May 12, 2008 -
Recently GamePolitics reported that Rep. Mark Kirk (R-IL) had called upon the Federal Trade Commission to issue a parental alert regarding online game Second Life.A local political blog has more, written from a decidely pro-Kirk perspective:
As usual, Congressman Kirk was extremely impressive... He began the interview by talking about his concern over the Internet alternate universe of "Second Life," which Kirk views as an uncontrolled and fertile ground for Internet predators due to insufficient age controls and restrictions.
A lot of people are paying attention to this important issue, and this week I have read numerous pieces, mostly on the blogs, that seem to be either strongly supportive of Kirk's efforts, or strongly against Kirk's stand. Among those who support Kirk are parents...
The ones who are critical of Kirk fall mainly into two camps: first, people who are either big fans of Second Life or similar games, or are somehow involved in the Internet gaming industry (and thus seem to be very defensive against what they perceive as government over-regulation); and, second, the usual anti-Kirk crowd who dismiss this as a political stunt.
Kirk spoke about Second Life on a local TV news program:
Parents should be worried about one of the fastest growing websites on the planet called Second Life. It's the next level up from MySpace, a fully interactive 3-D experience... I'm worried that they don't properly screen for children...
I contacted Second Life to say maybe we should have some minimum standards here but they responded by sending their $60,000 a year K Street lobbyist to tell me everything was okay...
GP: Who can argue with with protecting children from predators? On the other hand, we have to wonder how much of a problem this really is on Second Life. It's certainly not the most action-oriented game going and would seemingly have little attraction for younger players. Perhaps some of our SL-savvy readers will weigh with their thoughts on this issue.



Comments
You read the wrong blog in the IL-10
I'm sorry... is this even up for debate? *Looks for memo*
Additionally, SL is not an easy game. The controls are tricky, the game lags constantly, the scripting language is complex, building anything takes a lot of time, patience, and a little bit of math knowledge. Face it, SL is just not kid friendly and any kid that did slip onto the Adult grid just to look for pr0n has probably already used Google to do that before.
I understand the concern to protect children from the Age of Internet Anonymity, but harassing the makers of a somewhat successful, but not all that wonderful, online game isn't the way to do it. The easiest way is to simply have the parents check on their retarded rape-bait children every once in a while, rather than sitting in the other room writing Mr. Kirk letters of support and praise.
Translation:
Kirk pulls lots of political stunts and thus we have a pre-set defense against people who call him on such things.
@Tristram
but but... kids might find out sex exists! The world would end if they even know of it's existsane before they turn 18 and are ready! THINK OF THE CHILDREN! If we don't keep them ignorant they don't have any hope of coping as adults!! This is so much more important then silly liberal things like food or healthcare!
Exactly. But once again.. Logic is a stranger to these types of debates. Parents almost seem to enjoy thinking their child is so special, that certainly, there are just droves of sexual predators clamouring for that perfect opportunity to get at them.
Now, I'm only stating this here because I know how this can go. For those of you that want to sit and go on and on about how disgusting SL is and how its just a place for people to have rampant amounts of sex and so on...I just have one thing to say. You are now Jack Thompson.
I wonder how many parents would rather trust their child alone with a politician vs any random stranger. It would seem that people with skeletons in the closet are 1st pick for advancement. They are easy to manipulate. /shrug
The problem is with the idea that children are harmed by the learning of things that are in themselves harmful. For example, a child may stumble across storm front or some such nonsense. This is only harmful if you have never bothered to set up communication with your children or talked to them about acceptance of differences. Similarly, stumbling across porn is only harmful if you have never talked to your child about sex at all or have no open venues for the child to discuss sex with you. And even then I am skeptical. And with online predators, the child will only be harmed if you never taught them the obvious : don't give information to strangers. But any kid over 13 knows this, right? And don't most places require you to be at least 13?
Second Life is just like damn near everything else online when it comes to "verification". It's on an honor system, really, that is more to save their own ass. If someone lies on the sign-up, LL and those inside Second Life are not responsible if they are underage. That's not their job to begin with. So if someone age 16 claims they are 18, then according to the EULA that you agree too, you are the only one liable, not them. You are forced to agree to it, if you decline then you don't play. Simple as that. So most are under consideration that everyone there is atleast 18. If someone finds out they aren't, expect all of the following to happen within 20 minutes if they are at a mature place.
1. Report turned in by atleast one person, stating user is underage
2. Linden's review logs referring to given points that show a user stating his real age
3. Linden's ban the account
(and if this isn't the first offense on the same IP)
4. Linden's ban the IP
They're pretty good about making sure to keep underagers out. They don't even have to, because of the EULA and the sign-up process. They still do, though. Kudos, I say. Oh, and that case? After LL slapped them with the EULA and showed they were not liable, nor was anyone else involved, she tried changing the case to say her child was emotionally scarred. If I remember right, that was dropped when they found no mental or emotional damage done at all to the child.
This is something I'm really pushing in "Blame the Game"...parents, don't just try to lock your kids away from everything. Be there with them. Explain things to them. The world isn't so scary if you know what's hiding outside, and how to deal with it. If you tell a child they cannot have any involvement in something like that, without showing them why, they will only want to do it more. I had my mother sit my brother and I down when we were 8 and 10, and say "If you boys ever smoke cigarettes or do other drugs, I know in my heart I cannot stop you, but realize the effects they have on your health...and how much money you save by NOT getting addicted." To this day, neither of us smoke, have no reason to and understand because we were told the reasons why. It wasn't just "DONT DO THIS BECAUSE I SAID SO!". And it worked.
As for drinking, that's another story.
Second Life is amazing in the way that it truly can expand a person's creativity, no matter what they want to get into. The social structure of it is AMAZING. I talk with people from all walks of life all around the world every day. I also find time to go out and enjoy life in RL (something thats a punchline to many SL addicts). If I've had a stressful day or just have alot of creative juices flowing, I'll hop on Second Life and build whatever is in my mind. I get about $500 a month extra, non-taxed, from things I make and sell. It's nice. That's a car payment or half of rent right there. Oh, the last time I've been to a "sex" sim or anything sexually related? 9 months ago at a strip club for a friends bachelor party before he married his rl girlfriend (he had a real bachelor party later that night). 9 months, almost daily usage of Second Life, and no sexual "jump out and grab you" events?
Again, this is completely uncalled for and unnecessary. They should just stop putting money into this and start putting it all into child services. If you can't do enough good for your kid that you feel it would be better to shield them from everything in the world, maybe you aren't ready to be a parent yet. Or maybe you just need to relax...maybe...play some video games?
Inversely, if a 'Because I said so' rule was handed down, you can be damn sure that I scoffed at their arrogance and quickly went to work to circumvent it. If only out of spite.
IME... most parents are of the 'Because I said so' camp.
They don't have the tools or perhaps the ambition to assess the learning style of their children. They cannot deal with the dangers of a free society, and so, I strongly encourage them to leave it instead of attempting to hijack it and warp it to their inherently flawed means.
Watch out, that secondlife.com is teh eval!
The program on the other hand is just fine... what a moran...
It's so simple, but politics has to attack the medium, the world of possibilities, something they have no control.
I also like to note (which has been said by many people before me) kids don't play second life. I am lucky to find an 18-year-old let alone a 10-year-old.
What the hell do these people want from the gaming industry!? A happy learning game, with crappy graphics so as not making people think the game is real, without any offensive material or online mode? Yea that seems like a super phune thyme i would buy.
* Secondlife.com has a traffic rank of: 2,681 (down 593)
* Other sites that link to this site: 3818
* Online Since: 29-Apr-2002
Excuse me but "one of the fastest growing websites"? Secondlife.com has actually had a DECREASE in traffic in the last 6 months, both in rank and reach.
http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details/secondlife.com
So much for stealing the thunder of social networking sites like MySpace...
While it's cool and all to have a teen grid for the younger folks, a lot of people there complain that it's really sort of a wasteland compared to the main grid (more people on there). So temptation to go on the main grid is rather strong. After all, there are a lot of kids these days that want to feel like they are "grown up".
If Mr. Kirk did his homework, Linden Lab is about to introduce a verification system which if you head out to a mature area you HAVE to prove that you are 18 or older (and no, it's not by just verifying your age with a drop down menu) by having some sort of ID connected to you. I don't know how it will work, but apparently, a lot of residents don't like it.
so lets face it a 13 year old aint gonna be able to do ANYTHING in it. itl be the most boring experience ever.
as for 'new website' and 'next level up from myspace' .. what?
do they realise HOW OLD second life is?????? its been out since 2003!! that means its over 5 years old!! not exactly new. And has there been a massive string of second life peadophile attacks over the past 5 years? err... again no..
so why is it that after 5 years, now that it looks VERY dated and is becoming less and less attractive to people, especially the tech savvy younger generation, that it suddenly is a problem? It hasnt been for 5 years so it certainly isnt going to be one now. geez talk about not doing your homework.
I find these stats rather misleading.
First, it's Alexa, which only counts those people who have the toolbar installed, not the entire internet. Second, most people who experience Second Life on a regular basis DON'T go to the website. In order to experience SL, you must download a program. These "stats" are meaningless and very much like what the Yankee Group did by claiming that people only spend 10 minutes a month on the site, but in reality they spend more time IN WORLD. There are over a million active users (those that have logged on the site in the last 60 days).
As for those who claim SL is dated, you haven't seen Windlight. I'd suggest taking a look at the update they've done with the Windlight system, which is now the normal system used.
if someone tries to approach you, you can just fly away...
as for ingame money, there are other ways to get money in game, such as money camping, hippypay, gambling (which requires money in the first place), just to list a few.
so its not entirly impossible for underage users to get the linden bucks to get the stuff they want. Though if they were smart, they would learn to do the scripting and only use the linden money for uploading textures, then from there setup a shop to sell the items. Which I wouldnt be surprised if there arent minors that do that.
Though it may be enough time to do it with an adult unicorn and claim your unicorn baby...
http://kotaku.com/gaming/second-life-hits-new-low/humans-get-baby-unicor...
I can. 9 out of 10 crimes of sex crimes against children are committed by a family member or a family friend, usually in the home. A sizable portion of the remainder are by people with a position of authority such as teachers. As such, a child probably has a greater chance of being struck by lightning and/or a meteor.
This isn't to say children shouldn't be taught about internet safety, or monitored by their parents. But to bring the crushing, regulatory weight of the government down to guard against a one in a million risk is absurd. For starters, it's unlikely to help much, given that the very nature of the crime involves lurking in shadows to skirt rules and avoid detection. Second, and most importantly, all the money and resources thrown at such regulation would be better spent teaching the kids not to be prey in the first place, or on building rehabilitation/prison/euthanization facilities to deal with offenders.
You know, every time somebody says something like Kirk just did, I want to say that but I'm always too busy doing something else.
So thanks, you spared me that.
Also, it is easier to blame the internets than to blame your brother of molesting your child.
It was a JOKE. It says nothing about Second Life itself but rather how malleable its structure is, for better or worse.
I know, I was meaning that more towards the link, not you.
I hope that those in his district are smart enough to turn it around on him and ask, "So why are you doing this instead of working on making it possible for me to get another job?"
As to the author of the Team America's 10th District Blog: you are a souless sheeple who needs to stop letting others do the thinking for you.
Are you -- by chance -- Stephen King?
Um last I heard SL was in decline.