GameCyte Soliciting Questions for Sen. Leland Yee

GameCyte Soliciting Questions for Sen. Leland Yee

May 7, 2008
GameCyte has scored a video interview with California State Sen. Leland Yee (D), and is soliciting questions for Yee from readers.

The Senator, a child psychologist and frequent critic of video game violence, is the architect of California's 2005 video game law, which was overturned by a U.S. District Court judge last year. California has appealed the decision. From GameCyte:
In the interests of stimulating mature discussion about video game violence, GameCyte contacted the offices of California State Senator Leland Yee, an outspoken critic of Rockstar and the ESRB — and received a rather unique opportunity. Want to know if the Senator really saw GTA IV before denouncing it? How Senator Yee feels about current game regulation? What he thinks adults should be able to play? Just ask.

GameCyte readers and fellow gaming journalists are invited to pose questions which the Senator will answer on camera next week, the resulting video to be available here and freely distributed to other interested game publications.

GP: If you want to suggest a question for Sen. Yee, you should jump over to GameCyte...

Comments

Someone needs to ask him how he feels about the movie industry's lack of enforcement of their R rating.
There's plenty I'd like to ask people LIKE Leland Yee.. but as a Canadian, Leland Yee himself is irrelevant to me.

I'd be curious to know how he thinks he is helping his constituents or his state/country by trying to rob them of their first amendment rights.
WHAT... is your name?

WHAT... is your quest?

WHAT... is your opinion of legally enforcing movie and DVD ratings?


AAAAAAAAAAAAARGH!
[...] wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptGameCyte has scored a video interview with California State Sen. Leland Yee (D), and is soliciting questions for Yee from readers. The Senator, a child psychiatrist and frequent critic of video game violence, is the architect of California’s 2005 video game law, which was overturned by a U.S. District Court judge last year. California has appealed the decision. From GameCyte: In the interests of stimulating mature discussion about video game violence, GameCyte contacted the offices of California State Senator Leland Yee, an outspoken critic of Rockstar and the ESRB — and received a rather unique opportunity. Want to know if the Senator really saw GTA IV before denouncing it? How Senator Yee feels about current game regulation? What he thinks adults should be able to play? Just ask. [...]
Perhaps the shortest & most important question is: "Dude, WTF????"

Slightly longer ones would be "Exactly which studies prove a link between games & violence & who were they written by?". Frankly I think that's the most important question, if he can't answer he should sit down & shut the hell up.

Also, they should ask him if he's managed to shag that Kate chick in GTA4, she's still thinking of me as "A friend".

Ooh or maybe they could ask if he's seen the mission where you murder Jack Thompson, that mission DOES exist doesn't it? Jacky wouldn't lie would he?
"Are you prepared to issue a public apology to your constituents, the ESRB, Rockstar, taxpayers, and responsible gamers at large if another sufficiently funded and executed study concludes that there is no palpable link between video games and aberrant (or 'violent') behavior?

And also sir, Considering your background as a child psychiatrist, do you have any comments regarding the psychotropic drug treatments that are quite frequently prescribed to the individuals who exhibit massive violent outbursts, perpetrate school shootings, and commit infanticide?

In closing, permit me to add.. "You are a douche clown." That is all, I thank you for your time, Senator."
@Alias:
It kind of exists. There is a lawyer who is considered a moral crusader. But he never says the line, 'Guns don't kill people, video games do.' Or at least he didn't to me. And I held the gun on him for a good five minutes hoping he would say it.
Dear Mr Yee,
I went to pick up my GTA IV about a week back, and was asked for my ID (totally unreasonable, mind you, I'm old enough no one should ID me ever.), which I promptly, though grudgingly, presented. I got my game, rated M, and went home to play it.

I went to the movie theater the other day, at 2330, to see a movie. I saw Forgetting Sarah Marshall, which had full frontal MALE nudity, nipples exposed, etc, etc. It was, obviously, rated R. While watching, I had a group of insufferable 13 year old children sitting in front of me who would not shut the hell up. Their parents were nowhere in sight. I talked to the usher (a friend of mine, as I go see two movies a week minimum), and he ejected all 5 kids, after about an hour and 10 minutes of the movie.

Tell me: Which side let down the children? Gamestop, where my ID was checked by a man who knew me, or the movie theater, where 5 kids bought tickets to an R rated movie when they were OBVIOUSLY too young?
Please note, this story is not anecdotal, but representative of the problem. Theater's don't have to, and often don't, check ID. Game stores often do.
"Mr. Yee. Admist all the controversy surrounding video games, could you please tell me just what you are actually hoping to achieve?
Is it the protection of children from violence? If it is, then there are many other and more effective ways to do that. If it is the Glamorization of violence, then why not take to task the movie studios, TV networks, music studios etc... as well?
What do you think about the fact that there have been 9 attempts to ban or censor video games. And they have all been stricken down on constitutional grounds as violations of the First Amendment?"

Do I need to send this to Gamecyte or will they get it here?

Personally I just think he's doing the bandwagon thing for his career.
And also sir, Considering your background as a child psychiatrist, do you have any comments regarding the psychotropic drug treatments that are quite frequently prescribed to the individuals WHO LATER, exhibit massive violent outbursts, perpetrate school shootings, and commit infanticide?

Wtf do I have to do for an edit button?
@Rhade
What WOULD you do for an edit button?

Also,
What Would you do for a Klondike bar?
"were you born an uninformed pompous douchebag or did it take years or hard work and dedication?"

"what does JT's wang taste like?'
An excellent question would be, "You've continually stated a link between video game violence and violence in society. Would you please state and cite your sources where you found these links?" another would be, "How many California voters have asked you, in writing, to persue this action?"

Those questions press on his integrity as a senator for the state of California.

Whatever questions are asked they need to be objective.
My question: Why are you a douchebag?
If you ask about the studies, prepare for him to reply with mentioning the AMA study which one of the people in charge later came out on GP and said the findings were being twisted and misused... Or something like that.
Well I think either way, its a step in the right direction, although it remains to be seen how he actually handles our questions and the selection of them, they might intentionally pick ones that he can answer, or pick immature questions he can make an example of, or just in general ones he can easily argue against.


Anyways this is what I asked, im at work so it was just something I typed up real quick




"Mr Yee. My name is Timothy Anderson, I am 19 years old and reside in Minneapolis Minnesota.

I, as well as my friends and girlfriend, have been playing violent video games for the larger portion of my life and neither I, nor any of those whom I associate with, have ever been in any trouble with the law to any extent other than perhaps a parking ticket, and certainly no violent offenses of any kind to speak of.

Now I know this is not neccasarily evidence of anything sir, and its probably something many others will/have written in other questions to you, but I thought it was important to establish.

My question is simply, have you read, in detail, the so called studies that attempt to establish a link whatsoever between violent video games and the increased aggresion and/or desensitization of or to violent behavior?

If so, have you read the book Grand Theft Childhood? The book in which two harvard graduates conduct a large scale study (and one in my opinion much more proper, scientifically speaking and without a clear bias) That shows that not only is their no evidence showing such a correlation but to some extent, actually shows the oposite to be true.

And If you have, what were your thoughts on the book, its authors, and the way they conducted their study?



Thank you for your time sir."
I should have fixed it up a bit more before submission, they dont have an edit button either.
This sounds good.
Why can politicians do things ten times worse than whats in this game and get away with a slap on the wrist and giving themselves raises?

That would be my question.
I left some questions for the Senator. Hopefully, I'll get some answers...
Leland Yee has already proven that facts don't matter compared to his agenda.

Color me unimpressed-he's still a greater danger to the video game industry than Johnny Bruce Thompson ever will be. He will dance around the issues (as he has in the past) that he doesn't agree with, but will stick to his beliefs and he will not drop his appeal of his failed "nanny-state" legislation, while somehow endorsing first amendment rights for college newspapers.

Meanwhile, the state of Kah-lee-phone-eeya will lose $300K due to his bad behavior to the video game industry for fighting such unconstitutional legislation.

"So Yee, how does it feel to have to keep fighting your unconstitutional California law to censor video games up to the appeals court since you could not get it approved at the local level? Are you prepared to waste more taxpayer dollars to get it to the supreme court of the USA if necessary? What do you know that MULTIPLE Federal judges do not, concerning first amendment rights for video game media and the constitution?"
For me, I would love an AO rated game, but NOT at the expence to the Videogame Industry loosing money for a game that they could not sell because of the AO rating.

That is the real difference between you and me Sen Yee, I respect the hard work that Videogame Developers, Publishers, Console manufactures and the ESRB.

It is clear that the longer you try to hold onto your bias beliefs about Videogames making kids go out and kill people or that you want an AO rating for certain games will never chance the fact that you Senator have NO RESPECT for the Videogame Industry.
Re:

I think you are totally right here. Play games

Re: GameCyte Soliciting Questions for Sen. Leland Yee
All these violent games, the media, the movies and what they see on the street, turns innocent kids into vandals and criminals. We should stop the violence. ___ Johanna Bartley, Drug Rehab Volunteer.
Re: GameCyte Soliciting Questions for Sen. Leland Yee

Yes I agree, it all sounds good - earth4energy

Re: GameCyte Soliciting Questions for Sen. Leland Yee

As a parent, I totally agree with the Senator's actions.


Re: GameCyte Soliciting Questions for Sen. Leland Yee

Well, isn't the Senator violating freedom of speech then??

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
earth4energy - Learn how to reduce monthly energy costs.

Re: GameCyte Soliciting Questions for Sen. Leland Yee


That guy looks like a douche.

Earth4Energy

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 11/08/09 at 09:02am
DarkSaber: http://tinyurl.com/yez7jyo
Posted 11/08/09 at 09:01am
DarkSaber: Oh for gods sake, the Gearbox pres is gobbing off about Valve again
Posted 11/08/09 at 08:53am
JDKJ: But cheer up, Austin. If the unemployment rate continues to double-digit as predicted for the next few years, your half-dozen stands a better than likely chance of returning to power.
Posted 11/08/09 at 08:46am
JDKJ: @DS: If he had added the line about "or hiring illegals aliens under the table to work as nannies," it would have been a completely perfect descripition. And, yes, it's about the same difference between a six and a half-dozen.
Posted 11/08/09 at 08:31am
DarkSaber: My god, that description makes them sound almost Republican. Still what did you expect, Obama is only marginally more left than republicans.
Posted 11/08/09 at 01:07am
Austin_Lewis: Health insurance, brought to you by the same kind of bureacrats who couldn't, in timely fashion, investigate the comments of any of the men Obama appointed Czars. Or their past. Or their history of not paying taxes.
Posted 11/08/09 at 01:06am
Austin_Lewis: Yes, and what a piece of crap it was. Arresting and fining people just because they don't make a personal choice to buy healh insurance, creating over a hundred new bureacracies, and worse.
Posted 11/08/09 at 12:24am
ZippyDSMlee: JDKJ:the only trouble is a bunch of witless hacks wrote it....its going to be a train wreck....
Posted 11/07/09 at 11:33pm
JDKJ: BREAKING: In a photo-finish at the wire, House passes health care reform bill. Relatedly, in a fit of pique, Austin Lewis kicks innocent dog.
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:27pm
ZippyDSMlee: man I got alot of junk and dup files too >< god I need orginization...and no not the knee capping media mafia kind :P
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:26pm
ZippyDSMlee: replaced :P
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:23pm
ZippyDSMlee: beemoh:hey its like 60GB porn,400GB anime 100GB games and crap I have took from all my DVDs, I hate waiting on dvds to install stuff..... oh and 40GB of my porn was in the found.000 folder...mostly corrupted.... least I got names of wut needs to be repa
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:18pm
beemoh: @Zip: ...and you'd have to spend all that time re-downloading that porn?
Posted 11/07/09 at 03:34pm
ZippyDSMlee: ggrrrrr......vista lost one of my hard drives and I had a heart attack thinking I lost 1TB of data....
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:58am
JDKJ: Which could be explained by both (a) and (b).
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:56am
Austin_Lewis: JDKJ: You forgot C) the fact that, for some reason, every time he did something that would suggest he shouldn't be in the military, let alone an officer, higher ups ignored it or let it slide.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:51am
JDKJ: Part of the problem is, I believe, that (a) the Army had a lot of time and money already invested in him and which they were unwilling to simply write-off and (b) an increasing need for the type of skills and services he provided.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:48am
JDKJ: And that even if he was begging not to get cut loose, he was apparently a real good candidate for being cut loose, anyway.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:11am
JDKJ: @chada: And while Kennedy once noted that there's usually more than enough blame for everyone to get a slice, the possibility that the Army was unwilling to cut loose someone who was asking to get cut loose could be a factor.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:07am
ZippyDSMlee: *noms on his feet*..nomnomnomnom*droooll* ...wuuutttttt uuu looking at?
Login or register to post shouts