EA Gets a Loan for T2 Takeover War Chest; Pachter Explains What it Means

EA Gets a Loan for T2 Takeover War Chest; Pachter Explains What it Means

May 10, 2008
Electronic Arts issued a press release late yesterday announcing that it had secured a line of credit of up to a billion dollars to fund its hostile takeover bid for Take-Two Interactive.

The money will come from Morgan Stanley, the Bank of Nova Scotia and several other financial institutions.

With GP challenged by balancing his checkbook, we turned to Wedbush-Morgan analyst Michael Pachter (left), who explained what EA is up to:
It is something that should be expected.  After [the acquisition of] Pandemic/BioWare, EA has only around $1.7 billion in available cash... The Take-Two deal is around $2.1 billion... so they’re short.  They also probably need around $400 million in available cash for working capital needs, so they need to raise around $800 million to complete the deal.  The extra $200 million is just a cushion, although I suppose it could be construed as how much higher they’re willing to go [for Take-Two]...
 
The timing isn’t particularly unusual, a bit later than I would have thought, as they should have started the process on March 13 (when they went hostile).  However, I have no experience in credit markets like we’re experiencing now, so maybe it’s normal to take 8 weeks to get something like this done.  It’s also possible that they waited for their new CFO [Eric Brown] to start in order to allow him to negotiate terms...
 
I would not read any significance into the filing, other than to say that if they want to raise their offer price [for Take Two], they will likely need a higher credit line...

Comments

Interesting that a Canadian bank is financing the deal. We haven't been hit as hard with the credit crunch up here...
Well looks like GTA IV will be the last good GTA and say bye bye to Manhunt 3. It will get Thrill Kill'd by EA. :(
If EA does go under, wouldn't that make their licensing deals null and void? Specifically the NFL one where 2K can go back to making the good games.
What about all the "penises and vaginas" in Sims 2. Also It's ability to show pedophiles naked children parts and the "patch" that takes the blur away to show "full intercourse".
JT and EA have had their share of feuds in the past. I think that EA might bend a little more to political pressure. Hopefully whatever members of T2 that remain stand strong in the games they produce.
Why cant EA face it. They are not going to win and nobody likes them.
Message to EA: LEAVE T2 ALONE DAMN IT!
Just because EA has acquired a line of credit to help buy Take 2, that doesn't mean they'll succeed at doing so. This is just them keeping the issue in the spotlight. There's still FTC competition concerns they have to deal with (not that the FTC has ever really cared about maintaining competition) and when they tried to get a hostile vote at Take 2's last shareholders meeting, they got less than 10% of the votes they needed. Right now Take 2 shareholders don't believe being bought by EA is a good deal, particularly when GTA4 is selling even better than they predicted. Pachter says it's inevitible but he's also been wrong as much as he's been right. Just because gaming sites keep giving him attention doesn't mean it's going to happen.
@Jack Thompson, Attorney

You really are just a jerk.

Little more than a /b/tard
@Freyar

What I do take offense to is that she doesn’t take the approach of a parent and actually put a limitation on her son’s renting habits.

Huh? As far as I can tell, he wanted to buy it, she was willing to let him rent it and take a look at it. Presumably once she looked at it and decided she didn't like it, it went back to the rental store after the rental time was up and that was that.

Seems fairly reasonable to me, rent it check it out, and at least let her son conclude the story before returning it. The only stupid part is then proceeding to complain about game equivalent to crime movies like the Godfather, or TV shows like the Sopranos.
Well, at least I know now what ending to go for when I play GTA IV whne it coes out on PC (hopefully). I think I'll let go for the one where Niko's cousin buys it. I'd rather keep my girlfriend. Gotta look out for number 1 after all. ;)
three things I like most about GTA 4

Doing anything with Packie, especially when he's drunk and ranting on his tangents.

Brucie. I don't need to say anymore.

Lil' Jacob. One love.

BANE XXIII

Minneapolis, MN
[...] wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptElectronic Arts issued a press release late yesterday announcing that it had secured a line of credit of up to a billion dollars to fund its hostile takeover bid for Take-Two Interactive.The money will come from Morgan Stanley, the Bank of Nova Scotia and several other institutions. With GP challenged by balancing his checkbook, we turned to Wedbush-Morgan analyst Michael Pachter (left), who explained what EA is up to: It is something that should be expected.  After Pandemic/BioWare, EA has only around $1.7 billion in available cash… The Take-Two deal is around $2.1 billion… so they’re short.  They also probably need around $400 million in available cash for working capital needs, so they need to raise around $800 million to complete the deal.  The extra $200 million is just a cushion, although I suppose it could be construed as how much higher they’re willing to go…   The timing isn’t particularly unusual, a bit later than I […] [...]
I hope they fail somehow.

For a while i thought EA was slowly changing thier ways, but the recent mass effect/spore DRM fiasco has shown them to be back to thier evil ways.

EA taking over T2 would be bad for everyone except shareholders. EA will certainly mess around with GTA to some degree, whilst giving themselves total monopoly over sports games.
Will the last person to leave Rockstar please turn the lights off?
$1,000,000,000.00

Why do I picture the CEO of EA with his pinky finger up to his mouth... you know... Dr. Evil style.
I think from Take Two's stockholder view, I wouldn't sell anything until the GTA4 sales slow down.
@ koichan

I hope they fail to acquire T2. I hope they don't acquire them and then fail.
DammitDammitDammitDammitDammitDammitDammitDammitDammitDammitDammitDammitDammit...
I agree with Koichan. EA was starting to look better a while back.
I'm going to laugh when EA buys T2 and then goes bankrupt due to their huge debt.
Watch out everybody, get ready for the next video game crash of 1983!
@jb:

That just made my day. xD
@jb

We shall hold the gamers ransom for *dududadadunn* ONE BEELION DOLLARS! /pinky
@DarknessDeku It's as if you read my mind.....with so many taker overs by EA and EA holding a large portion of companies...if EA was to ever go under....we'd be really hurting.
Won't surprise me if EA caves to political pressure easier.
@ Altair

I hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate HATE EA!
@JB

That's exactly what I was thinking!
Man, they can't take a hint can they? EA needs a good swift kick in the rear.
[...] wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptElectronic Arts issued a press release late yesterday announcing that it had secured a line of credit of up to a billion dollars to fund its hostile takeover bid for Take-Two Interactive. The money will come from Morgan Stanley, the Bank of Nova Scotia and several other financial institutions. With GP challenged by balancing his checkbook, we turned to Wedbush-Morgan analyst Michael Pachter (left), who explained what EA is up to: It is something that should be expected.  After [the acquisition of] Pandemic/BioWare, EA has only around $1.7 billion in available cash… The Take-Two deal is around $2.1 billion… so they’re short.  They also probably need around $400 million in available cash for working capital needs, so they need to raise around $800 million to complete the deal.  The extra $200 million is just a cushion, although I suppose it could be construed as how much higher they’re willing to go [for Take-Two]…   The timing isn’t particularly unusual, […] [...]
Does this mean Jack thompson is going to go after EA now instead of take-two.

Quick Jack find and befriend a lawyer who knows the monopoly laws in this country unless you want take-two to be a lot harder to get rid of.
@Father Time

Actually, I think he knows EA's track record of ruining whatever they acquire, so he was openly advertising he'd be trying to influence the shareholders.
After bioshock was so much BS and chips let them have TT
>>
Can we ban the 1gamezone.net spam bot already?
..
though I do believe JT's first comment toward EA will be "Now that you've acquired Rockstar, you know what you must do". To which EA's response will be along the lines of "Make tons of money off it!"
i can see it now... Grand Theft Sims...

ick....if they do it, i'm never buying EA again...
@JohnnyD

Also, the Canadian banks are doing a lot better because of how strong the Canadian dollar is versus the American dollar. If the dollar gets stronger by the time the loan is paid off, the Canadian bank will be making tons of money off of this.
I think EA might be good in the long run for gta.

now hear me out first. EA has been known to get this FIGHT for ther franchises. this means whenever jack,lee or ptc, bullshit them. they will be stomped. and ricctello says all the shit probst did was bad and he won't censor games. I mean look at army of two. every other word was fuck.
also take two rearly defended rockstar. I still dislike EA but the enimye of my enimie is my friend. sorry for the spelling I am sick.
Rockstar Games - think about what your product is
By Susan Estrich
Published: May 7 2008, 11:42 PM
Category: Opinion
Topics: Column, Susan Estrich [Campaign Chairman for Dukakis for Pres.]

Rockstar is the name of the company that is rolling wheelbarrows of money to the bank this week, projected to rack up something on the order of $400 million in revenue from the sale of six million copies of its newest video game sensation, Grand Theft Auto IV.

Between a rock and a hard place is more like how I feel, as the mother of a gamer. So far, they only have a few dollars of my money (or Blockbuster does, anyway), since my deal with my son was to rent, not buy. But there’s no question that our reviews of the latest in this infamous series are not in sync.

He thinks it’s a great new game.

I write for a living and still have difficulty finding the words to describe it. Awful doesn’t begin to do it. From what I’ve heard about the ending (and this is one ending I really would love to spoil), you win by becoming the No. 1 mobster, even if your whole family dies in the process. In one version, so I’m told, your cousin and his bride die in a drive-by shooting at their wedding. In another, your girlfriend gets killed. At least this one doesn’t declare war on all Haitians (which an earlier installment in the series did, until the Haitian community complained), but it’s all about killing, including killing police officers.

Imagine gratuitous violence. Then imagine people with more imagination than you or I have making it more graphic and awful than we could ever dream, and you’re on your way to this new blockbuster entertainment.

A mother I know and respect told me some years ago that if you want your kids to follow your rules, don’t make too many of them, make clear that “no” is really “no,” and as for the rest, go for honesty and communication. I remember asking her what was on her “no” list. She said, three: heroin, cigarettes and motorcycles without helmets. I have a few more than that, but having seen the way kids get around their parents’ bans on video games, Internet content, etc., I’ve settled for full disclosure rather than absolute bans in those departments.

Trying to prove that video games cause violence is a bit like trying to prove that pornography causes crime against women or even that the death penalty deters crime. Figures don’t lie, but people do — and they manipulate, as well. Most people who look at porn or play violent video games live normal, healthy lives, but that doesn’t mean they’re good for you. You can find states that have the death penalty and high murder rates, and states that don’t and have much lower murder rates.

I’m old-fashioned enough to believe in personal responsibility. So, when someone commits an act of violence, I blame the person and believe they should be punished, regardless of deterrence. I do not blame the game they played or the Web site they visited. I also believe in the First Amendment, for adults anyway, which means that it’s not the business of government to tell people what has artistic value and what doesn’t. Kids, on the other hand, are another matter. We’re all responsible for them.

It’s not my son I’m really worried about. He does well in school, follows the important rules and generally gets bored with most video games before they get in the way of life. It’s his generation, the generation that he is going to grow up in and live with, full of kids who take this stuff for granted and spend more time with it than with real life, that worries me. It’s the genius that is being distorted into creating more and worse violence. There’s no question that great minds are behind these games, in terms of creative and technological skill, but think of what else they could be doing. And aren’t.

It’s a shame and a waste, and it portends a generation going down the tubes. “Rockstar,” my you-know-what. Shame on you. You owe the kids who worship you — and line your coffers — better than this garbage.

Susan Estrich is a nationally syndicated columnist.
@ Jack Thompson's Article

Susan Estrich admits that games don't cause violence, but she is still scared that it will "ruin" her son? Not very credible.
What is that, JT?

Oh, and thanks for spoiling the ending. I already finished it thankfully, but people who haven't may not be happy.
@DarknessDeku

Yeah, what's up with that? A little contradictive isn't it?
...I'm trying to find some sort of point in Jack's post.

But seeing as how I am a well-adjusted, logical human being, I'm having difficulty.
Damnit EA, stop being a bunch of tits. No one wants you lording over all of gaming.
Also, GTA Vice City did not "declare war on all hatians". In the game there was text that said "Kill all the Hatian dickheads". This was only refering to IN-GAME hatian GANGSTERS. The Hatian community sorta over-reacted. Also, regarding all the tragedy the character Niko Bellic goes through, tragedy is an important part of any story. It makes a person feel for the character, sort of like in The Godfather or The Sopranos.
Oh and most importantly, what did Jack's post have to do with the EA story? Seems like he just wanted to spoil GTA IV's ending. Sick bastard...
One last thing to add to JT's post, regarding "we're all responsible for children", this Estrich woman meant that we're all responsible for our OWN children, right? I am not responible for other people's children, DAMNIT!
Once again, Mr. Thompson, you exhibit your selective reading skills. I won't bother pointing them out because i know you have more important things to do. (Probably send three more harrassing letters to Judge Tunis by the end of the day, right?)

Oh, and stay on topic. This article has nothing to do with GTA4.

"I write for a living and still have difficulty finding the words to describe it. Awful doesn’t begin to do it. From what I’ve heard about the ending (and this is one ending I really would love to spoil), you win by becoming the No. 1 mobster, even if your whole family dies in the process. In one version, so I’m told, your cousin and his bride die in a drive-by shooting at their wedding. In another, your girlfriend gets killed."

It's called having a STORY. What, you'd prefer that stories never have ANY person die, ever? Stories would become incredibly bland without that, you know. It's motivation for your character to get back at the gangsters that killed their friends and family. Damn, a ten-year-old can understand that even without the violence itself being showed, just the context. I guess NBC should stop running Law & Order because of certain instances where there are drive-by shootings, because the children 'deserve better.'

"At least this one doesn’t declare war on all Haitians (which an earlier installment in the series did, until the Haitian community complained), but it’s all about killing, including killing police officers."

Not this crap again... i'm not even getting into it. Context, people, CONTEXT.
@ Jack

Off topic slightly arent we?

The guy above me is right it is essentially an interactive crime fable, so of course the cops are gonna show up at some point, but because its interacive you don't always have to shot your way out! (Any way why get so uptight over non real police men?)
Oh please no more spoliers Jacky soon to be disbarred Attorney.
What a fucking douchebag. Glad I saw the words GTA4 ending and immediately scrolled down...and the douchenozzle wonders why no one likes him, aside from being an absolute prick in general.
Jack, I refer you to a little story called "Hamlet". It results in the death of almost everyone, and is taught in every school across North America, Europe, and probably other places as well.

Rebuttal?
@Zeke129

Jack calls you a retard in 5...4...3...2...
@ Jack Thompson

Did that have anything to do with the takeover, or do you just like to spam?
Oh, and somebody tell this Susan Estrich lady that I hate her for spoiling the ending.
@ jack

umm... this is about how ea is acquiring take two. and the relevance of the article pretains to ea's hostile takeover how?


beyond that, why doesn't the mom just take the game away SHE'S THE AUTHORITY FIGURE FOR CHRIST'S SAKE!!!
@Jack Thompson, Attorney

Jack, please get a life.
I wish you would drink a knife.
Spend some quality time with your son,
instead of being Prick Number One.

I'm a poetrist!!!
/sarcasm
@Aaron, ditto! Besides, who gives a crap what a Campaign Chairman for epically failed presidential candidate from 20 years ago has to say?
Dear Susan Estrich,

Rockstar does NOT owe the kids a damn thing. GTA IV is a game for adults. Says so right on the package. Maybe you missed it.

Dear Jack,

You're still a douchebag and a bad lawyer. Shouldn't you be spending time with your wife instead of infecting message boards with drivel? After all, isn't it the Florida Bar keeping you from her? (Seems like you have plenty of spare time.)
From: Fake Jake Thompson, Gadfly & Esq.

To: Judge "Country" Joe Farina & Company.

RE: Budget Crisis.

Dear Judge Farina:
Can I call you Joe? Anyway, I have ready with gowing concern the budget crisis that you and your hardy band of rag tag Judges and staff are facing. Much like Washington's army in the winter of 1775, things seem desperate.

May I propose one money saving solution? DO AWAY WITH JUDGE DAVA TUNIS.
SHE WON'T GIVE ME A HAEARING. SHE WON'T RESPOND TO MY MOTIONS. SHE WON'T DO ANYTHING I ASK HER.

She recently asked the Supreme Court for more time to review the transcipt of the trial I had before her. HA.

And HA again. She apparently has nothing more to do than sit around her chambers and think of ways to disbar me. ME! Think of it. The conscience of our community. The lone man standing between you and the evil insidious video game industry. Why if it wasn't for me, you'd have PacMen running wild, and a video gamer running for president. Have you seen the "Go Diego Go" Video Game? Horrible. Destructive. And to make matters worse, Diego has some weird incestuous relationship with his cousin Dora the Explorer. And what does Dora do? She promotes beastiality by running around with some monkey. The whole thing is enough to make you sick.

Anyway, you can save a few bucks by shutting Dava down.
Just an idea.

Your pal.

Fake Jake Thompson, Gadfly & Esq.
[...] Wedbush-Morgan analyst Michael Pachter tried to explain to GamePolitics what EA is playing at by putting itself in to debt for this deal. He told them: “It is something that should be expected. After [the acquisition of] Pandemic/BioWare, EA has only around $1.7 billion in available cash… The Take-Two deal is around $2.1 billion… so they’re short. They also probably need around $400 million in available cash for working capital needs, so they need to raise around $800 million to complete the deal. The extra $200 million is just a cushion, although I suppose it could be construed as how much higher they’re willing to go [for Take-Two]…” [...]
I'd go so far as to say that Rockstar doesn't owe anybody a damned thing. We buy their products because we enjoy them. The same reason why many people refuse to buy EAs products, as well as their massive greed. Hence their desire to acquire Take Two, they believe that more people would buy from them if the incorporated T2 into their fold. They would effectively get rid of what was left of their competition with this merger and have a monopoly on almost all sports game. They would want to tone down any Rockstar games as well. Customers would eventually have to numb to the changes that would take place.

This is bad for everybody except EA.
I don't think they would tone them down. there is too much at stake.
@ Jack Thompson.

Wow, You just don't realize it yet do you? You fucking Fail at everything. I got to the part where she said she would gladly spoil the ending and skipped all the way to the end.

Mr. Thompson,
I have no word to describe the anger I'm feeling right now toward you. You wonder why Any self-respecting Adult, and young adults hate you? Have you even begun to comprehend the amount of bad karma you've accumulated over the years?

Pray that you never have to come to Minnesota, Pray that I will never meet you. I'll destroy your arguments word for word, Point for point.

But I doubt you will ever have the Balls for such a Debate.

BANE XXIII

Minneapolis, MN
Jacky the jokeman's latest non-sequitur shows how much of an idealogical prostitute he really is, flying the flag of a very left-wing demagogue for everyone to see. Do a simple search on Susan Estrich and you'll see my point.

On an aside, has anyone ever had the unfortunate experience of seeing or hearing Susan Estrich? To quote Austin Powers:

THAT'S A MAN BABY!
It's really too bad that John Thompson does what a normal in-"tard"web troll does and just spam his opinion in any thread that even mentions Rockstar, Take Two, or GTA 4.

I really don't see any real statement that I take offense to from Mrs./Ms. Estrich. What I do take offense to is that she doesn't take the approach of a parent and actually put a limitation on her son's renting habits. Provided he is under eighteen, she ought to have free reign to tell Blockbuster and other rental stores with her information that certain ratings are not permitted to be rented. That way, when she is there, she can make the decision to rent or not, while having the system safeguard it in the first place.

-----

I keep having to shake my head at EA. This whole thing would be terrible for the industry. The real question is whether or not this merger was investigated like most are for monopolies.
@kurisu

I think you give jack far too much credit.

Although you also have to consider EA's track record of reproducing the same thing over and over (see Madden).
Look at what monopolization did to pro-wrestling, baseball, and other such things. All of those things went to hell. Do NOT let that happen to games.
I am getting disbarred so I'm going to throw a temper tantrum until I get my way.

Representing the weak, and myself of course.

I HATE HATE HATE HATE HATE HATE me >.>

Sorry to take this off-topic.

I dislike EA also. After they took over Westwood studios, released a First Decade CD (THAT DOESN'T WORK 90% of the time!!!). The quality of their games is less than crap; this will just kill the GTA series.
Susan Estrich works for FOX News. What else would one expect? I'm glad I only briefly skimmed the article out of habit (when I see JT's posts), so fortunately I didn't fall victim to the GTA IV spoiler (I just bought the game). She's still a cunt for doing that, nonetheless.

Here's the comment board link for the article. I suggest we go to town.

http://featurepage.creators.com/comments/opinion/rockstar.html

As for you Jack, "fuck you" pretty much sums it up.
lets face jack thompson is nothing more than a pathetic character in a victor hugo novel
FUCK the bitch spoiled it.
Jack caused tangent aside, I'd imagine that this wouldn't exactly encourage Take Two share holders to sell out to EA. I mean, if someone wanted to buy out your company, but they needed a loan to actually pay for it, would you be interested in selling to them?
I like roman f the bitch
I think Jack Thompson realized his opinion was wrong a long time ago and he's just pissing off gamers for shits and giggles.
[Seems fairly reasonable to me, rent it check it out, and at least let her son conclude the story before returning it. The only stupid part is then proceeding to complain about game equivalent to crime movies like the Godfather, or TV shows like the Sopranos.]

Regardless, as a responsible parent, she ought to be checking the games and it's content prior to letting her son partake in it. By letting him participate, and then complaining about it's content and how it's offensive is a little stupid.
@ DarknessDeku

Yeah, I get that impression too. He knows he's pretty much beat now, so he has to contend himself with getting a rise out of us every now and then.
@Freyar

Regardless, as a responsible parent, she ought to be checking the games and it’s content prior to letting her son partake in it. By letting him participate, and then complaining about it’s content and how it’s offensive is a little stupid.


The ironic thing is, she doesn't seem to object to her son having played it. She seems to merely think it shouldn't have been created in the first place.

It's mindless whining about GTA IV, and her son just happens to be medium through which she was exposed to it.
Not only did the Willie Horton ad knock all the wind out of the sails of the Susan Estrich-run Dukakis campaign, it apparently knocked all her brains out her left ear.
Then she tries to play coy as if, because her son merely rents from Blockbuster, she ain't helping to put all that money in Rockstar's pockets. Even though she's an attorney at the intellectual property law firm, Quinn Emmanuel, and should know a little something -- I hope -- about licensing agreements.
She says she wishes game desighners would use their talents on something "worth while" instead of "wasting time" making video games. What defines a waste of time? It's kinda like asking someone why they consider paintng to be great, but consider illustrating comics to be a waste of talent. What makes a single painting on a canvas worth more artistically than an entire book of illustrations on paper? It's all a matter of how one looks at things I suppose.
There's nothing worse or more conflicted than a conservative disguised in liberal clothing.
@ JackDon'tKnowJack's most recent comment

You can say that again.
Would be the worst thing that could happen to T2.
@GRIZZAM 512

Well, people seem to be trying to impose their view of time wasters on everyone else.
Meh, Jack's been googling again. I swear the man spends 6 hours a day googling himself or GTA, and the other six writing legal documents that get returned to him.

He must feel so fulfilled....
EA needs to be ripped apart by the FTC
@go fish

Hella. Fuck the monopolies!
@jbt:

GET BACK TO /B/ DAMMIT!!!
T2 is a dying breed, lets just hope they can keep that breed alive. It is really up to them. EA is monster that must be stopped.
Fuck you Jack I Fucking hate you

_
/ \
/ \
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
_ _ _ _ _ I I __ __
/ \ / \ / \ / \ / \
I I
I I
I I
\ /
I I
I I
I I
\ /
\ /
\______________________/

Thats right, I just gave you the douchbag salute; just try to sue me for harrasment, go ahead I dare you, make my fucking day asshole
That was odd, I was trying to give jack the finger through ASCII but it didn't work out that well :-(

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 11/08/09 at 09:02am
DarkSaber: http://tinyurl.com/yez7jyo
Posted 11/08/09 at 09:01am
DarkSaber: Oh for gods sake, the Gearbox pres is gobbing off about Valve again
Posted 11/08/09 at 08:53am
JDKJ: But cheer up, Austin. If the unemployment rate continues to double-digit as predicted for the next few years, your half-dozen stands a better than likely chance of returning to power.
Posted 11/08/09 at 08:46am
JDKJ: @DS: If he had added the line about "or hiring illegals aliens under the table to work as nannies," it would have been a completely perfect descripition. And, yes, it's about the same difference between a six and a half-dozen.
Posted 11/08/09 at 08:31am
DarkSaber: My god, that description makes them sound almost Republican. Still what did you expect, Obama is only marginally more left than republicans.
Posted 11/08/09 at 01:07am
Austin_Lewis: Health insurance, brought to you by the same kind of bureacrats who couldn't, in timely fashion, investigate the comments of any of the men Obama appointed Czars. Or their past. Or their history of not paying taxes.
Posted 11/08/09 at 01:06am
Austin_Lewis: Yes, and what a piece of crap it was. Arresting and fining people just because they don't make a personal choice to buy healh insurance, creating over a hundred new bureacracies, and worse.
Posted 11/08/09 at 12:24am
ZippyDSMlee: JDKJ:the only trouble is a bunch of witless hacks wrote it....its going to be a train wreck....
Posted 11/07/09 at 11:33pm
JDKJ: BREAKING: In a photo-finish at the wire, House passes health care reform bill. Relatedly, in a fit of pique, Austin Lewis kicks innocent dog.
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:27pm
ZippyDSMlee: man I got alot of junk and dup files too >< god I need orginization...and no not the knee capping media mafia kind :P
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:26pm
ZippyDSMlee: replaced :P
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:23pm
ZippyDSMlee: beemoh:hey its like 60GB porn,400GB anime 100GB games and crap I have took from all my DVDs, I hate waiting on dvds to install stuff..... oh and 40GB of my porn was in the found.000 folder...mostly corrupted.... least I got names of wut needs to be repa
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:18pm
beemoh: @Zip: ...and you'd have to spend all that time re-downloading that porn?
Posted 11/07/09 at 03:34pm
ZippyDSMlee: ggrrrrr......vista lost one of my hard drives and I had a heart attack thinking I lost 1TB of data....
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:58am
JDKJ: Which could be explained by both (a) and (b).
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:56am
Austin_Lewis: JDKJ: You forgot C) the fact that, for some reason, every time he did something that would suggest he shouldn't be in the military, let alone an officer, higher ups ignored it or let it slide.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:51am
JDKJ: Part of the problem is, I believe, that (a) the Army had a lot of time and money already invested in him and which they were unwilling to simply write-off and (b) an increasing need for the type of skills and services he provided.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:48am
JDKJ: And that even if he was begging not to get cut loose, he was apparently a real good candidate for being cut loose, anyway.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:11am
JDKJ: @chada: And while Kennedy once noted that there's usually more than enough blame for everyone to get a slice, the possibility that the Army was unwilling to cut loose someone who was asking to get cut loose could be a factor.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:07am
ZippyDSMlee: *noms on his feet*..nomnomnomnom*droooll* ...wuuutttttt uuu looking at?
Login or register to post shouts