Play Soldier of Fortune. Nuff said.

Finally, one with a brain in his head..

*sigh*

I'm glad it's officials asking parents to be more vigilant rather than decrying the outrageous "filth" on our screens, but any salesperson with a shred of common sense should be checking that parents are ok with the game anyway. We had some left in store this weekend, and I made an effort that every person who seemed to be buying it for their kids was aware of the content of the game. Some were a bit surprised, but still let them have it. That's fine by me, as long as they don't come back instore and start screaming about it to me.

seems nice.

how old is he?

cool some common sense.

rare to see!

^^^ Hear hear.

Finally someone speaking some sense on the issue.


*grabs Jack Thompson and shoves his noise in the common sense*
It's the parents, stupid!

I gotta say, I like this guy.
It's good to see a lawyer with a brain.

Why do politicians need to tell parents the obvious??? I think after 11 years people would know that this game series is not for kids.

All of this hoopla against GTA IV is just plain silly. There is all kinds of misinformation about games and this game inparticular. If you want to see some interesting paralles and get a good laugh go rent "Reefer Madness" and you'll see the same type of manufactured hysteria. I swear, its fear mongers like Jack Thompson stirring up the sheep (uneducated right wingers and Faux News). Get a life losers.

[...] wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptThe attorney general of Rhode Island has warned parents about the mature content in Grand Theft Auto IV, according to Legal Newswire. Of the best-selling, highly controversial game, A.G. Patrick Lynch (left), a Democrat, said: As video games become more realistic and in many cases, more violent, parents must become more vigilant before buying them or letting their children use them. Also, retailers and salespeople have a responsibility to better inform parents how violent these games actually are. Grand Theft Auto IV is obviously rated ‘M’ for a reason, and parents need to keep a game like this away from their kids. [...]

so my eb games id'd everyone who bought the game including people well into there 40's and anyone over the age of 30 was asked if they were buying it for their kids.

"you do realize the second mission consists of you mass murdering a group of prostitues and slaugtering police in your escape attempt."

not very accurate but effective nonetheless

I see nothing wrong with what he said. Why can't Jack Thompson learn to talk in this kind of fashion instead of ridiculous lawsuits.

Is it just me or does he look like he isnt old enough to purchase the game himself?

Calling the parents and retailers to be aware of what their kids are playing while not even mentioning the developer/publisher?! Holy common sense in a politcian, Batman! His youthful appearance may not be coincidental.

Ugh. Enough with the goddamn frenzy!!! Any parent who doesn't already know about GTA is a goddamn recluse and needs to get out more. Or at least get a TV.

This is what we want to see. Or is it?

As the people above have already said, we shouldn't need politicians to tell us the obvious. I guess most people are just too content with letting others decide for them. Sad, true, but hopefully it can be changed.

Next up, a warning that water is wet and submerging your head/face in it can cause drowning.

HAHA! Like that episode of DethKlock Metalocalypse where a bunch of dumbshits sue Dethklock because their song "Go Into the Water" inspired them to breathe water. That sorta sums up the whole controversy, doesn't it?

When I was younger my mother bought me a Nintendo 64, she would only buy me E or T games...she understood M rated games werent for my age bracket, she also paid close attention to what was in the T rated games. If my mom understood the ESRB system how come its so hard for other people to? Especially this day and age with all the ESRB education panphlets.

Because people are lazy these days and don't want to take the time to read them.

Looks like this one has his head screwed on straight. Still, it seems odd that such a simple content rating system has to be taught to parents.

While in general, lawyers are much more damaging to society than any game, at least he makes a good statement without trying to bring down an iron fist and tell people what to do.

Rhode Islanders, keep this guy in office. The only way we are going to keep winning little battles like this is if we all remain politically vigilant.

Great message!!!

I support it 100%.

A moderate message from a lawyer?

Whatever next?

Strauss Zelnick will be arrested for porn trafficking to minors. Bet on it.

Hey, at least he's not being a D-bag about it. He's just giving a realistic warning about something that's not meant for kids.

@jack thompson

I really wish you were Thompson, we could have a fun conversation. Unfortunately from what I hear he's blocked from posting on this site.

I'm pretty sure the one who posted the message isn't the REAL Jack Thompson, because this fake missed Jack's favorite label: Attorney.

Back the the news, this is the kind of news I love to see: important persons who uses common sense.

Oh, and I would like to make a prediction: Most parents will either ignore this or take offense, saying he's trying to raise their children, whilst they simultainiously cede their parental rights over to crazy broads like Hillary Clinton. Oh the irony.

This is evidence that our generation is starting to take the helm. You know, people who have played video games and know how to convey relevant information.

It reinforces the happiness I experience when I think about how all the misinformed/uninformed, that are in power, are on their way out.

Witnessing positive change is so cool!

An educated response from an educated politician, there are so few of them nowadays

this guy looks pretty young...that explains a lot

I'm confused. Why do parents need to keep games like this away from kids? There has never been ANY evidence at all of ANY link between violent video games and violent behaviour. I mean he's saying that kids need to be kept away from completely harmless entertainment. Doesn't this guy have better things to do with his time than warning people about entirely harmless stuff? And those who are praising him for his more even-handed approach (i.e. praising the fact that he isn't acting like the Witchfinder General as other attorneys general - i.e. Elliot Spitzer - have) are kind of missing the point that this politician is wasting public resources by bringing up this non-issue. I mean what does it take for some folks to realise that politicians like this are wasting our tax money chasing wild geese?

It's still hillarious/sad that politicians need to issue a "warning" over a freakin' videogame.

@ Ian Cooper

I agree with you in context, but in context only. You wouldn't let a six-year-old watch something like, say, any horror films, correct? The same would be said for something like Resident Evil.

Now, say, along the lines of a 14-16 year-olds, that's where parents can step in and choose depending upon the development of their individual child which, for some reason, politicians of most shapes and sizes don't seem to get. If specific parents sheltered their child and they're traumatized at the sight of blood, they wouldn't want said child to get something like Mortal Kombat. If, however, the actually succeeded in starting to prepare their child for the real world, (you know, like parents are supposed to do, just give bits in gradual doses. Baby steps.) they might buy it for them despite the M rating, because, contrary to the belief of the inept, the human mind does not sit in an eggshell until the magic age of 18.

Sorry, afterthought to my previous post.

What most people seem to do is that they fail to scrutinize what they mean by 'kids' and 'children.' However, i think i can speak for everyone here when i say that the mind of a 3-year-old is leaps and bounds different than that of 16, so bounding them together within the same context is... well... you get the idea.

By the way, tomorrow I'm going to do the responsible adult thing and let my 5 year-old daughter play GTA IV. She will play the game, wander the streets of Liberty City without engaging in any violence at all and be as happy as can be playing the game nonviolently. She might even get into a car and drive happily and very slowly and carefully around the neighborhoods. This will prove (at least to me) that the ratings system is nonsense, that all the hoopla and negative publicity about this game is nonsense and that politicians who are using this as a political football need to get a life and start worrying about REAL issues.

Later in the day, I'll play the game. I'll doubtless kill numerous simulated cops, simulated innocent people and simulated prostitutes, I'll steal, I'll commit mass murder, I may even have simulated sex in the game with the simulated prostitutes, then in the real world I'll behave quite normally without harming or stealing from anyone and without cheating on my wife with a prostitute (or anyone else) because I, like almost everyone else in the world, can tell the difference between a game and reality, and because no game can ever influence me to place my morals and judgment on hold in the real world.

You know what else - even my daughter can tell a video game from the real world, and she's only FIVE!

DavCube Says:
"You wouldn’t let a six-year-old watch something like, say, any horror films, correct?"

Sure I would. If my daughter was six and she asked me if she could watch Halloween for example (or any horror film) I'd ask her if she was sure she wanted to watch it, and if she said yes I'd put it on and we'd watch it together. I'm pretty sure she'd balk at it part way through, but I'm not going to censor her. Heck, she may enjoy it.

@Jack Wessels

Indeed a fake. The real deal always capitalizes,adds slashes when not needed, and labels himself an attorney(And will likely continue to after disbarment)

Watch the real one fire off twelve emails for not controling the posters.

@the article.

Where were all these intelligent politicians when this started?

@Ian Cooper

My ma says the first movie I ever watched was Nightmare on Elm Street when I was 'bout a year old. I've been a horror fan all my life thanks to that film, and despite the fact that I have super deadly nightmare powers, I have never actually used them on anyone. I also watched Fist of the North Star (the anime one, not the lame live action one) when I was about six or so. That film is about as gory as it gets. Google it. You'll see.

@ Ian Cooper:

The fact is that the issue was brought up when GTA IV was first announced and it hasn't stopped yet. It expanded with the release, but that is to be expected. The issue was here, so he just added his input. But those are just semantics.

I would rather have a politician attempting to educate parents about the ESRB system than having them call for an outright ban. The fact is that this kind of thinking is a good step forwards. He places his belief that M rated games should be kept from children in his statements, but that is to be expected. Politicians act within their beliefs. Personally, I believe that it is up to the parents to decide what is right for their children. But those who realise that a video game won't hurt a child usually don't need a politician to explain the ESRB to them.

I'm planning on introducing my daughter to horror films at a young age. At its heart every horror film is slapstick comedy and as long as the kid understands it's not real and isn't going to get horrible nightmares I think there's nothing at all wrong in showing kids slasher flicks. Then again, I treat my kid with a lot more respect than most parents - I don't treat her like a delicate flower, sheltering her from every stupid societal taboo (like horror movies, comic books and video games), and she's a lot more mature because of it. If she tells me she can handle stuff I don't second-guess her, I let her prove it to me. If she can indeed handle the stuff I help her to see what's good about it and what may be not so good. This is how kids grow and it's how we expose kids to every other aspect of their learning. I do not believe in sheltering a kid from everything until he or she is eighteen and then just throwing him or her in the deep end - THAT, in my view, would be irresponsible and I bet many kids who grew up in an ultra-sheltered environment ended up with a lot more problems than those who were exposed to the real world naturally as the issues came up.

@Ian Cooper

Michael Jackson. That's a person who did not come to terms with the world soon enough.

well... at least he's not scare mongering. For once its nice to see someone not mentioning the words 'murder simulator' or 'school shooting'

am i right folks?

My parents wanted to shelter me, but that fell apart when I watched Robo Cop at a neighbor kids house. My parents then became what Ian Cooper has described. If we watched a scary sci-fi movie, action flick (my dad loves Commando with The Governator), or anything else, we would talk about it. Talking about these things with your kids is the best thing to do. For me, I felt respected when my parents had discussions about current issues with me and listened to my opinion. They've never really treated me like some kid when I was younger, of course unless I did something to deserve their fury. Heh, the good ol' days.
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Michael ChandraSo really the guy's own words strike me as "wah! How dare you disagree with me!" behaviour, which is the sort of childish attitude I am unfortunately not surprised by.10/20/2014 - 2:17pm
Michael ChandraCorrect AE, but then again the owner's own words are about "wishes", not about an order. No "we told him not to", but going against his wishes.10/20/2014 - 2:16pm
Matthew Wilsonyup. sadly that has been true for awhile.10/20/2014 - 2:10pm
james_fudgewelcome to 2014 politics. Increasingly fought online10/20/2014 - 1:54pm
E. Zachary KnightIt is honestly a shame that anyone has to publicly state they are against such vile behavior, but that is the sad life we live.10/20/2014 - 1:46pm
E. Zachary KnightDecided to publicly reiterate my opposition to harassment campaigns. http://randomtower.com/2014/10/just-stop-with-the-harassment-and-bullying-campaigns-already/10/20/2014 - 1:45pm
Andrew EisenMichael Chandra - Unless I overlooked it, we haven't seen how the directive to not talk about whatever he wasn't supposed to talk about was phrased so it’s hard to say if it could have been misconstrued as a suggestion or not.10/20/2014 - 12:35pm
Andrew EisenHey, the second to last link is the relevant one! He actually did say "let them suffer." Although, he didn't say it to the other person he was bickering with.10/20/2014 - 12:29pm
Neo_DrKefkahttps://archive.today/F14zZ https://archive.today/SxFas https://archive.today/1upoI https://archive.today/0hu7i https://archive.today/NsPUC https://archive.today/fLTQv https://archive.today/Wpz8S10/20/2014 - 11:21am
Andrew EisenNeo_DrKefka - "Attacking"? Interesting choice of words. Also interesting that you quoted something that wasn't actually said. Leaving out a relevant link, are you?10/20/2014 - 11:04am
quiknkoldugh. I want to know why the hell Mozerella Sticks are 4 dollars at my works cafeteria...are they cooked in Truffle Oil?10/20/2014 - 10:41am
Neo_DrKefkaAnti-Gamergate supporter Robert Caruso attacks female GamerGate supporter by also attacking another cause she support which is the situation happening in Syia “LET SYRIANS SUFFER” https://archive.today/F14zZ https://archive.today/Wpz8S10/20/2014 - 10:18am
Neo_DrKefkaThat is correct in an At-Will state you or the employer can part ways at any time. However Florida also has laws on the books about "Wrongful combinations against workers" http://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2012/448.04510/20/2014 - 10:07am
james_fudgehe'd die if he couldn't talk about Wii U :)10/20/2014 - 9:16am
Michael ChandraBy the way, I am not saying Andrew should stop talking about Wii-U. I find it quite nice. :)10/20/2014 - 8:53am
Michael Chandra'How dare he ignore my wishes and my advice! I am his boss! I could have ordered him but I should be able to say it's advice rather than ordering him directly!'10/20/2014 - 8:52am
Michael ChandraIf GP goes "EZK, do not talk about X publicly for a week, we're preparing a big article on it" and he still tweets about X, they'd have a legitimate reason to be pissed.10/20/2014 - 8:52am
Michael ChandraIf GP tells Andrew "we'd kinda prefer it if you stopped talking about Wii-U for 1 week" and he'd tweet about it anyway, firing him for it would be idiotic.10/20/2014 - 8:51am
Michael ChandraLegal right, sure. But that doesn't make it any less pathetic of an excuse.10/20/2014 - 8:50am
ZippyDSMleeYou mean right to fire states.10/20/2014 - 8:50am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician