More on Congressman's Campaign to Regulate Second Life

May 12, 2008 -
Recently GamePolitics reported that Rep. Mark Kirk (R-IL) had called upon the Federal Trade Commission to issue a parental alert regarding online game Second Life.

A local political blog has more, written from a decidely pro-Kirk perspective:
As usual, Congressman Kirk was extremely impressive... He began the interview by talking about his concern over the Internet alternate universe of "Second Life," which Kirk views as an uncontrolled and fertile ground for Internet predators due to insufficient age controls and restrictions.

A lot of people are paying attention to this important issue, and this week I have read numerous pieces, mostly on the blogs, that seem to be either strongly supportive of Kirk's efforts, or strongly against Kirk's stand. Among those who support Kirk are parents...

The ones who are critical of Kirk fall mainly into two camps: first, people who are either big fans of Second Life or similar games, or are somehow involved in the Internet gaming industry (and thus seem to be very defensive against what they perceive as government over-regulation); and, second, the usual anti-Kirk crowd who dismiss this as a political stunt.

Kirk spoke about Second Life on a local TV news program: 
Parents should be worried about one of the fastest growing websites on the planet called Second Life. It's the next level up from MySpace, a fully interactive 3-D experience... I'm worried that they don't properly screen for children...

I contacted Second Life to say maybe we should have some minimum standards here but they responded by sending their $60,000 a year K Street lobbyist to tell me everything was okay...

GP: Who can argue with with protecting children from predators? On the other hand, we have to wonder how much of a problem this really is on Second Life. It's certainly not the most action-oriented game going and would seemingly have little attraction for younger players. Perhaps some of our SL-savvy readers will weigh with their thoughts on this issue.

Comments

You read the wrong blog in the IL-10

You found the wrong blog in the IL Tenth, the one written by a well compensated Kirk stooge. The IL-10 is well aware that whenever election time rolls around Mark Kirk makes hay scaring parents about the Internet. What he won't do is help parents out so they don't have to work 2 and 3 jobs each just to keep their homes so someone could be home to make sure the kids use the internet responsibly.

How many kids use second life?

I am not a second life expert but is there not a "teen grid" which is monitored and stuff for the very reason of keeping kids safe in Second Life?

@ JustChris Maybe this is all a plot to get secondlife some media attention and make it one of the fastest growing communities out there. After you are told it is so popular everyone jumps on the bandwagon and the next thing you know...it is!

$60k lobbyist to meet with $170k congressman.

"they perceive as government over-regulation"

I'm sorry... is this even up for debate? *Looks for memo*

So worried about protecting the children... apparently "predators" are the worst thing that can happen to kids. How about, I don't know, the vast number of kids in the states without proper health care, whose parents don't have the money to feed them properly... but hey,m as long as they aren't being sent dirty messages on the internet, right?

The fact of the matter is that even though Second Life is dripping with possibility, the actual community itself is very split up. You're just not going to find cyber-sex on accident. Additionally, what kind of predator would be looking for underage players when you're supposed to be at least 18 to play? As if they're going to lure them out into the open and then cyber-rape them in a game where you can just teleport away at any time?

Additionally, SL is not an easy game. The controls are tricky, the game lags constantly, the scripting language is complex, building anything takes a lot of time, patience, and a little bit of math knowledge. Face it, SL is just not kid friendly and any kid that did slip onto the Adult grid just to look for pr0n has probably already used Google to do that before.

I understand the concern to protect children from the Age of Internet Anonymity, but harassing the makers of a somewhat successful, but not all that wonderful, online game isn't the way to do it. The easiest way is to simply have the parents check on their retarded rape-bait children every once in a while, rather than sitting in the other room writing Mr. Kirk letters of support and praise.

I like the comment: the usual anti-Kirk crowd who dismiss this as a political stunt.

Translation:

Kirk pulls lots of political stunts and thus we have a pre-set defense against people who call him on such things.

@Tristram

but but... kids might find out sex exists! The world would end if they even know of it's existsane before they turn 18 and are ready! THINK OF THE CHILDREN! If we don't keep them ignorant they don't have any hope of coping as adults!! This is so much more important then silly liberal things like food or healthcare!

@ Neeneko And hey, if they die they never have to find out about sex! Win!

"The easiest way is to simply have the parents check on their retarded rape-bait children every once in a while, rather than sitting in the other room writing Mr. Kirk letters of support and praise."

Exactly. But once again.. Logic is a stranger to these types of debates. Parents almost seem to enjoy thinking their child is so special, that certainly, there are just droves of sexual predators clamouring for that perfect opportunity to get at them.

I'll be honest. I love Second Life. It's easy once you get used to it, but the learning curve on it is a bitch. However, as ChrowX stated, you don't just stumble upon the sex accidentally. Can you find it if you look? Sure, just as easily as you can find porn websites by doing a google search. Yet, I'm on almost daily and never come across any of these sex sims or sexual situations that seem to be the one thing looked at. Regulation will never happen though. Second Life is a worldwide program. If they try, LL could just pack up and move their servers out of the US, and maybe (please!?) bring back gambling so I can play Texas Hold'em again.

Now, I'm only stating this here because I know how this can go. For those of you that want to sit and go on and on about how disgusting SL is and how its just a place for people to have rampant amounts of sex and so on...I just have one thing to say. You are now Jack Thompson.

[...] wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptRecently GamePolitics reported that Rep. Mark Kirk (R-IL) had called upon the Federal Trade Commission to issue a parental alert regarding online game Second Life. A local political blog has more, written from a decidely pro-Kirk perspective: As usual, Congressman Kirk was extremely impressive… He began the interview by talking about his concern over the Internet alternate universe of “Second Life,” which Kirk views as an uncontrolled and fertile ground for Internet predators due to insufficient age controls and restrictions. A lot of people are paying attention to this important issue, and this week I have read numerous pieces, mostly on the blogs, that seem to be either strongly supportive of Kirk’s efforts, or strongly against Kirk’s stand. Among those who support Kirk are parents… The ones who are critical of Kirk fall mainly into two camps: first, people who are either big fans of Second Life or similar games, or are somehow involved in the Internet gaming industry (and thus […] [...]

And.. on a slightly different note..

I wonder how many parents would rather trust their child alone with a politician vs any random stranger. It would seem that people with skeletons in the closet are 1st pick for advancement. They are easy to manipulate. /shrug

@ Rhade It isn't even a lack of logic. It is a cultural fear amongst parents that they are losing a grip on their kids. With the internet's very existence they can no longer control what their child learns. "Exposed to" is just another word for learning. Back in the day, you only had to make sure the school didn't teach things you find objectionable. Now the internet makes everything easily available. Due to the need to work, parents cannot possible monitor their children all the time so they try to make sure that the things they fear the most are censored.

The problem is with the idea that children are harmed by the learning of things that are in themselves harmful. For example, a child may stumble across storm front or some such nonsense. This is only harmful if you have never bothered to set up communication with your children or talked to them about acceptance of differences. Similarly, stumbling across porn is only harmful if you have never talked to your child about sex at all or have no open venues for the child to discuss sex with you. And even then I am skeptical. And with online predators, the child will only be harmed if you never taught them the obvious : don't give information to strangers. But any kid over 13 knows this, right? And don't most places require you to be at least 13?

"show me on this digital paper doll avatar, where the bad man executed his malicious GreenerWeener script on you."

Tristram, your words are wise but teaching your kids not to give out your personal info and them listening are two different stories. Teaching or telling your kids to behave a certain way often gives way to the tendency of children and especially teens to rebel. I'm not saying this is a justification of censorship, rather parents need to be preventative beyond just saying "don't do this" but stay out of my business in regards to what I, or others, choose to play.

Thinking back, I can only remember one case that came about with potential "damage done" to a child in Second Life, which really wasn't even damage as much as it was a mother going balistic over what her son was doing. Her 15 year old son was having cybersex at a virtual gentlemen's club and she caught him. She ended up attempting to sue the woman who controlled the other avatar, other members of the club, the owner, and Linden Labs. Last I remember, it never even hit the courts. But she sued over sexual conduct with a minor.

Second Life is just like damn near everything else online when it comes to "verification". It's on an honor system, really, that is more to save their own ass. If someone lies on the sign-up, LL and those inside Second Life are not responsible if they are underage. That's not their job to begin with. So if someone age 16 claims they are 18, then according to the EULA that you agree too, you are the only one liable, not them. You are forced to agree to it, if you decline then you don't play. Simple as that. So most are under consideration that everyone there is atleast 18. If someone finds out they aren't, expect all of the following to happen within 20 minutes if they are at a mature place.

1. Report turned in by atleast one person, stating user is underage
2. Linden's review logs referring to given points that show a user stating his real age
3. Linden's ban the account
(and if this isn't the first offense on the same IP)
4. Linden's ban the IP

They're pretty good about making sure to keep underagers out. They don't even have to, because of the EULA and the sign-up process. They still do, though. Kudos, I say. Oh, and that case? After LL slapped them with the EULA and showed they were not liable, nor was anyone else involved, she tried changing the case to say her child was emotionally scarred. If I remember right, that was dropped when they found no mental or emotional damage done at all to the child.

This is something I'm really pushing in "Blame the Game"...parents, don't just try to lock your kids away from everything. Be there with them. Explain things to them. The world isn't so scary if you know what's hiding outside, and how to deal with it. If you tell a child they cannot have any involvement in something like that, without showing them why, they will only want to do it more. I had my mother sit my brother and I down when we were 8 and 10, and say "If you boys ever smoke cigarettes or do other drugs, I know in my heart I cannot stop you, but realize the effects they have on your health...and how much money you save by NOT getting addicted." To this day, neither of us smoke, have no reason to and understand because we were told the reasons why. It wasn't just "DONT DO THIS BECAUSE I SAID SO!". And it worked.

As for drinking, that's another story.

Second Life is amazing in the way that it truly can expand a person's creativity, no matter what they want to get into. The social structure of it is AMAZING. I talk with people from all walks of life all around the world every day. I also find time to go out and enjoy life in RL (something thats a punchline to many SL addicts). If I've had a stressful day or just have alot of creative juices flowing, I'll hop on Second Life and build whatever is in my mind. I get about $500 a month extra, non-taxed, from things I make and sell. It's nice. That's a car payment or half of rent right there. Oh, the last time I've been to a "sex" sim or anything sexually related? 9 months ago at a strip club for a friends bachelor party before he married his rl girlfriend (he had a real bachelor party later that night). 9 months, almost daily usage of Second Life, and no sexual "jump out and grab you" events?

Again, this is completely uncalled for and unnecessary. They should just stop putting money into this and start putting it all into child services. If you can't do enough good for your kid that you feel it would be better to shield them from everything in the world, maybe you aren't ready to be a parent yet. Or maybe you just need to relax...maybe...play some video games?

This whole online predator issue is blown way out of proportion. These people are fearmongering about an issue that's about as real as the urban legend about the cat in the microwave oven.

He's calling SL a website? Ooookay...

Well, define "kids". Tweeners? Not many. Under 18? Significantly more because alot of 16 and 17 year olds are on there.

Well speaking as a rebellious child [and arguably rebellious adult]... I responded to open debate on rules. If an authority figure provided an explanation for the rule [why it exists, what it's meant to accomplish] and an opportunity for me to ask questions and compromise, I almost never had any problem keeping it.

Inversely, if a 'Because I said so' rule was handed down, you can be damn sure that I scoffed at their arrogance and quickly went to work to circumvent it. If only out of spite.

IME... most parents are of the 'Because I said so' camp.

They don't have the tools or perhaps the ambition to assess the learning style of their children. They cannot deal with the dangers of a free society, and so, I strongly encourage them to leave it instead of attempting to hijack it and warp it to their inherently flawed means.

@ Mikeu This is true. I guess the second necessity is communication and trust. Children will make mistakes and get into bad situations, you have to trust that they will come to you and tha they have to learn things for themselves. Kids cannot be protected until the day they turn 18 and then be expected to go out into the world as adults.

Second Life is a website now?

Parents should be worried about one of the fastest growing websites on the planet called Second Life.

Watch out, that secondlife.com is teh eval!
The program on the other hand is just fine... what a moran...

LOL I'm glad I'm not the only one who noticed that he doesn't even realise it's not a website.

The problem I have with the online sexual predators is that they are easy to avoid. Parents need to make sure that there kids know not to give their address, don't get personal, and NEVER GET TOGETHER IN REAL LIFE!!!

It's so simple, but politics has to attack the medium, the world of possibilities, something they have no control.

I also like to note (which has been said by many people before me) kids don't play second life. I am lucky to find an 18-year-old let alone a 10-year-old.

So..second life is dangerous somehow? Second life is like reality without danger, and shitty graphics.

What the hell do these people want from the gaming industry!? A happy learning game, with crappy graphics so as not making people think the game is real, without any offensive material or online mode? Yea that seems like a super phune thyme i would buy.

Alexa Site Stats for secondlife.com:

* Secondlife.com has a traffic rank of: 2,681 (down 593)
* Other sites that link to this site: 3818
* Online Since: 29-Apr-2002

Excuse me but "one of the fastest growing websites"? Secondlife.com has actually had a DECREASE in traffic in the last 6 months, both in rank and reach.
http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details/secondlife.com

So much for stealing the thunder of social networking sites like MySpace...

Yes, there is a Teen Grid, which is completely separate from the main grid where much of the world exists. Basically, if a person who is under the age of 18 is found out to be underage, he or she is usually "banished" to the TG where that person will remain until they turn 18.

While it's cool and all to have a teen grid for the younger folks, a lot of people there complain that it's really sort of a wasteland compared to the main grid (more people on there). So temptation to go on the main grid is rather strong. After all, there are a lot of kids these days that want to feel like they are "grown up".

If Mr. Kirk did his homework, Linden Lab is about to introduce a verification system which if you head out to a mature area you HAVE to prove that you are 18 or older (and no, it's not by just verifying your age with a drop down menu) by having some sort of ID connected to you. I don't know how it will work, but apparently, a lot of residents don't like it.

ok.. you do realise you need a credit card / payment method to get any kind of reasonable amount of ingame money in second life...?

so lets face it a 13 year old aint gonna be able to do ANYTHING in it. itl be the most boring experience ever.

as for 'new website' and 'next level up from myspace' .. what?

do they realise HOW OLD second life is?????? its been out since 2003!! that means its over 5 years old!! not exactly new. And has there been a massive string of second life peadophile attacks over the past 5 years? err... again no..

so why is it that after 5 years, now that it looks VERY dated and is becoming less and less attractive to people, especially the tech savvy younger generation, that it suddenly is a problem? It hasnt been for 5 years so it certainly isnt going to be one now. geez talk about not doing your homework.

lol oops i meant 2002, not 2003, so 6 years!

clearly we should regulate the phone book next cuz predators could use it to call underage kids.

Excuse me but “one of the fastest growing websites”? Secondlife.com has actually had a DECREASE in traffic in the last 6 months, both in rank and reach.

I find these stats rather misleading.

First, it's Alexa, which only counts those people who have the toolbar installed, not the entire internet. Second, most people who experience Second Life on a regular basis DON'T go to the website. In order to experience SL, you must download a program. These "stats" are meaningless and very much like what the Yankee Group did by claiming that people only spend 10 minutes a month on the site, but in reality they spend more time IN WORLD. There are over a million active users (those that have logged on the site in the last 60 days).

At any given time, 60k people are logged in. Seems like alot. It's not. The amount of land is so sparse that even the highly populated areas tend to be campers and whatnot.

As for those who claim SL is dated, you haven't seen Windlight. I'd suggest taking a look at the update they've done with the Windlight system, which is now the normal system used.

how would SL be fertile ground for online predators?

if someone tries to approach you, you can just fly away...

Whats up with him saying 60k a year like thats a lot, im sure the congressman makes three times that.

Not to mention that there are a lot of users yet there are quite a number that only log in for about 5 hours a week, generally. I myself log in for about 3 or 4 hours a week on friday night for a DJ night at Mako's Club to chat with friends, though I havnt done that in a few months. Personally I would say its not quite growing, nor quite decreasing, and remains at a steady level of users.

as for ingame money, there are other ways to get money in game, such as money camping, hippypay, gambling (which requires money in the first place), just to list a few.

so its not entirly impossible for underage users to get the linden bucks to get the stuff they want. Though if they were smart, they would learn to do the scripting and only use the linden money for uploading textures, then from there setup a shop to sell the items. Which I wouldnt be surprised if there arent minors that do that.

Wasn't there a study somewhere that noted the average Second Life session lasted less than half an hour long? That's hardly enough time for an internet predator to harm The Children.

Though it may be enough time to do it with an adult unicorn and claim your unicorn baby...

http://kotaku.com/gaming/second-life-hits-new-low/humans-get-baby-unicor...

That link is bullshit. That isn't Second Life hitting a new low. That's a person's idea being presented through Second Life hitting a new low. Hell, if thats the case, I say we just blame every bad, disgusting, shocking idea that people bring to life on the world. Michael Vick was abusing dogs and having them fight? Wow, the US has sure hit a new low.

GP: Who can argue with with protecting children from predators?


I can. 9 out of 10 crimes of sex crimes against children are committed by a family member or a family friend, usually in the home. A sizable portion of the remainder are by people with a position of authority such as teachers. As such, a child probably has a greater chance of being struck by lightning and/or a meteor.

This isn't to say children shouldn't be taught about internet safety, or monitored by their parents. But to bring the crushing, regulatory weight of the government down to guard against a one in a million risk is absurd. For starters, it's unlikely to help much, given that the very nature of the crime involves lurking in shadows to skirt rules and avoid detection. Second, and most importantly, all the money and resources thrown at such regulation would be better spent teaching the kids not to be prey in the first place, or on building rehabilitation/prison/euthanization facilities to deal with offenders.

I said it before and I'll say it again, if some kid finds something worthwhile on Second Life let me know because I still haven't found it.

That is what America needs more "The government saves the Kids so their parent don't have to!" The parents who support this guy should spend more time actually being a parent, rather then helping the government find ways so they don't have to.

@ Illspirit,

You know, every time somebody says something like Kirk just did, I want to say that but I'm always too busy doing something else.

So thanks, you spared me that.

Also, it is easier to blame the internets than to blame your brother of molesting your child.

@Ben Ambroso

It was a JOKE. It says nothing about Second Life itself but rather how malleable its structure is, for better or worse.

From how I see it, the only way predators can even think of getting at the kids is... well, I'm not gonna say it because perhaps there are some that frequent this site. Not saying there are, but rather there might be.

@unangbangkay

I know, I was meaning that more towards the link, not you.

This is more election year politics. Make an issue out of nothing that can villify ANYONE who opposes it. "Look! I'm saving your children from a game that none of them play!"

I hope that those in his district are smart enough to turn it around on him and ask, "So why are you doing this instead of working on making it possible for me to get another job?"

As to the author of the Team America's 10th District Blog: you are a souless sheeple who needs to stop letting others do the thinking for you.

@ Tristram: Wow, you managed to bring a completely irrelevant and unrelated bias to the discussion! Bravo!

Are you -- by chance -- Stephen King?

"Parents should be worried about one of the fastest growing websites on the planet called Second Life."

Um last I heard SL was in decline.
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenI have it. The problem, so far as I can tell, is neither of them allow me to overlay my webcam feed or text links to my Extra-Life fundraising page.10/19/2014 - 4:08pm
quiknkoldand yes, its free10/19/2014 - 4:05pm
quiknkoldshould grab Hauppauge capture. has mic support and can upload directly to youtube10/19/2014 - 4:05pm
Andrew EisenThe former.10/19/2014 - 4:00pm
quiknkoldwas it StreamEez, or the StreamEez feature in Hauppauge Capture? cause I know Capture has alot more support from the devs.10/19/2014 - 3:54pm
Andrew EisenI actually tried StreamEez last week. Flat out didn't work.10/19/2014 - 3:53pm
quiknkoldI use the Hauppauge Capture software's StreamEez. Arcsoft showbiz for recording. I just streamed a few hours of Persona 4 Golden with zero problem using the program. Xsplit is finniky when it comes to Hauppauge10/19/2014 - 3:40pm
Andrew EisenTrying to capture console games and broadcast with Open Broadcaster System because I've had technical difficulties using XSplit 3 weeks in a row.10/19/2014 - 3:37pm
quiknkoldand what are you trying to capture?10/19/2014 - 3:31pm
quiknkoldsame one I have. ok. what program are you using?10/19/2014 - 3:31pm
Andrew EisenHaupaugge HD PVR 210/19/2014 - 3:28pm
quiknkoldWhat Capture Card are you using, Andrew10/19/2014 - 3:26pm
quiknkoldI know Biddle isnt Kotaku. he's just a employee. Its up to Kotaku if they want to punish him for being a public representative of Kotaku...well...I wouldnt be against it.10/19/2014 - 3:26pm
Andrew EisenLovely, my capture card is not (yet) compatible with the broadcaster I want to use. Let's hope my workaround works!10/19/2014 - 3:19pm
Andrew EisenIf you find Biddle's statement off-putting, then you're certainly directing your distaste at the correct entity.10/19/2014 - 3:18pm
quiknkoldas somebody who once had his skull fractured behind a grocery store as a kid because I was a nerd. Sam Biddle can eff himself with barbwire10/19/2014 - 2:59pm
Matthew WilsonI dont agree with it, but that doesnt mean its not true sadly.10/19/2014 - 2:36pm
Andrew EisenWhich I find to be (in most cases) extraordinarily petty.10/19/2014 - 2:34pm
Matthew WilsonI get the joke andrew. In the social media age, if you say somthing stupid people will take it out on the company you work for.10/19/2014 - 2:30pm
Papa MidnightIt's Gawker. I'm not sure his comments can really do much to lower whatever modicum of perceived crediiblity that network of sites may have.10/19/2014 - 2:27pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician